Years ago, that prick with a stupid haircut AC Grayling was defending a poster of a prone naked Sophie Dahl being used to sell perfume and dismissing protesters as Victorian prudes. His rationale was that now that porn was mainstream, the poster had lost its power to shock. Obviously never seriously listen to women's objection to gratuitous objectification.
Years ago, that prick with a stupid haircut AC Grayling was defending a poster of a prone naked Sophie Dahl being used to sell perfume and dismissing protesters as Victorian prudes. His rationale was that now that porn was mainstream, the poster had lost its power to shock. Obviously never seriously listen to women's objection to gratuitous objectification.
Years ago, that prick with a stupid haircut AC Grayling was defending a poster of a prone naked Sophie Dahl being used to sell perfume and dismissing protesters as Victorian prudes. His rationale was that now that porn was mainstream, the poster had lost its power to shock. Obviously never seriously listen to women's objection to gratuitous objectification.
Or to the fact there are still many who do not watch or agree with porn even today.