These blokes have to be either totally delusional or just taking the piss. No one in their right mind would take these for anything other than blokes, and damned ugly ones at that.
Do these loverly laydeez ever find each other attractive and want to pair up after seeing the pictures on this app? If they are all real lesbians, then they should be attracted to each other, shouldn't they? And if not, why not?
Does she realise the graph shows a drop in the percentage of same-sex attracted people from Baby Boomer days compared to now ie Gen Z? It is 12% for Boomers, down to 11% for Gen Z. What a twit.
I love the next page of the report that Nancy retweeted as counter evidence to lesbian extinction ... a bar chart of sexualities showing 0% lesbians.
In more than 1100 interviewees MORI found just 3 opting to use that label. Many more 'exclusively same-sex attracted' women are recorded, but they must appear in that bar chart as 'pan' or 'rather not say', ie, distancing themselves from that solidarity.
Nancy is blissfully ignorant of all that. Her insouciant emoji piss-take of those sounding the alarm is a new low.
I couldn't take it seriously. . . I did a head tilt count to amuse myself. I'm in denial as it's just to horrendous to think that people DO think this is OK? My step daughter is a lesbian and uses these sites. . . these are the men that are easy to spot. I worry about the ones who are not.
and how many think a) they are cute and b) they 'pass' ?
Does the first line of “lesbian” Zachariya’s bio say “sincerity is my lifestyle”? Haha.
These blokes have to be either totally delusional or just taking the piss. No one in their right mind would take these for anything other than blokes, and damned ugly ones at that.
They're delusional AND taking the piss.
Hmm. Nancy Kelly speaks of LGBQ. No T. I wonder why...?
Do these loverly laydeez ever find each other attractive and want to pair up after seeing the pictures on this app? If they are all real lesbians, then they should be attracted to each other, shouldn't they? And if not, why not?
Indeed. How many male bodied self-identifying female lesbians pursue other male bodied self-identifying female lesbians? 🤔
I’m guessing none.
But wait! I thought body parts no longer mattered? Hypocrites.
" I describe my Queer identity as Lipstick and Godzilla movies" !! WTAF!
Aubrey looks like John Lennon.
Dear Nancy,
"Identifies as" is not the same as "is". Buy a fucking dictionary.
Yours,
The Sane People.
Does she realise the graph shows a drop in the percentage of same-sex attracted people from Baby Boomer days compared to now ie Gen Z? It is 12% for Boomers, down to 11% for Gen Z. What a twit.
Those are very poor impressions of lesbians, aren't they? What a bunch of pricks
If I were a lesbian looking for love, would I actually be the only woman on the entire app? (And what would that be like: dick pics galore?)
I love the next page of the report that Nancy retweeted as counter evidence to lesbian extinction ... a bar chart of sexualities showing 0% lesbians.
In more than 1100 interviewees MORI found just 3 opting to use that label. Many more 'exclusively same-sex attracted' women are recorded, but they must appear in that bar chart as 'pan' or 'rather not say', ie, distancing themselves from that solidarity.
Nancy is blissfully ignorant of all that. Her insouciant emoji piss-take of those sounding the alarm is a new low.
Male pattern balding as well ...
Some of that lot on 'Her' are just taking the piss though, right? I mean surely?
I couldn't take it seriously. . . I did a head tilt count to amuse myself. I'm in denial as it's just to horrendous to think that people DO think this is OK? My step daughter is a lesbian and uses these sites. . . these are the men that are easy to spot. I worry about the ones who are not.
That bloke 'Harley' wearing the tablecloth and the Halloween wig, for a start.
Also, at least two of them sported beards and I lost count of the five o'clock shadows.