Sorry to keep verging off topic, but I was thinking how weird it is that the Repubs in America didn't lead with the whole "Dems are going to strip women of their human rights" thing and really blast that message. Millions of slumbering idiots voted thinking Old Hair Sniffer was just going to be kind to trans identified males, and don't seem to have realised that they were signing women and girls rights and protections away to predatory men. If the average person in America had known that Touchy Feely Joe was planning to allow boys into girls changing rooms in schools, men into womens' everything, hand over women's sports to men etc I very much doubt they'd have won.
I wonder if it was because they, the Republicans, didn't want to say outright they don't support transology, because they plan to do so as well, just more quietly. It's not like they're doing much to stand up against the transology juggernaut. After all, there's lots of money coming from transology.
Speaking as someone with fairly small c conservatives views (in the main), I see it as something that has happened to the political right for years.
Much of the political right is wedded to 2 things: Reagan and Thatcherite idea of politics, and to their own political careers, and so quite a bit less to social conservatism. However, their voting base very often is socially conservative. Every so often, the Conservative party here in the UK, or the Republicans in the USA have to throw a bone to their core voting base: "ohh ohhh! yes!! We ARE actually against abortion!" But more often than not, they attempt to appeal to them based on economics. "Corbyn will bankrupt the country!"
Most people who vote Republican I would wager would be horrified at the thought of children being given cross sex hormones, and all other manner of horrors coming out of the TRA lot. However, those speaking out against it, on the political right, tend to be very specific pundits, and there's not even many of them speaking out against it. The Republican party certainly don't. Evangelical Christian churches aren't even speaking out against this in large numbers (which, as a Christian I am pretty fed up by). I've found some of the best dissent against this, is actually from radical feminists and folk here like Graham, who I would hardly describe as a small c conservative, Christian, right winger! But you guys speak the truth on this, and the more you guys speak, the more I find myself nodding along. And the more this goes on, I find myself horrified that way too few on the right and in the church are speaking out against this madness in the way that Graham, JK Rowling etc are doing so.
On his first day in office, Touchy Feely Joe wrote an executive order saying women have no sex based human rights any more. All of it gone. Sports, changing facilities, education, women's appointments, women's scholarships, all gone. Girls must now accept boys in their change rooms at school, women won't be allowed to choose a female to assist them with a rape exam, men can compete against women. Men are now allowed to say "Im a laydee!" and take any women's rights they want from women in the USA.
So far under the Wokestasi Taliban a woman has been forced to call her rapist "she", girls are being assaulted in school toilets by "trans" boys and women have already lost many trophies to men in sports, women have been assaulted in prison by men, stats are skewing and showing a massive increase in paedophilia in women - but the assailants are actually men being reported as women, political appointments for women have been handed to men.
All of these things have happened and many, many more, and that's mainly in countries which had not even made stealing women's human rights legal but have swallowed the cult koolaid.
The cretinous buffoon Dumpsterfire harmed women one at a time and by promoting the normalisation of misogyny. He should never have been elected. The answer is not to elect a cognitively impaired creeper.
The evil act of stripping 150 million women of all human rights has destroyed women's progress in America. I hope someone stops the sleazy old cretin, but even if they successfully challenge his attempted attack on women there's a gropey hair sniffer who despises half the human race enough to casually delete their human rights in charge of the USA.
Two things: I'm here on my own in NY swigging a Colony Cocktail and feeling maudlin. Appreciating my world-wide feminist and feminist ally friends. I am not ashamed of prioritizing women, girls and children. That's 50%+ of everyone in the world. When I chose, as a lefty who is aware of what historically democrats have become, to vote for neither Biden or Trump it was because Biden had told us he would erase women. Not ashamed. Thanks Glinner for your open-minded intelligence, your ability to think and grow. Thanks for the fun of this platform in these dark times.
Next, I'm having trouble accessing Slack. It seems to have forgotten me. May I have a new link? Thanks!
Absolutely. I hate Herr Dumpsterfire with an absolute passion, the man is a genuinely daughter sleazing, failed businessman and utter imbecile. And I would definitely have voted for him if I was in the USA as there is nothing, not a single law, position, concept or struggle more important than the human rights of half the human race.
Does anyone know or would make a guess at who wrote the review of Abigail Schrier's book for "Private Eye"? I would like to know who the PE correspondent is, please.
BTW: Graham, I hope that you do a security check on all applicants to this platform - apart from our subscriptions? I think that to date you and other leading GC campaigners have been able to identify your opponents - the most zealous TRAs campaigners. I ask this because I see no sign that the TRAs' income stream is being cut from official or private sources, and we know that they try to infiltrate everything. This is just a small query. Having said this I have posted freely and I do feel secure here.
Good! It's reassuring to know there are some things that are safe from attack by the monstrous regiment of pretend-women. If I wasn't already a PE subscriber I would become one.
On the other hand, PE's MD wrote some time ago expressing concern about the damage being done to young transitioners (can't recall whether he mentioned the Tavistock by name) and seems to have suffered no ill effects.
Thank you I think we’ve all seen or experienced quite enough violence and gore in our homes and communities so celebrating and selling it via “games” and media more than necessary seems gratuitous and unhealthy just as porn is lascivious and unhealthy. It has real world consequences and many of us have quite enough murder, abuse and mayhem in our lives without watching more. Isn’t it called violence porn or something? Infecting young and vulnerable minds as it is addictive. I would prefer my kids and family where exercising or playing and working healthily frankly.Can’t see a rationale for sharing or glorifying and promoting it frankly. Can’t be considered feminist or allied with feminism in the slightest given it’s a male industry, filled with men, therefore promoting the patriarchal male violence values without any analysis or evidence of safety. In fact doesn’t all the evidence point to both porn and gaming and violence having negative social outcomes? So naturally that would effect women and children worse being the most likely and vulnerable to being victimised by all forms of male violence (I hope that’s unarguable) by those inclined and effected. In this area we’ve had at least three murderous incidents perpetrated involving alcoholics with access to gun, sex offender attempting home invasion and now a young person shooting his Father and brother in just the past few weeks and months. All men. How’s everyone else here area’s bearing up against the culture of male supremacy and violence I wonder?
Not well. I became genuinely distressed when Hair Sniffer Joe signed the Executive Order to strip 150 million American women of their human rights yesterday. I'm in Queensland, but they've already infiltrated Aus anyway.
Have to stay off Twitter for a while, avoiding the news right now, might have to give Substack a swerve for a couple of weeks too.
Janey, if you don't mind, please don't use the T word. It can be screenshot and used to dismiss us. I'm deleting this for that reason so please don't be offended!
Sorry to keep verging off topic, but I was thinking how weird it is that the Repubs in America didn't lead with the whole "Dems are going to strip women of their human rights" thing and really blast that message. Millions of slumbering idiots voted thinking Old Hair Sniffer was just going to be kind to trans identified males, and don't seem to have realised that they were signing women and girls rights and protections away to predatory men. If the average person in America had known that Touchy Feely Joe was planning to allow boys into girls changing rooms in schools, men into womens' everything, hand over women's sports to men etc I very much doubt they'd have won.
I wonder if it was because they, the Republicans, didn't want to say outright they don't support transology, because they plan to do so as well, just more quietly. It's not like they're doing much to stand up against the transology juggernaut. After all, there's lots of money coming from transology.
Speaking as someone with fairly small c conservatives views (in the main), I see it as something that has happened to the political right for years.
Much of the political right is wedded to 2 things: Reagan and Thatcherite idea of politics, and to their own political careers, and so quite a bit less to social conservatism. However, their voting base very often is socially conservative. Every so often, the Conservative party here in the UK, or the Republicans in the USA have to throw a bone to their core voting base: "ohh ohhh! yes!! We ARE actually against abortion!" But more often than not, they attempt to appeal to them based on economics. "Corbyn will bankrupt the country!"
Most people who vote Republican I would wager would be horrified at the thought of children being given cross sex hormones, and all other manner of horrors coming out of the TRA lot. However, those speaking out against it, on the political right, tend to be very specific pundits, and there's not even many of them speaking out against it. The Republican party certainly don't. Evangelical Christian churches aren't even speaking out against this in large numbers (which, as a Christian I am pretty fed up by). I've found some of the best dissent against this, is actually from radical feminists and folk here like Graham, who I would hardly describe as a small c conservative, Christian, right winger! But you guys speak the truth on this, and the more you guys speak, the more I find myself nodding along. And the more this goes on, I find myself horrified that way too few on the right and in the church are speaking out against this madness in the way that Graham, JK Rowling etc are doing so.
On his first day in office, Touchy Feely Joe wrote an executive order saying women have no sex based human rights any more. All of it gone. Sports, changing facilities, education, women's appointments, women's scholarships, all gone. Girls must now accept boys in their change rooms at school, women won't be allowed to choose a female to assist them with a rape exam, men can compete against women. Men are now allowed to say "Im a laydee!" and take any women's rights they want from women in the USA.
So far under the Wokestasi Taliban a woman has been forced to call her rapist "she", girls are being assaulted in school toilets by "trans" boys and women have already lost many trophies to men in sports, women have been assaulted in prison by men, stats are skewing and showing a massive increase in paedophilia in women - but the assailants are actually men being reported as women, political appointments for women have been handed to men.
All of these things have happened and many, many more, and that's mainly in countries which had not even made stealing women's human rights legal but have swallowed the cult koolaid.
The cretinous buffoon Dumpsterfire harmed women one at a time and by promoting the normalisation of misogyny. He should never have been elected. The answer is not to elect a cognitively impaired creeper.
The evil act of stripping 150 million women of all human rights has destroyed women's progress in America. I hope someone stops the sleazy old cretin, but even if they successfully challenge his attempted attack on women there's a gropey hair sniffer who despises half the human race enough to casually delete their human rights in charge of the USA.
So, we can agree to disagree.
Oh, and I also read somewhere that Gropey Joe plans to let them sterilise children by transing them.
Oh, you know he does. He can't wait. Clearly...
I really do wish there was an edit function for Substack comments. Le sigh.
Two things: I'm here on my own in NY swigging a Colony Cocktail and feeling maudlin. Appreciating my world-wide feminist and feminist ally friends. I am not ashamed of prioritizing women, girls and children. That's 50%+ of everyone in the world. When I chose, as a lefty who is aware of what historically democrats have become, to vote for neither Biden or Trump it was because Biden had told us he would erase women. Not ashamed. Thanks Glinner for your open-minded intelligence, your ability to think and grow. Thanks for the fun of this platform in these dark times.
Next, I'm having trouble accessing Slack. It seems to have forgotten me. May I have a new link? Thanks!
PS Did you all see this? https://twitter.com/SourPatches2077/status/1352354121752301568
Slack was breached by aggressive men from the cult of transology.
Absolutely. I hate Herr Dumpsterfire with an absolute passion, the man is a genuinely daughter sleazing, failed businessman and utter imbecile. And I would definitely have voted for him if I was in the USA as there is nothing, not a single law, position, concept or struggle more important than the human rights of half the human race.
Dear Graham and friends,
Does anyone know or would make a guess at who wrote the review of Abigail Schrier's book for "Private Eye"? I would like to know who the PE correspondent is, please.
Thank you
Una
Felt like Francis Wheen to me
Whether it's Francis Wheen or someone else - good for whoever it is! And may The Curse of Gnome fall on any TRAs who try to get nasty with the writer!
Thank you. He is the deputy editor of PE.
BTW: Graham, I hope that you do a security check on all applicants to this platform - apart from our subscriptions? I think that to date you and other leading GC campaigners have been able to identify your opponents - the most zealous TRAs campaigners. I ask this because I see no sign that the TRAs' income stream is being cut from official or private sources, and we know that they try to infiltrate everything. This is just a small query. Having said this I have posted freely and I do feel secure here.
I can't stop anyone from spending money to join the substack and adding comments. But we're not saying anything wrong, so I don't worry.
Hope the TRAs don't work out who it is and start their usual vicious witch hunt and cancellation performance.
they will never, ever go after private eye. That would draw the kind of attention they don't want
Good! It's reassuring to know there are some things that are safe from attack by the monstrous regiment of pretend-women. If I wasn't already a PE subscriber I would become one.
On the other hand, PE's MD wrote some time ago expressing concern about the damage being done to young transitioners (can't recall whether he mentioned the Tavistock by name) and seems to have suffered no ill effects.
That content is ALL horrible. Especially the perverse violence in “gaming”. I’m not for it.
sorry, I should have given a warning. It is rather gory
Thank you I think we’ve all seen or experienced quite enough violence and gore in our homes and communities so celebrating and selling it via “games” and media more than necessary seems gratuitous and unhealthy just as porn is lascivious and unhealthy. It has real world consequences and many of us have quite enough murder, abuse and mayhem in our lives without watching more. Isn’t it called violence porn or something? Infecting young and vulnerable minds as it is addictive. I would prefer my kids and family where exercising or playing and working healthily frankly.Can’t see a rationale for sharing or glorifying and promoting it frankly. Can’t be considered feminist or allied with feminism in the slightest given it’s a male industry, filled with men, therefore promoting the patriarchal male violence values without any analysis or evidence of safety. In fact doesn’t all the evidence point to both porn and gaming and violence having negative social outcomes? So naturally that would effect women and children worse being the most likely and vulnerable to being victimised by all forms of male violence (I hope that’s unarguable) by those inclined and effected. In this area we’ve had at least three murderous incidents perpetrated involving alcoholics with access to gun, sex offender attempting home invasion and now a young person shooting his Father and brother in just the past few weeks and months. All men. How’s everyone else here area’s bearing up against the culture of male supremacy and violence I wonder?
Not well. I became genuinely distressed when Hair Sniffer Joe signed the Executive Order to strip 150 million American women of their human rights yesterday. I'm in Queensland, but they've already infiltrated Aus anyway.
Have to stay off Twitter for a while, avoiding the news right now, might have to give Substack a swerve for a couple of weeks too.
👍
It’s all very effective to erase women and remove us and our views and agency/legal and human rights from the public sphere isn’t it.
Janey, if you don't mind, please don't use the T word. It can be screenshot and used to dismiss us. I'm deleting this for that reason so please don't be offended!
Of course your site your rules x
Thanks for understanding x