13 Comments

Hugely impressive Science article this week , where bloody everything is unscientific

1. I hope rip4nutmegx account is put back up , She is very very efficient sleuth just like our JL.

2. Don't know about Duffield being attacked, but Staniland is trending, with another Word Cloud Bot, stalking Her and Many Wokeratis harassing Her, I find Helen's Strength more admirable and She suffers what Rosie is recently going through, daily to be honest.

3. Stonewalls are suffering from losers lurgy and literally calling on for pile on's at World Rugby by signing petitions. I have seen this FFs happening every now and then with Mermaid and Stonewall, they bloody BS sign the petitions and get their ways .

4. The Dude with short hair, is desperate to get laid, he need not emphasize how short haired woman he is to get that, perhaps he could have just been himself, Woman don't just see artificial looks, if a man is good at heart, it is enough to charm a Woman.

5. Lol, the response to Maya Forestater's thread is epic , logic in loop.

6. Some people hate "Graham Linehan" , umm is that new to Him ? Look at the turds with baseless allegations, I might have used the word groomers a lot too, so what ? BS will be called BS and those preaching it will be called groomers. Pedophiles, now I know we call them Nonce, which Graham didn't, so that's Gaslighting tweet. Leeches can't leave JK Rowling and Graham Linehan alone for a change, sucking on all our patience.

7. Wokeratis crying means

Fake Woke Tears Double Cheers

With this article, I seem to have missed a lot on twitter this week.

Expand full comment

Brilliant as ever though it is so painful xxx

Expand full comment

Yup the article is informative to a great level. And To add to the agony of this week, Keir tweets he is going to talk about comments from President and coronavirus. As if ladies in his party are not being threatened to be raped and killed. He and Nicola make twins , both of them seem to be emotionless dummies.

Expand full comment

WHY? WHY?? is Rosie Duffield still in the Labour party? they will not defend or support her?? she should resign saying just that but she wont - she'll complain and then apologise

Expand full comment

Yes Janey, You spoke out what I was going to write, infact I confessed the same over twitter, last time She locked twitter, posted an Apology on Facebook and came out as a " let's get everyone screened for cervical cancer, I am sorry for my Transphobic statement". It's very difficult to trust someone like that, where integrity has been an issue.

Expand full comment

thanks - nah shes being disingenuous - she never needed to apologise in the first place and yet she did saying the usual crap about, as you say 'nice' and now complains that the TRA's are not nice and Labour says what? it makes me so angry the cowardice

Expand full comment
author

I think this is harsh. We all know how tightly women are being policed in Labour, and when you’re first the victim of a witch hunt it’s easy to panic. Rosie found out how bad it could get and then spoke out anyway. She has my vote!

Expand full comment
author

When Stephen king defended Rowling I was shouting at my friends “go to his twitter and tell him not to apologise!” because I knew he didn’t know the score. No-one had the chance because the apology came seconds later. People freak out!

Expand full comment

maybe im being harsh but im so absolutely disgusted with the women in the party for not collectively getting together to say as one NO MORE - this is why i lose patience

Expand full comment

I share your feelings , unfortunately I can see what Graham means too, it's bad to hold someone's past against them, so if Rosie is trying to speak up its a good sign !!!

I will just stand against the hate directed towards Her for now.

Expand full comment

Check this out: Who would have thought of this

https://twitter.com/JoCoxFoundation/status/1316039335167381504?s=19

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

When you say "trans men" do you mean biological male Labour members or actual trans men i.e. those born female? Either way it's ludicrous...

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Ahh, so trans "women", then! I strongly doubted that they'd have insisted on having 4 extra women (or as they're known in Queer Theory "trans men")!

Expand full comment