During an interview with Izzard, Kelly didn't think twice about throwing women under the bus. She made sure to assure him that she was going to try to get his pronouns right. Even though she was having a conversation with him and wouldn't be using his pronouns. Who says "What does he think about xyz?" directly to the person? She said it to show how her compliance, she wanted her viewers to know that she thinks Izzard is a woman. Obviously she doesn't, it's let's pretend and everyone knows it.
The upshot of this should be that the viewers abandon her and her shit programme, particularly women. She's a fucking disgrace, kissing the arse of some prick wearing lipstick and badly fitting women's clothes. He's in 'girl mode', so he has access to women's spaces, entirely on his say so.
Women giving the impression they don't want him there are the ones who could get into trouble. Not him, good fucking grief, no. But Eddie's greedy, sometimes he wants to be in 'boy mode' too, especially when he's in actor mode. He knows looking like a grotesque parody of a middle aged woman who dresses like she's 20 won't get him the roles he wants.
I think he's hoping it's going to do him a bit of good getting into politics. But that would involve Starmer and some shadow cabinet ministers getting embroiled in a gender identity debacle again, and that's the last thing they want. Starmer can't tell the electorate or his political colleagues what a woman is. Nandy's convinced trans women are women, or so she says, but women and men who care about women and girls, are less and less inclined to tolerate this garbage. They don't want to dodge the trans issue or the misogyny and homophobia inherent in gender identity ideology and among activists.
No one wants to hear some politician with a third division mind parroting "More light and less heat", because you know the last thing they want is a light shining on this shitshow.
Well, it's his age inappropriate clothes really. The guy is a total bellend and looks it. Bleached hair, fuchsia lipstick, a mini skirt and lumpy knees. Just hideous, but people seem to be pretending they can't see that, all they see is brave Eddie fending off the bigots.
Oh wow, "love has no limits"??? Really? How about when children are concerned? Or when someone says the word no? Or where any safeguarding measure is put in place?
"Pride is about being proud of who you are, no matter who you love" it says, before it talks about children's sexed bodies. The pro-peudophilia slaps you right across the face in this one!
There’s a rogues’ gallery if ever I saw one. Emma Watson in particular - a fairly talentless child plucked from obscurity and given a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity by the fabulous J K Rowling. And what has she done? Spat in her face. Bitch.
Her smug "I stand with all the witches" was particularly awful, given how she was witch hunter general in chief to Rowling and many other women besides. She will be remembered only as a child abuse enabler for her own selfish PR stunt. Pure evil.
For the HP fans among us, she has basically become the most despised character after Voldemort. She's the embodiment of Dolores Umbridge, who wants everyone to be snitches on those who disagree with her.
You could tell them why you left? If a number withhold our dosh and tell them why, MAYBE they would notice and think twice about being gendercult enablers in the foreseeable?
What a collection. I sometimes used to wonder if Chris Morris was working away behind the scenes but there was no need for him; these morons dug their own elephant trap then jumped into it.
I don't have one scrap of sympathy for them; they had access to exactly the same information as any of us here, yet they chose to ignore it, grabbed their pitchforks and joined the mob. I hope they're shitting themselves about the publicity coming their way, because they deserve it.
Reminded now of a great throwaway line in Veep - "the Midas touch from Jenny Shitfinger".
A feeling we're entering a grim era of reverse ferreting now. It'll be full steam ahead on the 'it isn't what you said, its who said it/how you were saying it' equivocations.
Don't know about anyone else, but I'm not feeling particularly forgiving. There was a time for that, but probably about 2-3 years ago.
Yes it is. It comes from a newspaper editor (whose name I've forgotten) who would shout 'reverse ferret!' when his paper was about to take a 180 degree turn on a story.
It's not in common usage in the UK as far as I know - I hadn't known it till I got involved in fighting gender bollox 4 or 5 years ago. But we use it here!
Maugham's bragging that he gave "advice about law & comms" has turned into a right old shit sandwich. With support like that, MERMEN don't need much opposition 🤦♀️
Lorraine Kelly, Eddie Redmayne and John Barrowman, too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2OOyg8lHNg
During an interview with Izzard, Kelly didn't think twice about throwing women under the bus. She made sure to assure him that she was going to try to get his pronouns right. Even though she was having a conversation with him and wouldn't be using his pronouns. Who says "What does he think about xyz?" directly to the person? She said it to show how her compliance, she wanted her viewers to know that she thinks Izzard is a woman. Obviously she doesn't, it's let's pretend and everyone knows it.
The upshot of this should be that the viewers abandon her and her shit programme, particularly women. She's a fucking disgrace, kissing the arse of some prick wearing lipstick and badly fitting women's clothes. He's in 'girl mode', so he has access to women's spaces, entirely on his say so.
Women giving the impression they don't want him there are the ones who could get into trouble. Not him, good fucking grief, no. But Eddie's greedy, sometimes he wants to be in 'boy mode' too, especially when he's in actor mode. He knows looking like a grotesque parody of a middle aged woman who dresses like she's 20 won't get him the roles he wants.
I think he's hoping it's going to do him a bit of good getting into politics. But that would involve Starmer and some shadow cabinet ministers getting embroiled in a gender identity debacle again, and that's the last thing they want. Starmer can't tell the electorate or his political colleagues what a woman is. Nandy's convinced trans women are women, or so she says, but women and men who care about women and girls, are less and less inclined to tolerate this garbage. They don't want to dodge the trans issue or the misogyny and homophobia inherent in gender identity ideology and among activists.
No one wants to hear some politician with a third division mind parroting "More light and less heat", because you know the last thing they want is a light shining on this shitshow.
A middle-aged woman? He looks more like he's on the brink of collapsing into his own grave.
Well, it's his age inappropriate clothes really. The guy is a total bellend and looks it. Bleached hair, fuchsia lipstick, a mini skirt and lumpy knees. Just hideous, but people seem to be pretending they can't see that, all they see is brave Eddie fending off the bigots.
Excellent comments! 👍
Thanks. Noted.
And Mildreds Cookies
https://www.mildreds.co.uk/2022/06/07/love-has-no-limits-mildreds-pride-macarons/
Oh wow, "love has no limits"??? Really? How about when children are concerned? Or when someone says the word no? Or where any safeguarding measure is put in place?
"Pride is about being proud of who you are, no matter who you love" it says, before it talks about children's sexed bodies. The pro-peudophilia slaps you right across the face in this one!
More receipts?
https://twitter.com/egoraptor/status/1087124820376993793
https://twitter.com/donttrythis/status/1087177135750406144
https://twitter.com/traaaaaaannnnns/status/1087244943519817728
Grant Kirkhope (Has Voiced Donkey Kong)
https://twitter.com/grantkirkhope/status/1086809791702298624
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t0H3JkpxWbw
There’s a rogues’ gallery if ever I saw one. Emma Watson in particular - a fairly talentless child plucked from obscurity and given a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity by the fabulous J K Rowling. And what has she done? Spat in her face. Bitch.
Couldn’t have said it better, but I'll try … Bitch.
Her smug "I stand with all the witches" was particularly awful, given how she was witch hunter general in chief to Rowling and many other women besides. She will be remembered only as a child abuse enabler for her own selfish PR stunt. Pure evil.
For the HP fans among us, she has basically become the most despised character after Voldemort. She's the embodiment of Dolores Umbridge, who wants everyone to be snitches on those who disagree with her.
Arseholes
Lloyds I’ve just paid off my car , you’ll receive no interest from me
Tesco you’ve just lost my shopping
M&S lost it a while ago as did John Lewis with that fucking awful add
I’m sure I’ll not be missed
You could tell them why you left? If a number withhold our dosh and tell them why, MAYBE they would notice and think twice about being gendercult enablers in the foreseeable?
O I did
Ive not shopped at m & s since thr pronoun badges and mixed changing rooms. Didnt know they were supporting Mermaids.
Same , now to stop dil shopping at primark !
Don't forget Wagamamas 🙄
Wagabirthingparents.
😁
All with fingers in the P.I.E., whether they like it or not.
What a collection. I sometimes used to wonder if Chris Morris was working away behind the scenes but there was no need for him; these morons dug their own elephant trap then jumped into it.
I don't have one scrap of sympathy for them; they had access to exactly the same information as any of us here, yet they chose to ignore it, grabbed their pitchforks and joined the mob. I hope they're shitting themselves about the publicity coming their way, because they deserve it.
Reminded now of a great throwaway line in Veep - "the Midas touch from Jenny Shitfinger".
A feeling we're entering a grim era of reverse ferreting now. It'll be full steam ahead on the 'it isn't what you said, its who said it/how you were saying it' equivocations.
Don't know about anyone else, but I'm not feeling particularly forgiving. There was a time for that, but probably about 2-3 years ago.
Perfectly acceptable not to feel forgiveness for all of the above's sheer cuntry .
Good point re reverse ferreting -we could do bingo cards .
US here — “reverse ferreting”, is that what we would call backpedaling? Your expression sounds more expressive and craven.
Yes it is. It comes from a newspaper editor (whose name I've forgotten) who would shout 'reverse ferret!' when his paper was about to take a 180 degree turn on a story.
It's not in common usage in the UK as far as I know - I hadn't known it till I got involved in fighting gender bollox 4 or 5 years ago. But we use it here!
Anti- Midas touch. Haha -- that’s a good one!
What a lot of mean & greedy, fucked up monkey-fucker pedophile pals and misogyny apologists. Yucks-a-daisy!
More receipts popping up on Twitter!
Blech. We continue to speak the truth and recognize the arc of child development in its real, biological roadmap. Despite this brainwashed blech.
Maugham's bragging that he gave "advice about law & comms" has turned into a right old shit sandwich. With support like that, MERMEN don't need much opposition 🤦♀️
Shit sandwich 🤣🤣🤣
That’s a collection of photos we should not forget.
Have any of Maughan’s Good Law Project’s cases been successful?
Let's not forget this particularly stalwart supporter.
https://twitter.com/JocastaMoney/status/1577351978094575623?s=20&t=oNBTw6If884nW7be5FLjLg