I don’t like Drag Queens. They always make me feel like they are taking the piss out of women. On top of that they tend to be lewd, crude and sexually explicit. They shouldn’t be anywhere near small children. Ever. Its just totally inappropriate. They are never getting near my Grandchildren. Nope.
"And groomers don’t just groom children, they groom everyone, social groups, families, organisations… The grooming of the BBC and the NHS led to the grooming of the UK. "
I remember seeing JS running in a marathon and a group of us JW's were going to our meeting and clapping him for his great charity work!!! (cringe) (the marathon was going past our KH).
The BBC now know that appearance's are deceptive...so seriously men in women's clothes in women spaces...men rolling around with kids(drag!) right in front of everyone…they are now complicit!
I honestly think the propaganda is detrimental to the movement and the TQs will drag gays down with them. I hate this phrase, but it *is* being 'rammed down our throats'. It's pure brainwashing. People who support gay rights generally are heartily sick of hearing about it, esp older friends of mine who aleady began accepting gays in the 80s.
I was called a homophobe recently for moaning about the intensity of Gender Ideology promotion because they've been so intertwined. The conversation was not even about homosexuals!
A while back I actually wrote a novel (no longer for sale) about a closeted gay man in the 60s/70s & about the prejudice he experienced until he eventually overcame it, so to be called a homophobe because I don't like constant TQ messaging is galling.
I've ranted about it on my blog, but I decided to have a gendercult-free day. I stayed away from Twatter & went on Facebook only to find Historic Royal Palaces pushing a dubious transgender story for LGBT History month. People on the thread said 'go away if you don't like it.' But when you do retreat from it, gender will hit you elsewhere.
I went on Spotify and there was an advert about trans victimhood. Next, the 'feminist' host of a podcast I was listening to kept trying to bring Non-Binary and gender fluidity into a discussion ABOUT WORKINGS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS. I went on Instagram where I am part of the doll collecting community (don't judge me !!) and my explore page had 2 images of a mum and her three daughters a decade apart. The eldest is now a scarred transman and everyone was praising it. I left the house only to walk past my bank and see the transified new pride flag on the door.
'If you don't like it, look away' doesn't work when Queer Theory is blasted at you from every direction. Sorry for the long rant.
From the BBC: "Drag Queen Story Hour is the first of its kind and is a step towards "making children know they are accepted", Aida said."
Why do we need drag queens reading propaganda to make kids know they are accepted? That is the job of the PARENTS and their families. They're young kids. They shouldn't even be introduced to sexuality and all the baggage that goes with it. They should be left to grow up and find out from their parents and through educaiton based in reality and to discover who they are as they grow up, not have confusing issues that they are not cognitively capable of processing and understanding thrust on them dressed up in appealing rainbow colours and cartoons. Why are they trying to take the role of acceptance from children and families? The parallels with the child catcher from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang are hardly hidden! It's grooming, plain and clear.
The surname Starmer comes from the Old English words sterre, or starre, which mean star, and would have been given to someone with a bright personality.
I've put in three complaints to BBC today - a dismal record! The last one was the " LGBTQ+ History Month: Have attitudes really changed?" - I concentrated on the grooming of the child because of the excellent video about "Drag queen story time - child grooming in plain sight" by Sonia Poulton: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuMic0cVw4Y
I don't see the BBC piece as negatively. I mean, there is nothing positive to be said about it. It's a textbook example of bad journalism. It's also a texbook example of bad propaganda. It offers nothing of substance at all. Some people telling us that things are bad - but not a single example of why things are bad. Nothing that has happened to them, just highly theoretical musing about things not being the way they ought to be. Yes, we should ask why a drag queen reading to children features in this piece at all, and if so, why not a critical question has been asked. But this piece doesn't give us any clue that the guy "identifies as trans". Maybe he does, and there is a lot to be said about how absurd this, and while we all know that trans ideology just appropriates drag queens, I don't think the general public are aware of this. To them, that guy featuring in the article is just going to make them ask: Wtf has he got to do with any of this? I really think in this case this does little to normalize drag queens reading to children but backfires. And given the overall quality of the piece, I think the authors just had no idea what they were doing putting him in there. I don't think they had any specific intention, they just used the contacts they were given by, probably, Stonewall.
I fully agree, this is unethical, btw. And makes for a very tedious read no one who isn't exceptionally interested in gay or trans issues will ever finish reading.
Dr. Joanna-Kennedy-Olson-Mengele got a $6 million grant (from makers of Lupron, I think, to poison children as young as 8 (if I understand correctly, she was instrumental in lowering the age to 8) and cut off their 100% healthy body parts. Exulansic includes in this video a few mainstreamMedia news clips from pre TransLaLaLand days, featuring women who had been Rxed the "extremely dangerous...toxic" Lupron for endometriosis, and were terribly disabled as a result. It's interesting...where are these people now?
Also, great article from SafeSchoolsAllianceUK on "Drag Story Queen Hour" in public libraries and schools. "queerness’ is not a concept that is relevant to any child in any functioning school that correctly follows non-discriminatory, non-sexist policies. Drag is a form of adult entertainment, and as such can never be appropriate for the age, developmental stage, or background of pupils. The conflation of sex and gender results in greater confusion for children and encourages them to believe that a boy may be a girl if only he puts on a dress – another breach of government guidance, which specifically states that teaching should “not reinforce harmful stereotypes, for instance by suggesting that children might be a different gender based on their personality and interests or the clothes they prefer to wear...Seeking to keep one’s biological sex from curious children is both abusive and dangerous – children must always be allowed to ask questions so that they may correctly sex a person, no matter how embarrassing that question is or whom it may offend. The needs of adults come a distant second to the unqualified right of children to safety."
By the way, apologies if anyone already came up with 'Keir Theory'. It's so good, I can't believe it's my own invention.
I don’t like Drag Queens. They always make me feel like they are taking the piss out of women. On top of that they tend to be lewd, crude and sexually explicit. They shouldn’t be anywhere near small children. Ever. Its just totally inappropriate. They are never getting near my Grandchildren. Nope.
"And groomers don’t just groom children, they groom everyone, social groups, families, organisations… The grooming of the BBC and the NHS led to the grooming of the UK. "
I remember seeing JS running in a marathon and a group of us JW's were going to our meeting and clapping him for his great charity work!!! (cringe) (the marathon was going past our KH).
The BBC now know that appearance's are deceptive...so seriously men in women's clothes in women spaces...men rolling around with kids(drag!) right in front of everyone…they are now complicit!
I honestly think the propaganda is detrimental to the movement and the TQs will drag gays down with them. I hate this phrase, but it *is* being 'rammed down our throats'. It's pure brainwashing. People who support gay rights generally are heartily sick of hearing about it, esp older friends of mine who aleady began accepting gays in the 80s.
I was called a homophobe recently for moaning about the intensity of Gender Ideology promotion because they've been so intertwined. The conversation was not even about homosexuals!
A while back I actually wrote a novel (no longer for sale) about a closeted gay man in the 60s/70s & about the prejudice he experienced until he eventually overcame it, so to be called a homophobe because I don't like constant TQ messaging is galling.
I've ranted about it on my blog, but I decided to have a gendercult-free day. I stayed away from Twatter & went on Facebook only to find Historic Royal Palaces pushing a dubious transgender story for LGBT History month. People on the thread said 'go away if you don't like it.' But when you do retreat from it, gender will hit you elsewhere.
I went on Spotify and there was an advert about trans victimhood. Next, the 'feminist' host of a podcast I was listening to kept trying to bring Non-Binary and gender fluidity into a discussion ABOUT WORKINGS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS. I went on Instagram where I am part of the doll collecting community (don't judge me !!) and my explore page had 2 images of a mum and her three daughters a decade apart. The eldest is now a scarred transman and everyone was praising it. I left the house only to walk past my bank and see the transified new pride flag on the door.
'If you don't like it, look away' doesn't work when Queer Theory is blasted at you from every direction. Sorry for the long rant.
From the BBC: "Drag Queen Story Hour is the first of its kind and is a step towards "making children know they are accepted", Aida said."
Why do we need drag queens reading propaganda to make kids know they are accepted? That is the job of the PARENTS and their families. They're young kids. They shouldn't even be introduced to sexuality and all the baggage that goes with it. They should be left to grow up and find out from their parents and through educaiton based in reality and to discover who they are as they grow up, not have confusing issues that they are not cognitively capable of processing and understanding thrust on them dressed up in appealing rainbow colours and cartoons. Why are they trying to take the role of acceptance from children and families? The parallels with the child catcher from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang are hardly hidden! It's grooming, plain and clear.
Who decides /sanctions it's LGBTQ+ month and all the many other events on their calendar? And why do people comply with it?
According to Google …
The surname Starmer comes from the Old English words sterre, or starre, which mean star, and would have been given to someone with a bright personality.
Mmm 🤔
I've put in three complaints to BBC today - a dismal record! The last one was the " LGBTQ+ History Month: Have attitudes really changed?" - I concentrated on the grooming of the child because of the excellent video about "Drag queen story time - child grooming in plain sight" by Sonia Poulton: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuMic0cVw4Y
I don't see the BBC piece as negatively. I mean, there is nothing positive to be said about it. It's a textbook example of bad journalism. It's also a texbook example of bad propaganda. It offers nothing of substance at all. Some people telling us that things are bad - but not a single example of why things are bad. Nothing that has happened to them, just highly theoretical musing about things not being the way they ought to be. Yes, we should ask why a drag queen reading to children features in this piece at all, and if so, why not a critical question has been asked. But this piece doesn't give us any clue that the guy "identifies as trans". Maybe he does, and there is a lot to be said about how absurd this, and while we all know that trans ideology just appropriates drag queens, I don't think the general public are aware of this. To them, that guy featuring in the article is just going to make them ask: Wtf has he got to do with any of this? I really think in this case this does little to normalize drag queens reading to children but backfires. And given the overall quality of the piece, I think the authors just had no idea what they were doing putting him in there. I don't think they had any specific intention, they just used the contacts they were given by, probably, Stonewall.
I fully agree, this is unethical, btw. And makes for a very tedious read no one who isn't exceptionally interested in gay or trans issues will ever finish reading.
Dr. Joanna-Kennedy-Olson-Mengele got a $6 million grant (from makers of Lupron, I think, to poison children as young as 8 (if I understand correctly, she was instrumental in lowering the age to 8) and cut off their 100% healthy body parts. Exulansic includes in this video a few mainstreamMedia news clips from pre TransLaLaLand days, featuring women who had been Rxed the "extremely dangerous...toxic" Lupron for endometriosis, and were terribly disabled as a result. It's interesting...where are these people now?
https://odysee.com/@Exulansic:d/pediatric-placebo-purgatory-of-pausing:a
Also, great article from SafeSchoolsAllianceUK on "Drag Story Queen Hour" in public libraries and schools. "queerness’ is not a concept that is relevant to any child in any functioning school that correctly follows non-discriminatory, non-sexist policies. Drag is a form of adult entertainment, and as such can never be appropriate for the age, developmental stage, or background of pupils. The conflation of sex and gender results in greater confusion for children and encourages them to believe that a boy may be a girl if only he puts on a dress – another breach of government guidance, which specifically states that teaching should “not reinforce harmful stereotypes, for instance by suggesting that children might be a different gender based on their personality and interests or the clothes they prefer to wear...Seeking to keep one’s biological sex from curious children is both abusive and dangerous – children must always be allowed to ask questions so that they may correctly sex a person, no matter how embarrassing that question is or whom it may offend. The needs of adults come a distant second to the unqualified right of children to safety."
We've become a savagization.
https://safeschoolsallianceuk.net/2022/01/09/drag-queen-story-hour/
Keir Theory, so alliterative. It is child abuse. The abusers overpopulated by sex predators. The balance the Be Nice enablers.
I'm surprised that's on BBC Wales rather than CBBC or Newsbeat.