The BBC are sleepwalking into another scandal

Pumping out propaganda is not going to work out for them forever

Jimmy Savile. I hate to throw that name around after Boris’s latest gambit with Keir Starmer. One use by Boris and its currency is severely devalued, but I think I have a better case against the BBC than Boris had against Keir Theory, as I’ve decided to start calling him.

I’m no expert on Savile, but I do know that he was a groomer. And groomers don’t just groom children, they groom everyone, social groups, families, organisations… The grooming of the BBC and the NHS led to the grooming of the UK. Now, having learned nothing from this ordeal, the BBC are marching into another scandal that will make it impossible for any decent person to defend the license fee.

I’ve written many times on their unapologetic pumping of gender ideology into the atmosphere. Their complicity in the currently fashionable erasure of safeguarding and women’s rights is not yet as big a scandal as Savile, neither is it as damaging to their reputation. But give it time. This is an exponentially bigger scandal than Savile. Savile’s victims numbered in their hundreds but in the end, he was just one man. How much damage has been done, will continue to be done, because the Globally-respected BBC is pushing an ideology that obliterates safeguarding and delivers children all over the world into the hands of sociopaths?

WoLF @WomensLibFront

Children’s Hospital Los Angeles seems to be proud to admit that they’re giving 8 year old children puberty blockers, and performing mastectomies on 13 year olds.

As Helen Joyce, Abigail Shrier and others have pointed out, it’s a massive medical scandal. But that’s just the beginning.

The mental health fallout is going to be terrible. The kids affected will need an immense amount of support. We will also need to support the lesbian victims of harassment and sexual abuse that the BBC, to their credit, finally reported on, four years after women started trying to raise the issue at Pride.

But the BBC can’t continue to run articles like this one without accepting some culpability in the spread of this movement. On the question of ‘Are LGBT Rights Moving backwards’, does the piece profile…

The lesbian who Stonewall tried to have fired?

The lesbian academic bullied from her job by trans rights activists?

The gay man harassed from a Pride march by a straight woman?

The gay man whose business was destroyed by trans rights activists?

The Northern Irish lesbian couple harassed by Irish trans rights activists?

The lesbian MP who successfully sued Pink News?

The lesbian journalist who successfully sued Pink News?

The lesbian who was kicked out of Pride by a trans-male who now IDs as a man after all?

The lesbians who were asked to leave the National Theatre?

None of these! You’re getting your info from a drag artist who might lose his profitable gig confusing toddlers.

I suggest you read the whole thing. It’s quite the piece of propaganda.

Perhaps the BBC would permit a right to reply from Kate Harris or Bev Jackson of LGB Alliance? Because Kate and Bev would agree that LGBT rights are going backwards, but not for the same reasons as those profiled in this article. The BBC can go on pretending there isn’t another side to this story for only so long. In the end, events will overtake them. But this time, they can’t say they weren’t warned.