I am remembering how the NSPCC initially defended their employee (Rubber Fetish Wank Man), even accusing those of pointing out safeguarding implications of an employee parading his fetish online, of 'homophobia'. Also an organisation that is fatally undermined. They quietly let him go eventually, but their initial defence was borne of th…
I am remembering how the NSPCC initially defended their employee (Rubber Fetish Wank Man), even accusing those of pointing out safeguarding implications of an employee parading his fetish online, of 'homophobia'. Also an organisation that is fatally undermined. They quietly let him go eventually, but their initial defence was borne of their own employees' focus on 'Diversity and Inclusion' above all else - above their client group; above safeguarding.
See also St Mungo's defence of allowing convicted domestic abuser Marc/Melissa Addis access to women in one of their hostels. Because they are a 'top LGBT employer' and the feelz of their staff and the signalling of their VIrtue matter more than the women in their care:
I am remembering how the NSPCC initially defended their employee (Rubber Fetish Wank Man), even accusing those of pointing out safeguarding implications of an employee parading his fetish online, of 'homophobia'. Also an organisation that is fatally undermined. They quietly let him go eventually, but their initial defence was borne of their own employees' focus on 'Diversity and Inclusion' above all else - above their client group; above safeguarding.
See also St Mungo's defence of allowing convicted domestic abuser Marc/Melissa Addis access to women in one of their hostels. Because they are a 'top LGBT employer' and the feelz of their staff and the signalling of their VIrtue matter more than the women in their care:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6894599/When-man-called-Mark-locked-threatening-kill-mother-child.html