Please have a look at my reviews. There is psychological information to be gleaned. Yes, it takes a strong stomach, but to know your enemy is to have the tools for disarming him (and it is generally a "him"). I'm sorry. The stories are vile and a total waste of the joy and beauty of life.
I went to Good Reads for "A Boy Gets Pregnant" - went a little bit off the subject, but you will see why.
One star only.
Unfortunately there is another variation on this theme which is likely to become a reality. Uterus transplant is already a reality in the USA - 70 already carried out: https://apnews.com/article/b8c4a4da00.... Please note that this article mentions other alternatives for infertile couples as "adoption" or "gestational carrier" (aka "biological mother").
Here in the UK Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust has a "womb transplant" team: https://wombtransplantuk.org/uk-resea.... There is less demand - possibly for ethical reasons - so the team has recently been seeking out "target patients". They asked 181 transsexual men whether they would like a uterus and vagina, to which they unsurprisingly answered: "Yes, please". See this January 2021 report: "Perceptions and Motivations for Uterus Transplant in Transgender Women" -https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama... There is a reason why this "market research" was done in the US.
Please note that adult men (and women) suffering from gender dysphoria are (1) extreme narcissists and (2) have a lack of empathy at the extreme end. Transsexual men are the last people on Earth who should receive any transplanted organs - what the heck have they done with the organs which God gave them for procreation, viz penis and testicles?? No. just No.
And no prizes for guessing who will be the "donors" - big euphemism for "VENDORS" of said uteri? Answer: always the same group, the same as the "gestational carriers": the DEHUMANISED, poor, desparate women from the third world who will decide that rather than risk yet another pregnancy they will sell their body part to some "dealer" in a back-street clinic in India, Romania or Thailand. I choose these countries advisedly
I tried to engage the "womb transplant team" at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust via their website: https://wombtransplantuk.org/uk-research-team. I would be keen to see others try to get a response to a simple question: "Do you think it is now time for a UK-Gov ethics committee to direct your research, similar to the Warnock Committee which led to the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority? The implications of your work are very troubling (gentle word) to many people. Please?" I had no response. I have not tried my MP yet, but he has shown no interest in any aspect of "trans".
That is such a good question! I have also long thought that it is a great shame that Baroness Warnock was not asked to look into Gender Identity services, especially for children.
Are you on Mumsnet? I think you would get more take-up if you posted on FWR (I think I remember you mentioning Mumsnet in another thread).
I am sorry to say that Mumsnet have deleted my thread. They wrote to me yesterday 5th March: "...we've had to remove your thread as this below part broke our Talk Guidelines;
"Gender dysphoria is a mental disorder (s25 of the GRA2004). The distinguishing traits of that disorder include (1) narcissism and (2) lack of empathy at the extreme end."
As Gender dysphoria is described by the NHS as 'not a mental illness' this seems to go against our TG's around posting with civility.
We have no doubt you'll be disappointed by the deletion but we hope you can understand where we're coming from."
I wrote back saying that (1) Section 25 of the GRA is UK law and it says that GD is a disorder. And there is a good reason for this: the NHS offers services to GD sufferers because they have an illness or disorder. The NHS does not offer services for "non-illnesses" or "non-disorders". I have written to Dr Rosena Allin-Khan about this matter a few years ago and she has accepted that this is true. And (2) the PR dept of the NHS has a webpage declaring that GD is not a mental illness, but, as the following link to the Charing Cross Gender Identity Service webpage shows, the NHS is indeed offering a specialist treatment and care service for GD sufferers.
UK law and NHS practice both confirm that GD is a mental disorder. I asked the moderator to refer this matter, please, to Justine Roberts.
I only post occasionally on Mumsnet, and then only with facts, as above. How do you think Justine Greening will react??
I doubt that Justine Greening looks at all letters about thread and post deletions :-)
the meaning of "disorder" in the GRA2004 has changed by virtue of changes made to the ICD.
The World Health Organisation International Classification of Diseases classified "Gender Identity Disorder" as a "Mental Illness" in ICD-10. However, this was changed in ICD-11 , according to the WHO "in order to reduce stigma".
(It is arguable that the WHO should be campaigning to reduce the stigma attached to mental illness rather than re-classifying disorders in response to campaigning by lobby groups.)
Under ICD-11, "Gender Incongruence" has been re-classified under "Conditions related to Sexual Health". This is as a result of continued campaigning by trans advocacy groups to remove "psychiatric gatekeeping" from access to physical treatments (puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries).
ICD-11 "Conditions related to sexual health"^ (Category 17):
Gender incongruence is characterized by a marked and persistent incongruence between an individual’s experienced gender and the assigned sex. Gender variant behaviour and preferences alone are not a basis for assigning the diagnoses in this group.
_Exclusions_
Paraphilic disorders (6D30-6D3Z)
(ICD-11 divides "Gender Incongruence" into two diagnostic age groups, "Adult and Adolescent" and "Childhood".)
*HA60 Gender incongruence of adolescence or adulthood*
HA60 Gender incongruence of adolescence or adulthood
_Description_
Gender Incongruence of Adolescence and Adulthood is characterized by a marked and persistent incongruence between an individual´s experienced gender and the assigned sex, which often leads to a desire to ‘transition’, in order to live and be accepted as a person of the experienced gender, through hormonal treatment, surgery or other health care services to make the individual´s body align, as much as desired and to the extent possible, with the experienced gender. The diagnosis cannot be assigned prior the onset of puberty. Gender variant behaviour and preferences alone are not a basis for assigning the diagnosis.
Gender incongruence of childhood is characterized by a marked incongruence between an individual’s experienced/expressed gender and the assigned sex in pre-pubertal children. It includes a strong desire to be a different gender than the assigned sex; a strong dislike on the child’s part of his or her sexual anatomy or anticipated secondary sex characteristics and/or a strong desire for the primary and/or anticipated secondary sex characteristics that match the experienced gender; and make-believe or fantasy play, toys, games, or activities and playmates that are typical of the experienced gender rather than the assigned sex. The incongruence must have persisted for about 2 years. Gender variant behaviour and preferences alone are not a basis for assigning the diagnosis.
Paraphilic Disorders are still included in ICD-11 (under "06 Mental, behavioural or neurodevelopmental disorders"),
Although Paraphilic Disorders are still included in ICD-11 (under "06 Mental, behavioural or neurodevelopmental disorders"), *"Transvestism" has been removed from the list of paraphilias recognised in ICD-11*.
(ALL references to "fetish" have been removed from ICD-11, which is why "Fetish" is now part of "Pride" events. Fetish, BDSM and Transvestism have been considered normal variants of human sexuality by WHO since 2018.
"Paraphilic disorders are characterized by persistent and intense patterns of atypical sexual arousal, manifested by sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours, the focus of which involves others whose age or status renders them unwilling or unable to consent and on which the person has acted or by which he or she is markedly distressed. Paraphilic disorders may include arousal patterns involving solitary behaviours or consenting individuals only when these are associated with marked distress that is not simply a result of rejection or feared rejection of the arousal pattern by others or with significant risk of injury or death."
Exhibitionistic disorder is characterized by a sustained, focused and intense pattern of sexual arousal—as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviors—that involves exposing one’s genitals to an unsuspecting individual in public places, usually without inviting or intending closer contact. In addition, in order for Exhibitionistic Disorder to be diagnosed, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies or urges or be markedly distressed by them. Exhibitionistic Disorder specifically excludes consensual exhibitionistic behaviours that occur with the consent of the person or persons involved as well as socially sanctioned forms of exhibitionism.
Voyeuristic disorder is characterized by a sustained, focused and intense pattern of sexual arousal—as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours—that involves observing an unsuspecting individual who is naked, in the process of disrobing, or engaging in sexual activity. In addition, in order for Voyeuristic Disorder to be diagnosed, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies or urges or be markedly distressed by them. Voyeuristic Disorder specifically excludes consensual voyeuristic behaviours that occur with the consent of the person or persons being observed.
Pedophilic disorder is characterized by a sustained, focused, and intense pattern of sexual arousal—as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours—involving pre-pubertal children. In addition, in order for Pedophilic Disorder to be diagnosed, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies or urges or be markedly distressed by them. This diagnosis does not apply to sexual behaviours among pre- or post-pubertal children with peers who are close in age.
Coercive sexual sadism disorder is characterized by a sustained, focused and intense pattern of sexual arousal—as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges or behaviours—that involves the infliction of physical or psychological suffering on a non-consenting person. In addition, in order for Coercive Sexual Sadism Disorder to be diagnosed, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies or urges or be markedly distressed by them. Coercive Sexual Sadism Disorder specifically excludes consensual sexual sadism and masochism.
Frotteuristic disorder is characterized by a sustained, focused and intense pattern of sexual arousal— as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours— that involves touching or rubbing against a non-consenting person in crowded public places. In addition, in order for Frotteuristic Disorder to be diagnosed, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies or urges or be markedly distressed by them. Frotteuristic Disorder specifically excludes consensual touching or rubbing that occur with the consent of the person or persons involved.
6D35 Other paraphilic disorder involving non-consenting individuals
Other paraphilic disorder involving non-consenting individuals is characterized by a persistent and intense pattern of atypical sexual arousal— manifested by sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours— in which the focus of the arousal pattern involves others who are unwilling or unable to consent but that is not specifically described in any of the other named Paraphilic Disorders categories (e.g., arousal patterns involving corpses or animals). The individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies or urges or be markedly distressed by them. The disorder specifically excludes sexual behaviours that occur with the consent of the person or persons involved, provided that they are considered able to provide such consent.
6D36 Paraphilic disorder involving solitary behaviour or consenting individuals
Paraphilic disorder involving solitary behaviour or consenting individuals is characterized by a persistent and intense pattern of atypical sexual arousal— manifested by sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours— that involves consenting adults or solitary behaviours. One of the following two elements must be present: 1) the person is markedly distressed by the nature of the arousal pattern and the distress is not simply a consequence of rejection or feared rejection of the arousal pattern by others; or 2) the nature of the paraphilic behaviour involves significant risk of injury or death either to the individual or to the partner (e.g., asphyxophilia).
I am just as concerned that surgeons working in this field would have no need to source body parts from poor women in other countries, as they already have a ready supply of wombs that they are removing from females. Females who are paying them for "masculinisation" surgery.
I am not suggesting that surgeons would need to steal discarded wombs and repurpose them. I have seen transmen on Twitter volunteering that they would happily donate their surgically excised wombs to their "trans siblings".
This whole thing is so sick that it is horrifyingly easy to imagine that cut-price hysterectomies could be offered by "gender surgeons" on condition of womb-donation to transgender identified males.
This is an excellent and well-researched UK website on many familiar subjects from a transsexual perspective, eg. this page on "Transwomen Pregnancy"
There are so many strands to "transgenderism" that it is easy to get tangled up. One of those strands is the exploitation of "trans people" and "allies" for profit and/or political advancement.
I find it hard to believe that the likes of billionaire transhumanist Martine Rothblatt has any interest in the wellbeing of mere mortals, or that billionaire Jennifer Pritzker gives a toss about bearded, infertile, female detransitioners.
This is Mengele + Profit Motive + Propaganda.
When I first came across this ideology I was struck by the similarities with Lysenkoism under Stalin.
Now, I don't think that it is possible to pigeon-hole it with a particular political movement of the past. It is a new horror for our times, with totalitarian imposition of pick'n'mix pseudoscience serving financial profits for super-rich perverts.
Call them out for what they are, polluting the Liberal well from which we drink.
Thank you for the link to the article only available as an archive - deleted as too inflammatory? The orginal is https://www.secondtypewoman.info/pregnant.htm. "Second type woman".
This is an Autogynaenophile's pipe dream. It is totally unrealistic. The truth is that AGPs have to use a "dildo" to keep the neovagina open. This is excruciatingly painful after surgery, and this is when it needs to be done most frequently. This alone is evidence of the insanity of (1) the patient and (2) the surgeon. This utterly unnecessary surgery CREATES a hugely painful wound which has to be kept "packed" with inert material for a few weeks to ensure that healing does not close the opening, and then, after removal, the neo-vagina has to be forced open repeatedly for the rest of life, albeit less and less frequently. I simply feel sick at the thought that my ex-husband made this choice. I have seen the bill from the surgeon who did his surgery. Uuhhh.... No, no, no I don't want to think about it.
I just want publicity for this horror, this aberration of the otherwise generous and compassionate motivation of most doctors to help their patients. The first and most important principle of a doctor's life: "First of all, do no harm". These Mengele- type doctors should be banned from doing this LIFE-DESTROYING surgery on men. And all that flows from indulging male fantasies.
Finally: "it is horrifyingly easy to imagine that cut-price hysterectomies could be offered by "gender surgeons" on condition of womb-donation to transgender identified males." Guess what? These depraved operations count as economic activities and the surgeons' and hospitals' fees are included in Gross Domestic Product. "Gross": yes, very gross!
Please note that a proper attack on these practices must include the mental defects of "Transwomen": (1) Narcissism and (2) lack of empathy make these humans beings utterly and completely unsuitable to become mothers.
This needs to be shouted from the rooftops. Selfish "mothers" make terrible mothers with neglected and confused children.
There should be absolutely NO womb transplants to humans who have not been socialised from childhood to be girls and then women. It is a sign of insanity that any man wishes to have these horrifying injuries inflicted on his body to satisfy a fantasy which should stay just that, a fantasy. There is a reason that humans come in two sexes, which are different but complementary.
Sorry. Annie Richards, a ?middle-aged AGP, expresses some thoughtful reservations about gender self-ID in the UK, so I guess he must be British. I will study his website and may well write to him.
I archived the page that I linked to in order not to draw too much attention to the site itself. Often these sites become unavailable, eg. password protected or off-line, if there is too much traffic. It is good practice to archive a page and link to it rather than to the original site. The URL of the original page can always been seen in the top bar on the Archive site.
I have been "researching" these issues for several years now and I was astonished to find that site only very recently. It has been in existence for a long time but I have never seen it linked before.
Anonymous readers are obviously not studying the psychology of gender dysphoria, as I have had to do, or they would have noticed that it is the central fetish of GD as a mental disorder. The dehumanisation and degradation are the most compelling reasons why normal people do not want to know much at all about "gender dysphoria". It isn't a game. Been there, done that!
I went to Good Reads for "Turning my son into a pretty little girl":
One star only
"Where to begin? The mother is a bullying, manipulative tyrant. She does not like her son. On the present evidence she is not suited to looking after children, because she does not empathise with their need to be reassured and guided, not instructed and ordered to behave.
Contrast:
" When my son started to get older and act out, I began to wonder if maybe I should start to raise him as a girl instead. And once he started to get rowdy and rude around girls at school and in our neighborhood, I knew I had no choice. If he thought it was okay to make fun of innocent little girls in their ballet outfits, I decided that he should see what it's like to wear one himself."
And:
"Of course, I was hoping that my son would readily embrace his new identity as a girl. I really wanted him to be a daughter. Sometimes boys need to be put in their place in order to learn the rules. It wasn't always easy, but I am delighted to say that my son has never acted more feminine than he is now!"
He is compliant now because he is even more confused than before. This isn't a joke: this regime for raising a child is actually CHILD ABUSE.
Ms Anderson: your son was "acting out" because he needed and still needs your attention: your attention to his life, to the things he likes and dislikes, to the feelings which he has about others... which you may want to discuss with him in his own terms. That is the way to stop him "acting out". He wants your time and your unconditional love for him as he is and as the thoughtful, considerate young man which he will, I hope, become.
So: no more mind games which stiffle his natural development. It is not normal to cross-dress EXCEPT at play time. Certainly not all the time, certainly not at school. You are hobbling his mind and hindering his development with a confusing distraction. Please stop this "game" before it gets serious and his understanding of himself becomes unsure. At that point he will have gone mad - dissociation of his mind into two identities. Please stop the game now."
It's like the noughties revisited when there was a litany of teen stoner comedies with a clichéd plot.
Boy gets pregnant! Transgender bride! Tricked by a trap! M2F gamer girls! ENOUGH OF THIS SHIT! You self-indulgent wankers. Take a day off. Yeah?
They've got an enemy for life in me! I hate the weirdo fucks 😁 As a camp 1980s kung-fu movie once said: No retreat, no surrender 👊
This is the most upsetting thing I've seen here since Princess Mom.
FFS. Bezos waxes fat on perversion and paedophilia.
Still think Amazon should not be publishing those books - the extracts alone look vile.🤮🤬
Please have a look at my reviews. There is psychological information to be gleaned. Yes, it takes a strong stomach, but to know your enemy is to have the tools for disarming him (and it is generally a "him"). I'm sorry. The stories are vile and a total waste of the joy and beauty of life.
I went to Good Reads for "A Boy Gets Pregnant" - went a little bit off the subject, but you will see why.
One star only.
Unfortunately there is another variation on this theme which is likely to become a reality. Uterus transplant is already a reality in the USA - 70 already carried out: https://apnews.com/article/b8c4a4da00.... Please note that this article mentions other alternatives for infertile couples as "adoption" or "gestational carrier" (aka "biological mother").
Here in the UK Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust has a "womb transplant" team: https://wombtransplantuk.org/uk-resea.... There is less demand - possibly for ethical reasons - so the team has recently been seeking out "target patients". They asked 181 transsexual men whether they would like a uterus and vagina, to which they unsurprisingly answered: "Yes, please". See this January 2021 report: "Perceptions and Motivations for Uterus Transplant in Transgender Women" -https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama... There is a reason why this "market research" was done in the US.
Please note that adult men (and women) suffering from gender dysphoria are (1) extreme narcissists and (2) have a lack of empathy at the extreme end. Transsexual men are the last people on Earth who should receive any transplanted organs - what the heck have they done with the organs which God gave them for procreation, viz penis and testicles?? No. just No.
And no prizes for guessing who will be the "donors" - big euphemism for "VENDORS" of said uteri? Answer: always the same group, the same as the "gestational carriers": the DEHUMANISED, poor, desparate women from the third world who will decide that rather than risk yet another pregnancy they will sell their body part to some "dealer" in a back-street clinic in India, Romania or Thailand. I choose these countries advisedly
I tried to engage the "womb transplant team" at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust via their website: https://wombtransplantuk.org/uk-research-team. I would be keen to see others try to get a response to a simple question: "Do you think it is now time for a UK-Gov ethics committee to direct your research, similar to the Warnock Committee which led to the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority? The implications of your work are very troubling (gentle word) to many people. Please?" I had no response. I have not tried my MP yet, but he has shown no interest in any aspect of "trans".
Can others please join me in my quest? Thank you.
That is such a good question! I have also long thought that it is a great shame that Baroness Warnock was not asked to look into Gender Identity services, especially for children.
Are you on Mumsnet? I think you would get more take-up if you posted on FWR (I think I remember you mentioning Mumsnet in another thread).
https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights
Thank you. I've just done that: https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/4183747-Uterus-transplants-for-transwomen-Legal-ethical-and-social-implications
I am sorry to say that Mumsnet have deleted my thread. They wrote to me yesterday 5th March: "...we've had to remove your thread as this below part broke our Talk Guidelines;
"Gender dysphoria is a mental disorder (s25 of the GRA2004). The distinguishing traits of that disorder include (1) narcissism and (2) lack of empathy at the extreme end."
As Gender dysphoria is described by the NHS as 'not a mental illness' this seems to go against our TG's around posting with civility.
We have no doubt you'll be disappointed by the deletion but we hope you can understand where we're coming from."
I wrote back saying that (1) Section 25 of the GRA is UK law and it says that GD is a disorder. And there is a good reason for this: the NHS offers services to GD sufferers because they have an illness or disorder. The NHS does not offer services for "non-illnesses" or "non-disorders". I have written to Dr Rosena Allin-Khan about this matter a few years ago and she has accepted that this is true. And (2) the PR dept of the NHS has a webpage declaring that GD is not a mental illness, but, as the following link to the Charing Cross Gender Identity Service webpage shows, the NHS is indeed offering a specialist treatment and care service for GD sufferers.
UK law and NHS practice both confirm that GD is a mental disorder. I asked the moderator to refer this matter, please, to Justine Roberts.
I only post occasionally on Mumsnet, and then only with facts, as above. How do you think Justine Greening will react??
I doubt that Justine Greening looks at all letters about thread and post deletions :-)
the meaning of "disorder" in the GRA2004 has changed by virtue of changes made to the ICD.
The World Health Organisation International Classification of Diseases classified "Gender Identity Disorder" as a "Mental Illness" in ICD-10. However, this was changed in ICD-11 , according to the WHO "in order to reduce stigma".
(It is arguable that the WHO should be campaigning to reduce the stigma attached to mental illness rather than re-classifying disorders in response to campaigning by lobby groups.)
Under ICD-11, "Gender Incongruence" has been re-classified under "Conditions related to Sexual Health". This is as a result of continued campaigning by trans advocacy groups to remove "psychiatric gatekeeping" from access to physical treatments (puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries).
ICD-11 "Conditions related to sexual health"^ (Category 17):
https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f411470068
*Gender incongruence*
_Parent category:_
17 - Conditions related to sexual health
_Description_
Gender incongruence is characterized by a marked and persistent incongruence between an individual’s experienced gender and the assigned sex. Gender variant behaviour and preferences alone are not a basis for assigning the diagnoses in this group.
_Exclusions_
Paraphilic disorders (6D30-6D3Z)
(ICD-11 divides "Gender Incongruence" into two diagnostic age groups, "Adult and Adolescent" and "Childhood".)
*HA60 Gender incongruence of adolescence or adulthood*
https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f90875286
HA60 Gender incongruence of adolescence or adulthood
_Description_
Gender Incongruence of Adolescence and Adulthood is characterized by a marked and persistent incongruence between an individual´s experienced gender and the assigned sex, which often leads to a desire to ‘transition’, in order to live and be accepted as a person of the experienced gender, through hormonal treatment, surgery or other health care services to make the individual´s body align, as much as desired and to the extent possible, with the experienced gender. The diagnosis cannot be assigned prior the onset of puberty. Gender variant behaviour and preferences alone are not a basis for assigning the diagnosis.
_Exclusions_
Paraphilic disorders (6D30-6D3Z)
*HA61 Gender incongruence of childhood*
https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f344733949
_Description_
Gender incongruence of childhood is characterized by a marked incongruence between an individual’s experienced/expressed gender and the assigned sex in pre-pubertal children. It includes a strong desire to be a different gender than the assigned sex; a strong dislike on the child’s part of his or her sexual anatomy or anticipated secondary sex characteristics and/or a strong desire for the primary and/or anticipated secondary sex characteristics that match the experienced gender; and make-believe or fantasy play, toys, games, or activities and playmates that are typical of the experienced gender rather than the assigned sex. The incongruence must have persisted for about 2 years. Gender variant behaviour and preferences alone are not a basis for assigning the diagnosis.
_Exclusions_
Paraphilic disorders (6D30-6D3Z)
Paraphilic Disorders are still included in ICD-11 (under "06 Mental, behavioural or neurodevelopmental disorders"),
Although Paraphilic Disorders are still included in ICD-11 (under "06 Mental, behavioural or neurodevelopmental disorders"), *"Transvestism" has been removed from the list of paraphilias recognised in ICD-11*.
(ALL references to "fetish" have been removed from ICD-11, which is why "Fetish" is now part of "Pride" events. Fetish, BDSM and Transvestism have been considered normal variants of human sexuality by WHO since 2018.
See "FETISH RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS:" https://revisef65.net/2018/06/20/who/ )
*ICD-11 Definition of "Paraphilic disorders"*
https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http://id.who.int/icd/entity/2110604642
"Paraphilic disorders are characterized by persistent and intense patterns of atypical sexual arousal, manifested by sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours, the focus of which involves others whose age or status renders them unwilling or unable to consent and on which the person has acted or by which he or she is markedly distressed. Paraphilic disorders may include arousal patterns involving solitary behaviours or consenting individuals only when these are associated with marked distress that is not simply a result of rejection or feared rejection of the arousal pattern by others or with significant risk of injury or death."
_Paraphilic Disorders listed in ICD-11_
6D30 Exhibitionistic disorder
https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f141881468
Exhibitionistic disorder is characterized by a sustained, focused and intense pattern of sexual arousal—as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviors—that involves exposing one’s genitals to an unsuspecting individual in public places, usually without inviting or intending closer contact. In addition, in order for Exhibitionistic Disorder to be diagnosed, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies or urges or be markedly distressed by them. Exhibitionistic Disorder specifically excludes consensual exhibitionistic behaviours that occur with the consent of the person or persons involved as well as socially sanctioned forms of exhibitionism.
6D31 Voyeuristic disorder
https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f1832861162
Voyeuristic disorder is characterized by a sustained, focused and intense pattern of sexual arousal—as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours—that involves observing an unsuspecting individual who is naked, in the process of disrobing, or engaging in sexual activity. In addition, in order for Voyeuristic Disorder to be diagnosed, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies or urges or be markedly distressed by them. Voyeuristic Disorder specifically excludes consensual voyeuristic behaviours that occur with the consent of the person or persons being observed.
6D32 Pedophilic disorder
https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f517058174
Pedophilic disorder is characterized by a sustained, focused, and intense pattern of sexual arousal—as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours—involving pre-pubertal children. In addition, in order for Pedophilic Disorder to be diagnosed, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies or urges or be markedly distressed by them. This diagnosis does not apply to sexual behaviours among pre- or post-pubertal children with peers who are close in age.
6D33 Coercive sexual sadism disorder
https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f1890228613
Coercive sexual sadism disorder is characterized by a sustained, focused and intense pattern of sexual arousal—as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges or behaviours—that involves the infliction of physical or psychological suffering on a non-consenting person. In addition, in order for Coercive Sexual Sadism Disorder to be diagnosed, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies or urges or be markedly distressed by them. Coercive Sexual Sadism Disorder specifically excludes consensual sexual sadism and masochism.
6D34 Frotteuristic disorder
https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f1580013387
Frotteuristic disorder is characterized by a sustained, focused and intense pattern of sexual arousal— as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours— that involves touching or rubbing against a non-consenting person in crowded public places. In addition, in order for Frotteuristic Disorder to be diagnosed, the individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies or urges or be markedly distressed by them. Frotteuristic Disorder specifically excludes consensual touching or rubbing that occur with the consent of the person or persons involved.
6D35 Other paraphilic disorder involving non-consenting individuals
https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f1582257458
Other paraphilic disorder involving non-consenting individuals is characterized by a persistent and intense pattern of atypical sexual arousal— manifested by sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours— in which the focus of the arousal pattern involves others who are unwilling or unable to consent but that is not specifically described in any of the other named Paraphilic Disorders categories (e.g., arousal patterns involving corpses or animals). The individual must have acted on these thoughts, fantasies or urges or be markedly distressed by them. The disorder specifically excludes sexual behaviours that occur with the consent of the person or persons involved, provided that they are considered able to provide such consent.
6D36 Paraphilic disorder involving solitary behaviour or consenting individuals
https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f2055403635
Paraphilic disorder involving solitary behaviour or consenting individuals is characterized by a persistent and intense pattern of atypical sexual arousal— manifested by sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours— that involves consenting adults or solitary behaviours. One of the following two elements must be present: 1) the person is markedly distressed by the nature of the arousal pattern and the distress is not simply a consequence of rejection or feared rejection of the arousal pattern by others; or 2) the nature of the paraphilic behaviour involves significant risk of injury or death either to the individual or to the partner (e.g., asphyxophilia).
I am just as concerned that surgeons working in this field would have no need to source body parts from poor women in other countries, as they already have a ready supply of wombs that they are removing from females. Females who are paying them for "masculinisation" surgery.
I am not suggesting that surgeons would need to steal discarded wombs and repurpose them. I have seen transmen on Twitter volunteering that they would happily donate their surgically excised wombs to their "trans siblings".
This whole thing is so sick that it is horrifyingly easy to imagine that cut-price hysterectomies could be offered by "gender surgeons" on condition of womb-donation to transgender identified males.
This is an excellent and well-researched UK website on many familiar subjects from a transsexual perspective, eg. this page on "Transwomen Pregnancy"
https://archive.is/cRp9K
There are so many strands to "transgenderism" that it is easy to get tangled up. One of those strands is the exploitation of "trans people" and "allies" for profit and/or political advancement.
I find it hard to believe that the likes of billionaire transhumanist Martine Rothblatt has any interest in the wellbeing of mere mortals, or that billionaire Jennifer Pritzker gives a toss about bearded, infertile, female detransitioners.
This is Mengele + Profit Motive + Propaganda.
When I first came across this ideology I was struck by the similarities with Lysenkoism under Stalin.
Now, I don't think that it is possible to pigeon-hole it with a particular political movement of the past. It is a new horror for our times, with totalitarian imposition of pick'n'mix pseudoscience serving financial profits for super-rich perverts.
Call them out for what they are, polluting the Liberal well from which we drink.
Thank you for the link to the article only available as an archive - deleted as too inflammatory? The orginal is https://www.secondtypewoman.info/pregnant.htm. "Second type woman".
This is an Autogynaenophile's pipe dream. It is totally unrealistic. The truth is that AGPs have to use a "dildo" to keep the neovagina open. This is excruciatingly painful after surgery, and this is when it needs to be done most frequently. This alone is evidence of the insanity of (1) the patient and (2) the surgeon. This utterly unnecessary surgery CREATES a hugely painful wound which has to be kept "packed" with inert material for a few weeks to ensure that healing does not close the opening, and then, after removal, the neo-vagina has to be forced open repeatedly for the rest of life, albeit less and less frequently. I simply feel sick at the thought that my ex-husband made this choice. I have seen the bill from the surgeon who did his surgery. Uuhhh.... No, no, no I don't want to think about it.
I just want publicity for this horror, this aberration of the otherwise generous and compassionate motivation of most doctors to help their patients. The first and most important principle of a doctor's life: "First of all, do no harm". These Mengele- type doctors should be banned from doing this LIFE-DESTROYING surgery on men. And all that flows from indulging male fantasies.
Finally: "it is horrifyingly easy to imagine that cut-price hysterectomies could be offered by "gender surgeons" on condition of womb-donation to transgender identified males." Guess what? These depraved operations count as economic activities and the surgeons' and hospitals' fees are included in Gross Domestic Product. "Gross": yes, very gross!
Please note that a proper attack on these practices must include the mental defects of "Transwomen": (1) Narcissism and (2) lack of empathy make these humans beings utterly and completely unsuitable to become mothers.
This needs to be shouted from the rooftops. Selfish "mothers" make terrible mothers with neglected and confused children.
There should be absolutely NO womb transplants to humans who have not been socialised from childhood to be girls and then women. It is a sign of insanity that any man wishes to have these horrifying injuries inflicted on his body to satisfy a fantasy which should stay just that, a fantasy. There is a reason that humans come in two sexes, which are different but complementary.
Otherwise: thank you again for a most interesting article. The rest of the website is available: https://secondtypewoman.info/ and is written by annie.richards@hotmail.com who expresses
Sorry. Annie Richards, a ?middle-aged AGP, expresses some thoughtful reservations about gender self-ID in the UK, so I guess he must be British. I will study his website and may well write to him.
Yes, that is a UK site.
I archived the page that I linked to in order not to draw too much attention to the site itself. Often these sites become unavailable, eg. password protected or off-line, if there is too much traffic. It is good practice to archive a page and link to it rather than to the original site. The URL of the original page can always been seen in the top bar on the Archive site.
I have been "researching" these issues for several years now and I was astonished to find that site only very recently. It has been in existence for a long time but I have never seen it linked before.
The author is extremely well informed.
How do you archive? Sorry. I am not a techie.
Very worrying indeed.
I am glad to report that no one has reviewed the forced feminisation book: https://www.amazon.com/Sold-Forced-Feminization-Honey-Wells-ebook/dp/B08MTKZ7RG
Anonymous readers are obviously not studying the psychology of gender dysphoria, as I have had to do, or they would have noticed that it is the central fetish of GD as a mental disorder. The dehumanisation and degradation are the most compelling reasons why normal people do not want to know much at all about "gender dysphoria". It isn't a game. Been there, done that!
Unbelievable!
SORRY! I had my outrage meter set to low - I didn’t check first and AS’s book is now available incl on Kindle.
I went to Good Reads for "Turning my son into a pretty little girl":
One star only
"Where to begin? The mother is a bullying, manipulative tyrant. She does not like her son. On the present evidence she is not suited to looking after children, because she does not empathise with their need to be reassured and guided, not instructed and ordered to behave.
Contrast:
" When my son started to get older and act out, I began to wonder if maybe I should start to raise him as a girl instead. And once he started to get rowdy and rude around girls at school and in our neighborhood, I knew I had no choice. If he thought it was okay to make fun of innocent little girls in their ballet outfits, I decided that he should see what it's like to wear one himself."
And:
"Of course, I was hoping that my son would readily embrace his new identity as a girl. I really wanted him to be a daughter. Sometimes boys need to be put in their place in order to learn the rules. It wasn't always easy, but I am delighted to say that my son has never acted more feminine than he is now!"
He is compliant now because he is even more confused than before. This isn't a joke: this regime for raising a child is actually CHILD ABUSE.
Ms Anderson: your son was "acting out" because he needed and still needs your attention: your attention to his life, to the things he likes and dislikes, to the feelings which he has about others... which you may want to discuss with him in his own terms. That is the way to stop him "acting out". He wants your time and your unconditional love for him as he is and as the thoughtful, considerate young man which he will, I hope, become.
So: no more mind games which stiffle his natural development. It is not normal to cross-dress EXCEPT at play time. Certainly not all the time, certainly not at school. You are hobbling his mind and hindering his development with a confusing distraction. Please stop this "game" before it gets serious and his understanding of himself becomes unsure. At that point he will have gone mad - dissociation of his mind into two identities. Please stop the game now."
what the hell?!!! I didn't know any of this stuff existed, let alone all over Amazon. Bezos should be ashamed.
He won't ever be ashamed. He makes too much money from it. Pornography is very, very lucrative (Richard Desmond in UK).
SORRY! I had my outrage meter set to low - I didn’t check first and AS’s book is now available incl on Kindle.
Abhorrent
Hmmm its almost as if they sexulalise being in a female body...but no, obviously dismorphia, just wanna pee etc..