Monday 8th May - An Unsporting Chance #1 LEQUIPE: A trans-identified male athlete who stole first place in a women’s 200 metre race is outraged at not being allowed to compete unfairly at the Olympics. In March this year World Athletics barred transgender male athletes from competing in women’s competitions, citing the obvious ‘need to protect the female category’ for doing so. Until this ruling, French trans-identified male, Halba Diouf, had been
JL I salute you! How the hell do you put all this vomit inducing stuff together each week and not suffer a heart attack? I’ve read about most of these stories individually, but to read them altogether is just unbearable. Are we really getting somewhere? Even if the answer is yes, that doesn’t really reassure me. The fact that these things are happening at all is just unbelievable, incomprehensible insanity.
SMH, again. We must continue to mock these vile people and refuse to use their language. KJK has it right. Call them out, mock them, laugh at them and push back, hard. Where are the stories of the TIW creating havoc in men's spaces and men's sports? Can those blinded by the ideology not see that EVERY accommodation is being made for MEN? Women pretending to be men don't get a look-in. No media coverage for them, no beverage and makeup deals, no razor deals, no commercials for the US military..... Drakeford is a ridiculous, woman-hating fool. I wonder how many of these men in power secretly wear their wives' underwear? Could explain their doubling down on breaking down the doors to let men into women's spaces. Just saying..... Riley Gaines is giving me hope. Very good interview with her on Peterson's podcast. Also the sorority group in the USA suing their university. Girls don't like boys in their spaces ogling at them and stealing their trophies. Funny that. Also videos doing the rounds on YT of school girls challenging boys in their toilets. I don't feel as depressed as I usually do after this missive!
It's not just the danger to women prisoners and identity laundering that are serious worries where TiM crime is concerned. It's the sentencing. These 'transitioning' men carry their male aggression and male criminal behaviour with them (as stats from the UK Office of National Stats and Karen Ingala Smith report) and there is absolutely no evidence that they deserve lenient sentences (as if they were women) because they happen to rustle up an identity change.
So a 48 year old man puts on a dress and wants to compete against 15 year old girls. Nothing to see here. Probably a pedophile, definitely a wanker
Well. I wouldn’t have lasted 5 minutes as a civil servant in Westminster. I am happy to say.
Wow. You couldn't create a creepier creep magnet even if you tried — allowing men to compete in women’s sports is a surefire way to bring them pyschos up from the dark into the light.
Thanks as ever, JL albeit lots of horror stories as ever.
I still can't get over photos of obvious blokes and the article then referring to 'she' and 'her'!
I was at Brum LWS and reported on it here ( second item): https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/the-end-of-the-world-is-flat
My previous report (which explains the Jesus and the three fishes reference) with more photos is here:
Thanks again and will cross post this as usual
"We will mock you, mock you, mock you!"
"While pointing out that ‘gender reassignment’ is a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010, the guide fails to mention that sex has the same status."
And so does non-belief, as the Maya Forstater case made clear: the right to tell your employer (or anyone else) that you don't believe in unicorns or gendered souls is a protected characteristic and any punishment is illegal. But still it happens - even right there in the administrative branch of government - still taking their orders from Stonewall and Gendered Intelligence.
The Westminster government is no less pathetic than Mark Drakeford's - they're just better at feeding the occasional headline to the Daily Express on how "Sunak knows what a woman is."
I can hardly believe all these horrors are still being aided bysports bodies ,politicians , journalists etc and yet again I feel so outraged.i'm screaming at my own 4 walls. It's well past time for Sportswomen to absolutely REFUSE to compete against men ,and it should be a WORLDWIDE boycott ,tough as that may be but they have no chance of winning anyway if there's a man in the race. Let the cheats run against themmselves. They have no honour or integrity at all and neither do the sports bodies who allow this. Same goes for the media and courts who continue to use the WRONG pronouns for defendants in court. As for my opinion of Mark Drayford ,I would be arrested and jailed for life if the thought police could read my mind. !! We need a lot more Kellie Jay Keene's in this world and I'm too old to be much of an activist ,so young women need to step up. The very real damage being done to women and children by this evil ideology is on display for ALL to see so what is wrong with people who are either too cowardly or just pretend not to notice ?? It's absolutely shameful and I feel we're in the depths of Hell. Thanks ,JL ,for keeping us informed. It can't be easy reporting on this stomach churning , misogynistic movement week after week.👍👏❤️
The situation with Lord Simon of Wythenshawe is actually even more ridiculous (if that’s possible) than JL describes. Every individual hereditary peerage title has its own rules about who it will descend to after the grantee dies. In most cases, the rule is ‘heirs male of the body’ - i.e. male descendants of the first holder. If they run out, the title disappears. The barony of Simon of Wythenshawe, according to Wikipedia, is no exception. So it’s not that our Matilda would be leapfrogged by his older sister if he was actually a woman - he would never inherit under any circumstances if he was actually a woman. What an odd experience being him must be.
As Jenny, a trans widow who was interviewed on The Mess We're In, said, these guys want control and power over you and they use their sexual demands as the means. When you use the requested female pronoun and new name, you are stroking their sexual signaling.