Another onslaught to get the week started. Thanks JL, i’m not into conspiracy but we have a movement that indoctrinates children online and the solution sold to parents and kids turns out to be the ‘stupid pill’. Could it get anymore dystopian? Well turns out that the answer’s yes because you kept writing and writing! F- sake.
I still encounter the argument ‘if blockers represent the best option for distressed children, its the right thing to use despite the risks’ and…. things like…..
‘well all children’s medical practices and drugs were at some point experimental because you can’t test on kids’.
You say all the obvious things that we think are solid counter arguments, but no, insistence that drugs are the way- for some cases. And what amazes me is i’ve had this conversation with a number of people who are good caring people, who would do anything to help people they see in need. They aren’t activists or cruel or driven by an agenda.
They really really believe that
there is a case for drugging children. And they are nice people. Very very frustrating and shows the effectiveness of the propaganda. Sorry another long rant
This is eugenics. Nobody knows how these drugs will affect children in later life, but all the evidence thus far would appear to suggest that they will have a deleterious effect on physical and mental growth.
That golfer shows yet again that jealous and greedy men want women out of the way so that they can: a) steal their prizes and glory; b) destroy women's sport along the way.
We need Stonewall to be removed from all and every pie in which it has stuck its extremely sticky digits and tentacles.
It leaves the kids sterile, too, when we know that autistic kids are particularly vulnerable to this and that autism is hereditary. It absolutely is eugenics.
Significant concerns have been expressed about the long term affects of puberty blockers. Seemingly ignored by clinics and organisations who are more likely to ask parents the standard, emotionally manipulative question whether parents would prefer a transitioned child to a dead one. Despite that the is not the evidence to support an outcome that results in suicide. Has what is available of the Cass report and the closure of the GIC clinic at the Tavistock amounted to so little? Seemingly, yes, it has.
New clinics continue to function as the same way and parents are still being pressured to support the damage of their children's bodies. What's happening is almost inconceivable. Vulnerable people are being lied to, exploited and abused, whilst pharmaceutical companies and medical practitioners are becoming rich.
All the bastards involved in this industry in whatever capacity, will one day have to give some kind of account for what they were responsible for, and not on their terms. Including to the many people whose physical and psychological harm they were instrumental in creating.
Stonewall might have sticky digits but I would venture that the tentacles are insidiously slimy and filth encased. 🤮 And the only explanation for their free ride and continued control over us all is that they know too much about people in high places. Otherwise, where is the outrage that ought to exist? They appear to have more say and more clout than any institution or organisation, including the Government and local government, and every individual who disagrees with their devious agenda.
I too wonder why Stonewall seems to have this vice-like grip on everyone, everywhere. If more people were to listen to Stephen Nolan's podcast on Stonewall - on BBC Sounds (brilliant) it might get folk to understand some of it.
Men have always talked nonsense when they have been oppressing us. They have said our brains are too small to think very hard and so educating us was a waste of time. They have said our brains are too spongy to think properly. They have said because our heads are too small we should be restricted to embroidery and needlework. They have said that our brains are missing the part that makes men creative, and therefore we could not be artists. All sounding scientific while being complete nonsense.
Now they say that walloping great blokes who have reduced their testosterone are competing in sport fairly with women. That womanhood is to be defined on an individual basis by each man, and if he says he is a woman then he is one. They say that being afraid of rape or attack from the sort of man that decides to invade female only spaces is bigoted. New set of lies, same old oppression.
Sorry, meant to add that, while oestrogen may have an effect on men that can be fairly mild when they stop taking it, women taking testosterone will never be the same again. Testosterone is a powerful hormone, and like so much in medicine is not designed for the female physiology and brain. It seems to alter both irreparably. In Sweden, I think it was, they discovered that girls became noticeably more aggressive when taking testosterone. Males appear to have a stronger resistance to the potential ill-effects of female hormones. However, the long-term effects on both sexes of taking cross-sex hormones is not fully understood yet, and, in children,. the data is even scarcer.
Also the rate of death by suicide was 40 TIMES higher in females who had done the T and surgeries, in their long term study of death records. The suicide rate of males on E and post surgeries was 18-19% and there were more males, so Cecelia Djehne et al combined male and female stats to hide the shockingly high rate of female suicides in this cohort.
Yes, I can well believe that, Ute, given what the Swedish studies found. Those who expected to feel so much better by 'transitioning' would discover that their underlying problems were still present and a whole new layer laid on top because 'detransitioning' would make no difference to the 'hybrid'/'chimera' of the 'trans' identity in real time, where females would be left with beards, deep, masculine voices, etc., no breasts, shrivelled and possibly removed womb and ovaries (so also infertile).
It is eugenics, and a form of eugenics that they know - they know - will have adverse effects, even on boys and men, but far more so on girls and women. We can deduce only that they care nothing for children in general, and less than nothing for girls - except, perhaps, for one thing. The people who sanction this must be sadists and psychopaths. No benign explanation is possible because they also know that 'gender dysphoria' (a made-up term) is a species of body dysmorphia, and requires non-affirmation, not the opposite.
Dr Mengele was hunted until it was discovered that he had died. These people should be prepared to be hunted in due course and made to answer for their crimes against humanity - the most vulnerable of humanity in the West - in whatever country to which they flee.
In the 1980s, I was acquainted with a woman, a survivor of Auschwitz, whose category was "Mengele twin." She made it very clear to anyone who'd listen that he was a child sexual molester. I'd not thought of that before I met her. I regret that her name has faded into the inaccessible section of my long term memory.
Any parent going along with this child abuse should be imprisoned (along with the medics and teachers). It is no different from any other child abuse. The problem is that once they have irreversibly damaged their child, the parent will keep saying it was the right thing to do. I had (lost I believe because of this) a friend who justified going along with this insanity because said child was cutting himself. Lots of kids cut themselves. It’s not because they are in the “wrong body” but other issues.
Graham, make sure you send the Aidan Kelly video to Ian Trenholm at the CQC. Ask him to justify the opening of the gender clinic by people who actually said the treatment is “experimental” and not “benign”.
I've always been dubious about men disguising themselves as women as it makes them seem safer than they actually are. Victim would never have fallen into his clutches if she had known he was a man. Interesting how he has dropped the act now everyone knows what he is. I'm only surprised he didn't ask to go to prison as a woman.
I’m astonished at the US golf bodies. Since women (were allowed) to play golf there has always been separate Tees in consideration of men’s superior physiology. So that’s been wrong for over 100 years then? Hypocritical cowards. The bloke pretending to be a woman could stand in for Hercules any day. What a shit show.
Regarding the issues with rape centers and eroding women-only policies: In my data on trans widows, with 56 respondents to my survey, 20 Questions to Ask a Trans Widow, it happens that physical and sexual assaults on the wife by lingerie-clad husband are over 1/3 of the time. There is really nowhere to go. I know of one case in the UK where law enforcement dropped a clear case of rape, child endangerment of an infant and attempted murder through strangulation. She ran out into the street, barefoot, babe in her arms. There was DNA proof. They just will not enforce the law.
"He (Hailey) dismisses those protesting his inclusion in women’s sport as ‘transphobic’. That's right folks, look the other way, no cheating here. Classic DARVO.
Thanks for the weekly summary of lunacy JL. Looking forward to the good news!
One day there will be a reckoning, Terven, and near the top of the list who have to answer will be Aidan Kelly and Mr Wadhwa!
I see that only 32% of Stonewall employees are LGB. So the vast majority are straight albeit that they will give themselves some speshul names form their speshul names list: abrosexual, aromantic, pan sexual, Le Creuset sexual ( OK I stole that joke from Kathleen Stock) etc etc
Some great news! Jo Phoenix has won her tribunal claim 😊😊😊
I emailed the CQC after reading the piece about the Gender Plus Hormone Clinic. I started off -
Having read the information below I need to ask if you really think it wise to approve such a clinic given the lack of knowledge of the consequences of such treatments, and the past history of the founder of the clinic formerly of the Tavistock –now a discredited organisation. Your job is to protect people not wait to see what happens to them. I then included the transcript and a link to the video. I referred to Sallie Baxendale- “Young people and their families are unable to give truly informed consent for these treatments as their doctors cannot tell them what the long-term effects on their cognitive development will be”. and said the same could be said of this Gender Clinic. I then asked some questions -Why on earth did the Care Quality Commission give its approval to this clinic? Perhaps the answer lies with one of its ‘equality partners’ – Stonewall – who tends to elevate ideology over science.
Are you sure this approval is safe? Imagine one or two years down the line when, as in the US, legal cases could be brought over the advice and actions of this clinic. The CQC will quite possibly be referenced in those actions as well.
Surely research is needed before approval. Even the guy himself flagged all the risks and dangers in his lecture. - "and really it's quite an experimental area, especially in terms of young people.” Dangerous ground is it not?
I wonder what the delay in the final Cass Report is all about? When will it be done? It needs to be soon. Surely it will summarise the appalling lack of data- and the obvious harms? It would be an important nail in the coffin.
Several moons ago at least one leading lady golfer was proposed to a mens' professional golf tournament. The objection was that her presence would deprive a qualified male professional from taking his earned place in the competition.
This golfer is depriving qualified female players of taking their hard-earned place on the Tour.
Another onslaught to get the week started. Thanks JL, i’m not into conspiracy but we have a movement that indoctrinates children online and the solution sold to parents and kids turns out to be the ‘stupid pill’. Could it get anymore dystopian? Well turns out that the answer’s yes because you kept writing and writing! F- sake.
I still encounter the argument ‘if blockers represent the best option for distressed children, its the right thing to use despite the risks’ and…. things like…..
‘well all children’s medical practices and drugs were at some point experimental because you can’t test on kids’.
You say all the obvious things that we think are solid counter arguments, but no, insistence that drugs are the way- for some cases. And what amazes me is i’ve had this conversation with a number of people who are good caring people, who would do anything to help people they see in need. They aren’t activists or cruel or driven by an agenda.
They really really believe that
there is a case for drugging children. And they are nice people. Very very frustrating and shows the effectiveness of the propaganda. Sorry another long rant
This is eugenics. Nobody knows how these drugs will affect children in later life, but all the evidence thus far would appear to suggest that they will have a deleterious effect on physical and mental growth.
That golfer shows yet again that jealous and greedy men want women out of the way so that they can: a) steal their prizes and glory; b) destroy women's sport along the way.
We need Stonewall to be removed from all and every pie in which it has stuck its extremely sticky digits and tentacles.
It leaves the kids sterile, too, when we know that autistic kids are particularly vulnerable to this and that autism is hereditary. It absolutely is eugenics.
Significant concerns have been expressed about the long term affects of puberty blockers. Seemingly ignored by clinics and organisations who are more likely to ask parents the standard, emotionally manipulative question whether parents would prefer a transitioned child to a dead one. Despite that the is not the evidence to support an outcome that results in suicide. Has what is available of the Cass report and the closure of the GIC clinic at the Tavistock amounted to so little? Seemingly, yes, it has.
New clinics continue to function as the same way and parents are still being pressured to support the damage of their children's bodies. What's happening is almost inconceivable. Vulnerable people are being lied to, exploited and abused, whilst pharmaceutical companies and medical practitioners are becoming rich.
All the bastards involved in this industry in whatever capacity, will one day have to give some kind of account for what they were responsible for, and not on their terms. Including to the many people whose physical and psychological harm they were instrumental in creating.
More hear, hear
Dusty
Thank you for your support, Dusty 👍🏼
Stonewall might have sticky digits but I would venture that the tentacles are insidiously slimy and filth encased. 🤮 And the only explanation for their free ride and continued control over us all is that they know too much about people in high places. Otherwise, where is the outrage that ought to exist? They appear to have more say and more clout than any institution or organisation, including the Government and local government, and every individual who disagrees with their devious agenda.
I too wonder why Stonewall seems to have this vice-like grip on everyone, everywhere. If more people were to listen to Stephen Nolan's podcast on Stonewall - on BBC Sounds (brilliant) it might get folk to understand some of it.
Hear, hear
Dusty
This was a 'hear, hear' to Lorna Cal 😊
Men have always talked nonsense when they have been oppressing us. They have said our brains are too small to think very hard and so educating us was a waste of time. They have said our brains are too spongy to think properly. They have said because our heads are too small we should be restricted to embroidery and needlework. They have said that our brains are missing the part that makes men creative, and therefore we could not be artists. All sounding scientific while being complete nonsense.
Now they say that walloping great blokes who have reduced their testosterone are competing in sport fairly with women. That womanhood is to be defined on an individual basis by each man, and if he says he is a woman then he is one. They say that being afraid of rape or attack from the sort of man that decides to invade female only spaces is bigoted. New set of lies, same old oppression.
Some things never change.
Even more hear, hear
Dusty
Sorry, meant to add that, while oestrogen may have an effect on men that can be fairly mild when they stop taking it, women taking testosterone will never be the same again. Testosterone is a powerful hormone, and like so much in medicine is not designed for the female physiology and brain. It seems to alter both irreparably. In Sweden, I think it was, they discovered that girls became noticeably more aggressive when taking testosterone. Males appear to have a stronger resistance to the potential ill-effects of female hormones. However, the long-term effects on both sexes of taking cross-sex hormones is not fully understood yet, and, in children,. the data is even scarcer.
Spot on re testosterone. Just ask the East German female athletes from the 80s…
And the Nashville shooter who killed 6 people last year.
Also the rate of death by suicide was 40 TIMES higher in females who had done the T and surgeries, in their long term study of death records. The suicide rate of males on E and post surgeries was 18-19% and there were more males, so Cecelia Djehne et al combined male and female stats to hide the shockingly high rate of female suicides in this cohort.
Yes, I can well believe that, Ute, given what the Swedish studies found. Those who expected to feel so much better by 'transitioning' would discover that their underlying problems were still present and a whole new layer laid on top because 'detransitioning' would make no difference to the 'hybrid'/'chimera' of the 'trans' identity in real time, where females would be left with beards, deep, masculine voices, etc., no breasts, shrivelled and possibly removed womb and ovaries (so also infertile).
It is eugenics, and a form of eugenics that they know - they know - will have adverse effects, even on boys and men, but far more so on girls and women. We can deduce only that they care nothing for children in general, and less than nothing for girls - except, perhaps, for one thing. The people who sanction this must be sadists and psychopaths. No benign explanation is possible because they also know that 'gender dysphoria' (a made-up term) is a species of body dysmorphia, and requires non-affirmation, not the opposite.
Dr Mengele was hunted until it was discovered that he had died. These people should be prepared to be hunted in due course and made to answer for their crimes against humanity - the most vulnerable of humanity in the West - in whatever country to which they flee.
In the 1980s, I was acquainted with a woman, a survivor of Auschwitz, whose category was "Mengele twin." She made it very clear to anyone who'd listen that he was a child sexual molester. I'd not thought of that before I met her. I regret that her name has faded into the inaccessible section of my long term memory.
Wouldn't surprise me Ute. Of the Maquis de Sade variety.
Any parent going along with this child abuse should be imprisoned (along with the medics and teachers). It is no different from any other child abuse. The problem is that once they have irreversibly damaged their child, the parent will keep saying it was the right thing to do. I had (lost I believe because of this) a friend who justified going along with this insanity because said child was cutting himself. Lots of kids cut themselves. It’s not because they are in the “wrong body” but other issues.
Graham, make sure you send the Aidan Kelly video to Ian Trenholm at the CQC. Ask him to justify the opening of the gender clinic by people who actually said the treatment is “experimental” and not “benign”.
Scotland has taken a cue from Washington state's prison system, obviously.
You can't FOIA to find out if a prisoner is trans.
As far as I’m led to believe the SPS is not recording this info
Nothing to see here , move along
And the borders butcher is appealing his lengthy sentence , blaming it on his trans persona
Couldn’t make this shit up
I've always been dubious about men disguising themselves as women as it makes them seem safer than they actually are. Victim would never have fallen into his clutches if she had known he was a man. Interesting how he has dropped the act now everyone knows what he is. I'm only surprised he didn't ask to go to prison as a woman.
I’m going back a wee while , but he asked to be addressed and sentenced as a man in order to protect the trans community
Given that the average rape sentence is 8 years , wtf did he do to get 20+years , an awful lot not being told
Surprise surprise
Piece in the mail today by Sasha Bailey about trans , expect the poor man to be slaughtered soon by the mob
It’s the ultimate betrayal of women. A secret is kept by the state to protect potential abusers of women in prisons. It makes me spit.
I’m astonished at the US golf bodies. Since women (were allowed) to play golf there has always been separate Tees in consideration of men’s superior physiology. So that’s been wrong for over 100 years then? Hypocritical cowards. The bloke pretending to be a woman could stand in for Hercules any day. What a shit show.
Regarding the issues with rape centers and eroding women-only policies: In my data on trans widows, with 56 respondents to my survey, 20 Questions to Ask a Trans Widow, it happens that physical and sexual assaults on the wife by lingerie-clad husband are over 1/3 of the time. There is really nowhere to go. I know of one case in the UK where law enforcement dropped a clear case of rape, child endangerment of an infant and attempted murder through strangulation. She ran out into the street, barefoot, babe in her arms. There was DNA proof. They just will not enforce the law.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZViL3sZeII&t=38s
"He (Hailey) dismisses those protesting his inclusion in women’s sport as ‘transphobic’. That's right folks, look the other way, no cheating here. Classic DARVO.
Thanks for the weekly summary of lunacy JL. Looking forward to the good news!
Thanks as ever for your amazing hard work, JL.
One day there will be a reckoning, Terven, and near the top of the list who have to answer will be Aidan Kelly and Mr Wadhwa!
I see that only 32% of Stonewall employees are LGB. So the vast majority are straight albeit that they will give themselves some speshul names form their speshul names list: abrosexual, aromantic, pan sexual, Le Creuset sexual ( OK I stole that joke from Kathleen Stock) etc etc
Some great news! Jo Phoenix has won her tribunal claim 😊😊😊
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65ae82d58bbe95000e5eb1f7/Ms_J_Pheonix_v_The_Open_University_3322700.2021___other_FMH_Reserved_Judgment.pdf
Looking forward to even more good news in the GNS.
OK back to the grindstone 😏
Dusty
Many thanks JL.
Geezus H.I. J. K. Keyrice'st!
Again.
I emailed the CQC after reading the piece about the Gender Plus Hormone Clinic. I started off -
Having read the information below I need to ask if you really think it wise to approve such a clinic given the lack of knowledge of the consequences of such treatments, and the past history of the founder of the clinic formerly of the Tavistock –now a discredited organisation. Your job is to protect people not wait to see what happens to them. I then included the transcript and a link to the video. I referred to Sallie Baxendale- “Young people and their families are unable to give truly informed consent for these treatments as their doctors cannot tell them what the long-term effects on their cognitive development will be”. and said the same could be said of this Gender Clinic. I then asked some questions -Why on earth did the Care Quality Commission give its approval to this clinic? Perhaps the answer lies with one of its ‘equality partners’ – Stonewall – who tends to elevate ideology over science.
Are you sure this approval is safe? Imagine one or two years down the line when, as in the US, legal cases could be brought over the advice and actions of this clinic. The CQC will quite possibly be referenced in those actions as well.
Surely research is needed before approval. Even the guy himself flagged all the risks and dangers in his lecture. - "and really it's quite an experimental area, especially in terms of young people.” Dangerous ground is it not?
Well done David!
We all need to be doing more and more of this. We need to ensure these people cannot turn round and say "We haven't heard of any concerns".
Can I suggest you send a copy of your email to your MP as well and ask them to address your concerns?
So depressing . . . next week write about Jo Phoenix's win!
I wonder what the delay in the final Cass Report is all about? When will it be done? It needs to be soon. Surely it will summarise the appalling lack of data- and the obvious harms? It would be an important nail in the coffin.
Several moons ago at least one leading lady golfer was proposed to a mens' professional golf tournament. The objection was that her presence would deprive a qualified male professional from taking his earned place in the competition.
This golfer is depriving qualified female players of taking their hard-earned place on the Tour.