57 Comments

What on earth is the point of a misogyny law which includes the most misogynist men in society? This essentially gives them double protection and women none. As for C4, words fail me. I didn't think it was possible to be worse than the BBC but they have managed it.

Expand full comment

Just when you think the tide is turning, we get this. There’s still a long way to go to eradicate this cult. Thankfully Glinner et al are still doing their utmost to shine a light on the perpetrators and we are with them all the way!

Expand full comment
Apr 22Liked by JL

Wow! Channel Four really is shit. Giving a platform to comedy-vacuums like Joe Lycett and the other twat so they can brand Hilary Cass as "far-right," for her science-based report on child safeguarding. This is a woman who can't even travel on public transport for safety reasons, being tagged "far right" on national TV. I would love it if she sued them but I can understand why she maybe wouldn't want to spend time and money engaging with these lowlife.

Expand full comment
Apr 22·edited Apr 22Liked by JL

I am so sick of all this….. not your fault JL and thanks for all your hard work. But the gender ideology tentacles are wound so tightly around and through every business and institution everywhere that it’s going to take years to eradicate. Was just reading about a whistleblower from the NSPCC about how captured they are. And despite all the evidence of harm, we still see more and more organisations spewing out their trans policies, forbidding misgendering, talking in gobbledegook as if there was a shred of science or legality to back up any of it. I realise that many people are afraid to speak up, the gender bastards are misogynistic, homophobic bullies. But there are just so many brain dead sheep propping it all up and clapping the claptrap. Do they not have a brain cell between them? Can they not see that this is being pushed by huge money making globalists? ( sorry to malign sheep btw). And now we’ve got the prospect of a Labour govt with gender ideology deep in its bones, whatever lies they might come out with before the election. 🤬

Expand full comment

Is it going to take ALL men turning into trans predators before women clue into the fact that trans ideology is misogyny at its most extreme??? When will WOMEN wake up and stop enabling these monsters??? I've already given up expecting the average man to push back and feel enormously grateful when some men do. But this trans predator Juggernaut is fueled by women as much as by men because so many women have allowed their compassion to be weaponized against them. I tried talking to women about all of this and they're dismissive at best. Hostile at worst. It's heartbreaking because I have a granddaughter in her teens having to face a future with all of this going on.

Expand full comment

It does break my heart JL, all of it. I heard a Scottish green politician trying to discredit the cass review on radio 4. I was disappointed with the lack of scrutiny from the anchor. He seemed to just have free rein to spout a load of cliches about restricting health care to children without pointing out that he was actually talking about drugging children up. It speaks volumes that these people don’t actually want to say what they really mean out loud. Unforgivable. Thanks though JL.

Expand full comment

Reading this makes me more angry than I've ever been in my life. A great evil has been unleashed on the world ,worse than anything we've ever heard of before ,and it's been aided and abetted by virtue signalling morons who are craven cowards and assign me boot lickers. I fervently hope they get what they deserve and soon. Thanks JL ,hope the GNS cheers us up.🙏🙏🙏❤️

Expand full comment

Oof JL. Thank you, but oof. It's looking more and more like misogyny is now a specially protected characteristic, to be promoted, supported and encouraged and that the Scottish Executive are now pumping out as many 'laws' as they can dream up to enshrine that. It's well-evidenced that it's men like Jack Douglas who are the tiny select group of men that the Scots Executive and swayed minority groups banded together in Parli now fight on behalf of and do this for. And the rest of us look on in shock. And disgust. I am astonished but still saddened and very angry that they bothered to invent another new law to allegedly protect women's rights that includes men. So it's pointless from the start as it is the unhinged, mentally ill, deluded and fetishistic men who seem to have been involved in drafting this. It's for them. It not only won't protect us, women, yes, it gives them added, double protection. Some men can use this additional lawfare to attack women in yet another form.

I would have hoped that someone with a modicum of sense, pragmatism, or legal training might have sat them down and explained how none of their zealous policies-made-law are feasible within a wider legislative framework. So they are attempting to destroy the framework. The fact they dress this new sick men's protection law as a misogyny law is beyond words. Everything now to do with us or our legal rights the SNP/Greens/Labour/Lib Dems now stick on an *and men. And the Tories watch on. So therefore removing our rights by making them again impossible to define. And confusing organisations like the NHS and Universities who seem to be clueless about actual laws. And the total invented nonsense of 'misgendering'. So anyone calling a man who is a rapist 'a man who is a rapist' can be accused of breaking a misogyny law if yet another deluded trans activist wants? WTAF?

I have total, white-hot rage and disgust for Humza Yousaf comparing men who believe they are women to black and disabled women. He or someone in his office actually thought that was a rebuttal to someone on social media? What is he on? Ferring hormones? The noxious fumes of power gone to his head? That man is so out of his depth he and his totalitarian cabal are way beyond out of control now. That comparison is text book vile trans activist. To compare a black or a disabled woman as somehow not a woman, and to be 'protected' just like a trans-identifying man? It's the exact same very hateful and dehumanising statement Jonathan Willoughby has made repeatedly. Is no one sane advising any of them? We see you Humza. You have about the same political nous as the former TV presenter does. He hitched his political career to this and seems totally beyond reason. Please, people of Scotland, don't let this man and his errant activist colleagues anywhere near power again. Use your votes and keep fighting this totally corrupt voting system.

Expand full comment

The Title IX EO is compelled speech and the First Amendment knows how to deal with that - this will not survive a court challenge.

Expand full comment

We have a situation where almost no expert is willing to be or have their work in public and in more than one country. Women are not safe in many environments. We are not free to speak openly in real life or online. I read the statement that Hilary Cass made on how she has been advised to not use public transport. I read it a few times. Of course that's the advice. How entirely predictable. And the laughable suggestion that she would be willing to be involved in any adult services review. And face having her life destroyed by insane and dedicated trans activist zealots like so many have been? The constant stream of abuse, personal attacks, threats and lies. I have attended a few events in person to see for myself what it's like. It's been more chilling than I could describe. I didn't recognise the country or society I grew up in, where violent activists are allowed to take control of the streets and we are 'advised' to hide at home for our own 'safety'.

This is a terrorist issue and I am expecting the UK Government and all constituent parts to begin to start to maybe think about possibly addressing it, not wilt like fluffy toy rabbits in headlights, then blame us.

Expand full comment

Thanks as ever for your hard work in bringing us all this, JL.

I think Cass combined with the WPATH files have won the science argument ( I know how annoying this is since many people including your good self, Glinner, Kellie-Jay and many others have been telling it as it is for years). It is almost hilarious watching the gender borg now trying to argue with her ( something they are not very good at doing having previously preferred insults and threats - obviously they are also still employing insults and threats as well). But the ideologues are deeply entrenched throughout institutions and organisations. I agree with what Andrew Doyle said in his interview with Winston Marshall that we should just ignore or go around the ideologues. We need to target those in positions of power which can be done by debate and discussion but sometimes by court action and I think such actions will increase. Effectively the myth of the trans kid is dispelled. The AGPs and transvestite fetishists relied on 'the trans kid' to validate their mythical ideology. The desperation of Robin Moira White on Free Speech Nation ( totally demolished in a separate piece by Clive Simpson) shows what position they are in. So it is going to be a long, long struggle but I think we are heading in the right direction. Is this perhaps the Normandy Landings? Or is it winning the Battle of Britain? I'm looking for an analogy.

OK I need to get back into my Spitfire because I'm doing an update tonight 😊

Will cross post

Dusty

Expand full comment
Apr 22Liked by JL

Another week another shit show

As an aside I was at hospital today , more bloody blood tests , I’m sure all I’ve not been tested for now is rabies ( pretty sure that would come back as positive lol )

But … at least in my local hospital there was no sign of the rainbow madness !

Expand full comment

Pennbrook MS is an hour from me. Cannot get over this horrific story. I swear if I hadn't been ADAB my own kid wouldn't be caught in this mess. I'd have seen it coming. Her high school, also in Montgomery County PA, is another Marxist Indoctrination Factory.

https://www.lmsd.org/about-lmsd/deib

https://resources.finalsite.net/images/v1647456302/lmsdorg/kxhsgnxegsbm1uqt9zjl/Policy_AR259.pdf

Expand full comment

“LGBT Youth Scotland” is a doubly damned title.

First, the now customary sly insertion of the “T” which is the cuckoo term that takes over the whole. Thus “LGBT” translates into “transgender” alone i.e. the negation of all sexuality which is now being replaced by sheer narcissism ever ready to morph into violence.

Second, the oozing of this pernicious “T” into the youthful demographic. It is the children who are specifically targeted. Note the considerable number of Primary Schools involved. The very process of puberty is under attack.

That “LGBTYS is advising teachers not to inform parents if their child identifies as trans and/or is socially transitioning at school” is significant. I was recently arguing with a twitter entity who was practically gloating over the capture of young minds “freed from parental influence” and openly jeering, “Are you afraid that these kids are now free make up their own minds?” As if! These kids are being continuously molded by the relentless trans propaganda around them. And this twitter entity knows this well. The insinuation is, “We have your children now!”

Expand full comment
Apr 22·edited Apr 22

“That would be all well and good were it not for the CSP definition of ‘transphobia’ which is woolly, open-ended and includes adherence to sex realism. “Defining specific discrimination, including transphobia, is complex because discrimination is expressed and experienced in many ways”, it says. “There is no definitive list of transphobic behaviours but it includes, for example, the questioning of a transgender person's gender identity.””

The trans blather has become so insidious that even those opposing it seem to succumb to contradictions. Or .... at least that’s the way I read the above. I would have thought that “sex realism” is simply the screamingly obvious observation that sex is basic and immutable (and attempts to change sex inevitably fail and lead to mutilation of the original). Therefore surely the CSP definition of ‘transphobia’ cannot be “woolly, open-ended AND includes ADHERENCE to sex realism?”

In any case, I note that the word “gender” has now effectively been erased from the English language. Sundered from sex, it is now meaningless – as demonstrated by this colossal turd:

https://www.medicinenet.com/what_are_the_72_other_genders/article.htm

Yes, there are apparently 72 genders (not including male and female!). Note the fancy names given to them. Here is a sample with the definitions:

“Agender: A person who does not identify themselves with or experience any gender. Agender people are also called null-gender, genderless, gendervoid, or neutral gender.

Abimegender: Associated with being profound, deep, and infinite. The term abimegender may be used alone or in combination with other genders.

Adamas gender: A gender that is indefinable or indomitable. People identifying with this gender refuse to be categorized in any particular gender identity.

Aerogender: Also called evaisgender, this gender identity changes according to one’s surroundings.

Aesthetigender: Also called aesthetgender, it is a type of gender identity derived from aesthetics.

Affectugender: This is based on the person’s mood swings or fluctuations.”

“Being profound”, “indefinable or indomitable” (note the implied but non-existent link between those two), “derived from aesthetics”? “changes according to one’s surroundings” “based on the person’s mood swings or fluctuations”

The last one seems to get to the true matter i.e. “gender” is simply a passing mood.

And at this point I wondered if this web page was a parody. But these days it’s hard to tell the difference between sincerity and parody.

This conceptual rabbit hole has led to some interesting exchanges on twitter – something like the following:

THEM: “Transgender people just want to be allowed to exist!”

ME: “What does that mean?”

THEM: “Being free to express their gender! DUH!” (Rolls eyes as if it’s the obvious thing in the world!)

ME: “What does that mean?”

THEM: .... eyes continue to roll....

And the whole thing collapses into a void. Which is what it all came out of in the first place.

Expand full comment

On the topic of “Won’t somebody think of the children?”:

If the new groomerocracy is getting their hands on children as young as four, then it is incumbent on us to muse on how this will work out given the worst case scenario in which the “paedophication” of education is permitted to continue.

For we are talking about future generations. Imagine a generation taught from an early age – well before puberty (which they may not be allowed to experience anyway) – that their “gender” is fluid, the word “gender” being deprived of any specific meaning but, despite all protestations to the contrary, clearly linked with SEX. Girls will inevitably deviate from becoming fully functional women and may even not become functional women at all.

Of course the very idea of “fully functional women” will bring howls of rage from the “radical” “liberated” gender merchants. They will cry “Women are not your chattel slaves!” But this cry will eventuate in women who CANNOT function as mothers.

The boys meanwhile will also deviate from becoming fully functional men. But here there is indeed a difference in the sexes insofar as I can see from recent news. I may be wrong but it seems that there is a far greater tendency towards violence from males than females. And I think that the trans operation has led to a whole new breed of “incels” i.e. those “involuntary celibates” i.e. those bitter and twisted sexless loners with no social skills and who cannot form healthy sexual relationships. The trans theology has graced these figures with an unprecedented legally verified access to vulnerable women and even a “free pass” to any amount of psychopathic behaviour that they can deal out to those women. Witness the recent attack in the cafeteria of Pennbrook Middle School in North Wales, Montgomery County where the media unaccountably cannot bring themselves to mention that the curiously permitted attack was carried out by a trans identified 13 year old male.

Thus we have a preview of the future: the destruction of sex, no less.

Expand full comment