Hopped on to do a short recap about Aimee Challenor. Here’s the interview I did with Andy in 2020. Here are the tweets about Aimee Challenor that Sian Berry deleted (thanks to Nutmeg). I’m afraid you won’t get out of this that easily, Sian. You owe Andy Healy an apology.
The same punitive action is being taken against Shahrar Ali, Dawn Furness and myself for speaking out about women's rights.- we are treated like pariahs in the party, and the leadership is gung ho for transing kids and calling anything other than affirmation, 'torture'. It does not feel as if much has changed to be honest.
Seems pretty obvious the Greens are dominated by paedophiles and their useful idiots. Have you ever thought of getting together to form a non-paedophile Green Alternative? An old dyed in the wool Tory like myself would be tempted to vote for you if the alternative was a 'Tory' candidate trying to lock up people if they tell a groomed child biology is real.
I can't imagine Zack Polanski being elected deputy will help much. Or maybe it will, the bigger the public platform the greater the exposure to sunlight.
Challenor, a mentally disturbed young man, fleeing manhood, hiding his body under protective layers of fat, son of a pedophile, victim of sexual crimes, is living proof of how an emotionally and psychically damaged person will fall prey to the disturbed and damaging ‘trans’ cult. It gave him cover, refuge from painful self-growth, social credit, and a place to have his damage not only accepted — but celebrated.
Ah brevity and clarity have so much to answer for in safety messaging. How did anyone ever take him and this seriously? Everyone would be halfway out of the station before Ashton's preferred list of identifiers or oops whatever you call the things we identify as identifiers had been announced. I wonder if he waged a campaign against existing rules in how we address people in correspondence too. Dear they/them/whateverwhocares, yours unctuously, me/me/me (enby whimsy asab).
That reminds me, what did the Earl become after he was awarded an OBE? An earlobe.
Nothing more than vapid ill-informed enabling of degeneracy. Instead of helping Challenor, they used him, feted him & dumped him.
Challenor is a tragic & dangerous person. A beautiful lad who wanted to take photos and be an ambulance driver/paramedic. Daddy sure did a number on him.
Nice work Glinner. Just going to watch your interview with Andy Healy.
Slightly unrelated but not really because it is about creeps...
Once all the dust has well and truly settled on all this and gender ideology has been exposed for the dangerous ideology it is, do you think Drag Queen Story Hour will be exposed for the irresponsible infiltration of a public institution that it was? i.e. events where we let crazy gender fanatics close to kids? Will it be a shameful part of our history where event organisers (and anyone who was complicit) realise, in hindsight, that it was wrong?
Or do you think people will STILL somehow believe the unbelievably naive "it was a bit of fun" nonsense? And not just make the connection? I'm trying to get my friend to join the dots, that this bloke is part of the same movement that is needlessly transitioning kid but I'm not sure I'm getting through! I'm always interested in how these things play out long term, how things go down in history.
Surely it will be clear when he suddenly isn't invited back into libraries?
Oh and once LGB people fight back, it will much clearer then, no!? What does everyone think? I basically want to know if the whole thing will blow up and it'll be clearer to people what is going on...
I think it's a little bit more innocent than that. Someone like Ada HD or however he spells it is just filling a gap in the market. But it definitely is a form of ideological grooming.
DQSH was started by San Francisco genderqueer witch Michelle Tea in 2015.
If they were just reading every day children's stories, there might be a thin sliver of an argument that there's no 'transgressive' intent behind it.
But they're not. They're reading grooming material to 'queer kids'.
That guy on tour has been found to have a couple of paedo tweets on his timeline.
The paedophile intent behind it should be glaringly obvious to anyone with half a braincell, but hey, one might be called 'bigot', 'homophobe' or 'transphobe' if one says so, so the vast majority choose to be complicit with paedophile grooming.
Prediction: Age of consent abolished within 20 years, sooner rather than later.
Thanks for this. My hunch is that what we have had here - this one particular 2022 "tour" - is a diluted version of what is going on in the US. I think it is opportunistic for sure and certainly money-making, but also definitely an exercise in testing the water too (must push boundaries, of course). I think we've made (and are making) too many strides here for this to be sustainable, long-term.
Agree that the Tweets are an absolutely unacceptable safeguarding no-no.
Beatrix Campbell's words are also mandatory reading on the Green's capture by ideology. This caused quite a kerfuffle at the time, four years later it has aged rather well.
I can vouch for sick minds everywhere. I distribute online medical training films. The ones which are about children are viewed vastly more times than the others even though there is nothing for the perverted mind to feed on. But a title like 'Clinical examination of a young child' attracts these sick people.
This should be a major news story. Once more, between Graham and Reduxx, they're just about the only place major news is found.
Sian Berry and two other colleagues on the London Assembly. One of them, Caroline Russell, was recently calling for Laurence Fox to be locked up for sharing the LGBTQ swastika. Seems to have some correlation as to why the Green Party would persecute a member who exposes glaring failings in child safe guarding.
One reason the London Conservatives (even with Shaun Bailey as an AM) will never make a campaign issue of London Greens covering up for paedophilia, is that it's leader Andrew Boff is every inch as dodgy as the Greens.
That's good news then. I see Susan Hall's response to Lozza's LGBTQ Swastika was more in line with the insouciance one would expect from a conservative (althought she did delete her palm slap when she got a pile on).
The same punitive action is being taken against Shahrar Ali, Dawn Furness and myself for speaking out about women's rights.- we are treated like pariahs in the party, and the leadership is gung ho for transing kids and calling anything other than affirmation, 'torture'. It does not feel as if much has changed to be honest.
Seems pretty obvious the Greens are dominated by paedophiles and their useful idiots. Have you ever thought of getting together to form a non-paedophile Green Alternative? An old dyed in the wool Tory like myself would be tempted to vote for you if the alternative was a 'Tory' candidate trying to lock up people if they tell a groomed child biology is real.
I can't imagine Zack Polanski being elected deputy will help much. Or maybe it will, the bigger the public platform the greater the exposure to sunlight.
Challenor, a mentally disturbed young man, fleeing manhood, hiding his body under protective layers of fat, son of a pedophile, victim of sexual crimes, is living proof of how an emotionally and psychically damaged person will fall prey to the disturbed and damaging ‘trans’ cult. It gave him cover, refuge from painful self-growth, social credit, and a place to have his damage not only accepted — but celebrated.
The trans movement is thoroughly artificial but it feeds on psychosis that is already there.
Only a total twit would get hyped up about " ladies and gentlemen".
The Green Party version would be "non-ladies and non-gentlemen"
Ah brevity and clarity have so much to answer for in safety messaging. How did anyone ever take him and this seriously? Everyone would be halfway out of the station before Ashton's preferred list of identifiers or oops whatever you call the things we identify as identifiers had been announced. I wonder if he waged a campaign against existing rules in how we address people in correspondence too. Dear they/them/whateverwhocares, yours unctuously, me/me/me (enby whimsy asab).
That reminds me, what did the Earl become after he was awarded an OBE? An earlobe.
Nothing more than vapid ill-informed enabling of degeneracy. Instead of helping Challenor, they used him, feted him & dumped him.
Challenor is a tragic & dangerous person. A beautiful lad who wanted to take photos and be an ambulance driver/paramedic. Daddy sure did a number on him.
Meanwhile back at the ranch, they're still at it.
Nice work Glinner. Just going to watch your interview with Andy Healy.
Slightly unrelated but not really because it is about creeps...
Once all the dust has well and truly settled on all this and gender ideology has been exposed for the dangerous ideology it is, do you think Drag Queen Story Hour will be exposed for the irresponsible infiltration of a public institution that it was? i.e. events where we let crazy gender fanatics close to kids? Will it be a shameful part of our history where event organisers (and anyone who was complicit) realise, in hindsight, that it was wrong?
Or do you think people will STILL somehow believe the unbelievably naive "it was a bit of fun" nonsense? And not just make the connection? I'm trying to get my friend to join the dots, that this bloke is part of the same movement that is needlessly transitioning kid but I'm not sure I'm getting through! I'm always interested in how these things play out long term, how things go down in history.
Surely it will be clear when he suddenly isn't invited back into libraries?
Oh and once LGB people fight back, it will much clearer then, no!? What does everyone think? I basically want to know if the whole thing will blow up and it'll be clearer to people what is going on...
I think it's a little bit more innocent than that. Someone like Ada HD or however he spells it is just filling a gap in the market. But it definitely is a form of ideological grooming.
Ah, gotcha! Thanks so much for responding 👍 Looking forward to Helen Joyce's piece on DQSH. Don't think it's out just yet.
DQSH was started by San Francisco genderqueer witch Michelle Tea in 2015.
If they were just reading every day children's stories, there might be a thin sliver of an argument that there's no 'transgressive' intent behind it.
But they're not. They're reading grooming material to 'queer kids'.
That guy on tour has been found to have a couple of paedo tweets on his timeline.
The paedophile intent behind it should be glaringly obvious to anyone with half a braincell, but hey, one might be called 'bigot', 'homophobe' or 'transphobe' if one says so, so the vast majority choose to be complicit with paedophile grooming.
Prediction: Age of consent abolished within 20 years, sooner rather than later.
Thanks for this. My hunch is that what we have had here - this one particular 2022 "tour" - is a diluted version of what is going on in the US. I think it is opportunistic for sure and certainly money-making, but also definitely an exercise in testing the water too (must push boundaries, of course). I think we've made (and are making) too many strides here for this to be sustainable, long-term.
Agree that the Tweets are an absolutely unacceptable safeguarding no-no.
Beatrix Campbell's words are also mandatory reading on the Green's capture by ideology. This caused quite a kerfuffle at the time, four years later it has aged rather well.
http://www.beatrixcampbell.co.uk/somewhere-in-englands-green-and-pleasant-land/
Indeed.
I can vouch for sick minds everywhere. I distribute online medical training films. The ones which are about children are viewed vastly more times than the others even though there is nothing for the perverted mind to feed on. But a title like 'Clinical examination of a young child' attracts these sick people.
God, that's grim!
Yes !
This should be a major news story. Once more, between Graham and Reduxx, they're just about the only place major news is found.
Sian Berry and two other colleagues on the London Assembly. One of them, Caroline Russell, was recently calling for Laurence Fox to be locked up for sharing the LGBTQ swastika. Seems to have some correlation as to why the Green Party would persecute a member who exposes glaring failings in child safe guarding.
One reason the London Conservatives (even with Shaun Bailey as an AM) will never make a campaign issue of London Greens covering up for paedophilia, is that it's leader Andrew Boff is every inch as dodgy as the Greens.
Andrew Boff hasn't lead the GLA Conservatives for almost a decade.
That's good news then. I see Susan Hall's response to Lozza's LGBTQ Swastika was more in line with the insouciance one would expect from a conservative (althought she did delete her palm slap when she got a pile on).
Susan Hall is basically Nadine Dorries without the intellectual rigour.