Well, isn't this interesting?
Despite The Guardian's best efforts, The Wi Spa story continues to be true
Oh, look. Five women have filed police reports alleging indecent exposure at Wi Spa. And yet the Guardian under Alex Jones—I mean Kath Viner—has twice run stories implying that the whole thing was a hoax. It’ll be interesting to see how much more Viner is willing to debase herself, and disgrace the Guardian, for the benefit of crossdressing men.
(Note: Slate and The Daily Beast also suggested the incident was a hoax)
We shouldn't be too surprised, their ideology changes with the wind, and their grasp on truth and reality is questionable on the best of days.
I will reiterate my position on this. If a TW wants to posit that a penis doesn't necessarily belong to a man, that's it's a lady-dick or whatever, or that genitals are irrelevant and inconsequential, then all the people with penises can get changed together and share the same no-clothing spaces.
A person with gender dysphoria would not get their dick out for all to see, highly highly sceptical that they would go to a nude spa AT ALL. And people keep saying the person in question in this incident doesn't have GD nor does one need to to be trans. But that begs the question, why is a man in the women's section if he doesn't have dysphoria? There is a certain kind of man who gets a thrill out of showing women and girls his cock. That's what kind of man this is. That the activists are defending him is disgusting, and I believe it hurts people with genuine dysphoria.
Maybe that's why they're going heavy with the "it never happened" angle, because they've realized it's indefensible unless they really really want to come across as condoning creepy perverted flashers.
I bet there will be more women coming along soon. The spa says it has to meet the needs of all its customers, but I have a need not to see male genitals - how will they square that circle?