Remember trans-identified male Jonathan “Jessica” Yaniv? Of course you do. There is a great deal to say about Yaniv, but the most important thing is that he took legal action against 16 female beauticians, many of them immigrant women on low incomes, because they refused to give him a Brazilian wax. He claimed ‘transphobic discrimination’ because the women refused to touch his genitalia.
I will never believe that trans-identified males will advocate for what's in women's best interests. Never. Wadhwa is showing us who he is. We should believe him.
The mainstream media are not merely complicit by showing trans paedophiles in a good light, they also monitor and withhold any comment that questions the legality or rights of trans identifying people, no matter what crimes they commit. Also I have yet to find any stories regarding non-sexual crimes that trans people commit. It appears to me that if you research the crime history of any trans person their crime is always sex crime
Why am i not surprised ? These events, and there are many of them, really need to be given a higher priority by the media. People need to know the reality of the TRA agenda.
There must surely be a good old fashioned journalist, aside from glinner of course, who is not scared to take this on . Surely. Please. Is there anyone out there ?
Basically he's saying, I know nothing about this case but, purely because one of the participants in the dispute identifies as MIF, my instinct is to throw poor immigrant women under the bus - "as an immigrant woman".
Lying male head of Rape Crisis Centre with a curious interest in whether women orgasm during rape doesn't seem to understand that forcing or blackmailing anyone to handle your genitals when they don't want to... is a sexual assault!
If you were a woman who has been raped by a TIM (apparently a vastly under-reported crime), how encouraged might you feel to present yourself at Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre?
Yaniv displaying ignorance and hate speech. Immigrants working in this country are legally entitled to work here, as are those with refugee status. Asylum seekers are not allowed to work here until they achieve a right to remain. The very idea the this trans person would demand a Brazilian from these women is disgusting.
I genuinely do not understand why the law and the entire legal system is enabling these perverts to operate with the full protection of the law and beyond that legal protection into political protection. I was recently (last week) looking at an article on the Glinner update and decided to do my own research. Tik Tok (a social media site owned and operated in China, with the full backing of Chinese government officials) appears to have an extraordinary amount of content relating to male children who are encouraged by their parents to dress as girls. Youtube has similar content. None of it, well none of it that I found, after doing some research was overtly sexual in any seedy kind of way, but what I found fascinating was the comments, some of which were lewd and were obviously adults viewing the content in a different way than (possibly) intended. It's all over social media. I am pretty sure there is worse hidden behind private content and in comments that I found. It struck me that Children might view these images and these comments and think that it is normal for adults to make suggestive comments regarding children. My belief is that people such as Jonathan “Jessica” Yaniv and others must have, at some point in their development, gained the idea that children are sexual beings and therefore prey for sexual desires. I believe social media platforms should not only delete content that is unsuitable but comments too, and that more should be done to identify those who, may not exhibit paedophile tendencies in social media, but are anyway known and convicted paedophiles in the real world, and ban them. Why do they only ban people who argue against fetishists and paedophiles?
Searched for this, which I remember reading some time ago. (I’m guessing many will already be aware of this, but I’m relatively new to this trans fuck-wittery so am still appalled daily by stuff I read.)
It would seem that some judges (at least at the time of this article) do have common sense.
it doesn't surprise me that a man who would lie and say he's female would lie and say he knows nothing about Yaniv. Sorry, that's impossible. I wish I didn't know who Yaniv is. I live in the rural S.E. United States and I know about BOTH of these scumbags. What else is the loony rape fetishist hiding? No sane man wants to work in rape crisis unless it's male rape crisis. Any other job lying on the app is grounds for dismissal.
Well, not to mention that removing hair from female genitals is much different from removing hair from male genitals. It's not painless in any instance, but I would imagine it's infinitely MORE painful for men. So, perhaps the answer, all along ... was to go ahead and wax and rip the hair off those penises and balls. The aestheticians involved said that they were not TRAINED to wax the pee pee and testicles. They were only trained to wax female parts. Maybe the answer all along was "The trial of Testicles, hot wax and rip version."
Wait, there's MORE?? You're on fire JL - this is so well laid out and juxtaposed it's so clear to see. Coopting and hijacking is the very thing Mridul has done and is still clinging to. That he accuses others of. No shame. Attcking others who are genuine and highlighting actual vulnerable women. This is projection and gaslighting all rolled into one. It's fraud.
How can a man play the vulnerable woman card to attack women for defending vulnerable women. Ahhhhhh and breathe...wrong'un defends other wrong'un shocker.
I will never believe that trans-identified males will advocate for what's in women's best interests. Never. Wadhwa is showing us who he is. We should believe him.
The mainstream media are not merely complicit by showing trans paedophiles in a good light, they also monitor and withhold any comment that questions the legality or rights of trans identifying people, no matter what crimes they commit. Also I have yet to find any stories regarding non-sexual crimes that trans people commit. It appears to me that if you research the crime history of any trans person their crime is always sex crime
Why am i not surprised ? These events, and there are many of them, really need to be given a higher priority by the media. People need to know the reality of the TRA agenda.
There must surely be a good old fashioned journalist, aside from glinner of course, who is not scared to take this on . Surely. Please. Is there anyone out there ?
Basically he's saying, I know nothing about this case but, purely because one of the participants in the dispute identifies as MIF, my instinct is to throw poor immigrant women under the bus - "as an immigrant woman".
Lying male head of Rape Crisis Centre with a curious interest in whether women orgasm during rape doesn't seem to understand that forcing or blackmailing anyone to handle your genitals when they don't want to... is a sexual assault!
If you were a woman who has been raped by a TIM (apparently a vastly under-reported crime), how encouraged might you feel to present yourself at Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre?
Yaniv displaying ignorance and hate speech. Immigrants working in this country are legally entitled to work here, as are those with refugee status. Asylum seekers are not allowed to work here until they achieve a right to remain. The very idea the this trans person would demand a Brazilian from these women is disgusting.
I genuinely do not understand why the law and the entire legal system is enabling these perverts to operate with the full protection of the law and beyond that legal protection into political protection. I was recently (last week) looking at an article on the Glinner update and decided to do my own research. Tik Tok (a social media site owned and operated in China, with the full backing of Chinese government officials) appears to have an extraordinary amount of content relating to male children who are encouraged by their parents to dress as girls. Youtube has similar content. None of it, well none of it that I found, after doing some research was overtly sexual in any seedy kind of way, but what I found fascinating was the comments, some of which were lewd and were obviously adults viewing the content in a different way than (possibly) intended. It's all over social media. I am pretty sure there is worse hidden behind private content and in comments that I found. It struck me that Children might view these images and these comments and think that it is normal for adults to make suggestive comments regarding children. My belief is that people such as Jonathan “Jessica” Yaniv and others must have, at some point in their development, gained the idea that children are sexual beings and therefore prey for sexual desires. I believe social media platforms should not only delete content that is unsuitable but comments too, and that more should be done to identify those who, may not exhibit paedophile tendencies in social media, but are anyway known and convicted paedophiles in the real world, and ban them. Why do they only ban people who argue against fetishists and paedophiles?
Searched for this, which I remember reading some time ago. (I’m guessing many will already be aware of this, but I’m relatively new to this trans fuck-wittery so am still appalled daily by stuff I read.)
It would seem that some judges (at least at the time of this article) do have common sense.
(NB: I’m not a fan of beauty pageants 😉)
https://nypost.com/2020/10/27/transgender-woman-sues-after-being-refused-by-beauty-pageant/
hang on a second I recognise that person. Pretty sure it's the Romantic Novelist from "Little Britain"
Dame Sally Markham
it doesn't surprise me that a man who would lie and say he's female would lie and say he knows nothing about Yaniv. Sorry, that's impossible. I wish I didn't know who Yaniv is. I live in the rural S.E. United States and I know about BOTH of these scumbags. What else is the loony rape fetishist hiding? No sane man wants to work in rape crisis unless it's male rape crisis. Any other job lying on the app is grounds for dismissal.
Perverts hiding in plain sight
There must be a quarter of a million women in Scotland more fit for the job of chief executive of Edinburgh Rape Crisis than Mridul Wadhwa.
Well, not to mention that removing hair from female genitals is much different from removing hair from male genitals. It's not painless in any instance, but I would imagine it's infinitely MORE painful for men. So, perhaps the answer, all along ... was to go ahead and wax and rip the hair off those penises and balls. The aestheticians involved said that they were not TRAINED to wax the pee pee and testicles. They were only trained to wax female parts. Maybe the answer all along was "The trial of Testicles, hot wax and rip version."
I'm very willing to wax his genitalia for him. Pass the hot wax.
Wait, there's MORE?? You're on fire JL - this is so well laid out and juxtaposed it's so clear to see. Coopting and hijacking is the very thing Mridul has done and is still clinging to. That he accuses others of. No shame. Attcking others who are genuine and highlighting actual vulnerable women. This is projection and gaslighting all rolled into one. It's fraud.
How can a man play the vulnerable woman card to attack women for defending vulnerable women. Ahhhhhh and breathe...wrong'un defends other wrong'un shocker.
https://meowmix.org/who-is-jessica-yaniv-simpson/
That link shows how perverse the man is
I'm delighted to read the court dismissed his application as being for personal gain from small businesses.