Shame is for so called trans kids to feel. Shame in their bodies and who they are, shame if they question what's happening to them. Shame if they're afraid. When what they really want is to hear, and desperately need to hear, is someone saying "you don't have to do this". These children are so in need of protection from people who understand that they're not okay, they're traumatised children and need help. But they're getting affirming messages from everywhere, and told that when that doesn't happen, they're going to be harmed, it's what people who don't affirm want.
Tut tut. That's in the 'not progressive pile'. Whheeeee! Mummmy! Sweetie shop we can all do what we want, whenever and wherever we want to 'reduce stigma'!
Regardless. Only the other week Monty was drawing attention to Graham’s substack when TRA’s normally know to not even mention it.
Monty’s strategy was masterful (in Kimball Kinnison-mode again); undermine the TRA’s by having the curious visit the free pages. Whereupon the unsure and doubtful will be peaked.
Monty is a one-man-peak-transing machine, and he’s getting more adept at kicking the TRA’s where it hurts every day.
It's not too bad. Just a narcissistic talking head display from a young and very, very, very stupid man on how 'bottoms' are shamed. Without seeming to have much insight into why being 'feminine' or a 'bottom' might be ridiculed as not rufty tufty strong and male enough. He clearly has no idea why or that being an actual woman in society, or feminine in any way might lead to less favourable conditions. We are seen as submissive. And lesser.
I watched it all. He was apparently sticking up for 'bottoms' but still not understanding much. He used the word 'impale'. I have no idea how he makes a living from expressing himself.
His student paper published by the TLS shows a man completely self obsessed. That gender study departments indulge this wank fest posing as research and award masters on the subject baffles and depresses me in equal measures.
That’s what the Romans thought about the ‘passive’ partner in sodomy. It was fine being the dominant male in a homosexual encounter, but the recipient was despised and scorned.
Plus ça change…..a very masculine view of relationships.
The detail about preparation and experience should be widely available to anyone thinking about ‘experimenting’ though. I’m tempted to add the vomit face but that would be trivialising the essential horrid ness.
The one thing that bothers me is why this isn't in the media? Why are things like this only known to people who have their eyes on the ball (no, that wasn't a Freudian slip). And even if this was made public, then the people who expose this kind of behaviour are made out to be the people in the wrong. The world is upside down at the minute.
Oh I think the Daily Mail is reading Glinner's Twitter - they often feature something he has posted in their news the next day. I hope they are paying for a subscription. I wouldn't be surprised to see an article on this charming fellow tomorrow.
The Daily Mail have really kept him in the news and they have also sided with lesbians against the trans menace so if anyone from the Mail reads this: 'fair play to you.'
Wondering why the DM hasn't picked it up. Having pixellated the entire image of course and given some hilarious explanation for why a narcissistic porn-addled twerp has been grooming kids online in his official capacity as a digital engagement officer for Groomermaids.
Good news! I find it frustrating that only the right leaning press seem keen to pick up on this. With the exception of the Observer, the left-wing press are ignoring the issue.
At least word is creeping out there in one way or another. It would be better if it was a tidal wave of news.
My daughter who is 20 is telling me that the only information her peers get on this issue is positive messages on TikTok etc. she is only finding out about this stuff from me and so isn’t surprised that her friends aren’t concerned and don’t question any of this stuff. When are mainstream media going to wake up to the threat here? Where is the “spotlight”
style investigation to show everyone what is going on?
There's a young American commentator on YouTube. She's old style conservative and very articulate. Maybe people your daughter's age could check her out. She has some great posts on the madness. https://www.youtube.com/c/TheCommentsSection
You are spot on - very few people have an inkling of what’s happening. I overheard a group of women discussing ‘trans’ people and one of them said ‘as long as their heart is in the right place’
Here's the issue, written in crayon, for those of you who inevitably come crying 'transphobia'...
I wouldn't want to see that 'art' produced by anyone associated with a kids charity, irrespective of gender identity or sex. It's gross and utterly inappropriate. Even if they keep it in the fridge in a locked box.
I think he may have been going for sexy but I keep thinking 'that's nice, dear' like a little boy showing off his new Transformers toy for the gazillionth time. 'And it folds out like this, then you push this up, that bit back and look it turns into...'
This is the issue in child safeguarding that the men and women involved are so wanting to make out that males aren't an intrinsic threat to children they will cover up any type of abuse. I'm having similar battles with children's services in getting them to acknowledge that they now have 7 senior domestic abuse specialist services saying my daughter's father, who took her hostage 3 years ago as an act of abuse on me and her, need to investigate him. Child protection has all but disappeared in this country as male libertarian sexual boundary breaking has become the norm. This is what you get when you cram a culture full of porn, remove understanding of class supremacy/vulnerability and insist everyone is as bad as each other.
No, he still has her and is subjecting her to severe coercive control, protected by childrens services. Its my experiences in da and knowing other mums losing their children for not affirming sex based conversion therapy after fathers sexual abuse that made me realise that patriarchy believers are unfit to be in safeguarding work, full stop
Yes, along with every opinion has validity we get everyone is either as bad or good as the next person. How convenient for every form of domination and exploitation! The woman working in an Amazon sweatshop is just as bad a human being -- working to care for her children -- as Jeff Bezos. Bull fucking shit!
I wish you and your daughter the very best, Vicki.
Hahaha! Yes. A bit like the old story of the old lady watching Alan Bates and Oliver Reed wrestling in the nude in Women in Love, who commented: 'nice carpet'.
I love that story. In one of Carrie Fisher's books (may have been Surrender the Pink) I first discovered the concept of not being able to fully commit if there was domestic drudgery distracting you, like needing to scrub a bath before a long soak in it (with or without company). I was a child and my older sister gave me a few books to read so it's formed a memory that I may have confused with other important life lessons gleaned from a Carmen Callil Virago book or a heavy dose of DH Lawrence. Or was it being thrown across a bed with (gay) abandon and trying to ignore the fact the sheets do need a wash, there's a pile of whiffy socks in the corner and all you can see is dust. Focus!! I do like a nice carpet too. Weren't they rolling next to a nice roaring and crackling fire too? And some nice candelabra ;-)
trans think genitals and breasts are just mix and match meat lego.
Perhaps their ideal would be have velcro on the chest and crotch and be able to buy a selection of bits to stick on for whatever sex they fancy to perform on any given day?
No apologies necessary. After months of depressing news, the last few days have been so cheering that it's nice to enjoy a bit of a dirty laugh at the expense of those perverts.
I love that the reaction on here has been to laugh. And why is it always young, arrogant, pathetic men who think they've 'discovered' sex? Then their narcissistic rage when we say no, we try to get on with life, with safeguarding and with the damage they wreak.
The nasty underbelly of this TRA, and online TRA abuse directed at mostly women has been about 'teaching' us and that 'no one will fuck us' and sticking barbed-wire covered bats or guns into us, to rape us in some sort of vindication of their supposed power or whatever they think their 'cause' is.
He did write on the student page of the TLS. I'm presuming he got his masters on some non-binary navel gazing subject since the article is all about 'me, myself and I'. Truly a wanker.
His feces thesis is online. It's like it reaches in and screams insults at your brain as you read it. Sorry, confusing this one with Jacob Breslow. Aggh I can't keep up with all this queer theory tosh :-(
Natch of course he has. Uh oh. I think bleach is needed too, they will be busy!
Weirdly as more and more is revealed it really is a very small group of the same people. They often know and refer to each other. They're on several boards, they 'teach', they 'write' they are 'campaigners' and 'advocates'. They fund others in this field (when they're not bashing foxes) to 'increase profile' and 'awareness'. They use this to further their own careers.
It's how a few years back the same organisations and corporations glommed on to the 'anything else' aspect of corporate social responsibility and to lazily tick that box you got in a 'provider', did some 'training', got on some list, got some award, then all your EDI needs were met til next year. Stick a flag on and job done. Tweet about giving to a trans charidee. Even better if it's a children's charidee. Everything and all protected characteristics were swept up in that. Like the Breslow LSE thing where one of the panel mentioned all marginalised women and people with disabilities. You get the feeling it's bung anyone 'other' into some category - let's call that 'queer' - and you've neatly satisfied all your business brownie points. Racism, sexism, homophobia is all neatly swept under the one umbrella if you pay your fee to the trans mafia to absolve you of all your sins.
Porn engagement officer you say there Graham? Imagine the faces of the Charity Commission and those poor sods who will have to investigate this. Oh, and the police and every element as they bounce through the whole criminal justice system. And those in Parliaments and Governments who supported all this 'advocacy'. How many times were they 'invited to the House' for nice events to sell their wares?
Mermaids, trans this and that and the whole of genderology = minds addled by porn. As we all knew.
And I thought this was a Moley, but then of course not, all this is proudly out there as some kind of 'right'.
Are you kidding? They would have to sack themselves. They are probably deleting all the unsavoury information about themselves as fast as possible, hoping that they won't be exposed. The great thing about many of the GC feminists is they have been trawling the depths of the internet to find this stuff and archive it. They can't escape.
Yes, please archive everything. Remember how the evidence on Jimmy Savile was found under a wall, decades later, and used for conviction. This is incredibly important.
Mew by name, ew by nature...
Has me thinking Woman by name, Man by nature. 😄
Sorry i should have given more warning!
Cocked up there Graham!
Hahahaha!
Yes that was a NSFW moment if ever there was one! Shocking. Bring back kink shaming!
Do they have shame these days ?
Or is it discouraged ?
Shame is for so called trans kids to feel. Shame in their bodies and who they are, shame if they question what's happening to them. Shame if they're afraid. When what they really want is to hear, and desperately need to hear, is someone saying "you don't have to do this". These children are so in need of protection from people who understand that they're not okay, they're traumatised children and need help. But they're getting affirming messages from everywhere, and told that when that doesn't happen, they're going to be harmed, it's what people who don't affirm want.
Beautifully written comment.
Beautifully worded😊
Thank you, that's very kind.
💜
Tut tut. That's in the 'not progressive pile'. Whheeeee! Mummmy! Sweetie shop we can all do what we want, whenever and wherever we want to 'reduce stigma'!
I was eating when I opened this email D:
Regardless. Only the other week Monty was drawing attention to Graham’s substack when TRA’s normally know to not even mention it.
Monty’s strategy was masterful (in Kimball Kinnison-mode again); undermine the TRA’s by having the curious visit the free pages. Whereupon the unsure and doubtful will be peaked.
Monty is a one-man-peak-transing machine, and he’s getting more adept at kicking the TRA’s where it hurts every day.
Yeah, that's what I was going to say.
My poor eyes.
Hahahaha
Yes you should have - hard to forget
I've been sleuthing!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rXHfHMMbs9I
Thank you.
'You can be feminine and get what you want'
Looks like a lecture on manipulation.
Oh....do I want to peep?
It's his old YouTube channel.
Who? The cocky guy?
This is a YouTube channel of the erm 'cocky' guy yeah. 😄
It's not too bad. Just a narcissistic talking head display from a young and very, very, very stupid man on how 'bottoms' are shamed. Without seeming to have much insight into why being 'feminine' or a 'bottom' might be ridiculed as not rufty tufty strong and male enough. He clearly has no idea why or that being an actual woman in society, or feminine in any way might lead to less favourable conditions. We are seen as submissive. And lesser.
The man is a complete idiot.
This is the thing, he and his ilk seem to be utterly socially inept.
I watched it all. He was apparently sticking up for 'bottoms' but still not understanding much. He used the word 'impale'. I have no idea how he makes a living from expressing himself.
His student paper published by the TLS shows a man completely self obsessed. That gender study departments indulge this wank fest posing as research and award masters on the subject baffles and depresses me in equal measures.
That’s what the Romans thought about the ‘passive’ partner in sodomy. It was fine being the dominant male in a homosexual encounter, but the recipient was despised and scorned.
Plus ça change…..a very masculine view of relationships.
The detail about preparation and experience should be widely available to anyone thinking about ‘experimenting’ though. I’m tempted to add the vomit face but that would be trivialising the essential horrid ness.
My issue isn't with the video, my issue is he's working for a supposed children's charity.
Hi TikTok account archived before the inevitable social media nuking begins.
https://archive.ph/LQQDP
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/darrennathanmew_ive-been-seeing-so-many-tiktoks-recently-activity-6983420645770461186-W8pY 😂
Am I even remotely surprised? No, not at all.
The one thing that bothers me is why this isn't in the media? Why are things like this only known to people who have their eyes on the ball (no, that wasn't a Freudian slip). And even if this was made public, then the people who expose this kind of behaviour are made out to be the people in the wrong. The world is upside down at the minute.
Oh I think the Daily Mail is reading Glinner's Twitter - they often feature something he has posted in their news the next day. I hope they are paying for a subscription. I wouldn't be surprised to see an article on this charming fellow tomorrow.
The Daily Mail have really kept him in the news and they have also sided with lesbians against the trans menace so if anyone from the Mail reads this: 'fair play to you.'
;-)
Wondering why the DM hasn't picked it up. Having pixellated the entire image of course and given some hilarious explanation for why a narcissistic porn-addled twerp has been grooming kids online in his official capacity as a digital engagement officer for Groomermaids.
It’s in the Times today Suzanne but without the explicit photo. I’ve recommended people to subscribe to Glinner if they want to stay informed.
Good news! I find it frustrating that only the right leaning press seem keen to pick up on this. With the exception of the Observer, the left-wing press are ignoring the issue.
At least word is creeping out there in one way or another. It would be better if it was a tidal wave of news.
My daughter who is 20 is telling me that the only information her peers get on this issue is positive messages on TikTok etc. she is only finding out about this stuff from me and so isn’t surprised that her friends aren’t concerned and don’t question any of this stuff. When are mainstream media going to wake up to the threat here? Where is the “spotlight”
style investigation to show everyone what is going on?
There's a young American commentator on YouTube. She's old style conservative and very articulate. Maybe people your daughter's age could check her out. She has some great posts on the madness. https://www.youtube.com/c/TheCommentsSection
Yeah ,Brett Cooper.👍👏
Really good point. There needs to be a separate TikTok campaign. Someone...
You are spot on - very few people have an inkling of what’s happening. I overheard a group of women discussing ‘trans’ people and one of them said ‘as long as their heart is in the right place’
We all know where their hearts are and it's not in their chests
Jesus Christ. I can't unseen that Graham.
Here's the issue, written in crayon, for those of you who inevitably come crying 'transphobia'...
I wouldn't want to see that 'art' produced by anyone associated with a kids charity, irrespective of gender identity or sex. It's gross and utterly inappropriate. Even if they keep it in the fridge in a locked box.
Genuinely, what's it going to take for Mermaids to even be shut down temporarily until an investigation is complete?
It should have happened years ago.
To fully rehabilitate a predator simply wrap in a rainbow flag & liberally sprinkle with glitter.
Unicorn horn is a requirement too.
:-D fairy lights are another option.
And we must have swishy skirts (see all their fucking swishy skirt pieces to camera)
There are some things you can't unsee!
He has a lot of confidence, it has to be said.
I think he may have been going for sexy but I keep thinking 'that's nice, dear' like a little boy showing off his new Transformers toy for the gazillionth time. 'And it folds out like this, then you push this up, that bit back and look it turns into...'
I always wonder where you shove the batteries in, and wait patiently for the lights to come on.
The lights are on but there's nobody home :-(
A bit cocky really
This is the issue in child safeguarding that the men and women involved are so wanting to make out that males aren't an intrinsic threat to children they will cover up any type of abuse. I'm having similar battles with children's services in getting them to acknowledge that they now have 7 senior domestic abuse specialist services saying my daughter's father, who took her hostage 3 years ago as an act of abuse on me and her, need to investigate him. Child protection has all but disappeared in this country as male libertarian sexual boundary breaking has become the norm. This is what you get when you cram a culture full of porn, remove understanding of class supremacy/vulnerability and insist everyone is as bad as each other.
The very serious side to this. Sending you warmest of wishes and courage Vicki.
Thanks my love. Its all serious and first rule of abusers is to groom kids away from protective parent
My God! For those who don't have the means, justice will never be done. I fear.
I hope you and your daughter are now safe.
No, he still has her and is subjecting her to severe coercive control, protected by childrens services. Its my experiences in da and knowing other mums losing their children for not affirming sex based conversion therapy after fathers sexual abuse that made me realise that patriarchy believers are unfit to be in safeguarding work, full stop
Yes, along with every opinion has validity we get everyone is either as bad or good as the next person. How convenient for every form of domination and exploitation! The woman working in an Amazon sweatshop is just as bad a human being -- working to care for her children -- as Jeff Bezos. Bull fucking shit!
I wish you and your daughter the very best, Vicki.
Thank you ❤️
Oh good lord is that even legal!
Lock him up!
and why has he got his socks on?
I love that this is what you took away from that image Sian...the socks :-)
I imagine it's so he looks like a schoolgirl. S'cuse me while I puke
Hahaha! Yes. A bit like the old story of the old lady watching Alan Bates and Oliver Reed wrestling in the nude in Women in Love, who commented: 'nice carpet'.
Snorted.. that’s priceless.
I love that story. In one of Carrie Fisher's books (may have been Surrender the Pink) I first discovered the concept of not being able to fully commit if there was domestic drudgery distracting you, like needing to scrub a bath before a long soak in it (with or without company). I was a child and my older sister gave me a few books to read so it's formed a memory that I may have confused with other important life lessons gleaned from a Carmen Callil Virago book or a heavy dose of DH Lawrence. Or was it being thrown across a bed with (gay) abandon and trying to ignore the fact the sheets do need a wash, there's a pile of whiffy socks in the corner and all you can see is dust. Focus!! I do like a nice carpet too. Weren't they rolling next to a nice roaring and crackling fire too? And some nice candelabra ;-)
Yes, they were. You can see a few photos on google (the more discreet ones) with the fire in the background... and the very nice carpet
Yes, that was funny
he's a bit shy about his shins and calves
yep exposing his feet would be going too far!
Another fetish 😂
correct...but not foot shy...those white above the knee stockings (rather than "socks") are fetish gear for men who like to pretend to be schoolgirls.
A little anime thinking, absolutely!
Really? You ask about the socks and not why there are boobs where a scrotum should be?
trans think genitals and breasts are just mix and match meat lego.
Perhaps their ideal would be have velcro on the chest and crotch and be able to buy a selection of bits to stick on for whatever sex they fancy to perform on any given day?
Socks on for a quick getaway.
Or useful if no tissues are available… sorry 😞
No apologies necessary. After months of depressing news, the last few days have been so cheering that it's nice to enjoy a bit of a dirty laugh at the expense of those perverts.
I love that the reaction on here has been to laugh. And why is it always young, arrogant, pathetic men who think they've 'discovered' sex? Then their narcissistic rage when we say no, we try to get on with life, with safeguarding and with the damage they wreak.
The nasty underbelly of this TRA, and online TRA abuse directed at mostly women has been about 'teaching' us and that 'no one will fuck us' and sticking barbed-wire covered bats or guns into us, to rape us in some sort of vindication of their supposed power or whatever they think their 'cause' is.
Oh Jan! That's worse than the blooming image itself 🤣
Hahahaha
That’s also a fetish.
No S**t!
Oh, I'm sure there must also be a dose of coprophilia in that group.
He's written for Pink News??? 😂
https://muckrack.com/darren-mew
Yet when I click to the full articles on Pink News, I cannot see his name. The articles have no writer? Or have Pink News been scrubbing?
He did write on the student page of the TLS. I'm presuming he got his masters on some non-binary navel gazing subject since the article is all about 'me, myself and I'. Truly a wanker.
His feces thesis is online. It's like it reaches in and screams insults at your brain as you read it. Sorry, confusing this one with Jacob Breslow. Aggh I can't keep up with all this queer theory tosh :-(
Rub a dub dub
Too much slime in the tub.
Natch of course he has. Uh oh. I think bleach is needed too, they will be busy!
Weirdly as more and more is revealed it really is a very small group of the same people. They often know and refer to each other. They're on several boards, they 'teach', they 'write' they are 'campaigners' and 'advocates'. They fund others in this field (when they're not bashing foxes) to 'increase profile' and 'awareness'. They use this to further their own careers.
It's how a few years back the same organisations and corporations glommed on to the 'anything else' aspect of corporate social responsibility and to lazily tick that box you got in a 'provider', did some 'training', got on some list, got some award, then all your EDI needs were met til next year. Stick a flag on and job done. Tweet about giving to a trans charidee. Even better if it's a children's charidee. Everything and all protected characteristics were swept up in that. Like the Breslow LSE thing where one of the panel mentioned all marginalised women and people with disabilities. You get the feeling it's bung anyone 'other' into some category - let's call that 'queer' - and you've neatly satisfied all your business brownie points. Racism, sexism, homophobia is all neatly swept under the one umbrella if you pay your fee to the trans mafia to absolve you of all your sins.
Porn engagement officer you say there Graham? Imagine the faces of the Charity Commission and those poor sods who will have to investigate this. Oh, and the police and every element as they bounce through the whole criminal justice system. And those in Parliaments and Governments who supported all this 'advocacy'. How many times were they 'invited to the House' for nice events to sell their wares?
Mermaids, trans this and that and the whole of genderology = minds addled by porn. As we all knew.
And I thought this was a Moley, but then of course not, all this is proudly out there as some kind of 'right'.
Moley is tasteful, the above certainly isn't
That’s a job title that could cover many aspects.
2022: The Year Of The Screenshot. 😄
Ooof!
I wonder whether The Telegraph will go after other 'members' of Mermaids.
This one seems a likely candidate.
I suspect Stonewall are going to check their own staff, just in case.
Are you kidding? They would have to sack themselves. They are probably deleting all the unsavoury information about themselves as fast as possible, hoping that they won't be exposed. The great thing about many of the GC feminists is they have been trawling the depths of the internet to find this stuff and archive it. They can't escape.
Yes, please archive everything. Remember how the evidence on Jimmy Savile was found under a wall, decades later, and used for conviction. This is incredibly important.
Great! No virtual shredder then.
I suspect Stonewall are in their bunker, waiting for it all to die down.