Men wanting to “pass” as women. “Pass”. What a ridiculous life goal/aspiration. YOU SHALL NOT PASS. Not as women. Not as a civil rights movement. Not as a social justice movement. Not as a progressive movement. Not as the future of our world. No. You shall not ‘pass’. You shall NEVER pass.
Pass is not enough. Willoughby insists he is a “beautiful” woman, a Sufragette, better than any born woman. No my dear fellow you are not and never will be. My granddaughter and everyone else’s granddaughter epitomise what a woman is simply because that is what they were designed to be. Their bodies are a thing of wonder. Nature may not always produce perfection but she sure as hell knows a male from a female.
Unfortunately, the time when they just wanted to "pass" is long gone. The proof is in the growing numbers of "transgender women" who don't even bother shaving their face or their chest. They now want to be accepted and recognized as women - with all the rights and 'privileges' that entails - complete with beard and dick. I will never forgive 80% + of Western governmrnts, lawmakers and medias for throwing women in the path of a runaway train. It is downright disgusting. THAT is the real hate crime.
this story has enraged even women who keep making excuses for men. Hard to know what to do or say about it anymore. Not much fun watchng this celebration of misogyny all around us. And very hard to swallow the fact the onlookers are enjoying it.
Yes. The idea that "females matter so little" been true for about 5,000 years except for a small window of time in less than half of the world that started in about 1918 and is now coming to an end. However, before this system began, and for very many millennia more, women were seen as wonderful beings who could regenerate life and were valued for that. But men now use violence (personal and state) and the threat of violence to keep women subservient, as they have done for the aforementioned 5,000 years.
These are nonentity men cheating and stealing women's sports. No man no matter how he identifies should be in any women's sport. Mr. Dennis is a cheat no more and certainly less. Sports bodies need to understand that women's sports are for natal biological females not plastic surgeon wannabees. It's time for women and girls to turn up, whistle blows, turn their backs and walk away. If the sporting bodies continue to spit on women and girls, then women and girls should remove themselves from the harm this is doing to them..sports bodies need to see that the money they make from encouraging larping men to hurt females will be taken away should they wish to continue with this insane policy. Sporting bodies are liars and cheats full stop period.
I agree but that won't happen till the women and girls force the issue because they are cowards. Its a thundering disgrace that sporting bodies and sponsors are encouraging cheating, shame on them all
they shouldnt have to. but they do have to. if spat on in the face, the only way to make it stop is to turn one's head. otherwise the spat on person participates in their own abuse.
Just an ongoing comment to thank you for highlighting/sharing on your own platform these vitality important stories from feminist voices - should be world news ✊🏼
𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗿𝗲 𝗠𝗶𝗱 𝗩𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗦𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗸𝗲𝘁𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗯𝗮𝗻: The Vermont Principals Association has extended the ban from participating in basketball to include all sports categories. Mid Vermont has appealed to the VPA and my sources say that Mid Vermont will proceed to Vermont Superior Court in the event of a likely denial of their appeal by VPA.
Note: VPA members supports changing the words "boys" and "girls" to "sperm producers" and "egg producers. The change was authored by @OutrightVT, a trans advocacy and LGB conversion therapy organization.
> VPA members supports changing the words "boys" and "girls" to "sperm producers" and "egg producers"
You might consider yourself and point out to the VPA that that is exactly what are the standard biological definitions for the (two) sexes. See the "male" and "female" entries in the Glossary of this article in the Journal of Molecular Human Reproduction
Though the logical consequences of those definitions are that we generally don't ACQUIRE a sex until the onset of puberty, that the prepubescent are sexLESS.
I agree - but still, even if he did it would not make him a woman - nothing will. And anyway, I object to sex-differences being reduced to genitals, when there's so much more to it and to our bodies. It strikes me as a very male thing to make it all about genitals (and then, telling us we must ignore even that!)
I completely agree with what you say. 100%. My comment was just making the specific point of men claiming to be lesbians and then getting upset when lesbians don't want them. I was just making that very logical nuances point and that they should put their money where their mouth is. Of course they will NEVER be women but I think my point does highlight that they are even further from their deluded view of being a woman if they want to hold on to the very body part that is used to quickly identify a male.
What WOULD make Riley Dennis into a female and a woman is having his testicles replaced with functional ovaries of his own. See this old tweet of evolutionary biologist Colin Wright:
"What if I woke up and my reproductive anatomy had somehow inexplicably changed from a functional penis and testes to a functional vagina and ovaries? Would I cease to be male? 100% YES! I would absolutely now be a female."
By the standard biological definitions for the sexes, to have a sex is to have functional gonads of either of two types, those with neither being, ipso facto, sexLESS.
Not that most people, "women" in particular, are much willing to countenance such definitions. Further evidence of the ubiquity of scientific illiteracy -- sadly, even among so-called biologists and philosophers. Further elaborations in this post of mine:
Thanks for this - interesting. I think Kathleen Stock treats this subject quite well - she has different definitions, which she refers to throughout the book. I can't agree, however, that losing one's reproductive capacity means exiting one's sex-class! That is very exclusionary!
"exclusionary"? Isn't that why transwomen object to "adult human female"? 😉🙂
The words aren't identity or tribal markers; "male" and "female" are, by definition, exclusionary of those who don't have functional gonads of the right type.
The words "sex" and "sex-class" aren't identical; "male" and "female" are, by definition, biological types, whereas "man" and "woman" are social types.
Having his testicles replaced with functional ovaries of his own would make him into a female; it wouldn't necessarily make him into a women - as is, we recognize him as a man regardless of whether his testicles are functional.
If it's "adult human female" then "he" would be a woman. Seems you're defining the category as a gender, as anyone who has a passing resemblance to an adult human female.
I shudder to think what it's like for the female martial arts students who spar with my ex husband, who had "the surgeries" in his middle thirties in 1996. He cheated even on the "Blanchard Protocols" in which the man was to cross-dress full time for 2 years. For at least until 6 months after the surgeries he presented as androgynous to our sons, the children he fathered. He then blamed me for "forcing" him to "make the decision to live as a female" in an affidavit, along with the same words in his psychologist's affidavit, in our custody case. Some women are now being forced to sign a divorce settlement in which she basically gives up her freedom of speech in service of his "privacy." We will never stop advocating for ourselves.
I am so sorry to hear what you went through. So very sorry. I hope you have managed to hold on to your children and that they have come through this on. This cult will end. More and more people are speaking out against this insanity and it will end.
Thanks. My sons will not talk to me since I discovered their father's 2 frauds in court, and started talking truth, refused to say female pronouns. I have faith they'll return to our past warmth when this cult is exposed for the truly damaging radical movement it is. I find it obnoxious that Dr. Ray Blanchard, the supposed world expert on this diagnosis, tells us that no one can possible understand. Here are his words, justifying fantasy, from an article in The Atlantic 20 years ago:
"Cross-dressers' desires do not map onto anything in our world," Ray Blanchard says. "You will never know how they feel if you are not one of them. And they have to disconnect between reality and their fantasy. Otherwise their desires are too disruptive. It's too disruptive to acknowledge that you wish your penis was part of your wife's body and not yours. It's too disruptive to acknowledge that this is a sexual compulsion."
They don't want me telling the truth. He pretended to be unemployed to get out of paying child support, while he was actually paid $600/$700 a day as a Crystal Report Writer. I have that documented because the company later sued him for breach of contract when he tried to start his own company and stole clients. The second one was not telling the truth about the equity contract to become 51% owner of the tech firm he was an executive at. He listed his job as "sales" and did not list the equity as pay. My sons work in tech and their father now has a lot of power over them, including the indoctrination of all the mainstream media companies. It is a cult and later, I believe we will reunite. For the time being though, they are partially disinherited, as I cannot trust them to have any decision-making power as I age. Their father is too enraged at me. He brainwashed them from young that it was me who caused the divorce. Unbelievable, but come over to Trans Widow Ute Heggen youtube channel and listen to other mirror-image stories of ex-wives and sisters of and so one who contacted me. Thanks for your concern. This cult is damaging society.
Unbelievable and horrendous. I’ve heard of the narcissism inflicted on trans widows but am staggered that he’s saying the divorce is your fault. Thanks I’ll look up your YouTube channel
Australia’s E Safety Commissioner Julie Iman Grant is behind this BS censorship of Reduxx. She also Covered up the infamous Australian trans identifying man who used his newborn baby to affirm his identity as a “Breastfeeding Mother”. First he narcissistically boasted about his cruel human lactation experiment to the Daily Mail and then when he didn’t like the balanced story written he demanded through Iman-Grant and the Australian Press Council that he was at risk of self harming if the article wasn’t taken down. The Daily Mail struck a deal with the press council but luckily the internet is forever
They have developed and forced funding to be diverted for them to have 'booklets' and web based guides and 'support' for most things and things you couldn't possibly want to begin to imagine. And things only girls and women can ever know and live. Our lives are just a plaything and male fetish for this bunch. And the weight of governments, nations and multinational bodies and corporations are behind it and promoting it. Look at charities and organisations specifically developed to help mothers with breastfeeding. And the worldwide corruption of that to centre and promote the needs of men. To be 'inclusive'. Ahhhh how 'nice', how 'kind'.
They wheedled their way into all women's groups, all pregnancy groups, all those for mothers, female and only female medical conditions, loss, grief, on and on and on. To properly 'live' their fantasy lives by LARPing our experiences and totally take over all aspects of our lives. Then demanded all that didn't 'include' them in online and offline groups be shut down and all the women deplatformed.
The more grotesque ones seem to push so far they get exposed as what they are, then more grotesque ones sprout new fetishes to fill their place.
I wouldn't be surprised to hear the usual loud and threatening TIMs demanding a national compensation scheme for their neo vagina mesh trauma at the same time as claiming endo made their noses fall off.
What is it with these men? They are not women, will never be women. They do not pass. They fool no one. Is it really about the sport or is it about being able to perv on the women and girls in the changing rooms and showers? Third spaces. Third sports. Third everything.
Sharron Davies suggests that the men’s is an open category and the women’s is single sex. They don’t want that though, they want validation and domination.
I’ve been attending online the Genspect conference this weekend. Just amazing. Incredible speakers who are so thought provoking. One of the lines that keeps going around my head is that (I’m paraphrasing) “the trans activists could have quietly destroyed women’s sports and safe spaces and they would have got away with it. The thing that has woken people up is the kids.”
I’m not sure that’s true.Many women are very angry about the abuse of their rights and there would have been a growing tsunami against it for that reason alone.
It's only a matter of time before woke Aus, NZ,USA AND Canada start following the many European countries and backlash against this INSANE BS. Love that the weightlifting coach made a point. However, I think the strongest message would come from the football women by refusing to participate. It's the only way. The entire league, hell, the entire population that makes up sports women needs to refuse to play if there are men in the pitch.
This is what they want. They want females to have nothing because they are better women. I don't believe we have scratched anything but the surface of this abhorrent, sadistic, misogynist movement.
Why should women give up their sport, because men want to intrude into it? No no no, ban the men, let the women vpcontinue to play.Otherwise the TW will have won.
Of course they should ban men!! But whilst the woke Aussie government is doing nothing of that sort I think the women boycotting will send a very very strong message.
I am so not surprised that m*therf*cker popped up somewhere else to keep bugging women. Look at that picture! He can obviously sweep females out of his way with one arm. WHY don't sports organizations automatically say, "No, you're not eligible. The men's team is over there, or you can do the work and start a mixed-sex team for the gender ideologues.
Again I ask, where has common sense gone and moral compass? What is behind this hatred for women, the ones with vaginas? The 'women' with penises seem to be reified now. If women simply refused to compete with the penis owning imposters, they wouldn't have any teams left and nobody to hurt and injure. Coz that's what they like doing, let's face it, they rather get off on hurting women, don't they? We see them.
They hate us because we can reproduce and they can't. There are other factors, but that is what it comes down to. They want the sole rights to reproduction even if they come via artificial wombs and harvested ovaries, etc. It is, essentially, the God Complex. Now, they want the Goddess Complex, too. The thing is, it is MOTHER Nature, and she will not allow it to succeed. They are overreaching themselves straight into the Law of Unintended Consequences.
Men wanting to “pass” as women. “Pass”. What a ridiculous life goal/aspiration. YOU SHALL NOT PASS. Not as women. Not as a civil rights movement. Not as a social justice movement. Not as a progressive movement. Not as the future of our world. No. You shall not ‘pass’. You shall NEVER pass.
Pass is not enough. Willoughby insists he is a “beautiful” woman, a Sufragette, better than any born woman. No my dear fellow you are not and never will be. My granddaughter and everyone else’s granddaughter epitomise what a woman is simply because that is what they were designed to be. Their bodies are a thing of wonder. Nature may not always produce perfection but she sure as hell knows a male from a female.
That's it - men hate nature and declared war on it.
Unfortunately, the time when they just wanted to "pass" is long gone. The proof is in the growing numbers of "transgender women" who don't even bother shaving their face or their chest. They now want to be accepted and recognized as women - with all the rights and 'privileges' that entails - complete with beard and dick. I will never forgive 80% + of Western governmrnts, lawmakers and medias for throwing women in the path of a runaway train. It is downright disgusting. THAT is the real hate crime.
men are a hate crime. Their sadism speaks for itself
I must admit that most of these "trans women" look like Balrogs!
How are so many people, so accepting of this insanity. Do females matter so little?
Yes, we are almost irrelevant now
Have we ever mattered that much, anywhere at any time, Tenaciously?
No, but it’s shocking to see such violent and aggressive misogyny after thinking that we’d made some progress over the last few decades.
Misogyny, often aided and abetted by other women, that really angers and hurts.
They hate us. Do that many people, male and female, hate their mother?
this story has enraged even women who keep making excuses for men. Hard to know what to do or say about it anymore. Not much fun watchng this celebration of misogyny all around us. And very hard to swallow the fact the onlookers are enjoying it.
Yes. The idea that "females matter so little" been true for about 5,000 years except for a small window of time in less than half of the world that started in about 1918 and is now coming to an end. However, before this system began, and for very many millennia more, women were seen as wonderful beings who could regenerate life and were valued for that. But men now use violence (personal and state) and the threat of violence to keep women subservient, as they have done for the aforementioned 5,000 years.
These are nonentity men cheating and stealing women's sports. No man no matter how he identifies should be in any women's sport. Mr. Dennis is a cheat no more and certainly less. Sports bodies need to understand that women's sports are for natal biological females not plastic surgeon wannabees. It's time for women and girls to turn up, whistle blows, turn their backs and walk away. If the sporting bodies continue to spit on women and girls, then women and girls should remove themselves from the harm this is doing to them..sports bodies need to see that the money they make from encouraging larping men to hurt females will be taken away should they wish to continue with this insane policy. Sporting bodies are liars and cheats full stop period.
Women and girls shouldn’t have to walk away. Sponsors should walk away (although that’s assuming that they have the backbone)
I agree but that won't happen till the women and girls force the issue because they are cowards. Its a thundering disgrace that sporting bodies and sponsors are encouraging cheating, shame on them all
they shouldnt have to. but they do have to. if spat on in the face, the only way to make it stop is to turn one's head. otherwise the spat on person participates in their own abuse.
Mediocre Male Cheater.
True. But there also seems some kind of a vicious streak, of wanting to hurt, and to bully (actual/real) women?
Just an ongoing comment to thank you for highlighting/sharing on your own platform these vitality important stories from feminist voices - should be world news ✊🏼
𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗿𝗲 𝗠𝗶𝗱 𝗩𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗦𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗸𝗲𝘁𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗯𝗮𝗻: The Vermont Principals Association has extended the ban from participating in basketball to include all sports categories. Mid Vermont has appealed to the VPA and my sources say that Mid Vermont will proceed to Vermont Superior Court in the event of a likely denial of their appeal by VPA.
Note: VPA members supports changing the words "boys" and "girls" to "sperm producers" and "egg producers. The change was authored by @OutrightVT, a trans advocacy and LGB conversion therapy organization.
https://www.wcax.com/2023/03/21/upper-valley-religious-school-appeals-ban-school-sports/ uh
WT actual F? right?
Right.
> VPA members supports changing the words "boys" and "girls" to "sperm producers" and "egg producers"
You might consider yourself and point out to the VPA that that is exactly what are the standard biological definitions for the (two) sexes. See the "male" and "female" entries in the Glossary of this article in the Journal of Molecular Human Reproduction
https://academic.oup.com/molehr/article/20/12/1161/1062990
Though the logical consequences of those definitions are that we generally don't ACQUIRE a sex until the onset of puberty, that the prepubescent are sexLESS.
Some further elaborations in this post of mine:
https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/p/binarists-vs-spectrumists
En passant, how did you get the bolded text? Some recent improvements from Substack?
Genital preferences are... wait for it... genital preferences. They are not transphobic.
Forcing their penises on women who don't want them. Any man would surely chop it off if they are so certain they are a woman.
I agree - but still, even if he did it would not make him a woman - nothing will. And anyway, I object to sex-differences being reduced to genitals, when there's so much more to it and to our bodies. It strikes me as a very male thing to make it all about genitals (and then, telling us we must ignore even that!)
I completely agree with what you say. 100%. My comment was just making the specific point of men claiming to be lesbians and then getting upset when lesbians don't want them. I was just making that very logical nuances point and that they should put their money where their mouth is. Of course they will NEVER be women but I think my point does highlight that they are even further from their deluded view of being a woman if they want to hold on to the very body part that is used to quickly identify a male.
Double-think run rampant.
Oh no, what it is is that they are not hung-up on genitals - so therefore superior to us.
What WOULD make Riley Dennis into a female and a woman is having his testicles replaced with functional ovaries of his own. See this old tweet of evolutionary biologist Colin Wright:
https://twitter.com/SwipeWright/status/1240781010800979968
"What if I woke up and my reproductive anatomy had somehow inexplicably changed from a functional penis and testes to a functional vagina and ovaries? Would I cease to be male? 100% YES! I would absolutely now be a female."
By the standard biological definitions for the sexes, to have a sex is to have functional gonads of either of two types, those with neither being, ipso facto, sexLESS.
Not that most people, "women" in particular, are much willing to countenance such definitions. Further evidence of the ubiquity of scientific illiteracy -- sadly, even among so-called biologists and philosophers. Further elaborations in this post of mine:
https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/p/binarists-vs-spectrumists
Thanks for this - interesting. I think Kathleen Stock treats this subject quite well - she has different definitions, which she refers to throughout the book. I can't agree, however, that losing one's reproductive capacity means exiting one's sex-class! That is very exclusionary!
"exclusionary"? Isn't that why transwomen object to "adult human female"? 😉🙂
The words aren't identity or tribal markers; "male" and "female" are, by definition, exclusionary of those who don't have functional gonads of the right type.
You might take a look at my "woman" post.
The words "sex" and "sex-class" aren't identical; "male" and "female" are, by definition, biological types, whereas "man" and "woman" are social types.
Having his testicles replaced with functional ovaries of his own would make him into a female; it wouldn't necessarily make him into a women - as is, we recognize him as a man regardless of whether his testicles are functional.
Depends on how you define "woman", doesn't it?
If it's "adult human female" then "he" would be a woman. Seems you're defining the category as a gender, as anyone who has a passing resemblance to an adult human female.
I shudder to think what it's like for the female martial arts students who spar with my ex husband, who had "the surgeries" in his middle thirties in 1996. He cheated even on the "Blanchard Protocols" in which the man was to cross-dress full time for 2 years. For at least until 6 months after the surgeries he presented as androgynous to our sons, the children he fathered. He then blamed me for "forcing" him to "make the decision to live as a female" in an affidavit, along with the same words in his psychologist's affidavit, in our custody case. Some women are now being forced to sign a divorce settlement in which she basically gives up her freedom of speech in service of his "privacy." We will never stop advocating for ourselves.
I am so sorry to hear what you went through. So very sorry. I hope you have managed to hold on to your children and that they have come through this on. This cult will end. More and more people are speaking out against this insanity and it will end.
Thanks. My sons will not talk to me since I discovered their father's 2 frauds in court, and started talking truth, refused to say female pronouns. I have faith they'll return to our past warmth when this cult is exposed for the truly damaging radical movement it is. I find it obnoxious that Dr. Ray Blanchard, the supposed world expert on this diagnosis, tells us that no one can possible understand. Here are his words, justifying fantasy, from an article in The Atlantic 20 years ago:
"Cross-dressers' desires do not map onto anything in our world," Ray Blanchard says. "You will never know how they feel if you are not one of them. And they have to disconnect between reality and their fantasy. Otherwise their desires are too disruptive. It's too disruptive to acknowledge that you wish your penis was part of your wife's body and not yours. It's too disruptive to acknowledge that this is a sexual compulsion."
I cannot imagine what you have had to go through. I don’t understand why your sons are upset with you. How is his fraud your fault?
They don't want me telling the truth. He pretended to be unemployed to get out of paying child support, while he was actually paid $600/$700 a day as a Crystal Report Writer. I have that documented because the company later sued him for breach of contract when he tried to start his own company and stole clients. The second one was not telling the truth about the equity contract to become 51% owner of the tech firm he was an executive at. He listed his job as "sales" and did not list the equity as pay. My sons work in tech and their father now has a lot of power over them, including the indoctrination of all the mainstream media companies. It is a cult and later, I believe we will reunite. For the time being though, they are partially disinherited, as I cannot trust them to have any decision-making power as I age. Their father is too enraged at me. He brainwashed them from young that it was me who caused the divorce. Unbelievable, but come over to Trans Widow Ute Heggen youtube channel and listen to other mirror-image stories of ex-wives and sisters of and so one who contacted me. Thanks for your concern. This cult is damaging society.
Unbelievable and horrendous. I’ve heard of the narcissism inflicted on trans widows but am staggered that he’s saying the divorce is your fault. Thanks I’ll look up your YouTube channel
Australia’s E Safety Commissioner Julie Iman Grant is behind this BS censorship of Reduxx. She also Covered up the infamous Australian trans identifying man who used his newborn baby to affirm his identity as a “Breastfeeding Mother”. First he narcissistically boasted about his cruel human lactation experiment to the Daily Mail and then when he didn’t like the balanced story written he demanded through Iman-Grant and the Australian Press Council that he was at risk of self harming if the article wasn’t taken down. The Daily Mail struck a deal with the press council but luckily the internet is forever
https://archive.ph/ekhDf
Seems like a job for social services to me. It’s child abuse.
My jaw is on the floor. There’s a booklet advising TIMs on how to lactate!!!!
They have developed and forced funding to be diverted for them to have 'booklets' and web based guides and 'support' for most things and things you couldn't possibly want to begin to imagine. And things only girls and women can ever know and live. Our lives are just a plaything and male fetish for this bunch. And the weight of governments, nations and multinational bodies and corporations are behind it and promoting it. Look at charities and organisations specifically developed to help mothers with breastfeeding. And the worldwide corruption of that to centre and promote the needs of men. To be 'inclusive'. Ahhhh how 'nice', how 'kind'.
They wheedled their way into all women's groups, all pregnancy groups, all those for mothers, female and only female medical conditions, loss, grief, on and on and on. To properly 'live' their fantasy lives by LARPing our experiences and totally take over all aspects of our lives. Then demanded all that didn't 'include' them in online and offline groups be shut down and all the women deplatformed.
The more grotesque ones seem to push so far they get exposed as what they are, then more grotesque ones sprout new fetishes to fill their place.
I wouldn't be surprised to hear the usual loud and threatening TIMs demanding a national compensation scheme for their neo vagina mesh trauma at the same time as claiming endo made their noses fall off.
Upside down world is upside down for sure. jaysus.
What does post-human even mean? ask the machines.
What is it with these men? They are not women, will never be women. They do not pass. They fool no one. Is it really about the sport or is it about being able to perv on the women and girls in the changing rooms and showers? Third spaces. Third sports. Third everything.
Add another category that anyone can enter but get them out of women’s competitions
Sharron Davies suggests that the men’s is an open category and the women’s is single sex. They don’t want that though, they want validation and domination.
I’ve been attending online the Genspect conference this weekend. Just amazing. Incredible speakers who are so thought provoking. One of the lines that keeps going around my head is that (I’m paraphrasing) “the trans activists could have quietly destroyed women’s sports and safe spaces and they would have got away with it. The thing that has woken people up is the kids.”
I’m not sure that’s true.Many women are very angry about the abuse of their rights and there would have been a growing tsunami against it for that reason alone.
It's only a matter of time before woke Aus, NZ,USA AND Canada start following the many European countries and backlash against this INSANE BS. Love that the weightlifting coach made a point. However, I think the strongest message would come from the football women by refusing to participate. It's the only way. The entire league, hell, the entire population that makes up sports women needs to refuse to play if there are men in the pitch.
This is what they want. They want females to have nothing because they are better women. I don't believe we have scratched anything but the surface of this abhorrent, sadistic, misogynist movement.
Why should women give up their sport, because men want to intrude into it? No no no, ban the men, let the women vpcontinue to play.Otherwise the TW will have won.
I think until a LOT of men stand up to this shite then they will win
Of course they should ban men!! But whilst the woke Aussie government is doing nothing of that sort I think the women boycotting will send a very very strong message.
I am so not surprised that m*therf*cker popped up somewhere else to keep bugging women. Look at that picture! He can obviously sweep females out of his way with one arm. WHY don't sports organizations automatically say, "No, you're not eligible. The men's team is over there, or you can do the work and start a mixed-sex team for the gender ideologues.
Again I ask, where has common sense gone and moral compass? What is behind this hatred for women, the ones with vaginas? The 'women' with penises seem to be reified now. If women simply refused to compete with the penis owning imposters, they wouldn't have any teams left and nobody to hurt and injure. Coz that's what they like doing, let's face it, they rather get off on hurting women, don't they? We see them.
They hate us because we can reproduce and they can't. There are other factors, but that is what it comes down to. They want the sole rights to reproduction even if they come via artificial wombs and harvested ovaries, etc. It is, essentially, the God Complex. Now, they want the Goddess Complex, too. The thing is, it is MOTHER Nature, and she will not allow it to succeed. They are overreaching themselves straight into the Law of Unintended Consequences.
Indeed. It's breathtaking in its narcissism, this gender cult.