39 Comments

Graham at his best — hope Ireland is listening to this heroic and unfairly beleaguered man.

Expand full comment

I swear to God, Graham, you must have incredible mental reserves to still get up in the morning after what you've been through with these evil bastards. All I can say, again, is thank you. It is ineed a wonderful thing that Graham Linehan exists in the world. Tonight my husband and I are attending Abigail Shreir's new book launch as an online even through the FSU. Another person and another organisation whose existences in this world provide some solace as some hope.

Expand full comment

From the Tatchell letter:

“adults from the ages of nine to 13”.....

(Momentarily speechless!)

But note how the first age is SPELLED OUT whilst the second age is given as a number! As if to cover up that 9 with “nine”. That signals definite deliberate misdirection. This guy knows what he’s suggesting – and knows that what he’s suggesting is wrong!

“While it may be impossible to condone paedophilia,” (“may be”??!!) “it is time society acknowledged that not all sex with children is unwanted, abusive and harmful.”

First, note that “sex with children” IS paedophilia. And then note that this reduces the sentence to:

“It is now possible to condone paedophilia”.

And just to make that crystal clear, “condone” is defined thusly:

“-accept (behaviour that is considered morally wrong or offensive).”

OR

“-approve or sanction (something), especially with reluctance.”

So, Tatchell is saying paedophilia is OK!

Expand full comment

The journalistic style of writing only includes numbers from 10 onwards, below that they're written in full. He's still a sick fuck though!

Expand full comment

I agree. It may well be true that there are people who have been predated on who say in retrospect that they were OK with it. That does not make predation OK. Tatchel is ignoring the power-difference between adults and children.

Expand full comment

Well done Graham for bringing up Peter Tatchells letter. The people condoning this trans agenda need to realise it’s got a lot to do with sexual deviancy being made to look acceptable. Thank goodness for people like you not afraid to speak out and show the truth.

Expand full comment

"The people condoning this trans agenda need to realise it’s got a lot to do with sexual deviancy being made to look acceptable"

I really like the way you have phrased that, Elaine. Succinct and to the point.

Expand full comment

Just look at how lenient the courts are with trans identifying males abusing women. Paedophiles are being the benefit of the doubt with a slapped wrist!

The public is being groomed to accept the unacceptable.

Expand full comment

Well educated, experienced and intelligent campaigner against the mutilation of unhappy children Graham Linehan gets interviewed by an utter plonker who thinks all that matters is niceness. If it wasn’t so utterly tragic, it would be comedic.

Expand full comment

Always, ALWAYS record any media interraction you may have so you have recourse when they lie about you.

During the 2016 election there were numerous stories of mendacious bad-faith 'journalists' like THE DAILY SHOW trying to 'Gotcha!' interview people at Trump rallies, and were dismayed when a number of these people pulled out their phones and demanded to have their own version of the interview.

Needless to say, they left the scene pretty quick.

Expand full comment

Brilliant interview Graham. You were fantastic, hit it out the park, nailed it, etc etc.

Do some more!

Expand full comment

Great interview Graham. Well done

Expand full comment

When all this madness is over (and it is starting to collapse like a house of cards), I wonder how quickly these people who defend mutilating children and taking rights away from women, will 'forget' that they ever supported the nonsense that is gender id? I suspect lots of recordings will suddenly disappear or be wiped and memories will become very hazy. There'll be no apologies of course because that's an admission that the people who should have been asking the questions based on facts were actually asking the wrong questions or no questions at all. At least the rest of us will know who the sheep are.

Expand full comment

Stewart Lee (unoriginal bandwagoner) Graham Norton (rat) biggest of all

Jimmy Mulville (treacherous and cowardly)

Expand full comment

It'll be interesting to see what they'll do when the gender nonsense falls out of favour. Presumably, we'll be expected to forget what they've said and done.

Expand full comment

Brilliant! Good on you for turning the questions round on him. Love your reply to his question what you would do differently - that you'd ask someone like him to cover it in the first place and how his sort of people are not doing their jobs! Bloody cowardly journalists are prolonging the life of this evil ideology.

Expand full comment

Clever, my friend, very clever. Why are these people so, so willing to appear on the wrong side of history?

Expand full comment

Wow Graham. You were ready for them this time!

Expand full comment

Bravo Graham, you really showed him up along with all the so called journalists who should have been doing the job that you and others are doing.

Expand full comment

Good journalism is dead.

Expand full comment

Not on gender critical substack it isn't 😎

Welcome to the Land of the Terf Resistance 😎

Dusty

Expand full comment

Well done Graham! What an absolute buffoon your interviewer is. You handled him perfectly.

Expand full comment

Worst of all, Peter Tatchell ghosted poor wee Chad: https://youtu.be/bWfFVh3sIwc?si=ne4GS701FMQBMmA3

Expand full comment

Poor Chad 😂😂😂

Expand full comment