We are so used to make threats and violence. What is mind boggling is how captured some women are ( friends of mine) who’s answer to shit like this is: it’s not violence when they defend themselves.
This is what drives me the most mad: that up is down and down is up. There is this meme of TRA being vulnerable and their violence towards TERF (or Karen’s - Imagined to be white bourgeois women - being legit.
My own daughter has bought it. Suck my girl dick made her laugh.
there are about 7 lawsuits against porn hub right now, one against x videos, one against twitter, one against facebook just got the green light from the texas legislature. I think this is going to bring a sea change for platforms in terms of moderation. only when they start paying out huge awards to victims will they sweep predators off their sites (at least four of the PH lawsuits are class actions, expect huge awards). Unbridled access of predators/groomers plus the techies manufacturing consent on platforms is what drives this movement. What eventually will happen I hope is that the moderation standards will be overhauled when the platform owners like Dorsey/zuckerberg/etc start paying out millions. Hopefully when the platforms, boards like reddit etc start paying out tens of millions in awards they will be forced to sweep the nests of predators from their sites where they have hived up. Plus it looks like the majors are champing at the bit to get into the subscription game as well...so this is going to break up/fractionalize so many large platforms because content won't be free. In five years most of these people will be in jail or at least on probation. It grieves my heart for their victims though.
Only last week after seeing aggressive imagery and words, I thought to myself, at some point these extreme activists will be seen as a terrorist group. Then, only to confirm my intuition, this image pops up on my feed yesterday.
In Ireland in the 70's and 80's men with balaclavas and guns were called terrorists.
After reading his latest view of women and seeing these pictures, I’m actually beginning to think he’s dangerous.Either way,any woman should get the hell away from him.
I'm not sure that using the term "they're mentally ill" isn't a bit of a cop out for these men really. It's a bit like saying "they can't help it and need our sympathy".
I'm more inclined towards what said here by Teer. These men are a kind of terrorist. Terrorists whose political objective is to neutralise women. I think they CAN help it, they ARE in control of themselves and they CHOOSE to be aggressive and violent. But what you said about getting more people to see them for what they are holds true, yes.
they have the kind of mental illness that GD is a SYMPTOM of. Anyone who has studied psychiatry knows that. Their dysphoria is a symptom of their severe mental illness just as is their pedophilia or whatever other depraved stuff they are into (and they always are). It's all symptomatic of severe trauma in early childhood. That's why I never bought this sh*t cause I was raped as a toddler and I see these f*cks for exactly what they are
please find someone to talk to offline (face to face) because the cyberworld can be a very nasty place, and it seems to bring out the worst in people. and there is nothing wrong with being angry, but it displays vulnerability as much as sobbing in the corner. predators know this, so please be careful to look after you own mental health.
I agree in part. Being mentally ill does not excuse. Eg A psychopath is still culpable for their crimes. Initially I avoided this term but the absence or refusal to engage with logic, reason and consistency indicates mental failure. I avoided terming these individuals thus as casting aspersions on women's sanity has proved to be a robust historical device to silence us...
I still don't see it as a mental illness though. It's a personality disorder. I'm sure their refusal to engage is a choice not an inability.
Its like was said in Graham's recent Mess, Dont play to the live audience in front of you, play to the audience at home. In other words, it's best not to engage with these personalities on a personal level cos it wastes your time and energy; we don't have the ability to change their minds.
And oh my god, don't get me started on how men throughout history from all social levels have silenced "inconvenient" women by having them sent yo the Asylum. That was/is indeed a very robust device, as you say. Makes me furious.
'feminine' personality disorder? dsmv 5 has a lot to answer for with the promotion of 'transing' of kids - the idea of wrongly gendered childs play is in there - i was aware of this by 2012. exactly how the transition pushers took control of the lgb community i'm not sure.
manufacturing consent. The world moved online. They are GROSSLY overrepresented in tech. They are pornsick tech geeks first exposed to porn via video games while still in single digits, many incels, MRA, (massive misogyny) on gamer sites...WE moved into THEIR arena when WE got online, not the other way around. It's like if all of us moved to an islamic regime in MENA we'd soon be wearing burka. The internet STARTED OUT as a captured institution, via pornsickness.
personality disorder (cluster B disorders) is MENTAL ILLNESS. Not only that but cluster B are incurable, and they are comorbid with gender dysphoria. Totally agree, with two NPD parents you learn no/low contact and gray rock etc because you are right they drain your soul completely, they are incurably MENTALLY ILL and best avoided. When i went back on twitter that was the rule that I don't interact with them, period. plus I muted 'trans' in the advanced muting feature on there.
unfortunately i dont think you understand how the mad system works - children/young adults (mostly female/gay/poc) are often subjected to a lifetime of drugged regulation after receiving a simple diagnosis maybe from a gp - later from a psychiatrist. most people who receive personality disorder diagnoses (female) have experienced repeated physical abuse and have ptsd symptoms (inc flashbacks). the reason these women get pd diagnoses is because of the 'self-harm' which (includes suicide attempts). obviously self harm has nothing to do with attention seeking - i can guarantee you do not want to be locked up in the chaos of the mad ward. these locked in Assessment centres observe and drug patients, they do not provide care or cures to mental health disorders but assess risk, something that families need to be aware of. as to the accusation that 'mental illness' is incurable, remember that gay people were all considered mad until 1973 in usa, mid 80's in the uk and later out in the sticks.
i have spent a lot of time in the 'mad' community and people deemed mad arent allowed the agency/(due to severe druggings - even mild mad drugs wreck sexual functioning ) to behave like this. mad people might be victims of the 'desiring' nature of others - consider the position of lavery's younger 'girlfriend', and remember that the *academics* have a high status and are acting out their fantasies from a position of holding power. and we all should question why people who havent' really considered what madness/mental illness is and their usage of the term 'nutter'? is 'nutter' used purely as a put down to shut up someone they disagree with? - like 'no debate'?
strongly disagree this is why they wanted GD dumped out of the DSM because they know they are unstable. GD is a symptom of their mental illness. Anyone trans or not who acts like this has mental illness.
Men will always find a way to pick on and exploit women and children. Especially women who resist. Damned if you do damned if you don’t. People think it’s an overreaction to say women aren’t considered human but it’s not. It’s like watching a whole majority being systematically and individually dehumanised, brutalised and oppressed with their light being crushed from them. Once you see it you can’t unsee it and the consequences for social cohesion, peace, progress and safety are dire. As history shows. As for being a woman things internally and in terms of our children are tough enough as it is (men have literally no idea) and without being taken for granted, objectified, used and abused. Simply unpaid slaves to be exploited, disciplined and absorb the blame and responsibility men do not want to take on themselves. It’s so tediously obvious. As for children well they’re just easy targets who don’t matter at all to them. To acknowledge women and their children belong together and require and deserve support is just to challenging for these men who are so selfish they see children as threatening them and their access to sex and food. An unfortunate by product of sex which is all women’s fault. They’re so unevolved, irresponsible, unnatural and downright stupid it’s laughable. Here now men will claim to be the primary parent (read Mother)or stay home and send Mother out to work to get money from Government. No one is acknowledging it’s best for babies and children to be with supported Mothers for many years. But that’s what happens in a mans world. The more these guys do this ^ stuff the more obvious it becomes they’re men. Apologies for using the generic term “men” to good men but let’s face it men in power won’t deal with the bad ones will they? Bro’ hood is more important than women or children. Or maybe it’s just cowardice.
thanks for the warning. its pretty rough stuff. *academics* like lavery seem to be outta control having got their way without much come back from academic authorities. the b-movie trash style posing may be a steal/homage to a john-waltersesque aesthetic but and the big but is its all about hostility and the violent potential of gun-totting (rather than the made up 'literal violence' of 'mis-gendering). these academics are teaching culture from a gendered ideology point of view and are well aware of the power of images on young minds (see cissy porn and lavery). such cinematic narratives provide the excitement of confrontation and horror that may provoke fear/revulsion and arouse desires, by mixing sex and violence against a 'feminine' body and thereby creating a confusion of feelings in those who watch. and bascially 'trained' to perform for the instigator, then asked to act out these 'fantasies'.
I can partially understand why someone might side with the "trans rights are human rights" brigade if they have a close friend or relative who's trans, but I really don't understand not calling out male violence towards women regardless of how those males are dressed or theirs preferred pronouns.
People are too afraid of being called a bigot or terf for daring to speak up against anything trans. Afraid of the truth. Just like the grooming and abuse in Rotherham. But it is NOT bigoted to question male oppression of women.
predators are master manipulators, they have stolen what used to afflict a tiny, tiny percentage of the population and are using that designation to act out a terrorization and control fetish on women. They WANT to terrorize/threaten up to assaulting/raping/killing women. It is not a lack of any 'rights' that puts this desire in them. They have this drive as a fetish because of their mental illness and depravity. They get off on it. They picked a not-well loved these days demographic, feminism, to vent that misogyny on. And the world, meaning men and spineless handmaidens, either cheered them on, or stood by quietly.
As an academic, I have to say this Lavery person is raising red flags for "predatory lecturer" all over the place. What kind of contact does he have with students? Does he meet students in his office without anyone else, behind a closed door? Also, I did a quick google of Berkeley's student societies. Scroll down and weep: for when one "qu**r" society isn't enough....https://cejce.berkeley.edu/geneq/resources/lgbtq-resources/campus-organizations
The internet raised them, i.e. they raised each other. My nephews come here twice a week and sit at a computer for 8 or 9 hours. NEVER go outside. it's insane
We are so used to make threats and violence. What is mind boggling is how captured some women are ( friends of mine) who’s answer to shit like this is: it’s not violence when they defend themselves.
This is what drives me the most mad: that up is down and down is up. There is this meme of TRA being vulnerable and their violence towards TERF (or Karen’s - Imagined to be white bourgeois women - being legit.
My own daughter has bought it. Suck my girl dick made her laugh.
I am so lost
I can empathise with how you feel. This shit is deeply disturbing.
Keep going! You are sane.
Male threats* ! Not « make threats ». Damn corrector!
there are about 7 lawsuits against porn hub right now, one against x videos, one against twitter, one against facebook just got the green light from the texas legislature. I think this is going to bring a sea change for platforms in terms of moderation. only when they start paying out huge awards to victims will they sweep predators off their sites (at least four of the PH lawsuits are class actions, expect huge awards). Unbridled access of predators/groomers plus the techies manufacturing consent on platforms is what drives this movement. What eventually will happen I hope is that the moderation standards will be overhauled when the platform owners like Dorsey/zuckerberg/etc start paying out millions. Hopefully when the platforms, boards like reddit etc start paying out tens of millions in awards they will be forced to sweep the nests of predators from their sites where they have hived up. Plus it looks like the majors are champing at the bit to get into the subscription game as well...so this is going to break up/fractionalize so many large platforms because content won't be free. In five years most of these people will be in jail or at least on probation. It grieves my heart for their victims though.
I would love to read more about these class actions. Any links,?
Only last week after seeing aggressive imagery and words, I thought to myself, at some point these extreme activists will be seen as a terrorist group. Then, only to confirm my intuition, this image pops up on my feed yesterday.
In Ireland in the 70's and 80's men with balaclavas and guns were called terrorists.
I've been calling it trans rights terrorism since the beginning, cause it is.
After reading his latest view of women and seeing these pictures, I’m actually beginning to think he’s dangerous.Either way,any woman should get the hell away from him.
Hard to watch those pictures calmly. I'd be happy to do worse to them, honestly. Bastards
They're mentally ill & infecting society. What matters is getting more people & quickly to see that.
I'm not sure that using the term "they're mentally ill" isn't a bit of a cop out for these men really. It's a bit like saying "they can't help it and need our sympathy".
I'm more inclined towards what said here by Teer. These men are a kind of terrorist. Terrorists whose political objective is to neutralise women. I think they CAN help it, they ARE in control of themselves and they CHOOSE to be aggressive and violent. But what you said about getting more people to see them for what they are holds true, yes.
they have the kind of mental illness that GD is a SYMPTOM of. Anyone who has studied psychiatry knows that. Their dysphoria is a symptom of their severe mental illness just as is their pedophilia or whatever other depraved stuff they are into (and they always are). It's all symptomatic of severe trauma in early childhood. That's why I never bought this sh*t cause I was raped as a toddler and I see these f*cks for exactly what they are
please find someone to talk to offline (face to face) because the cyberworld can be a very nasty place, and it seems to bring out the worst in people. and there is nothing wrong with being angry, but it displays vulnerability as much as sobbing in the corner. predators know this, so please be careful to look after you own mental health.
I agree in part. Being mentally ill does not excuse. Eg A psychopath is still culpable for their crimes. Initially I avoided this term but the absence or refusal to engage with logic, reason and consistency indicates mental failure. I avoided terming these individuals thus as casting aspersions on women's sanity has proved to be a robust historical device to silence us...
I still don't see it as a mental illness though. It's a personality disorder. I'm sure their refusal to engage is a choice not an inability.
Its like was said in Graham's recent Mess, Dont play to the live audience in front of you, play to the audience at home. In other words, it's best not to engage with these personalities on a personal level cos it wastes your time and energy; we don't have the ability to change their minds.
And oh my god, don't get me started on how men throughout history from all social levels have silenced "inconvenient" women by having them sent yo the Asylum. That was/is indeed a very robust device, as you say. Makes me furious.
'feminine' personality disorder? dsmv 5 has a lot to answer for with the promotion of 'transing' of kids - the idea of wrongly gendered childs play is in there - i was aware of this by 2012. exactly how the transition pushers took control of the lgb community i'm not sure.
manufacturing consent. The world moved online. They are GROSSLY overrepresented in tech. They are pornsick tech geeks first exposed to porn via video games while still in single digits, many incels, MRA, (massive misogyny) on gamer sites...WE moved into THEIR arena when WE got online, not the other way around. It's like if all of us moved to an islamic regime in MENA we'd soon be wearing burka. The internet STARTED OUT as a captured institution, via pornsickness.
personality disorder (cluster B disorders) is MENTAL ILLNESS. Not only that but cluster B are incurable, and they are comorbid with gender dysphoria. Totally agree, with two NPD parents you learn no/low contact and gray rock etc because you are right they drain your soul completely, they are incurably MENTALLY ILL and best avoided. When i went back on twitter that was the rule that I don't interact with them, period. plus I muted 'trans' in the advanced muting feature on there.
unfortunately i dont think you understand how the mad system works - children/young adults (mostly female/gay/poc) are often subjected to a lifetime of drugged regulation after receiving a simple diagnosis maybe from a gp - later from a psychiatrist. most people who receive personality disorder diagnoses (female) have experienced repeated physical abuse and have ptsd symptoms (inc flashbacks). the reason these women get pd diagnoses is because of the 'self-harm' which (includes suicide attempts). obviously self harm has nothing to do with attention seeking - i can guarantee you do not want to be locked up in the chaos of the mad ward. these locked in Assessment centres observe and drug patients, they do not provide care or cures to mental health disorders but assess risk, something that families need to be aware of. as to the accusation that 'mental illness' is incurable, remember that gay people were all considered mad until 1973 in usa, mid 80's in the uk and later out in the sticks.
i have spent a lot of time in the 'mad' community and people deemed mad arent allowed the agency/(due to severe druggings - even mild mad drugs wreck sexual functioning ) to behave like this. mad people might be victims of the 'desiring' nature of others - consider the position of lavery's younger 'girlfriend', and remember that the *academics* have a high status and are acting out their fantasies from a position of holding power. and we all should question why people who havent' really considered what madness/mental illness is and their usage of the term 'nutter'? is 'nutter' used purely as a put down to shut up someone they disagree with? - like 'no debate'?
And it's not even stochastic terror.
Yes male violence and oppression and erasure of women being normalised to benefit all men.🤮
i don't think its anything to do with mental illness - its about *desire*/and getting what they want - please see my comment below for more info.
strongly disagree this is why they wanted GD dumped out of the DSM because they know they are unstable. GD is a symptom of their mental illness. Anyone trans or not who acts like this has mental illness.
Men will always find a way to pick on and exploit women and children. Especially women who resist. Damned if you do damned if you don’t. People think it’s an overreaction to say women aren’t considered human but it’s not. It’s like watching a whole majority being systematically and individually dehumanised, brutalised and oppressed with their light being crushed from them. Once you see it you can’t unsee it and the consequences for social cohesion, peace, progress and safety are dire. As history shows. As for being a woman things internally and in terms of our children are tough enough as it is (men have literally no idea) and without being taken for granted, objectified, used and abused. Simply unpaid slaves to be exploited, disciplined and absorb the blame and responsibility men do not want to take on themselves. It’s so tediously obvious. As for children well they’re just easy targets who don’t matter at all to them. To acknowledge women and their children belong together and require and deserve support is just to challenging for these men who are so selfish they see children as threatening them and their access to sex and food. An unfortunate by product of sex which is all women’s fault. They’re so unevolved, irresponsible, unnatural and downright stupid it’s laughable. Here now men will claim to be the primary parent (read Mother)or stay home and send Mother out to work to get money from Government. No one is acknowledging it’s best for babies and children to be with supported Mothers for many years. But that’s what happens in a mans world. The more these guys do this ^ stuff the more obvious it becomes they’re men. Apologies for using the generic term “men” to good men but let’s face it men in power won’t deal with the bad ones will they? Bro’ hood is more important than women or children. Or maybe it’s just cowardice.
thanks for the warning. its pretty rough stuff. *academics* like lavery seem to be outta control having got their way without much come back from academic authorities. the b-movie trash style posing may be a steal/homage to a john-waltersesque aesthetic but and the big but is its all about hostility and the violent potential of gun-totting (rather than the made up 'literal violence' of 'mis-gendering). these academics are teaching culture from a gendered ideology point of view and are well aware of the power of images on young minds (see cissy porn and lavery). such cinematic narratives provide the excitement of confrontation and horror that may provoke fear/revulsion and arouse desires, by mixing sex and violence against a 'feminine' body and thereby creating a confusion of feelings in those who watch. and bascially 'trained' to perform for the instigator, then asked to act out these 'fantasies'.
Utterly obnoxious
I can partially understand why someone might side with the "trans rights are human rights" brigade if they have a close friend or relative who's trans, but I really don't understand not calling out male violence towards women regardless of how those males are dressed or theirs preferred pronouns.
People are too afraid of being called a bigot or terf for daring to speak up against anything trans. Afraid of the truth. Just like the grooming and abuse in Rotherham. But it is NOT bigoted to question male oppression of women.
predators are master manipulators, they have stolen what used to afflict a tiny, tiny percentage of the population and are using that designation to act out a terrorization and control fetish on women. They WANT to terrorize/threaten up to assaulting/raping/killing women. It is not a lack of any 'rights' that puts this desire in them. They have this drive as a fetish because of their mental illness and depravity. They get off on it. They picked a not-well loved these days demographic, feminism, to vent that misogyny on. And the world, meaning men and spineless handmaidens, either cheered them on, or stood by quietly.
As an academic, I have to say this Lavery person is raising red flags for "predatory lecturer" all over the place. What kind of contact does he have with students? Does he meet students in his office without anyone else, behind a closed door? Also, I did a quick google of Berkeley's student societies. Scroll down and weep: for when one "qu**r" society isn't enough....https://cejce.berkeley.edu/geneq/resources/lgbtq-resources/campus-organizations
Utterly fruitloop.
Jesus, that girls eyes are from the worst nightmares .
Trans stickers in Oxford - anyone able to take this on? https://twitter.com/stickersftw
Have a look at the following Twitter account: https://n3ko.eu
www.instagram.com/N3KOcardiff/
N3KOcardiff! for Trans Rights!!
They've currently:
Vandalised a number of bikes in Cardiff with various flags
Graffiti-ed a number of walls with gender theory
Encourage crime: selling stickers with guns saying "shut the fuck up TERF" and Be Gay Do Crimes
The internet raised them, i.e. they raised each other. My nephews come here twice a week and sit at a computer for 8 or 9 hours. NEVER go outside. it's insane