One of the hardest things to get across to people is just how far and how deeply entrenched gender ideology is, in the thinking, policies and actions of every organisation, business, govt depts, health services etc. across the West. It’s not going to be beaten without a long, hard struggle and as the BBC and the MSM generally are deliberately concealing all the problems and horrors, im not sure how we wake people up. I’m really beginning to think that some kind of alien mind virus has infected the planet and driven millions insane, I can’t see any other explanation for something so blatantly insane.
It has surprised me how easy it has been for this to happen - whether it's money or power, or to create a new 'field' individuals can climb to the top of as 'experts'. It's this mass back-slapping aren't-we-so-wonderful and once it started, then gathered momentum, it had all the civil society support organisations - the charities, the helplines, the advertising to help prop it up. These men have built their careers on this. The Royal Colleges, the entire profession and all related ones in effect. All CPD points they can win by investing in this 'learning'. The Executive and Parliaments still spout this bilge. It was suggested we need some paths out, some change of direction, to help those who've invested and set their professional paths in this direction. They need to be helped to think differently - or more likely forced to. They are so deeply deluded in teaching and spreading the delusion that there is very little impetus for them to desist. These men above clearly think they are 'good' men doing a grand old job. Whole structures, departments, policies, course materials, pay scales and grades, it all needs scrutiny and removal. Regulators, senior leaders, policy, main government departments are clearly still supporting if not actively encouraging this - with the suspect 'advisors' like Gendered Intelligence still propagating this. It's still being taught and expected at every level. On so many sites and individual GPs or hospitals. You start to peel this away from one corrupted 'Royal' College, then face all the others, then the unions, then the associations, then the...
Well, we do have people on camera like the head of BlackRock saying things like 'We have to force change' . The money is where it starts, I know there was a GC woman who traced back funding, but this issue is also affecting businesses like media and video games. There are some great users on you tube who are tracking this- but it basically works like this:
These companies, Unis, and NGOs desire money for new projects. To get that money out of lenders and foundations such as Gates, BlackRock, etc they need to maintain what is essentially a 'social credit score'. This money is not given like a normal loan. These are low interest loans being offered that seem very tempting to these orgs, but the catch is that they have to abide by the DEI hiring rules as well as rules that prohibit them from speaking about these subjects in anything but the most glowing terms. Often they have to hire candidates that these lenders put forward as terms of the agreement. There are 3 kinds of people who agree to this: ones who want the big money these lenders/funders offer (think heads of NGOs with 6 figure salaries or businesses looking for reduction of the amount of interest charged on loans), true believers who think this is all for the social good, and relatively idealistic people who accept the funding with the strings attached because it is enabling them to do something that they believe is for the greater good.
This allows these big entities to shape society, if not public opinion, very quickly because almost all business and large scale Non profit work relies on these influxes of cash from these lenders and funders.
Years ago, I worked for a small non-profit that provided services to the homeless in Seattle. We were chronically short of funds and one day I asked the head of the organization why we didn't accept funding from Gates/Microsoft or Amazon. She told me something that makes total sense now: "We can't because if we did we would no longer be able to run our operation the way we want to. If we took their money, we would have to hire who they wanted and do what they wanted to do even if it was harmful to us or our clients."
Unfortunately, I don't know how we get rid of this system of money managers that can dictate the warping of the social fabric at a distance. All we can do is to encourage businesses and orgs to stop taking their money and not spending money on their products or donating money to them. I think this will pass eventually, but we will probably be fighting this in some form for awhile.
Thanks for your full reply. As you say, those like Jennifer Bilek have done all the investigatory work and shown how the money works. And I'm grateful for the details you gave, which I was aware of happening but there is this niggling set of questions I have. Excuse the length of this. We know the theory behind how this happens, but really, how is it happening on the ground, at the coal face? I'm never sure how it manifests in different countries and systems. How does the delusion keep feeding itself?
I was speaking to academic colleagues about this recently - the kind who burrow away for many decades and whole careers making advances which save lives all over the world and no one would apparently know their names. But many actually do and they are hugely respected in our fields. The older ones who stand for total academic rigor have been retiring and dying and there is something lost, but many aren't aware of exactly what that is. Many are very worried about standards, that have noticeably declined and it's hard to explain how or what happened. It's the purest form of the freedom of academic enquiry and buffeted by the total mess of academia, and the politicisation of our fields troubles many of us. The quality is missing. We also can't speak up as many lost funding, or our jobs even whole departments - that wasn't even over 'just' gender ('woke'?), but this amorphous 'change' which isn't clearly defined or defendable. Younger academics give up. And therefore very hard to pin down to defend against. It's got no basis. It's totally slippery - and just like all definitions of 'trans' which include anything and everything. It's maybe 'progressive' &/or 'profit' and the destruction of educational models. And laziness and not knowing what you don't know. The level of blithe ignorance is stunning. Chuck gender woo into that mix and it combusts. Is it that we've lost the few who would or could stand up, who knew any other way, to slow the march, or stop it, so it wasn't even in the room to start to do its damage? Then what, how do the few of us try to hold the ground?
I've worked across business, charity (your non-profit), government and academia with practice and application that translates worldwide so am not totally naive to how things get done. You do your due diligence and sometimes slightly hold your nose, you get brands or organisations to display their logos on your projects or policy, but if some good work, a public health measure succeeds, some robust research is produced, measures are introduced and literally lives are saved, then that's how I can live with it. That's part of the game we are forced to work within. But from the big Gates/BlackRock type picture, down to the individual doctors like above, there is no scrutiny, no caution, no one saying hang about a minute here, this directly contradicts our code of conduct. How is this escaping that? They are directly ignoring guidance and standards. They skirt the law. They ignore it all. All those layers that stand to catch these errors. No personal responsibility. How does that get squared away? The BMA, like this college, is a total joke. I have been troubled by things that are wrong and known diverted funds that every man and his dog knew were wasted or not put to good use, but this is a scale way above that. There are many layers between Gates/BlackRock, to the men shown above - who've all personally managed to carve a niche role that works for them on the ground - so the funding or funders is almost lost in all that - it benefits these men personally to fly this gender flag. With direct and indirect decisions to do so. They seem genuinely invested and no one, no manager, no senior, no external regulator or their professional body is challenging this. Where is their professional indemnity? Not enough colleagues are questioning. You'd be laughed at if you mentioned Gates. It's that regulatory capture or rather absence that allows this to happen. So, not the pushing of an agenda, but the deliberate gap of lack of accountability. A crime of omission. I'm trying to figure out what the detailed layers are.
I have sat in rooms, with those from big corporations and multinationals, who I was advised or needed to have in the meeting, or on the board or project working group. Often they did nothing - I did all the work. I was lucky they turned up, and it was a trick to have meetings in posh buildings with high status as then more bother to turn up to meetings. It was frustrating, but as long as they weren't overtly obstructive, or wasted time, it is how it is and there's often a lot of placeholders who 'represent' another organisation or group to 'liaise'. Sometimes you are genuinely left to get on with it which is ideal. They can help you network with others. You build relationships and you might get something useful from them at some point other than your salaries paid. It looks good for them. One had a link to funding from a big sports company (I was involved in health and we were trying to pull funding from all sources). Nationally important work done on a shoestring. I was on a very low salary for what I (the grand 'we') was trying to achieve yet that company had given them hundreds of thousands for one small project without the blink of an eye by tying it to a big sporting event. A pointless project, with no outcomes, no robust research happening. Hugely overstaffed, there are how many doing the equivalent of my role, but not, what do they do all day?! The total hypocrisy, of all that money, time, staff and every resource sloshing about was hard for me to cope with - there weren't enough hours in the day for me to juggle three roles in one and lots of people doing nothing getting credit. To keep fighting those vested interests is hard work. We rely on those genuinely motivated to keep plugging away in their fields so it doesn't all implode. So many I work with contribute their time voluntarily for the good of their professions - it's how these Royal Colleges work. Otherwise it's just a bunch of consultants vying for contracts. It's valued, but not. It's how most institutions function which is a little alarming when you realise. You get one or a few paid members of staff, then in effect volunteer professionals. Which is how so many fields are captured by vested interests - from student unions, to politics, to universities, to professional bodies, to whole sectors and industry advising government. And we all know this is happening.
And it's not just the money managers - I've worked in government and academia - this seems more. It's the ability for individuals in any field to look away and keep looking away. How, in practice, does that happen? If anyone of us sat with those men featured above, sat and chatted and explored their thinking, it would become apparent if we had enough time that their thinking was flawed, and more than that, real harm is being done because they are so wedded to that very flawed thinking. We have evidence of harm to counter their supposed 'evidence'. At what point does your conscience kick in. Who is holding them to account? The cognitive dissonance must be extraordinary for those 'nice' men to continue to believe they are 'nice men' who are fulfilling their job roles 'helping' others. Saviour complexes? Narcissism? How can they be so far from 'do no harm' yet can dissemble enough to escape censure? They can't all be related to a 'trans' child.
Thank you for J Bilek's name... I was at work typing surreptitiously and for the life of me could not remember her name and didn't have time to seek it..
Thank you also for the detailed reply. You give a lot of food for thought. You point out a interesting thing that we all should keep in mind, that the world is run by those who show up. I think that is how so many were blindsided by this- because they either didn't think there were any issues to have to deal with because everything appeared to be running smoothly, or they were too busy doing real work to attend the meetings that heralded this moment.
I think most 'nice men' (and women) simply wish to have the optics of being percieved to be nice and will adopt a certain perfunctory 'niceness', adopting whatever the cause du jour is current. I'm not sure many even have cognitive dissonance. They say and do 'X' because it is the price of business or 'the right thing to do' and it doesn't really cross their minds that they are perpetuating harm. This is then, in turn reinforced by their organization and their social bubble. There is also a certain compartmentalization that has prevented this from being examined for so long. When I first tried talking to people about this in 2015 most people thought it was a 'gay' thing* so it just didn't compute for them. The ones who could articulate their thoughts on it would say something,"Well that's a gay/LBGT issue, It's not my business." They thought they were being nice by being tolerant and accepting and there the thought stopped.
As for the diminishment of academic excellence- that's been ongoing a long time. It's hard to believe there was a time that people read 'classics' for entertainment- even my bumpkin relatives on my dad's side played fairly sophisticated word games to amuse themselves and cited what is now literature that no one reads anymore. My education in the 70's was still far superior to what my child received in the 00's. This could correlate with the rise of mass media in the form of TV and now computers (at least radio still required an imagination and frame of reference) and a loss of the ability to concentrate on one thing for long periods. I'm not sure how to solve that one. I was at a laundry the other day and everyone was sitting there-even kids- glued to phones. IMO, The current malaise owes a lot to screen hypnosis and the constant positive reinforcement of the dopamine hit. Add some not too savory folk controlling the algorithms and suddenly you have a bunch of people who get warm fuzzies for all the wrong reasons and no amount of explaining or truth is going to change it. There are similarities to cult think, but also to addiction. Philip Dick had one of his characters joke about 'Crash Day', an imagined event where everyone on the West Coast ran out of drugs on the same day and went in to withdrawl at the same time. Nowadays, all it would take is an EMP event to send everyone buggy. Being thrust back into reality is going to be very harsh, but to also quote Dick- "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, does not go away." Go Team Reality!
*Still a lot of men out there who also perceive this as a 'feminist' thing and shut down thought accordingly...
This is exactly what I mean when I say that I can’t understand how so many people appear to be captured. I understand the money behind it, the transhumanists, big pharma etc. t Also its the prefect cover for predators, paedophiles and men who just want to be openly misogynistic. What puzzles me are the people falling for it all, especially the women who are giving away our rights.
I heard a woman from Iran interviewed and she said something that terrified me: a small, determined group of people can overturn society. That’s what happened in Iran. The Islamist’s took over buy doing things under the radar, glomming onto anti-shah activism, and appealing to the majority’s more moderate religiousness and abusing their trust. Next thing you know, dress codes and morality police.
Yes indeed, it’s an old idea and it is terrifying. It relies on people being controlled through fear which is exactly what’s happening. We must keep talking to people to try and wake them up …regardless of the names we’re likely to get called.
Thank you Rebecca. Gendered Effin Stupidity yet again. And the 'new gender services'. Just like the old 'gender services' then. This lot will not give up without being forced out. Every one with any influence - and if they work with patients, that's every one of them. The word 'trust' is used again and again in their blether. It stuns me that supposedly intelligent people pass lots of exams to be allowed into the hallowed halls of medicine, needing to rely on evidence, logic, facts and the scientific method, to then propagate nonsense based on something something 'feelings'. How do they balance that piknmix approach? Telling a child to use whichever loo they like is encouraging them to be totally selfish, onanistic, narcissistic, disrespectul and to ignore all societal norms and laws, let alone their peers, as they somehow know better. How to mess up a child. Because a 'trusted' adult told them they not only could but should. It's revolting and is abusive. These men are authority figures, with undue influence, directly contravening guidance and Cass. Reified? So what, they don't agree? Based on what? We have to stop every one of these deluded activists. Where the hell are professional standards? Child protection and safety? It's vile.
Word! I love the eloquence & passion.. it’s only with this kind of clear, unequivocal & downright arsey attitude that we’ll have any chance of getting rid of this cretinous insanity. Where the actual fuck are the supposedly ‘trusted’ news organisations (yes you, @BBC) that should be reporting on this stuff? Not a squeak on the WPATH Files; limp, tepid ‘if we must’ single sentences on Cass. How can they all be claiming “nothing to see here” when the elephant in this particular room is so enormous you could see it from space…?
As a trans widow who collects the only data in the world on women who divorced suddenly demanding, crossdressing men, I've been contacted several times now by confused teens. They find me because of the videos on my channel explaining that Piaget's first stage of child development (sensory motor, birth - 3) doesn't work together with "wrong body from birth." As Richie Herron says, we who have been hurt by their cult have to do the work of the professionals, as they've abdicated.
So, I currently offer observations to "Paul" who thinks maybe his left hand and face are female. For the first time in 2 years running my channel, Trans Widow Ute Heggen, I got that blue box from Trevor Project, warning about "conversion therapy." If they think suggesting 8 hours of sleep, limited time online, a break from gaming and eating healthy is "conversion therapy," they have a lot of work ahead.
Thank you for covering this. I despair at members of the medical profession who ignore the lack of evidence and dare to accuse the likes of Dr Cass of being biased....
BTW, "RCP" generally means "Royal College of Physicians" - while not entirely free of the gender cult, it is a separate organisation from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, so the headline should say "RCPCH".
Thank you for shining a light on this, Rebecca Says No. It’s truly sobering to read how the TRAs (and the moneyed men behind the scenes) managed to infiltrate the RCP and other bodies of import so effectively.
Wasn’t it said that once they invaded women’s prisons, they knew the sky was the limit… 😮 😤
These doctors are not really doctors they are clowns pretending to be doctors. Our children are apparently not safe anymore. Just like the medical profession went mad during covid and joined in the general lying to us, they seem intent on making sure we completely lose our respect for them and have to learn to be self sufficient and visit the doctor as little as possible and take their advice with a grain of salt.
One of the hardest things to get across to people is just how far and how deeply entrenched gender ideology is, in the thinking, policies and actions of every organisation, business, govt depts, health services etc. across the West. It’s not going to be beaten without a long, hard struggle and as the BBC and the MSM generally are deliberately concealing all the problems and horrors, im not sure how we wake people up. I’m really beginning to think that some kind of alien mind virus has infected the planet and driven millions insane, I can’t see any other explanation for something so blatantly insane.
It has surprised me how easy it has been for this to happen - whether it's money or power, or to create a new 'field' individuals can climb to the top of as 'experts'. It's this mass back-slapping aren't-we-so-wonderful and once it started, then gathered momentum, it had all the civil society support organisations - the charities, the helplines, the advertising to help prop it up. These men have built their careers on this. The Royal Colleges, the entire profession and all related ones in effect. All CPD points they can win by investing in this 'learning'. The Executive and Parliaments still spout this bilge. It was suggested we need some paths out, some change of direction, to help those who've invested and set their professional paths in this direction. They need to be helped to think differently - or more likely forced to. They are so deeply deluded in teaching and spreading the delusion that there is very little impetus for them to desist. These men above clearly think they are 'good' men doing a grand old job. Whole structures, departments, policies, course materials, pay scales and grades, it all needs scrutiny and removal. Regulators, senior leaders, policy, main government departments are clearly still supporting if not actively encouraging this - with the suspect 'advisors' like Gendered Intelligence still propagating this. It's still being taught and expected at every level. On so many sites and individual GPs or hospitals. You start to peel this away from one corrupted 'Royal' College, then face all the others, then the unions, then the associations, then the...
Well, we do have people on camera like the head of BlackRock saying things like 'We have to force change' . The money is where it starts, I know there was a GC woman who traced back funding, but this issue is also affecting businesses like media and video games. There are some great users on you tube who are tracking this- but it basically works like this:
These companies, Unis, and NGOs desire money for new projects. To get that money out of lenders and foundations such as Gates, BlackRock, etc they need to maintain what is essentially a 'social credit score'. This money is not given like a normal loan. These are low interest loans being offered that seem very tempting to these orgs, but the catch is that they have to abide by the DEI hiring rules as well as rules that prohibit them from speaking about these subjects in anything but the most glowing terms. Often they have to hire candidates that these lenders put forward as terms of the agreement. There are 3 kinds of people who agree to this: ones who want the big money these lenders/funders offer (think heads of NGOs with 6 figure salaries or businesses looking for reduction of the amount of interest charged on loans), true believers who think this is all for the social good, and relatively idealistic people who accept the funding with the strings attached because it is enabling them to do something that they believe is for the greater good.
This allows these big entities to shape society, if not public opinion, very quickly because almost all business and large scale Non profit work relies on these influxes of cash from these lenders and funders.
Years ago, I worked for a small non-profit that provided services to the homeless in Seattle. We were chronically short of funds and one day I asked the head of the organization why we didn't accept funding from Gates/Microsoft or Amazon. She told me something that makes total sense now: "We can't because if we did we would no longer be able to run our operation the way we want to. If we took their money, we would have to hire who they wanted and do what they wanted to do even if it was harmful to us or our clients."
Unfortunately, I don't know how we get rid of this system of money managers that can dictate the warping of the social fabric at a distance. All we can do is to encourage businesses and orgs to stop taking their money and not spending money on their products or donating money to them. I think this will pass eventually, but we will probably be fighting this in some form for awhile.
Thanks for your full reply. As you say, those like Jennifer Bilek have done all the investigatory work and shown how the money works. And I'm grateful for the details you gave, which I was aware of happening but there is this niggling set of questions I have. Excuse the length of this. We know the theory behind how this happens, but really, how is it happening on the ground, at the coal face? I'm never sure how it manifests in different countries and systems. How does the delusion keep feeding itself?
I was speaking to academic colleagues about this recently - the kind who burrow away for many decades and whole careers making advances which save lives all over the world and no one would apparently know their names. But many actually do and they are hugely respected in our fields. The older ones who stand for total academic rigor have been retiring and dying and there is something lost, but many aren't aware of exactly what that is. Many are very worried about standards, that have noticeably declined and it's hard to explain how or what happened. It's the purest form of the freedom of academic enquiry and buffeted by the total mess of academia, and the politicisation of our fields troubles many of us. The quality is missing. We also can't speak up as many lost funding, or our jobs even whole departments - that wasn't even over 'just' gender ('woke'?), but this amorphous 'change' which isn't clearly defined or defendable. Younger academics give up. And therefore very hard to pin down to defend against. It's got no basis. It's totally slippery - and just like all definitions of 'trans' which include anything and everything. It's maybe 'progressive' &/or 'profit' and the destruction of educational models. And laziness and not knowing what you don't know. The level of blithe ignorance is stunning. Chuck gender woo into that mix and it combusts. Is it that we've lost the few who would or could stand up, who knew any other way, to slow the march, or stop it, so it wasn't even in the room to start to do its damage? Then what, how do the few of us try to hold the ground?
I've worked across business, charity (your non-profit), government and academia with practice and application that translates worldwide so am not totally naive to how things get done. You do your due diligence and sometimes slightly hold your nose, you get brands or organisations to display their logos on your projects or policy, but if some good work, a public health measure succeeds, some robust research is produced, measures are introduced and literally lives are saved, then that's how I can live with it. That's part of the game we are forced to work within. But from the big Gates/BlackRock type picture, down to the individual doctors like above, there is no scrutiny, no caution, no one saying hang about a minute here, this directly contradicts our code of conduct. How is this escaping that? They are directly ignoring guidance and standards. They skirt the law. They ignore it all. All those layers that stand to catch these errors. No personal responsibility. How does that get squared away? The BMA, like this college, is a total joke. I have been troubled by things that are wrong and known diverted funds that every man and his dog knew were wasted or not put to good use, but this is a scale way above that. There are many layers between Gates/BlackRock, to the men shown above - who've all personally managed to carve a niche role that works for them on the ground - so the funding or funders is almost lost in all that - it benefits these men personally to fly this gender flag. With direct and indirect decisions to do so. They seem genuinely invested and no one, no manager, no senior, no external regulator or their professional body is challenging this. Where is their professional indemnity? Not enough colleagues are questioning. You'd be laughed at if you mentioned Gates. It's that regulatory capture or rather absence that allows this to happen. So, not the pushing of an agenda, but the deliberate gap of lack of accountability. A crime of omission. I'm trying to figure out what the detailed layers are.
I have sat in rooms, with those from big corporations and multinationals, who I was advised or needed to have in the meeting, or on the board or project working group. Often they did nothing - I did all the work. I was lucky they turned up, and it was a trick to have meetings in posh buildings with high status as then more bother to turn up to meetings. It was frustrating, but as long as they weren't overtly obstructive, or wasted time, it is how it is and there's often a lot of placeholders who 'represent' another organisation or group to 'liaise'. Sometimes you are genuinely left to get on with it which is ideal. They can help you network with others. You build relationships and you might get something useful from them at some point other than your salaries paid. It looks good for them. One had a link to funding from a big sports company (I was involved in health and we were trying to pull funding from all sources). Nationally important work done on a shoestring. I was on a very low salary for what I (the grand 'we') was trying to achieve yet that company had given them hundreds of thousands for one small project without the blink of an eye by tying it to a big sporting event. A pointless project, with no outcomes, no robust research happening. Hugely overstaffed, there are how many doing the equivalent of my role, but not, what do they do all day?! The total hypocrisy, of all that money, time, staff and every resource sloshing about was hard for me to cope with - there weren't enough hours in the day for me to juggle three roles in one and lots of people doing nothing getting credit. To keep fighting those vested interests is hard work. We rely on those genuinely motivated to keep plugging away in their fields so it doesn't all implode. So many I work with contribute their time voluntarily for the good of their professions - it's how these Royal Colleges work. Otherwise it's just a bunch of consultants vying for contracts. It's valued, but not. It's how most institutions function which is a little alarming when you realise. You get one or a few paid members of staff, then in effect volunteer professionals. Which is how so many fields are captured by vested interests - from student unions, to politics, to universities, to professional bodies, to whole sectors and industry advising government. And we all know this is happening.
And it's not just the money managers - I've worked in government and academia - this seems more. It's the ability for individuals in any field to look away and keep looking away. How, in practice, does that happen? If anyone of us sat with those men featured above, sat and chatted and explored their thinking, it would become apparent if we had enough time that their thinking was flawed, and more than that, real harm is being done because they are so wedded to that very flawed thinking. We have evidence of harm to counter their supposed 'evidence'. At what point does your conscience kick in. Who is holding them to account? The cognitive dissonance must be extraordinary for those 'nice' men to continue to believe they are 'nice men' who are fulfilling their job roles 'helping' others. Saviour complexes? Narcissism? How can they be so far from 'do no harm' yet can dissemble enough to escape censure? They can't all be related to a 'trans' child.
Thank you for J Bilek's name... I was at work typing surreptitiously and for the life of me could not remember her name and didn't have time to seek it..
Thank you also for the detailed reply. You give a lot of food for thought. You point out a interesting thing that we all should keep in mind, that the world is run by those who show up. I think that is how so many were blindsided by this- because they either didn't think there were any issues to have to deal with because everything appeared to be running smoothly, or they were too busy doing real work to attend the meetings that heralded this moment.
I think most 'nice men' (and women) simply wish to have the optics of being percieved to be nice and will adopt a certain perfunctory 'niceness', adopting whatever the cause du jour is current. I'm not sure many even have cognitive dissonance. They say and do 'X' because it is the price of business or 'the right thing to do' and it doesn't really cross their minds that they are perpetuating harm. This is then, in turn reinforced by their organization and their social bubble. There is also a certain compartmentalization that has prevented this from being examined for so long. When I first tried talking to people about this in 2015 most people thought it was a 'gay' thing* so it just didn't compute for them. The ones who could articulate their thoughts on it would say something,"Well that's a gay/LBGT issue, It's not my business." They thought they were being nice by being tolerant and accepting and there the thought stopped.
As for the diminishment of academic excellence- that's been ongoing a long time. It's hard to believe there was a time that people read 'classics' for entertainment- even my bumpkin relatives on my dad's side played fairly sophisticated word games to amuse themselves and cited what is now literature that no one reads anymore. My education in the 70's was still far superior to what my child received in the 00's. This could correlate with the rise of mass media in the form of TV and now computers (at least radio still required an imagination and frame of reference) and a loss of the ability to concentrate on one thing for long periods. I'm not sure how to solve that one. I was at a laundry the other day and everyone was sitting there-even kids- glued to phones. IMO, The current malaise owes a lot to screen hypnosis and the constant positive reinforcement of the dopamine hit. Add some not too savory folk controlling the algorithms and suddenly you have a bunch of people who get warm fuzzies for all the wrong reasons and no amount of explaining or truth is going to change it. There are similarities to cult think, but also to addiction. Philip Dick had one of his characters joke about 'Crash Day', an imagined event where everyone on the West Coast ran out of drugs on the same day and went in to withdrawl at the same time. Nowadays, all it would take is an EMP event to send everyone buggy. Being thrust back into reality is going to be very harsh, but to also quote Dick- "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, does not go away." Go Team Reality!
*Still a lot of men out there who also perceive this as a 'feminist' thing and shut down thought accordingly...
This is exactly what I mean when I say that I can’t understand how so many people appear to be captured. I understand the money behind it, the transhumanists, big pharma etc. t Also its the prefect cover for predators, paedophiles and men who just want to be openly misogynistic. What puzzles me are the people falling for it all, especially the women who are giving away our rights.
I heard a woman from Iran interviewed and she said something that terrified me: a small, determined group of people can overturn society. That’s what happened in Iran. The Islamist’s took over buy doing things under the radar, glomming onto anti-shah activism, and appealing to the majority’s more moderate religiousness and abusing their trust. Next thing you know, dress codes and morality police.
Yes indeed, it’s an old idea and it is terrifying. It relies on people being controlled through fear which is exactly what’s happening. We must keep talking to people to try and wake them up …regardless of the names we’re likely to get called.
Wow. Just, WOW.
People who ought to know better have lost the thread completely over and over again.
It's some kind of weird "born again" faith, says an old ex born again, who ought to know.
"Have you been baptized in the blood of the surgeon's blade?--- Nothing less than TOTAL IMMERSION will do--- "
Thank you Rebecca. Gendered Effin Stupidity yet again. And the 'new gender services'. Just like the old 'gender services' then. This lot will not give up without being forced out. Every one with any influence - and if they work with patients, that's every one of them. The word 'trust' is used again and again in their blether. It stuns me that supposedly intelligent people pass lots of exams to be allowed into the hallowed halls of medicine, needing to rely on evidence, logic, facts and the scientific method, to then propagate nonsense based on something something 'feelings'. How do they balance that piknmix approach? Telling a child to use whichever loo they like is encouraging them to be totally selfish, onanistic, narcissistic, disrespectul and to ignore all societal norms and laws, let alone their peers, as they somehow know better. How to mess up a child. Because a 'trusted' adult told them they not only could but should. It's revolting and is abusive. These men are authority figures, with undue influence, directly contravening guidance and Cass. Reified? So what, they don't agree? Based on what? We have to stop every one of these deluded activists. Where the hell are professional standards? Child protection and safety? It's vile.
Word! I love the eloquence & passion.. it’s only with this kind of clear, unequivocal & downright arsey attitude that we’ll have any chance of getting rid of this cretinous insanity. Where the actual fuck are the supposedly ‘trusted’ news organisations (yes you, @BBC) that should be reporting on this stuff? Not a squeak on the WPATH Files; limp, tepid ‘if we must’ single sentences on Cass. How can they all be claiming “nothing to see here” when the elephant in this particular room is so enormous you could see it from space…?
I really want to see these creatures in court and being asked to explain themselves.
I’m sure they will be brought to justice for something or some behaviour-I swear it’s just a matter of time.
Let's hope it's soon.
As a trans widow who collects the only data in the world on women who divorced suddenly demanding, crossdressing men, I've been contacted several times now by confused teens. They find me because of the videos on my channel explaining that Piaget's first stage of child development (sensory motor, birth - 3) doesn't work together with "wrong body from birth." As Richie Herron says, we who have been hurt by their cult have to do the work of the professionals, as they've abdicated.
So, I currently offer observations to "Paul" who thinks maybe his left hand and face are female. For the first time in 2 years running my channel, Trans Widow Ute Heggen, I got that blue box from Trevor Project, warning about "conversion therapy." If they think suggesting 8 hours of sleep, limited time online, a break from gaming and eating healthy is "conversion therapy," they have a lot of work ahead.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDNnXPaqSaI
I hate those Nanny Blue Boxes. Most of them cite Wikipedia which is no proof of anything at all, really.
The American Academy of Pediatrics has been captured, too.
Thank you for covering this. I despair at members of the medical profession who ignore the lack of evidence and dare to accuse the likes of Dr Cass of being biased....
BTW, "RCP" generally means "Royal College of Physicians" - while not entirely free of the gender cult, it is a separate organisation from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, so the headline should say "RCPCH".
Yes we’ll correct this.
Thank you for shining a light on this, Rebecca Says No. It’s truly sobering to read how the TRAs (and the moneyed men behind the scenes) managed to infiltrate the RCP and other bodies of import so effectively.
Wasn’t it said that once they invaded women’s prisons, they knew the sky was the limit… 😮 😤
Thanks, Rebecca. Another captured professional body!!
Have cross posted
https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/brooklyn
Dusty
These doctors are not really doctors they are clowns pretending to be doctors. Our children are apparently not safe anymore. Just like the medical profession went mad during covid and joined in the general lying to us, they seem intent on making sure we completely lose our respect for them and have to learn to be self sufficient and visit the doctor as little as possible and take their advice with a grain of salt.
On another scary related topic -normalizing pedophiles - by calling them Maps-Minor attracted
Persons.
https://fackel.substack.com/p/were-humans-too-pedophiles-in-germany?
https://substack.com/home/post/p-150626396
Scary is right, Hele… It’s like saying murderers are death fan/observers.
On close look some of those badges on on the paediatrician's lanyard are very dodgy.