By "women" they mean trans-identified males who ID as women and sleep with other men, innit? Ain't π science - just queer theory BS verbal diarrhea.
More likely I think to be trans id women who expect gay men to want to sleep with them because theyβve removed their breasts and have facial hair, and this is the fu**ing disgusting lie theyβve been sold.
Remember that blog written by young girl who had transitioned and gone to a party with gay men expecting to be lauded, and she was ignored at best, mocked at worst. She hid in the loo crying. Sold a lie.
Or the TIF who went to a naked gay baths/sauna with her trans-masc boobs & male vageegee and got chucked out. As she should. Not that the Gs would necessarily see the double standards, us being just "fish" n"all.
Nah, Bonerwall would refer to them as "(transgender) men" and I don't think there's ever been an issue with actual real females donating blood (although if they've been pregnant, it could be fatal to a male recipient. Or some such). So no, they mean gay guys like PeniSleaze, Erasure Faye, Bergbarf, etc.
Exactly but when the almighty pink-pound Boxer brigade, as opposed to the Cotton, don't get rape/death-threatened with barbed-wire baseball bats. And that's quite enough *B* alliteration for a Thursday night, innit? π€£ππ€£ππ€£
Hi, Brett. I tried to find the piece, but it was quite a while ago. You might check out feministcurrent.com and contact Meghan Murphy to see if she can access it. It caused a lot of discussion with some defensive gay men getting very angry. But when you consider that few of us are totally homo- or heterosexual, and when you understand that sexual violence is mostly about power and control, it doesn't seem so unimaginable. Sorry I couldn't find the essay.
Expect to see this framed as an "attack" on trans people by the likes of Owen Jones and Pink News. Everything is SO dramatic with them. No one believes trans people will suddenly have the same rights as we all have taken away, it just means these govt bodies and organisations will be implementing policies that use the Equality Act as guidance, and not Stonewall.
Anything that isn't total capitulation's framed as an attack or transphobic. Luckily, most people aren't falling for it any more. What I found really interesting, is the lack of concern for the death of Leeze Lawrence. I was expecting certain people to weaponise it, but the usual suspects were suspiciously quiet. I guess that even they had second thoughts about using the death of such an unpleasant individual to beat Terfs over the head with.
I suspect, yet to be confirmed, that there will be little to weaponise about Leeze's death once the facts are known. This was a person with an extensive history of drug usage.
I replied to Duncan to explain that itβll just be about when gay men get really drunk and women take advantage of them. Weβve all done it, am I right ladies? Guys like Mr Menno shouldnβt be so damn cute. Itβs such a relief to know that I will now be able to donate blood again.
From what I've seen, it now means heterosexuals who want to pretend they are part of an oppressed group. Didn't you know that everyone in the U.S. is oppressed, particularly if they are white, male, and straight? (And Republican.)
The reckoning has arrived. GB News are are like a dog with a bone over this. The house of cards is about to collapse so go stock up on plenty of beer and popcorn π
By "women" they mean trans-identified males who ID as women and sleep with other men, innit? Ain't π science - just queer theory BS verbal diarrhea.
More likely I think to be trans id women who expect gay men to want to sleep with them because theyβve removed their breasts and have facial hair, and this is the fu**ing disgusting lie theyβve been sold.
Remember that blog written by young girl who had transitioned and gone to a party with gay men expecting to be lauded, and she was ignored at best, mocked at worst. She hid in the loo crying. Sold a lie.
Or the TIF who went to a naked gay baths/sauna with her trans-masc boobs & male vageegee and got chucked out. As she should. Not that the Gs would necessarily see the double standards, us being just "fish" n"all.
I'm guessing those gay men weren't inundated with death and rape threats for not being inclusive.
How gullible do you have to be to think that gay men would want to have sex with vaginas? This post-modern BS is melting the brains of young people.
But surely Stonewall are counting them as men since, ahem, trans men *are* men. π
Nah, Bonerwall would refer to them as "(transgender) men" and I don't think there's ever been an issue with actual real females donating blood (although if they've been pregnant, it could be fatal to a male recipient. Or some such). So no, they mean gay guys like PeniSleaze, Erasure Faye, Bergbarf, etc.
Bergbarf... lol. Mean, but funny.
Boxer ceiling!
Exactly but when the almighty pink-pound Boxer brigade, as opposed to the Cotton, don't get rape/death-threatened with barbed-wire baseball bats. And that's quite enough *B* alliteration for a Thursday night, innit? π€£ππ€£ππ€£
You say that with humor... but I ran across the term being used with no irony whatsoever recently.
Took me a few moments to untangle this statement. The language is so dense it's easy to miss that it claims that gay men have sex with women.
Organisations are cutting ties with SW coincides with SW cutting ties with reality.
Feminist Current had a thread about women being sexually harassed and assaulted by gay men, and it apparently is not a rare event.
I'd be interested to read that Susan, if you have a link (assuming it's publicly viewable)?
Hi, Brett. I tried to find the piece, but it was quite a while ago. You might check out feministcurrent.com and contact Meghan Murphy to see if she can access it. It caused a lot of discussion with some defensive gay men getting very angry. But when you consider that few of us are totally homo- or heterosexual, and when you understand that sexual violence is mostly about power and control, it doesn't seem so unimaginable. Sorry I couldn't find the essay.
The priests in school always said there was no such thing as gay and stonewall has proved him right..
This is huge
"Exodus over transgender advice continues as Government pulls out of Stonewall diversity training"
https://archive.is/VYxZ9
Expect to see this framed as an "attack" on trans people by the likes of Owen Jones and Pink News. Everything is SO dramatic with them. No one believes trans people will suddenly have the same rights as we all have taken away, it just means these govt bodies and organisations will be implementing policies that use the Equality Act as guidance, and not Stonewall.
Anything that isn't total capitulation's framed as an attack or transphobic. Luckily, most people aren't falling for it any more. What I found really interesting, is the lack of concern for the death of Leeze Lawrence. I was expecting certain people to weaponise it, but the usual suspects were suspiciously quiet. I guess that even they had second thoughts about using the death of such an unpleasant individual to beat Terfs over the head with.
I suspect, yet to be confirmed, that there will be little to weaponise about Leeze's death once the facts are known. This was a person with an extensive history of drug usage.
They don't normally let pesky facts get in the way of blaming Terfs for something ;)
They are beyond contempt. A complete betrayal of LGB community. Talk about Wolves in sheepβs clothing.
I replied to Duncan to explain that itβll just be about when gay men get really drunk and women take advantage of them. Weβve all done it, am I right ladies? Guys like Mr Menno shouldnβt be so damn cute. Itβs such a relief to know that I will now be able to donate blood again.
?!
So what does queer mean, according to SW? Is blue hair a must?
From what I've seen, it now means heterosexuals who want to pretend they are part of an oppressed group. Didn't you know that everyone in the U.S. is oppressed, particularly if they are white, male, and straight? (And Republican.)
That umbrella that Stonewall has created would make Noah jealous.
The reckoning has arrived. GB News are are like a dog with a bone over this. The house of cards is about to collapse so go stock up on plenty of beer and popcorn π
I naively thought they meant women who sleep with men who've ever had sex with men.
No one replied with 'You ok, hun?... I am disappointed... π Word soup would indicate that they are far from alright... π±
Did the definition of "gay" change when I wasn't looking?
The comments under Stonewall's original tweet are priceless.