34 Comments

By "women" they mean trans-identified males who ID as women and sleep with other men, innit? Ain't 🚀 science - just queer theory BS verbal diarrhea.

Expand full comment

More likely I think to be trans id women who expect gay men to want to sleep with them because they’ve removed their breasts and have facial hair, and this is the fu**ing disgusting lie they’ve been sold.

Expand full comment

Remember that blog written by young girl who had transitioned and gone to a party with gay men expecting to be lauded, and she was ignored at best, mocked at worst. She hid in the loo crying. Sold a lie.

Expand full comment

Or the TIF who went to a naked gay baths/sauna with her trans-masc boobs & male vageegee and got chucked out. As she should. Not that the Gs would necessarily see the double standards, us being just "fish" n"all.

Expand full comment

I'm guessing those gay men weren't inundated with death and rape threats for not being inclusive.

Expand full comment

How gullible do you have to be to think that gay men would want to have sex with vaginas? This post-modern BS is melting the brains of young people.

Expand full comment

But surely Stonewall are counting them as men since, ahem, trans men *are* men. 🙃

Expand full comment

Nah, Bonerwall would refer to them as "(transgender) men" and I don't think there's ever been an issue with actual real females donating blood (although if they've been pregnant, it could be fatal to a male recipient. Or some such). So no, they mean gay guys like PeniSleaze, Erasure Faye, Bergbarf, etc.

Expand full comment

Bergbarf... lol. Mean, but funny.

Expand full comment

Boxer ceiling!

Expand full comment

Exactly but when the almighty pink-pound Boxer brigade, as opposed to the Cotton, don't get rape/death-threatened with barbed-wire baseball bats. And that's quite enough *B* alliteration for a Thursday night, innit? 🤣😂🤣😂🤣

Expand full comment

You say that with humor... but I ran across the term being used with no irony whatsoever recently.

Expand full comment

Took me a few moments to untangle this statement. The language is so dense it's easy to miss that it claims that gay men have sex with women.

Expand full comment

Organisations are cutting ties with SW coincides with SW cutting ties with reality.

Expand full comment

Feminist Current had a thread about women being sexually harassed and assaulted by gay men, and it apparently is not a rare event.

Expand full comment

I'd be interested to read that Susan, if you have a link (assuming it's publicly viewable)?

Expand full comment

Hi, Brett. I tried to find the piece, but it was quite a while ago. You might check out feministcurrent.com and contact Meghan Murphy to see if she can access it. It caused a lot of discussion with some defensive gay men getting very angry. But when you consider that few of us are totally homo- or heterosexual, and when you understand that sexual violence is mostly about power and control, it doesn't seem so unimaginable. Sorry I couldn't find the essay.

Expand full comment

The priests in school always said there was no such thing as gay and stonewall has proved him right..

Expand full comment

This is huge

"Exodus over transgender advice continues as Government pulls out of Stonewall diversity training"

https://archive.is/VYxZ9

Expand full comment

Expect to see this framed as an "attack" on trans people by the likes of Owen Jones and Pink News. Everything is SO dramatic with them. No one believes trans people will suddenly have the same rights as we all have taken away, it just means these govt bodies and organisations will be implementing policies that use the Equality Act as guidance, and not Stonewall.

Expand full comment

Anything that isn't total capitulation's framed as an attack or transphobic. Luckily, most people aren't falling for it any more. What I found really interesting, is the lack of concern for the death of Leeze Lawrence. I was expecting certain people to weaponise it, but the usual suspects were suspiciously quiet. I guess that even they had second thoughts about using the death of such an unpleasant individual to beat Terfs over the head with.

Expand full comment

I suspect, yet to be confirmed, that there will be little to weaponise about Leeze's death once the facts are known. This was a person with an extensive history of drug usage.

Expand full comment

They don't normally let pesky facts get in the way of blaming Terfs for something ;)

Expand full comment

They are beyond contempt. A complete betrayal of LGB community. Talk about Wolves in sheep’s clothing.

Expand full comment

I replied to Duncan to explain that it’ll just be about when gay men get really drunk and women take advantage of them. We’ve all done it, am I right ladies? Guys like Mr Menno shouldn’t be so damn cute. It’s such a relief to know that I will now be able to donate blood again.

Expand full comment

?!

Expand full comment

So what does queer mean, according to SW? Is blue hair a must?

Expand full comment

From what I've seen, it now means heterosexuals who want to pretend they are part of an oppressed group. Didn't you know that everyone in the U.S. is oppressed, particularly if they are white, male, and straight? (And Republican.)

Expand full comment

That umbrella that Stonewall has created would make Noah jealous.

Expand full comment

The reckoning has arrived. GB News are are like a dog with a bone over this. The house of cards is about to collapse so go stock up on plenty of beer and popcorn 😁

Expand full comment

I naively thought they meant women who sleep with men who've ever had sex with men.

Expand full comment

No one replied with 'You ok, hun?... I am disappointed... 😂 Word soup would indicate that they are far from alright... 😱

Expand full comment

Did the definition of "gay" change when I wasn't looking?

Expand full comment

The comments under Stonewall's original tweet are priceless.

Expand full comment