Also, look who’s giving advice to AppleCoreKatie! Norfolk police might like to know that Tony/Steven/Stephanie himself was behind the first complaint and we are currently pursuing him for costs after his case against me was unceremoniously struck out
I am annoyed that these TRAs are not labelled as vexatious by the police and treated as such. They waste police time and tax payer money. After all the police seem very willing to ignore women.
I think the Police have been infiltrated by a mind-altering being that over rules ‘ordinary’ crimes and gives blue-light treatment for anything it perceives is attacking it.
I can't even fathom the mental state of these cretins, wanting to report people to the police for views and opinions expressed on social fucking media. What a world eh.
CONTENT DEACTIVATED –WHY? Mmmn did you mention the book she had taken!
@quetiapina1
"When my house was raided, it has come to my attention that a BOOK was taken by the police. A book edited by Heather Brunskell-Evans on GC children. It was crammed with my notes. MY THINKING IS BEING INVESTIGATED- not things, not materials, not actions my actual thinking."
The razor blades libel
Police, journalists and trans activists join forces to smear feminists with a disgusting, dangerous lie
search the... glinner update.
Katie2
Reply to sianrosierose
Hi Sian, Could you please remove the reference to Glinner's blogpost because it contains defamatory information about me.
I did not remove my comment... the wales online deactivated it!
Some platforms and people handle this very differently. Who knows why some removal of content is happening, who it protects or attempts or purports to protect.
Some platforms delete first. It's who gets to the report button first. Sometimes it's anyone reporting or using any key words or names, so to be cautious content is removed. One report or an organised attempt to mass report. It's a pity some content is removed and other content remains freely and happily present despite being open to question, clearly threatening or genuinely, objectively, to the common man, hateful, defamatory or open to being thought of as such. To side with one commenter over another seems partisan, but if it names someone and that online identity can be linked to a real life person or their identity, that might be another category, so before any facts are established it's removed. Despite that person openly identifying themselves and their personal details online.
We know that content moderation is sometimes highly suspect and entire threads, sites or forums disappear if something is deemed ‘transphobic’, which is almost meaningless as dogs, cats and cheese-eating is declared hateful and ‘-phobic’.
That you referenced another site (that was allegedly defamatory), rather than any comment you made yourself about any individual seems a little weak. But perhaps WOL site is now realising (or they are being advised) how they waded into some contentious areas? They might not want to be the middleman.
That you were thanked in a reply to you, despite not removing it yourself, with someone with a similar name to another online profile name? Yes, that might lead you to perhaps conclude it was the same person named in recent content in 'Glinner's blogpost' :-)
It strikes me that most people are easy going and don’t report stuff. The fact that trans activists are so obsessed / litigious / active with this is because it exposes their weak arguments and they know it. They use dodgy tactics to control any ‘wrong’ reactions and shut critics down. They get hysterical and more controlling if they don’t get their way and behave like children - toys out of the pram stuff and all that. Using bullying tactics, emotional blackmail and the law to back them makes their position look worse, especially now it is becoming ‘transparently’ obvious the law / police have been infiltrated by trans activists and those who do not comply will be punished.
I think is an abuse of police powers. A certain group are using the Police for their own purposes and persecuting / prosecuting people they don’t like. The police are being used by Hayden, Paisley etc as a shield to hide behind while they carry out their vindictive and vexatious actions against anyone who disagrees with them. The Police are protecting them; the question is - is it deliberate, or are they unwittingly being used? Their own policies show they’ve adopted Stonewall’s strategy. That suggests the Police will be biased.
Probably reported for thought crimes. That absolute linebacker of a TIM Stephanie/Steven/Tony is so vexatious I'm sure they cringe and probably laugh everytime he comes around around with complaints.
"Norfolk police might like to know ..." The problem with that is they would be required to do a little research and research doesn't seem to be their strong suit.
I am annoyed that these TRAs are not labelled as vexatious by the police and treated as such. They waste police time and tax payer money. After all the police seem very willing to ignore women.
"Adult Human Feline" and cat ears is beyond on the nose. One of those guys that's only in it for the trolling.
100% wouldn't even be trans if twitter didn't exist because no one in his village would give a shit either way.
Reported you to Norfolk police for what exactly? I don't supposed they'll have the good grace to tell you.
I think the Police have been infiltrated by a mind-altering being that over rules ‘ordinary’ crimes and gives blue-light treatment for anything it perceives is attacking it.
They never let the truth get in the way.
Petition to Gwent police
https://citizengo.org/en-gb/ot/206091-tell-gwent-police-use-common-sense?tcid=95350847
Clicked link but just kept getting error msg...is it just me?
Looks like the website is down. Hope it is not a malicious attack.
I can't even fathom the mental state of these cretins, wanting to report people to the police for views and opinions expressed on social fucking media. What a world eh.
sianrosierose
CONTENT DEACTIVATED –WHY? Mmmn did you mention the book she had taken!
@quetiapina1
"When my house was raided, it has come to my attention that a BOOK was taken by the police. A book edited by Heather Brunskell-Evans on GC children. It was crammed with my notes. MY THINKING IS BEING INVESTIGATED- not things, not materials, not actions my actual thinking."
The razor blades libel
Police, journalists and trans activists join forces to smear feminists with a disgusting, dangerous lie
search the... glinner update.
Katie2
Reply to sianrosierose
Hi Sian, Could you please remove the reference to Glinner's blogpost because it contains defamatory information about me.
I did not remove my comment... the wales online deactivated it!
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/woman-arrested-abusive-posters-city-22877509?__vfz=medium%3Demail_notification#comments-wrapper
Is this "AppleCoreKatie" ?
Some platforms and people handle this very differently. Who knows why some removal of content is happening, who it protects or attempts or purports to protect.
Some platforms delete first. It's who gets to the report button first. Sometimes it's anyone reporting or using any key words or names, so to be cautious content is removed. One report or an organised attempt to mass report. It's a pity some content is removed and other content remains freely and happily present despite being open to question, clearly threatening or genuinely, objectively, to the common man, hateful, defamatory or open to being thought of as such. To side with one commenter over another seems partisan, but if it names someone and that online identity can be linked to a real life person or their identity, that might be another category, so before any facts are established it's removed. Despite that person openly identifying themselves and their personal details online.
We know that content moderation is sometimes highly suspect and entire threads, sites or forums disappear if something is deemed ‘transphobic’, which is almost meaningless as dogs, cats and cheese-eating is declared hateful and ‘-phobic’.
That you referenced another site (that was allegedly defamatory), rather than any comment you made yourself about any individual seems a little weak. But perhaps WOL site is now realising (or they are being advised) how they waded into some contentious areas? They might not want to be the middleman.
That you were thanked in a reply to you, despite not removing it yourself, with someone with a similar name to another online profile name? Yes, that might lead you to perhaps conclude it was the same person named in recent content in 'Glinner's blogpost' :-)
Oh what a tangled web we weave…
Of course it is!
Well it might have been an 'alter' as we/us/they/themming is all the rage now ;-)
It strikes me that most people are easy going and don’t report stuff. The fact that trans activists are so obsessed / litigious / active with this is because it exposes their weak arguments and they know it. They use dodgy tactics to control any ‘wrong’ reactions and shut critics down. They get hysterical and more controlling if they don’t get their way and behave like children - toys out of the pram stuff and all that. Using bullying tactics, emotional blackmail and the law to back them makes their position look worse, especially now it is becoming ‘transparently’ obvious the law / police have been infiltrated by trans activists and those who do not comply will be punished.
I think is an abuse of police powers. A certain group are using the Police for their own purposes and persecuting / prosecuting people they don’t like. The police are being used by Hayden, Paisley etc as a shield to hide behind while they carry out their vindictive and vexatious actions against anyone who disagrees with them. The Police are protecting them; the question is - is it deliberate, or are they unwittingly being used? Their own policies show they’ve adopted Stonewall’s strategy. That suggests the Police will be biased.
That means society has a problem. Trans activism has rooted itself within the Police & other bodies and has deployed its “No debate” strategy.
Probably reported for thought crimes. That absolute linebacker of a TIM Stephanie/Steven/Tony is so vexatious I'm sure they cringe and probably laugh everytime he comes around around with complaints.
In other news: "Burglaries go unpunished with only 5% of cases solved." (Times)
Well you can't be out solving burglaries and checking people's thoughts at the same time. These are tough choices.
This is what we are dealing with as far as the police and their attitudes to women go:
https://www.gbnews.uk/news/met-police-officers-racist-sexist-and-homophobic-messages-from-whatsapp-group-chat-revealed/217608
"Norfolk police might like to know ..." The problem with that is they would be required to do a little research and research doesn't seem to be their strong suit.