This week trans-identified male and gender activist, Sam Brinton, has been accused of a second luggage theft and faces another felony charge. Recent events mean that Brinton, hitherto the they/them du jour of US politics, is having to deal with some media scrutiny. Given the influence he seems to wield at the highest levels, this scrutiny is, perhaps, long overdue.
Oh JL. Thank you. This is a corker! A second theft, why surely not. This looks like a teensy tiny bit of a pattern now, even a waveform pattern of stealing and breaking boundaries...then stealing and breaking boundaries...then...and all in plain view with everyone being told to look the other way and cancelled for raising eyebrows. Ripley's Believe It or Not! It's hard to credit it's happening and been allowed to unfold as it has.
A while back this all reminded me of men stealing our underwear from washing lines or communal washing facilities, making dirty phone calls (heavy breathing, threats, filthy language or the silent ones). All that pent up frustration, vitriol, force, control and coercion. The weird sense of being followed, stared at or then harassed in the street. You know, we all know. Boundary breaking. Often accepted as 'just part of life'. They're all still at, down through the generations but this lot have been lauded and applauded.
Are those unfortunate women supposed to take back their fouled clothes? I hope they at least make him give the owners cold hard cash to replace them. I'd burn mine.
Thanks Susan, that particular thing has not been a problem for me for a fair few decades now and with modern mobile numbers it doesn't seem to happen any longer. It's much easier to block and divert unwanted calls. It's the style of harassment that seems to have changed, and their platforms, not their motivations or ability to do it. Like water, they find a way. Men have this whole online world to harass, pillory and track us through now.
I'm keen that we download the monitor that alerts us to unknown tracking (devices) nearby - I guess that's the modern version of a whistle or horn by the phone. You know, those small (often coin sized) devices (Apple etc) that some bright spark marketed that can be hidden in our cars, dropped in our coat pockets, our bags...or the tracking devices that are our mobile phones themselves :-(
We don't have to be, that's what's so chilling. Read accounts of women who've usually known 'something' was up, felt they were going mad, then realised or discovered the extent of the surveillance. Track your own luggage ladies, track your luggage! ;-)
In the days before everyone did it for everything, I could always tell when and which sites men had looked at when they'd been googling me and it was all so bloody obvious it was sometimes hard to keep a straight face. Oh but you mentioned X or Y, and that time you were in Rome. Erm no, no I didn't (oh but that's the fourth entry down for one of my digital twins). They also thought I enjoyed hobbies as they'd read about 'me' so I could even tell which search terms they'd used and from when. Spooky huh.
As a Biological Psychologist, I think there's something very disturbing about this. I'm concerned about what this is doing to women and girls, and gay people who are not among the outlandish. Again, as a psychologist, I'm pretty convinced that this is not about being trans as much as it is about normalizing ostentatious, intrusive, and bad behavior. Interestingly, a lot of heterosexual people are into "kink". However, you will notice that they don't display it in public, or expose children to it. That's really the difference.
Pushing the boundaries seems to be their vicious and vile way of forcing females to kow tow to them. I really do not think that most even believe they are women (I don't mean the sex offenders who decide to 'trans' so that they can have an easier time in the female prison estate and perv on females at the same time) but pretend to do so in order to play out a hate fest against females. There has to be a deep resentment, hatred even, of all women and girls, and it is scary in its intensity and for the fact that it has become mainstream. Control is often their watchword, although they seldom see it like that. I am often shocked at the comments of some men when a journalist has written something about women's lives. They always revert to: yes, but what about us as if they are raped, beaten, forced into a gender stereotype that curtails and stultifies their lives. These comments are very often patronising and vicious, too. At my age now, I am just starting to get a grip on how much some men - not all, by any means - resent and hate us for being what we were born to be - women. What is it they think we have that they are denied? Is it that they want to control and humiliate us to the point where we are mere slaves, especially sex slaves and second rate humans? I really don't get their reasoning. Does your average man-in-the-street understand how crushing that is for us, to be viewed as something put on this Earth for man's pleasure, man's control and punch-bag?
One or two of these men in positions of power provides a facilitator for others. The slow eradication of women from positions of power, sport, everyday life has begun. We desperately need to help of decent men. It's time to acknowledge we can't do this alone. We need men to speak out in numbers.
To be fair, majority of men at least know they are not women and respect women's spaces, dont want to look like a big grownup baby with jam all over his face, claim to be 'special' aka 'non binary' because they like wearing dresses theyve nicked from rich women and shagging both sexes {or so he says} cos theyre not fussed as long as it involves dog masks. Altho I could be wrong about that - Glinner wots your take on this haha
There appears to be a big overlap between transwomen and general fetishists. Not enough just to be trans...you need to be into BDSM, diapers, furry suits and in the case of SB it seems auto erotic asphyxiation. Not to mention paedophilia, bestiality etc. Has any work been done on this?
This is a very interesting comment, with which I agree. The topic is outside of my area of expertise. However, I'm sure there is data on this. I know that Doctor Debra Soh works in this area. You can find her easily on the web.
Everytime I see articles like this I hope and pray that these despicable excuses for human beings wake up anyone who, by some miracle, remain unaware of the psychopathy of these men who've gone rogue.
Because the morons at the APA (American Psychologists Association) agreed that it wasn't mental illness. In exchange for what, I wonder? Because any reasonably intelligent person can see that IT IS.
We need a whole series on the jiggery-pokery that goes on to get things in or out of the formularies and diagnostic 'manuals'. Once you know, you know, but it astonishes me how incurious and blithely trusting so many people are.
This is what is called succesor ideology: A reasonable view is made unreasonable, taken too far, taken to the extreme. It makes the person thinking these things feel like a liberator, a destroyer of oppression. They really see boundaries as oppression, prudence is repression, restraint is oppression, patience is oppression. This is how doctors and parents get turned into monsters.
There are two people I just cannot look at, or listen to. Literally. I cannot do it. Jeffrey Marsh and Sam Brinton. Both are severely damaged men who, instead of healing themselves, have chosen to inflict that damage on the rest of the world.
I don't care what people do in private with consenting adults (providing it is legal). But I do not want to see it in public at Pride Parades, in the streets etc. And I do not want to be forced to CELEBRATE frankly weird and gross preferences like BDSM, golden showers, diapers, furry suits etc. Neither do I think that society as a whole should and the tax payer fund people's kinks. What next? Should we celebrate people picking their noses, defecating in public? Incidentally SB appears to be into auto erotic asphyxiation - a rather dangerous practice.
I would not want them back and if I was reunited with them, burn them, even very treasured objects. Let's hope there weren't any shoes in there, we know what these nutcases use them for, and how they view people and children as objects to meet their fetishes. 'Personal items', eurgh.
I am fond of reusing and recycling but this is all part of their boundary breaking fetish. Once you've been invaded it's often very hard to view things or places or people in the same light. I know people who've moved houses and even totally out of towns and countries to leave some awful experiences behind. Some who've had to for their physical safety and sanity. Trust is broken and all those who allowed, promoted and protected this silly and nasty man are culpable.
You might be amused at this: I knew the selectwoman in a nearby town who said the history of her town (Troy, Maine) was the history of people moving their houses to another part of their land to get away from their neighbors! It's amazing how many buildings were moved in the days before power equipment and gasoline.
I think she'll be ok with shopping vouchers for same value and quality plus compensation for inconvenience and loss of dignity ..... Nah but seriously you'd want more than full brand reimbursement. You'd want to see remorse but maybe be glad someone so selfish and dangerously narcissistic has been removed from his post and subject to the criminal law like anyone else.
.......along with a proper enquiry into those who appointed him to be in charge of managing nuclear waste ffs (since he cant even manage to nick a woman's bag properly!) If that isn't professional negligence then not sure what is.
It feels like there should be a sexual element to part of his criminal offence. They need to have looked for semen on the clothes- I wonder if they did?
Entirely likely. So, what was the purpose of you stealing those cases Sam? How likely is he to be telling the complete truth now. He is a fantasist and likes to break boundaries. He also believes himself to be fighting some superior cause for something and his own privilege. Not a great combination, and this is the thing about boundary breakers, where is the line for what they deem is acceptable when that's the whole point, they get off on the thrill of knowing they break them and others knowing they break them. He sees his sexual kinks as some kind of civil rights movement which Stonewall and others have strangely mixed up with gay rights and TQ. Pride in wearing women's knickers, who cares if the woman who owns them is unaware you stole them. A spritz of her perfume, looking through her personal belongings. It was nasty TERFs that left him with no other option because of our bigotry. We women are here to serve their needs and it's all about them.
What would he do if there were no consequences for anything, which really seems how many of these men think and then they are allowed to, despite those ones who are caught and end up in prison. They then continue their 'fight' for 'freedom' to be their 'true selves'.
When he got caught, he hadn't even checked luggage. You'd think someone doing something that risky would cover themselves by having "Oh I picked the wrong bag up" as an excuse if necessary.
He was very confident he wouldn't need the excuse and I'd bet good money it was because he'd stolen bags many, many times before, this was just the first time he's been caught. Or the first time he was caught and it wasn't brushed under the rug by his employer.
Of course he was. This man and his ilk live in cognitive dissonance land and there's always a justification and excuse ready for everything. It must be very strange to push and push and push, have literally no barriers, no challenge, your path eased, then get encouraged and promoted further than your wildest dreams, passing security clearance after clearance, managing to be invited in to 'educate' students and then held up in front of the whole nation and world as the best possible version of a citizen who represents the best of the best. How would he know when to stop? Who would tell him? Who would he listen to? He's been doing what he likes for a while and being beatifically smiled at and indulged. Anyone not in total agreement has been pilloried. Now he's crashing. I suspect with many soft landings prepared. It's very odd, like they were grooming him to be the 'poster they' of whatever Queer Theory identifies as this week within the administration itself. Grooming is wearing down your boundaries and sometimes playing a very long game. The past seven years every media outlet, charity, 'project', sleb narcissist and government department promoting this man has been doing exactly that to the public.
But of course. Surgically enhanced receding hairline, testicles, fake left tit and hormone-induced right tit doesn't scan as well as spectacles, testicles, wallet and watch. It's funny, I was about to ramblingly say he clearly thinks he's higher than a higher body but thought I should stop there.
Listening to someone discussing the current range of arrests and executions in Iran it did take a few minutes for me to realise the extent of what is covered in the crime of 'Enmity against God'. If you are a state body, that see yourself as simply and literally acting in the pure role of serving, delivering for and on behalf of God, then anyone disagreeing with you is therefore directly going against God, so therefore it's enmity and therefore you must be sentenced to death. That's it, that's the interpretation, no debate as debate is enmity.
That's the same streak of what's been happening in the West with a different theocratic flavour and punishment but with just as much logic deployed. Transsharia law.
That's an excellent interpretation I think. Very insightful. We're in a theo-illogical age right now, whatever mode of dress it appears in, as the new technologies advance and the old institutions falter for a variety of very good and alarming reasons, not the least of which would be their rampant bad faiths, it seems to me, which are blooming everywhere right now like a metastatic cancer.
It is Queer Marxism. On the surface, the antithesis of religion, but a political religion nonetheless. It was bound to herald a right-wing backlash. Oddly, I tremble for these people when that backlash really starts even though they make me so angry right now. They are so stupid. Their triumph will be ephemeral.
How very dare you, that's so transphobic to ask a man about his fuel rod(s), spent or otherwise. You rotter. This must now be about that poor man's 'safety and security'.
I think it may be a reference to a reference I made (!) elsewhere in this thread about the erm things that Jacob Breslow, the LSE 'academic' wrote about and how he compared objects like shoes to children and 'cumming' over or near (?) them. It was clear objectification and very disturbing sexual objectification for his sexual gratification. Men often take the personal possessions of others as part of fetishes or imbue them with special significance, as trophies or mementos. Referring to children as objects in the same category and without personhood, integrity or self is hugely disturbing. Jacob is the one who Mermaids and Penis (Pink) News then suddenly realised they shouldn't be connected to. Then who never existed in a 'Jacob who?' way. So that was what I was linking to Sam Brinton and what he may have been up to. All boundaries broken and all the time is the trans mantra. Oooh a woman's suitcase, image what delights for a pervert to 'find' as in steal. Ooh look another one. Ooh look...
So shoes is a bit of a shorthand now for their fetishistic inner lives that are now outer lives and affecting us all. But I may be wrong and it was a reference to another nuanced layer!
I can only imagine they're all pointing fingers at each other and shrugging, 'just how could we have known, he seems like such a straight up, decent guy?'.
Yeah the way theses guys are lying about being women is a sign of poor character and/or mental illness and should be treated accordingly. Not cheered or elevated ffs.
The danger with nickers of knickers is where it leads, a lot of them then commit terrible murders when knickers no longer satisfy them. Jerry brudos, Russell Williams, sung koo Kim, Joel rifkin, hidden Clark, pawel relowicz, Christopher Michael, gang known, Roy Jones and on and on
That is bang on the money, trudie. These fetishes so often lead to terrible crimes. The FBI have done a lot of work on this area. So often, after a woman has been hideously murdered, you find out that the man responsible was known to the police for numerous other offences. Their fetishes are often denied by them so that they express great anger when they are pointed out to them. Yet, this is what the Scottish government wants to open up all female spaces and rights to. Why should females be subjected to fetishes at all?
In the UK Wayne Couzens, the police officer, who murdered Sarah Everard was known to the police but nothing was done, for many incidents and areas. His behaviours escalated and different reports were made and nothing happened. It was forgotten, 'overlooked', 'missed' and not 'connected up enough' or soon enough to save her life.
It is distressing to then retrospectively have these looked at, properly recorded, investigated and 'come to light' when they were glaringly obvious for years and he moved areas and responsibilities without anyone checking or following up. He could have been stopped right up until weeks and hours before. Procedures having supposedly changed to prevent this.
These men are often in plain view and this one Sam Brinton was being held up as some kind of idol of tolerance and inclusivity, whatever those words have been corrupted to mean.
To be honest, Una-Jane, even the gender dysphoric ones are often autogynephiles, too. I don't think they are mutually incompatible, and I think also, that we have to accept that there a various different strands to this movement. The one thing they all appear to have in common apart from a tiny minority (and they have still encroached on female boundaries) is their antipathy towards women.
Many people in the street just don't get it: they think we are being cruel and unheeding. However, most women and girls who are on this side have arrived here after having gone through all the 'just be kind' nonsense, and they see that these 'trans' people are taking the michael, using our innate sense of wishing to be decent and using it against us to push their perverse and queer agenda.
They mean, I promise you, to strip us all of our every right, space, job, career, etc., and please do not be fooled into believing that they are a tiny minority. Once self-ID comes in as a legal tool, we will see the numbers burgeon. They have been hiding in plain sight and, now, they are emboldened to strike out at females. Please do not be fooled either into thinking that they present as female because they love women. Nothing could be further from the truth. Many of them hate, detest and loathe us.
They find our bodily functions disgusting, but crave them for sexual thrills. Their activists, the skinny wee laddies in black, also hate females, but are more of the men's rights persuasion. If they could, they would replace us with themselves as better women than we could ever be. I can't explain it as I am not male and, frankly, could never hope to understand what goes in in a male's head, any more than they know what goes on in ours, despite their insane claims.
I think that all these things should be treated like trying to starve oneself to death, cutting, being convinced a limb is not yours, etc. - as a mental health issue, best treated with counselling, especially where children are concerned. What they are most definitely not are women's problems to bear or clear up. It is time for men to take on board that we are not on this Earth to be the world's cleaners, and they must take responsibility for what are a subset of men - men they shy away from for not being 'masculine' in the stereotypical sense, or we will never see the end of this.
Many men appear to be at the mercy of their sex drive, forever boosted to intolerable levels by easy-access hardcore porn, and women cannot and will not put up with what is harming us as a result of their unreal expectations. This is an issue of safety, primarily, but also dignity and privacy and the right to decide our sexual partners without coercion. This is going to become so bad, and I do believe that women are going to find a new unity of purpose apart from men, and the men will have only themselves to blame.
Men do not have enough to do, and you can be damn sure Sam Brinton has nothing to do other than talk about kink and indulge in it. He should be in a labor camp, eating school lunches and living in barracks where he is kept an eye on at all times. I am sick of these dudes destroying everything that gay liberation tried to achieve, living up to the worst stereotypes of gay men.
Interesting question. My initial thoughts is depends what you call fetish - AGP seems like self-fetishisation .... maybe gender dysphoria is thinking self-fetishisation is the answer to your probs? Prolly talking rubbish but thems me initial thorts fwiw.
Oh JL. Thank you. This is a corker! A second theft, why surely not. This looks like a teensy tiny bit of a pattern now, even a waveform pattern of stealing and breaking boundaries...then stealing and breaking boundaries...then...and all in plain view with everyone being told to look the other way and cancelled for raising eyebrows. Ripley's Believe It or Not! It's hard to credit it's happening and been allowed to unfold as it has.
A while back this all reminded me of men stealing our underwear from washing lines or communal washing facilities, making dirty phone calls (heavy breathing, threats, filthy language or the silent ones). All that pent up frustration, vitriol, force, control and coercion. The weird sense of being followed, stared at or then harassed in the street. You know, we all know. Boundary breaking. Often accepted as 'just part of life'. They're all still at, down through the generations but this lot have been lauded and applauded.
Thank you so much for your kind words! Much appreciated x
A second theft that we know of, probably. Most likely has been going on for some time.
Are those unfortunate women supposed to take back their fouled clothes? I hope they at least make him give the owners cold hard cash to replace them. I'd burn mine.
If you have a problem with phone calls, buy a loud whistle and use it. Very effective.
Thanks Susan, that particular thing has not been a problem for me for a fair few decades now and with modern mobile numbers it doesn't seem to happen any longer. It's much easier to block and divert unwanted calls. It's the style of harassment that seems to have changed, and their platforms, not their motivations or ability to do it. Like water, they find a way. Men have this whole online world to harass, pillory and track us through now.
I'm keen that we download the monitor that alerts us to unknown tracking (devices) nearby - I guess that's the modern version of a whistle or horn by the phone. You know, those small (often coin sized) devices (Apple etc) that some bright spark marketed that can be hidden in our cars, dropped in our coat pockets, our bags...or the tracking devices that are our mobile phones themselves :-(
Yes, this has been on the news. So glad I am not on the tech bandwagon.
We don't have to be, that's what's so chilling. Read accounts of women who've usually known 'something' was up, felt they were going mad, then realised or discovered the extent of the surveillance. Track your own luggage ladies, track your luggage! ;-)
In the days before everyone did it for everything, I could always tell when and which sites men had looked at when they'd been googling me and it was all so bloody obvious it was sometimes hard to keep a straight face. Oh but you mentioned X or Y, and that time you were in Rome. Erm no, no I didn't (oh but that's the fourth entry down for one of my digital twins). They also thought I enjoyed hobbies as they'd read about 'me' so I could even tell which search terms they'd used and from when. Spooky huh.
A toxic man is a nuclear waste adviser.
As a Biological Psychologist, I think there's something very disturbing about this. I'm concerned about what this is doing to women and girls, and gay people who are not among the outlandish. Again, as a psychologist, I'm pretty convinced that this is not about being trans as much as it is about normalizing ostentatious, intrusive, and bad behavior. Interestingly, a lot of heterosexual people are into "kink". However, you will notice that they don't display it in public, or expose children to it. That's really the difference.
https://everythingisbiology.substack.com/p/whats-a-woman-whats-a-man-whats-an
Pushing the boundaries seems to be their vicious and vile way of forcing females to kow tow to them. I really do not think that most even believe they are women (I don't mean the sex offenders who decide to 'trans' so that they can have an easier time in the female prison estate and perv on females at the same time) but pretend to do so in order to play out a hate fest against females. There has to be a deep resentment, hatred even, of all women and girls, and it is scary in its intensity and for the fact that it has become mainstream. Control is often their watchword, although they seldom see it like that. I am often shocked at the comments of some men when a journalist has written something about women's lives. They always revert to: yes, but what about us as if they are raped, beaten, forced into a gender stereotype that curtails and stultifies their lives. These comments are very often patronising and vicious, too. At my age now, I am just starting to get a grip on how much some men - not all, by any means - resent and hate us for being what we were born to be - women. What is it they think we have that they are denied? Is it that they want to control and humiliate us to the point where we are mere slaves, especially sex slaves and second rate humans? I really don't get their reasoning. Does your average man-in-the-street understand how crushing that is for us, to be viewed as something put on this Earth for man's pleasure, man's control and punch-bag?
One or two of these men in positions of power provides a facilitator for others. The slow eradication of women from positions of power, sport, everyday life has begun. We desperately need to help of decent men. It's time to acknowledge we can't do this alone. We need men to speak out in numbers.
I certainly agree with that.
I agree with you…
https://everythingisbiology.substack.com/p/beauty-pageants-rarely-make-me-sad
“When will women be human? When?”
Men don't think for one minute about their privilege; that's the Joy of Patriarchy!
And it all comes down to: Men cannot create life. Yes, they can make art, which may be nice, but mostly they destroy because they cannot create.
To be fair, majority of men at least know they are not women and respect women's spaces, dont want to look like a big grownup baby with jam all over his face, claim to be 'special' aka 'non binary' because they like wearing dresses theyve nicked from rich women and shagging both sexes {or so he says} cos theyre not fussed as long as it involves dog masks. Altho I could be wrong about that - Glinner wots your take on this haha
They're doing it now. The vast majority of transgender males are heterosexual.
The Last Days of the Roman Empire. Should we be surprised?
There appears to be a big overlap between transwomen and general fetishists. Not enough just to be trans...you need to be into BDSM, diapers, furry suits and in the case of SB it seems auto erotic asphyxiation. Not to mention paedophilia, bestiality etc. Has any work been done on this?
This is a very interesting comment, with which I agree. The topic is outside of my area of expertise. However, I'm sure there is data on this. I know that Doctor Debra Soh works in this area. You can find her easily on the web.
I hsall google Dr Doh. there does seem to be a high incidence of paraphilias with TG 'women'.
https://www.drdebrasoh.com/
Everytime I see articles like this I hope and pray that these despicable excuses for human beings wake up anyone who, by some miracle, remain unaware of the psychopathy of these men who've gone rogue.
Why is it difficult to understand that a gender identity crisis is often a symptoms of mental illness
Because the morons at the APA (American Psychologists Association) agreed that it wasn't mental illness. In exchange for what, I wonder? Because any reasonably intelligent person can see that IT IS.
We need a whole series on the jiggery-pokery that goes on to get things in or out of the formularies and diagnostic 'manuals'. Once you know, you know, but it astonishes me how incurious and blithely trusting so many people are.
YES!
This is what is called succesor ideology: A reasonable view is made unreasonable, taken too far, taken to the extreme. It makes the person thinking these things feel like a liberator, a destroyer of oppression. They really see boundaries as oppression, prudence is repression, restraint is oppression, patience is oppression. This is how doctors and parents get turned into monsters.
yep it's about power to draw boundaries and say enuf is enuf.
There are two people I just cannot look at, or listen to. Literally. I cannot do it. Jeffrey Marsh and Sam Brinton. Both are severely damaged men who, instead of healing themselves, have chosen to inflict that damage on the rest of the world.
I agree with your choice of the world's most unbearable men 100%. !
theyve been allowed to get away with it - and even celebrated! ..... until now?
I don't care what people do in private with consenting adults (providing it is legal). But I do not want to see it in public at Pride Parades, in the streets etc. And I do not want to be forced to CELEBRATE frankly weird and gross preferences like BDSM, golden showers, diapers, furry suits etc. Neither do I think that society as a whole should and the tax payer fund people's kinks. What next? Should we celebrate people picking their noses, defecating in public? Incidentally SB appears to be into auto erotic asphyxiation - a rather dangerous practice.
i think you may have a few good points there!
That LGBTQNation piece is pretty damning.
Personally I would have just trusted the evidence of my own eyes and not touched SB with a bargepole.
And yet again the unquestioning sycophancy of the mainstream media to anything TQ shines through.
Eew! Just imagine how the woman would feel about wearing those clothes again, however expensive.
I would not want them back and if I was reunited with them, burn them, even very treasured objects. Let's hope there weren't any shoes in there, we know what these nutcases use them for, and how they view people and children as objects to meet their fetishes. 'Personal items', eurgh.
I am fond of reusing and recycling but this is all part of their boundary breaking fetish. Once you've been invaded it's often very hard to view things or places or people in the same light. I know people who've moved houses and even totally out of towns and countries to leave some awful experiences behind. Some who've had to for their physical safety and sanity. Trust is broken and all those who allowed, promoted and protected this silly and nasty man are culpable.
You might be amused at this: I knew the selectwoman in a nearby town who said the history of her town (Troy, Maine) was the history of people moving their houses to another part of their land to get away from their neighbors! It's amazing how many buildings were moved in the days before power equipment and gasoline.
That's why he has to reimburse the full value of brand-new equivalent clothes. Personally I'd burn the entire suitcase on his front lawn.
I think she'll be ok with shopping vouchers for same value and quality plus compensation for inconvenience and loss of dignity ..... Nah but seriously you'd want more than full brand reimbursement. You'd want to see remorse but maybe be glad someone so selfish and dangerously narcissistic has been removed from his post and subject to the criminal law like anyone else.
.......along with a proper enquiry into those who appointed him to be in charge of managing nuclear waste ffs (since he cant even manage to nick a woman's bag properly!) If that isn't professional negligence then not sure what is.
It feels like there should be a sexual element to part of his criminal offence. They need to have looked for semen on the clothes- I wonder if they did?
Entirely likely. So, what was the purpose of you stealing those cases Sam? How likely is he to be telling the complete truth now. He is a fantasist and likes to break boundaries. He also believes himself to be fighting some superior cause for something and his own privilege. Not a great combination, and this is the thing about boundary breakers, where is the line for what they deem is acceptable when that's the whole point, they get off on the thrill of knowing they break them and others knowing they break them. He sees his sexual kinks as some kind of civil rights movement which Stonewall and others have strangely mixed up with gay rights and TQ. Pride in wearing women's knickers, who cares if the woman who owns them is unaware you stole them. A spritz of her perfume, looking through her personal belongings. It was nasty TERFs that left him with no other option because of our bigotry. We women are here to serve their needs and it's all about them.
What would he do if there were no consequences for anything, which really seems how many of these men think and then they are allowed to, despite those ones who are caught and end up in prison. They then continue their 'fight' for 'freedom' to be their 'true selves'.
When he got caught, he hadn't even checked luggage. You'd think someone doing something that risky would cover themselves by having "Oh I picked the wrong bag up" as an excuse if necessary.
He was very confident he wouldn't need the excuse and I'd bet good money it was because he'd stolen bags many, many times before, this was just the first time he's been caught. Or the first time he was caught and it wasn't brushed under the rug by his employer.
Of course he was. This man and his ilk live in cognitive dissonance land and there's always a justification and excuse ready for everything. It must be very strange to push and push and push, have literally no barriers, no challenge, your path eased, then get encouraged and promoted further than your wildest dreams, passing security clearance after clearance, managing to be invited in to 'educate' students and then held up in front of the whole nation and world as the best possible version of a citizen who represents the best of the best. How would he know when to stop? Who would tell him? Who would he listen to? He's been doing what he likes for a while and being beatifically smiled at and indulged. Anyone not in total agreement has been pilloried. Now he's crashing. I suspect with many soft landings prepared. It's very odd, like they were grooming him to be the 'poster they' of whatever Queer Theory identifies as this week within the administration itself. Grooming is wearing down your boundaries and sometimes playing a very long game. The past seven years every media outlet, charity, 'project', sleb narcissist and government department promoting this man has been doing exactly that to the public.
Jenn-dar Gee-zuess told z/him it was ok!
But of course. Surgically enhanced receding hairline, testicles, fake left tit and hormone-induced right tit doesn't scan as well as spectacles, testicles, wallet and watch. It's funny, I was about to ramblingly say he clearly thinks he's higher than a higher body but thought I should stop there.
Listening to someone discussing the current range of arrests and executions in Iran it did take a few minutes for me to realise the extent of what is covered in the crime of 'Enmity against God'. If you are a state body, that see yourself as simply and literally acting in the pure role of serving, delivering for and on behalf of God, then anyone disagreeing with you is therefore directly going against God, so therefore it's enmity and therefore you must be sentenced to death. That's it, that's the interpretation, no debate as debate is enmity.
That's the same streak of what's been happening in the West with a different theocratic flavour and punishment but with just as much logic deployed. Transsharia law.
That's an excellent interpretation I think. Very insightful. We're in a theo-illogical age right now, whatever mode of dress it appears in, as the new technologies advance and the old institutions falter for a variety of very good and alarming reasons, not the least of which would be their rampant bad faiths, it seems to me, which are blooming everywhere right now like a metastatic cancer.
'Transsharia law' and 'Theo-illogical age': excellent coinings. Thank you both.
It is Queer Marxism. On the surface, the antithesis of religion, but a political religion nonetheless. It was bound to herald a right-wing backlash. Oddly, I tremble for these people when that backlash really starts even though they make me so angry right now. They are so stupid. Their triumph will be ephemeral.
Yes, yes. Must use "Transsharia law". Perfect!
*edited to correct enmity, which is one of those words I perpetually struggle to say and write :-)
Were I the DOE, I’d start doing an inventory on the number of spent fuel rods I currently have in my custody.
How very dare you, that's so transphobic to ask a man about his fuel rod(s), spent or otherwise. You rotter. This must now be about that poor man's 'safety and security'.
Don’t give him ideas for his defence 😂
Traded for shoe trees, you think? Or wooden hangers, maybe... ?
Sorry. I'm going to ask because your words are intriguing: can you please explain??
I think it may be a reference to a reference I made (!) elsewhere in this thread about the erm things that Jacob Breslow, the LSE 'academic' wrote about and how he compared objects like shoes to children and 'cumming' over or near (?) them. It was clear objectification and very disturbing sexual objectification for his sexual gratification. Men often take the personal possessions of others as part of fetishes or imbue them with special significance, as trophies or mementos. Referring to children as objects in the same category and without personhood, integrity or self is hugely disturbing. Jacob is the one who Mermaids and Penis (Pink) News then suddenly realised they shouldn't be connected to. Then who never existed in a 'Jacob who?' way. So that was what I was linking to Sam Brinton and what he may have been up to. All boundaries broken and all the time is the trans mantra. Oooh a woman's suitcase, image what delights for a pervert to 'find' as in steal. Ooh look another one. Ooh look...
So shoes is a bit of a shorthand now for their fetishistic inner lives that are now outer lives and affecting us all. But I may be wrong and it was a reference to another nuanced layer!
I’d also like to point out that his is now a crime of moral turpitude and should jeopardize his Q clearance.
I can only imagine they're all pointing fingers at each other and shrugging, 'just how could we have known, he seems like such a straight up, decent guy?'.
“No red flags at all! This came right out of the blue!”
Yeah the way theses guys are lying about being women is a sign of poor character and/or mental illness and should be treated accordingly. Not cheered or elevated ffs.
Ha, ha, Though. Funny!
The danger with nickers of knickers is where it leads, a lot of them then commit terrible murders when knickers no longer satisfy them. Jerry brudos, Russell Williams, sung koo Kim, Joel rifkin, hidden Clark, pawel relowicz, Christopher Michael, gang known, Roy Jones and on and on
Keep making this point, everyone. This is not a harmless crime.
That is bang on the money, trudie. These fetishes so often lead to terrible crimes. The FBI have done a lot of work on this area. So often, after a woman has been hideously murdered, you find out that the man responsible was known to the police for numerous other offences. Their fetishes are often denied by them so that they express great anger when they are pointed out to them. Yet, this is what the Scottish government wants to open up all female spaces and rights to. Why should females be subjected to fetishes at all?
In the UK Wayne Couzens, the police officer, who murdered Sarah Everard was known to the police but nothing was done, for many incidents and areas. His behaviours escalated and different reports were made and nothing happened. It was forgotten, 'overlooked', 'missed' and not 'connected up enough' or soon enough to save her life.
It is distressing to then retrospectively have these looked at, properly recorded, investigated and 'come to light' when they were glaringly obvious for years and he moved areas and responsibilities without anyone checking or following up. He could have been stopped right up until weeks and hours before. Procedures having supposedly changed to prevent this.
These men are often in plain view and this one Sam Brinton was being held up as some kind of idol of tolerance and inclusivity, whatever those words have been corrupted to mean.
Couldn't agree more, Though. It is heartbreaking.
Thé final photo says it all, really.
Which is SoDom and which Gomorrher?
2, Forgot to say, WELL DONE, JL ! xx
Ah thank you, Ellen! I do appreciate your kind words x
Always knew the majority of trans-identified men were fetishists and autogynephiles.
Indeed, Elizabeth. Very, very few gender/body dysphoric.
Are "fetishists" "AGPs" "gender dysphoric" mutually incompatible? Honest question.
To be honest, Una-Jane, even the gender dysphoric ones are often autogynephiles, too. I don't think they are mutually incompatible, and I think also, that we have to accept that there a various different strands to this movement. The one thing they all appear to have in common apart from a tiny minority (and they have still encroached on female boundaries) is their antipathy towards women.
Many people in the street just don't get it: they think we are being cruel and unheeding. However, most women and girls who are on this side have arrived here after having gone through all the 'just be kind' nonsense, and they see that these 'trans' people are taking the michael, using our innate sense of wishing to be decent and using it against us to push their perverse and queer agenda.
They mean, I promise you, to strip us all of our every right, space, job, career, etc., and please do not be fooled into believing that they are a tiny minority. Once self-ID comes in as a legal tool, we will see the numbers burgeon. They have been hiding in plain sight and, now, they are emboldened to strike out at females. Please do not be fooled either into thinking that they present as female because they love women. Nothing could be further from the truth. Many of them hate, detest and loathe us.
They find our bodily functions disgusting, but crave them for sexual thrills. Their activists, the skinny wee laddies in black, also hate females, but are more of the men's rights persuasion. If they could, they would replace us with themselves as better women than we could ever be. I can't explain it as I am not male and, frankly, could never hope to understand what goes in in a male's head, any more than they know what goes on in ours, despite their insane claims.
I think that all these things should be treated like trying to starve oneself to death, cutting, being convinced a limb is not yours, etc. - as a mental health issue, best treated with counselling, especially where children are concerned. What they are most definitely not are women's problems to bear or clear up. It is time for men to take on board that we are not on this Earth to be the world's cleaners, and they must take responsibility for what are a subset of men - men they shy away from for not being 'masculine' in the stereotypical sense, or we will never see the end of this.
Many men appear to be at the mercy of their sex drive, forever boosted to intolerable levels by easy-access hardcore porn, and women cannot and will not put up with what is harming us as a result of their unreal expectations. This is an issue of safety, primarily, but also dignity and privacy and the right to decide our sexual partners without coercion. This is going to become so bad, and I do believe that women are going to find a new unity of purpose apart from men, and the men will have only themselves to blame.
Men do not have enough to do, and you can be damn sure Sam Brinton has nothing to do other than talk about kink and indulge in it. He should be in a labor camp, eating school lunches and living in barracks where he is kept an eye on at all times. I am sick of these dudes destroying everything that gay liberation tried to achieve, living up to the worst stereotypes of gay men.
Interesting question. My initial thoughts is depends what you call fetish - AGP seems like self-fetishisation .... maybe gender dysphoria is thinking self-fetishisation is the answer to your probs? Prolly talking rubbish but thems me initial thorts fwiw.
To be fair to all the people who promoted Sam to the top, it's not like there was any warning signs...