Fantastic piece of investigative journalism 👍. This really shows how this ideology has been allowed to infiltrate our schools and subject ‘infants’ to its harmful content!
I didn't realise that Ruth Hunt is also now a Member of the House of Lords, (appointed in October 2019). And also according to Wikipedia, she attracted much attention in May 2014 when she announced in the Daily Telegraph that Stonewall would not be joining a wide boycott of the Dorchester Hotel, owned by the Sultan of Brunei, Bolkiah, who was at the time proposing the introduction of the death penalty for sodomy.
I remember when there was a lot of stuff in the news about the sexual harassment and sexual abuse of girls in schools last year, when interviewed, AS seemed to show almost a resignation that sharing intimate pics is just 'something that young people do these days', rather than complete outrage, which is what I was feeling - ie that boys sending dick pics and asking for 'nudes' is the sexual abuse of girls.
I remember being really shocked at her response given her responsibility for the inspection of safeguarding
It's fascinating to glimpse a little corner of the network to which any aspiring apparatchik may gain access by signing-up to the belief system as an ally. It very clearly facilitates the awarding of plum jobs across the State and third sector.
Spiked has been harping on about "moral entrepreneurs" forever, and this is precisely what's happening, here: Stonewall discovered it was sitting on a goldmine of *political capital* which it was able dole out to people and organisations in need of wokewash. People in the right locations in its network, and related ones, were able to barter for all kinds of personal advancement and reward if they understood how to capitalise on their position and network standing.
Then, as the stock of gay rights political capital began to look a bit depleted and the organisations they'd shared with risked going independent having built up their own reserves, Stonewall did what any enterprise will do - it innovated, bringing a "higher tech" next generation virtue signal to market. The value of LGB virtue signals collapsed quite swiftly.
This is not an abstract process. Organisations, and power centres *within* organisations, forever in competition for resources, will grab any tool going that gives them legitimacy and clout. So they'll promote or hire the moral entrepreneurs who have a knack for this art, consciously or not. You've told the story of this happening in relation to a handful of Stonewall chums. Stories like these are playing out in every FTSE-100 plc, every department of state, every national charity.
It's not new. But the execs and risk officers who are supposed to be alert to such perverse incentives skewing the behaviour of their organisations are charmed by this one - it has the favour of the king, in all these little kingdoms. That's what makes it all work. The moment the crown notices that this wonderful gift of (almost) free virtue conceals a toxic package of liabilities, the mood will flip.
I hope we can ringfence the LGB elements before that happens. It could be devastating.
Malcom Clarke is very perceptive. I select two of the above thread of Tweets:
(1) 13./ The core tenet of trans ideology isn't a leap for most religions either. Hunt's church says human beings' authentic selves are their inner invisible 'souls'. Trans activists say their authentic selves are their inner invisible 'gender identities'. A rose by any other name...
(2) 20./ It's also harder to find compromise the more self-righteous and cult like the trans movement becomes. Here's a trans deacon called Joy (!) arguing homosexuality can't exist any more and will soon disappear. The future is reserved for the trans Chosen Ones apparently. 👇3,896 views0:25 / 0:31
WOW! You joined the dots..I feel visceral hatred for these people.
All on our money of course.
I hope this exposure gets a wider audience.
Interesting - thanks Graham and @STILLtish
Fantastic piece of investigative journalism 👍. This really shows how this ideology has been allowed to infiltrate our schools and subject ‘infants’ to its harmful content!
I didn't realise that Ruth Hunt is also now a Member of the House of Lords, (appointed in October 2019). And also according to Wikipedia, she attracted much attention in May 2014 when she announced in the Daily Telegraph that Stonewall would not be joining a wide boycott of the Dorchester Hotel, owned by the Sultan of Brunei, Bolkiah, who was at the time proposing the introduction of the death penalty for sodomy.
I remember when there was a lot of stuff in the news about the sexual harassment and sexual abuse of girls in schools last year, when interviewed, AS seemed to show almost a resignation that sharing intimate pics is just 'something that young people do these days', rather than complete outrage, which is what I was feeling - ie that boys sending dick pics and asking for 'nudes' is the sexual abuse of girls.
I remember being really shocked at her response given her responsibility for the inspection of safeguarding
You do have to wonder, are women like this feeders? As in people who give paedophiles access to children. I know there are women who do this.
It's fascinating to glimpse a little corner of the network to which any aspiring apparatchik may gain access by signing-up to the belief system as an ally. It very clearly facilitates the awarding of plum jobs across the State and third sector.
Spiked has been harping on about "moral entrepreneurs" forever, and this is precisely what's happening, here: Stonewall discovered it was sitting on a goldmine of *political capital* which it was able dole out to people and organisations in need of wokewash. People in the right locations in its network, and related ones, were able to barter for all kinds of personal advancement and reward if they understood how to capitalise on their position and network standing.
Then, as the stock of gay rights political capital began to look a bit depleted and the organisations they'd shared with risked going independent having built up their own reserves, Stonewall did what any enterprise will do - it innovated, bringing a "higher tech" next generation virtue signal to market. The value of LGB virtue signals collapsed quite swiftly.
This is not an abstract process. Organisations, and power centres *within* organisations, forever in competition for resources, will grab any tool going that gives them legitimacy and clout. So they'll promote or hire the moral entrepreneurs who have a knack for this art, consciously or not. You've told the story of this happening in relation to a handful of Stonewall chums. Stories like these are playing out in every FTSE-100 plc, every department of state, every national charity.
It's not new. But the execs and risk officers who are supposed to be alert to such perverse incentives skewing the behaviour of their organisations are charmed by this one - it has the favour of the king, in all these little kingdoms. That's what makes it all work. The moment the crown notices that this wonderful gift of (almost) free virtue conceals a toxic package of liabilities, the mood will flip.
I hope we can ringfence the LGB elements before that happens. It could be devastating.
Tweet No8: Baroness Ruthie and The Son of God go nightclubbing.... Who knew?
https://twitter.com/twisterfilm/status/1269300501880938496
Malcom Clarke is very perceptive. I select two of the above thread of Tweets:
(1) 13./ The core tenet of trans ideology isn't a leap for most religions either. Hunt's church says human beings' authentic selves are their inner invisible 'souls'. Trans activists say their authentic selves are their inner invisible 'gender identities'. A rose by any other name...
(2) 20./ It's also harder to find compromise the more self-righteous and cult like the trans movement becomes. Here's a trans deacon called Joy (!) arguing homosexuality can't exist any more and will soon disappear. The future is reserved for the trans Chosen Ones apparently. 👇3,896 views0:25 / 0:31