Thanks for alerting us to this one Graham. Peaked once again... Just donated and good to see the coverage and support building already. Very proud to support Rachel.
Thanks for sharing this. I've donated. Just shocking that Social Work England would not look into these spurious claims. Surely this is something that their profession does on a daily basis, you know, er, investigate situations. If this is their idea of investigation, we should be highly concerned about their abilities.
"Concerns have also been expressed regarding his views of women which have been described as “misogynistic”."
Wow... they write that in defence of a movement that seeks to erase women's rights & safeguards? A movement that's popular with blokes dressed as hookers and porn stars and who openly hate women (and like to share rape fantasies)?
I've no idea if that's genuine ignorance of the facts or if the cult of gender ideology has just recruited a few more suckers.
Bloody hell it’s the 17th century. TRAs: “She’s a witch ! Burn her !” Social Work England: “Yeah ok.” Donation on its way. I’m going to be bankrupt soon.
Safeguarding must be one of the most important parts of social work and yet SWE are hounding this woman - it's disgraceful. Am shocked to hear that I've been subscribing to a notorious misogynist's substack though - shurely shome mistake!
We really are in Upside-down World. You write defending women’s rights & highlighting women’s voices = “misogynist”. Social workers concerned about safeguarding = “transphobic”.
We really are in Upside-down World. You write defending women’s rights & highlighting women’s voices = “misogynist”. Social workers concerned about safeguarding = “transphobic”.
Rachel Meade needs your help!
Thanks for alerting us to this one Graham. Peaked once again... Just donated and good to see the coverage and support building already. Very proud to support Rachel.
Thanks for sharing this. I've donated. Just shocking that Social Work England would not look into these spurious claims. Surely this is something that their profession does on a daily basis, you know, er, investigate situations. If this is their idea of investigation, we should be highly concerned about their abilities.
"Concerns have also been expressed regarding his views of women which have been described as “misogynistic”."
Wow... they write that in defence of a movement that seeks to erase women's rights & safeguards? A movement that's popular with blokes dressed as hookers and porn stars and who openly hate women (and like to share rape fantasies)?
I've no idea if that's genuine ignorance of the facts or if the cult of gender ideology has just recruited a few more suckers.
Found it. Made a donation.
As a retired social worker, i am appalled. Donated
Bloody hell it’s the 17th century. TRAs: “She’s a witch ! Burn her !” Social Work England: “Yeah ok.” Donation on its way. I’m going to be bankrupt soon.
Safeguarding must be one of the most important parts of social work and yet SWE are hounding this woman - it's disgraceful. Am shocked to hear that I've been subscribing to a notorious misogynist's substack though - shurely shome mistake!
BTW it's hard to believe you're actually a TRA, misogynist and do NOTHING to help women/ GC/feminism!!!
Well done. This is scandalous treatment.
https://archive.ph/ehoQv the times article archived
Donated and shared.
We really are in Upside-down World. You write defending women’s rights & highlighting women’s voices = “misogynist”. Social workers concerned about safeguarding = “transphobic”.
Thanks for highlighting this.
We really are in Upside-down World. You write defending women’s rights & highlighting women’s voices = “misogynist”. Social workers concerned about safeguarding = “transphobic”.
Thanks for highlighting this.