It's incredible how a Police Division would start their tweets with 'Hi,...' so unprofessional, not to mention a glaring grammatical error. Looks like it was written by a 12 year old...
Great detective work JL. It’s so obvious these men are manipulating the system and the people who are suffering are their victims and women in prison. It makes me so angry that they get away with it, time after time.
It's a hate crime for John Stephen to steal the name 'Sally Ann'. It's a hate crime for the Sussex Police to refer to this man as 'Sally Ann'. It's a hate crime for the Sussex Police to call this man a woman. It's a hate crime to use feminine pronouns for this man. These are hate crimes against women.
They are indeed. And all these crimes are making me fume. I also ask myself why is a women with learning disabilities and mental health problems in prison. That strikes me as another hate crime.
Excellent point. I will once again refer to John Grisham, the writer of thrillers, who stated that there should be no women's prisons because women rarely commit violent crimes and the women in prison usually only made the mistake of choosing the wrong boyfriends. But in a country where women are in prison for not paying their TV license fees?
It's like locking a kid in a sweet shop. Everything about this is horrendous. It is a vile insult to victims who know what sex abused them, to women as these are not our crimes, and to prisoners who have to share their facilities. How is this a right? The right to keep abusing? The right to have reality bent so much that a police force defends a dangerous paedophile? I have trouble understanding how this is defensible.
You're quite right. It IS horrendous. The feelings of even a vile and dangerous man like Dixon will be prioritised over the safety of vulnerable women. Patriarchy in action.
Every aspect of this is deeply wrong, there are multiple layers of wrongness, especially where the justice system and prison is concerned. Sussex police are a fucking disgrace, I'd like to see every senior officer suspended and investigated. Obviously, nothing like that is going to happen, they're safe, unlike the women imprisoned with this disgusting sack of shit, who was a man, is a man and will continue to be a man; including to himself, I'm sure.
I'm wondering how much harm and suffering female inmates have to endure, before anyone begins to think that this might be a bad idea. Women have already been sexually assaulted and raped. A woman is going to die at some stage, but I don't think one is going to matter enough.
I don't think one will be enough either and I think the rhetoric around it will range from "she had it coming", through to victim blaming. We see this all the time already. Sarah Everard was blamed by the police commissioner for not knowing the law whne she was abducted, raped and murdered by a policeman.
Thank you JL. So Sussex Police, what are the chances there are other victims out there who will never connect the dots, never come forward and have no idea about the 'new identity' of this man? I hope the coverage helps. Although he has the same surname that's enough to distract as it's a key identifier. Oh well it's a woman, so it can't be the man that did that to me. Catching these offenders seems more luck than anything and we're turning the needle in one of multiple possible haystacks invisible.
This man should be moved immediately to a men’s prison. He has no GRC, is clearly male and a paedophile. His ‘gender identity’ is simply a ruse that helps him prey on women (and no doubt children again if given the opportunity). Why are we standing for this crap in our country?
Because your government is under the thumb of the U.S. government and some very powerful people in the U.S. are using this movement for their own nefarious purposes.
HOW? The misogyny is absolutely breath-taking. A man said he's really a woman so the police and prison service just..... took him at his word. The female prisoners don't get a say about being locked up with a male paedophile, so... what? They're all just okay with a bunch of women getting raped, which is better than saying no to a man? It's like men are human and women are of equal value to hamsters or ferrets or something. I'm not even joking.
That's exactly how it is. These men have more in common with incels (who wnat women to go back to being sex slaves), than women, and that goes for Sussex police too.
Basic lesson: Because women cannot escape their biological reality, men like to pretend that they (men) are humans and women are animals. Of course in reality we are all animals, but I have not come up with a word to describe the majority of males in this world. They certainly aren't human in the best sense of the word.
It’s very unprofessional and I would imagine the cretin that wrote the statement has badly dyed pink purple hair, wears a dress and says he’s a woman. It just a feeling I got lol.
Odd how respecting a "gender identity" is identical to denying a person's sex, isn't it? And yet, the useful idiots of the world insist on playing along with the gender ideation of delusional perverts.
What the fuck is female about that predator? I swear, I am so sorry for female inmates. 90% of them did nothing deserving such a punishment. Even those Guilty of graver crimes should be protected from assault.
Equally unbearably sad and burn it all down enraging, reading this story. Why would Sussex Police, the various courts and Brozefield Prison authorities all break common decency to give this violent male child rapist further access to vulnerable female victims.
Tell me this is not happening. Tell me that everything that has happened with regard to sex and gender in our society in the past forty years was just a bad dream I was having as a teenager. Tell me that I'll soon wake up and it will be 1970 all over again, and the only 'trans' in existence is the transistor radio and the old guy on the top floor who dresses in women's clothes when his wife is at work, and who wouldn't harm a fly. Tell me I'm sleeping and the nightmare will soon be over. Please.
I'm struggling to read, am not quite getting this and it feels rubbernecky in how awful it is. The Daily Mail article states ''Mrs Spencer also told the Mail that Dixon was living with a female partner. They ran a nearby computer shop, though their house was deserted this week. She said Dixon had been ‘hounded out’ of a previous address in Havant by neighbours who learned of those paedophile tendencies, adding that the abuser had trained a CCTV security camera on the nearby common where children gathered.''
He what? If this is true he really ran rings around the police. He ran a computer shop?? And was fond of CCTV? Oh of course. Like a nice image does he? All sounds completely above board. Move along, nothing to see here.
It sounds like the Sussex Police let him slip through their fingers more than once from what I've read. One of his earliest victims tried to tell them but was ignored. Dixon was only caught years after the crimes.
It's incredible how a Police Division would start their tweets with 'Hi,...' so unprofessional, not to mention a glaring grammatical error. Looks like it was written by a 12 year old...
It probably was!
Agreed. It speaks volumes about their attitudes.
Great detective work JL. It’s so obvious these men are manipulating the system and the people who are suffering are their victims and women in prison. It makes me so angry that they get away with it, time after time.
Thank you, Toni.
It's a hate crime for John Stephen to steal the name 'Sally Ann'. It's a hate crime for the Sussex Police to refer to this man as 'Sally Ann'. It's a hate crime for the Sussex Police to call this man a woman. It's a hate crime to use feminine pronouns for this man. These are hate crimes against women.
They are indeed. And all these crimes are making me fume. I also ask myself why is a women with learning disabilities and mental health problems in prison. That strikes me as another hate crime.
Excellent point. I will once again refer to John Grisham, the writer of thrillers, who stated that there should be no women's prisons because women rarely commit violent crimes and the women in prison usually only made the mistake of choosing the wrong boyfriends. But in a country where women are in prison for not paying their TV license fees?
Everything about it is appalling, including the people defending him and his right to be called a woman.
It's like locking a kid in a sweet shop. Everything about this is horrendous. It is a vile insult to victims who know what sex abused them, to women as these are not our crimes, and to prisoners who have to share their facilities. How is this a right? The right to keep abusing? The right to have reality bent so much that a police force defends a dangerous paedophile? I have trouble understanding how this is defensible.
You're quite right. It IS horrendous. The feelings of even a vile and dangerous man like Dixon will be prioritised over the safety of vulnerable women. Patriarchy in action.
Every aspect of this is deeply wrong, there are multiple layers of wrongness, especially where the justice system and prison is concerned. Sussex police are a fucking disgrace, I'd like to see every senior officer suspended and investigated. Obviously, nothing like that is going to happen, they're safe, unlike the women imprisoned with this disgusting sack of shit, who was a man, is a man and will continue to be a man; including to himself, I'm sure.
I'm wondering how much harm and suffering female inmates have to endure, before anyone begins to think that this might be a bad idea. Women have already been sexually assaulted and raped. A woman is going to die at some stage, but I don't think one is going to matter enough.
I don't think one will be enough either and I think the rhetoric around it will range from "she had it coming", through to victim blaming. We see this all the time already. Sarah Everard was blamed by the police commissioner for not knowing the law whne she was abducted, raped and murdered by a policeman.
Thank you JL. So Sussex Police, what are the chances there are other victims out there who will never connect the dots, never come forward and have no idea about the 'new identity' of this man? I hope the coverage helps. Although he has the same surname that's enough to distract as it's a key identifier. Oh well it's a woman, so it can't be the man that did that to me. Catching these offenders seems more luck than anything and we're turning the needle in one of multiple possible haystacks invisible.
I agree. To pretend this man is a woman is the vilest insult to his victims. And sends the most horrendous message to other victims of male violence.
This man should be moved immediately to a men’s prison. He has no GRC, is clearly male and a paedophile. His ‘gender identity’ is simply a ruse that helps him prey on women (and no doubt children again if given the opportunity). Why are we standing for this crap in our country?
Because your government is under the thumb of the U.S. government and some very powerful people in the U.S. are using this movement for their own nefarious purposes.
HOW? The misogyny is absolutely breath-taking. A man said he's really a woman so the police and prison service just..... took him at his word. The female prisoners don't get a say about being locked up with a male paedophile, so... what? They're all just okay with a bunch of women getting raped, which is better than saying no to a man? It's like men are human and women are of equal value to hamsters or ferrets or something. I'm not even joking.
That's exactly how it is. These men have more in common with incels (who wnat women to go back to being sex slaves), than women, and that goes for Sussex police too.
Basic lesson: Because women cannot escape their biological reality, men like to pretend that they (men) are humans and women are animals. Of course in reality we are all animals, but I have not come up with a word to describe the majority of males in this world. They certainly aren't human in the best sense of the word.
https://bentilly.blogspot.com/2009/11/did-males-start-as-parasites.html
See how you put there that he now identifies as trans well thats how it should be reported how hard is it to reported he is a male thats trans
It’s very unprofessional and I would imagine the cretin that wrote the statement has badly dyed pink purple hair, wears a dress and says he’s a woman. It just a feeling I got lol.
What are the chances 'they' have got a big Brighton bro beard too? Just to cover all representative bases now.
Odd how respecting a "gender identity" is identical to denying a person's sex, isn't it? And yet, the useful idiots of the world insist on playing along with the gender ideation of delusional perverts.
What the fuck is female about that predator? I swear, I am so sorry for female inmates. 90% of them did nothing deserving such a punishment. Even those Guilty of graver crimes should be protected from assault.
Equally unbearably sad and burn it all down enraging, reading this story. Why would Sussex Police, the various courts and Brozefield Prison authorities all break common decency to give this violent male child rapist further access to vulnerable female victims.
I'd like to see their 'risk assessments'.
Me too.
Tell me this is not happening. Tell me that everything that has happened with regard to sex and gender in our society in the past forty years was just a bad dream I was having as a teenager. Tell me that I'll soon wake up and it will be 1970 all over again, and the only 'trans' in existence is the transistor radio and the old guy on the top floor who dresses in women's clothes when his wife is at work, and who wouldn't harm a fly. Tell me I'm sleeping and the nightmare will soon be over. Please.
I'm struggling to read, am not quite getting this and it feels rubbernecky in how awful it is. The Daily Mail article states ''Mrs Spencer also told the Mail that Dixon was living with a female partner. They ran a nearby computer shop, though their house was deserted this week. She said Dixon had been ‘hounded out’ of a previous address in Havant by neighbours who learned of those paedophile tendencies, adding that the abuser had trained a CCTV security camera on the nearby common where children gathered.''
He what? If this is true he really ran rings around the police. He ran a computer shop?? And was fond of CCTV? Oh of course. Like a nice image does he? All sounds completely above board. Move along, nothing to see here.
It sounds like the Sussex Police let him slip through their fingers more than once from what I've read. One of his earliest victims tried to tell them but was ignored. Dixon was only caught years after the crimes.
This pervert should be in a male prison. Protecting pedophiles is just WTAF is happening?