I've no doubt it's a small number of incels taking a rare break from whacking off to internet porn to vote but that's not dismiss it - quite the opposite. Gender ideology is always about a tiny (vocal, bullying) minority of people who believe in it, but the majority going along with it.
This is how you end up with hospital staff telling a heavily-traumatised woman she couldn't have been raped because there were no men in her ward. I'd bet that the majority of those staff understood perfectly well that there was a man in her ward but were too scared to say otherwise. "Dystopian" is the exact word for that.
Try getting into the mind of the nurse who had to deny that a man did this. I just can’t. Any I’ve ever met are practical sensible souls. We need to find one of these people to tell us how this happened.
Same here; my experience of NHS staff has been exactly that. It just shows what a pervasive ideology this is when decent, compassionate people feel they can't deviate from it, even in those hellish circumstances.
I am terrified for our children. And I guess my dating pool is now zero as I'd be too afraid to meet men is case the lunatics identify as a heterosexual just to target GC.
Elphaba thanks be to the God I don’t really believe in that most men are perfectly alright. That has to be the case or we couldn’t survive. The crazies exist in substantial numbers but the good guys outnumber them. Go ahead and find one of the good ones.
Elaine Milkers speech 🎤 a an eye opener. The selfishness of transmen wanting their cake and eat it. They put their babies at severe risk because their bodies have been changed by testosterone. Placentas are smaller, babies are born prem, they have no idea what the testosterone in the mother will do to the child long term. Totally narcissistic behaviour. They want to be men and give birth? It’s unnatural - we have plenty of novels written on the outcomes of going against nature.
Yes, how will it affect their child’s health, development, future fertility. Similarly TIMs who want to ‘breast feed’ with their dribbles of drug induced gruel-milk (supported by La Leche League!). REAL women are put under huge amounts of pressure to prepare their bodies for conception and pregnancy (eat/drink/don’t eat/don’t drink that, lose weight, don’t take antibiotics or painkillers or any medication) and while breastfeeding in case it impacts on the child. But for the sacred caste it’s completely fine to pump yourself full of drugs and hormones and starve your baby in utero!
I don't think trans-identified females have the interests of their babies in mind when deciding to take puberty blockers, almost inevitably followed by synthetic T.
At that stage they mostly have no interest in becoming a parent or have never considered it. And are not informed of the implications of changing their minds: at an age where they lack capacity anyway to consent to this "not even experimental" life-changing, damaging treatment.
All this, after being indoctrinated with a pernicious ideology as an "answer" to other mental health problems that are not explored, or to internalised homophobia: preventing them from maturing into lesbians.
More sinned against than sinning, perhaps?
The alternative is to decide they are not fit to have children at all: due to earlier bad decisions which were not their fault. (But many women persevere with pregnancies for children they know will be handicapped, with medical problems and shortened lives, eg with Down Syndrome. Is this equally wrong?)
Unless, as Elaine Miller explains, some are shocked to find themselves pregnant having not been told this was even possible.
Have there been any public examples of TIFs who have been on puberty blockers then T getting pregnant? I thought - like Freddy - they had gone through a normal puberty then taken T, which made getting pregnant possible. I also thought PBs plus T basically most likely = infertility. They would need to pause PBs to (hopefully) go through puberty. If you follow PBs with T can you still stop and trigger puberty or has your body skipped to menopause by that point?
Obviously I feel absolutely heartbroken for young women who have been brainwashed into writing off their chances of being mothers when they are still children themselves.
I don't feel so sympathetic towards the likes of Freddy (who demands grieving women who have lost babies be called 'birthing parents')
But mainly - WHERE ARE THE FUCKING HEALTH PROFESSIONALS IN ALL THIS WHO ARE WAVING THIS SHIT SHOW THROUGH?! (While women remain under the same stringent pressures to be a walking womb and can't even take a painkiller!)
I totally agree. Can't believe midwives are going along with this horror !! Thank God I'm retired. Wouldn't be able to keep my mouth shut and might've ended up sacked !!
Sorry no, I don't know of any public examples of TIFs on puberty blockers then taking T and getting pregnant.
I was thinking of the TIF mentioned by Elaine Miller, but I don't remember her giving details of how an unexpected pregnancy came about. Thanks for explaining the situation in which it might.
What I noticed most about its being cited by Elaine Miller was as yet another example of what females wanting to transition are not told by medical professionals, that they need to be told and should be told, to enable informed decision on an elective procedure. IF they are even old enough to have "agency" for such a decision: with brains kept permanently immature by failing to go through puberty.
And I have just read a chilling email from Genevieve Gluck to all her subscribers, pending a Substack article which she says will be the worst stuff she has ever written about. It will include pedophiles endorsing puberty blockers for the girls (fostered or adopted) they want to keep in a permanently immature state.
They'll want ovaries an fallopian tubes as well ,for " authenticity " so that'll be experimentation on the unborn ,although it's so against nature and biology that it's unlikely to work !! Where do they think all these female reproductive organs are coming from ? Might make some women opt out from transplant donations !!
Currently uteruses are taken with prior consent from women who have died, for experimental transplantation into women with gynaecological issues. Of the first ten such transplants, one woman recipient died.
But there is discussion about harvesting uteruses for transplant from breeding pigs engineered with human genes to prevent rejection by the host, & associated need for immunosuppressive drugs to prevent rejection.
Such pigs are already bred for lungs to be harvested for transplant by United Therapeutics, a medical company set up by Martine Rothblatt to manufacture a drug to counter his daughter's lung disease.
This progressed from preserving human lungs for transplant rejected by transplant surgeons. It's part of Rothblatt's Transhumanist programme for eternal life via spare parts surgery, with fallbank immortality via AI memory banks downloaded as "consciousness" into robotic heads.
See Rothblatt's book "From Transgender to Transhuman" 2011 (often regarded as a "Transgender Manifesto"), originally "The Apartheid of Sex" published in 1990s. And a host of articles & YouTube videos. Rothblatt transitioned in 1994.
Thanks for that explanation ,awful as it is 😭. It's already well known of course that he's one of the evil billionaires funding this horror ! Well ,if men want to " get pregnant " after their uterine transplants ,with a pig uterus ,where are the ovaries coming from or do they think that IVF using a donor egg will " take " and gestate well in this abhorrent organ ?.Evil beyond imagining and hard to understand how he gets away with this appalling vision. Frankenstein indeed 🤮😭
Yes Rothblatt is one of the "founding fathers" of transactivism among US $billionaires, detailed in Jennifer Bilek's articles in The11thHourBlog.com.
I guess it will be donor eggs for uterus transplants in men: not (yet) seen ovaries mentioned. In fact it's already possible for men to carry foetuses, by surgical implantation & attachment to colon tissue in the abdomen. The foetus generates its own placenta. This has occasionally happened in women but is quite dangerous, and unlikely to be carried to term. Ectopic pregnancies -- with a fertilised egg attaching to a fallopian tube before reaching the uterus -- are most dangerous for women and always need surgery. Not an issue for men with uterus transplants if you do without ovaries.
I find it all very perverse, while both babies and women still die in childbirth, and so little is known about women's health: very neglected relative to the well-researched default male.
Katie Montgomery tweeted a few of these surveys (including another one about whether or not women can have penises) to his followers for them to bombard the study with false reality answers..
Obviously he doesn't realise that ,to have an abortion ,he would need to "accidentally " get pregnant and that can never happen to MEN !! Pie in the sky
Some Labour MPs are breaking ranks and some are getting closer to understanding that self ID will mean intact penisy men saying they're women.
Siobhain McDonough, Tonia Antoniazzi (in the chamber) and Wes Streeting. Oh and Khalid Mahmood spoke sense during Cervixgate. Hope more have the confidence now.
There has been articles in the tabloids about uterine transplants, where one TW said he was to go to Brazil for this and once it was done he would get pregnant the natural way as once he has the womb, he would start ovulating! This will be like the virgin birth all over again, as having a womb doesn't bring on ovulation, a woman needs fallopian tubes for that to happen. And oh, guess what, a uterus transplant doesn't come with fallopian tubes, but a uterus transplant may be attached to a woman's own fallopian tubes. Guess what, Jennifer, the TW in the article, you don't have fallopian tubes because you are biologically a man! This was not picked up in the Daily Mail article...
Colin Montgomerie and a few others sent out the Twat signal. Unfortunately for them, it just highlights how many of these ‘laydeeeez’ still have a penis, a fact that is still penetrating (so to speak) the wider public consciousness. People don’t support penises in women/girls toilets and changing rooms.
That is my recollection too. The high heels would damage the fairway.
I have looked at the pic of 'Katie' M which bears no resemblance to the golfer but, you know, Photo Shop and all. Hayden looks nothing like his pics, 'Sue' Pascoe certainly doesn't. Nor do any of the rest of them really.
Result of a trans network "vote in this poll" alert? At least it's not as awful as it looked a few hours ago.
And there are probably a lot of jokers voting YES
-- as I remember a poll on Twitter which asked: "Would you ever vote in an online poll?"
62% of the answers were NO
I am thinking that this poll has been shared by TRAs too. The FB comments beneath the clip from yesterday did not reflect this percentage.
😹
Lol!!🤪🙄🤔
I've no doubt it's a small number of incels taking a rare break from whacking off to internet porn to vote but that's not dismiss it - quite the opposite. Gender ideology is always about a tiny (vocal, bullying) minority of people who believe in it, but the majority going along with it.
This is how you end up with hospital staff telling a heavily-traumatised woman she couldn't have been raped because there were no men in her ward. I'd bet that the majority of those staff understood perfectly well that there was a man in her ward but were too scared to say otherwise. "Dystopian" is the exact word for that.
Try getting into the mind of the nurse who had to deny that a man did this. I just can’t. Any I’ve ever met are practical sensible souls. We need to find one of these people to tell us how this happened.
Same here; my experience of NHS staff has been exactly that. It just shows what a pervasive ideology this is when decent, compassionate people feel they can't deviate from it, even in those hellish circumstances.
That must surely be a survey of Uni students - lol!
With rapid network messaging, Answer this poll!
That was Colin Montgomerie’s doing
I am terrified for our children. And I guess my dating pool is now zero as I'd be too afraid to meet men is case the lunatics identify as a heterosexual just to target GC.
Elphaba thanks be to the God I don’t really believe in that most men are perfectly alright. That has to be the case or we couldn’t survive. The crazies exist in substantial numbers but the good guys outnumber them. Go ahead and find one of the good ones.
My experience says that somewhere there may be some decent men, but as a friend put it, they're all codependent. And, that, Kap, is called privilege.
Furious after reading a Times article about a tory MP - a proper twat has landed in the only remaining mostly uncaptured political group https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/tory-mp-jamie-wallis-announces-im-transgender-or-want-to-be-r56ng7mgl
This obscenity has drawn sympathetic responses demanding empathy and kindness. Jamie Wallis can eat shit and die!
Monty and their pals stuffing it. Quite frankly, does it matter? It's like having a poll on whether the moon is made of cream cheese or not!
I always thought that was GREEN cheese!
Perhaps the question should be changed to "Will men get pregnant?" to weed out the stupid Yes answers a bit.
Elaine Milkers speech 🎤 a an eye opener. The selfishness of transmen wanting their cake and eat it. They put their babies at severe risk because their bodies have been changed by testosterone. Placentas are smaller, babies are born prem, they have no idea what the testosterone in the mother will do to the child long term. Totally narcissistic behaviour. They want to be men and give birth? It’s unnatural - we have plenty of novels written on the outcomes of going against nature.
Yes, how will it affect their child’s health, development, future fertility. Similarly TIMs who want to ‘breast feed’ with their dribbles of drug induced gruel-milk (supported by La Leche League!). REAL women are put under huge amounts of pressure to prepare their bodies for conception and pregnancy (eat/drink/don’t eat/don’t drink that, lose weight, don’t take antibiotics or painkillers or any medication) and while breastfeeding in case it impacts on the child. But for the sacred caste it’s completely fine to pump yourself full of drugs and hormones and starve your baby in utero!
I don't think trans-identified females have the interests of their babies in mind when deciding to take puberty blockers, almost inevitably followed by synthetic T.
At that stage they mostly have no interest in becoming a parent or have never considered it. And are not informed of the implications of changing their minds: at an age where they lack capacity anyway to consent to this "not even experimental" life-changing, damaging treatment.
All this, after being indoctrinated with a pernicious ideology as an "answer" to other mental health problems that are not explored, or to internalised homophobia: preventing them from maturing into lesbians.
More sinned against than sinning, perhaps?
The alternative is to decide they are not fit to have children at all: due to earlier bad decisions which were not their fault. (But many women persevere with pregnancies for children they know will be handicapped, with medical problems and shortened lives, eg with Down Syndrome. Is this equally wrong?)
Unless, as Elaine Miller explains, some are shocked to find themselves pregnant having not been told this was even possible.
Have there been any public examples of TIFs who have been on puberty blockers then T getting pregnant? I thought - like Freddy - they had gone through a normal puberty then taken T, which made getting pregnant possible. I also thought PBs plus T basically most likely = infertility. They would need to pause PBs to (hopefully) go through puberty. If you follow PBs with T can you still stop and trigger puberty or has your body skipped to menopause by that point?
Obviously I feel absolutely heartbroken for young women who have been brainwashed into writing off their chances of being mothers when they are still children themselves.
I don't feel so sympathetic towards the likes of Freddy (who demands grieving women who have lost babies be called 'birthing parents')
But mainly - WHERE ARE THE FUCKING HEALTH PROFESSIONALS IN ALL THIS WHO ARE WAVING THIS SHIT SHOW THROUGH?! (While women remain under the same stringent pressures to be a walking womb and can't even take a painkiller!)
I totally agree. Can't believe midwives are going along with this horror !! Thank God I'm retired. Wouldn't be able to keep my mouth shut and might've ended up sacked !!
Sorry no, I don't know of any public examples of TIFs on puberty blockers then taking T and getting pregnant.
I was thinking of the TIF mentioned by Elaine Miller, but I don't remember her giving details of how an unexpected pregnancy came about. Thanks for explaining the situation in which it might.
What I noticed most about its being cited by Elaine Miller was as yet another example of what females wanting to transition are not told by medical professionals, that they need to be told and should be told, to enable informed decision on an elective procedure. IF they are even old enough to have "agency" for such a decision: with brains kept permanently immature by failing to go through puberty.
And I have just read a chilling email from Genevieve Gluck to all her subscribers, pending a Substack article which she says will be the worst stuff she has ever written about. It will include pedophiles endorsing puberty blockers for the girls (fostered or adopted) they want to keep in a permanently immature state.
That's exactly what I've bee thinking for a while now. The more " children " there are, the bigger the victim pool !
They will when they get the uterus transplants some of them are agitating for, also asserting the right to have it publicly funded
They'll want ovaries an fallopian tubes as well ,for " authenticity " so that'll be experimentation on the unborn ,although it's so against nature and biology that it's unlikely to work !! Where do they think all these female reproductive organs are coming from ? Might make some women opt out from transplant donations !!
Currently uteruses are taken with prior consent from women who have died, for experimental transplantation into women with gynaecological issues. Of the first ten such transplants, one woman recipient died.
But there is discussion about harvesting uteruses for transplant from breeding pigs engineered with human genes to prevent rejection by the host, & associated need for immunosuppressive drugs to prevent rejection.
Such pigs are already bred for lungs to be harvested for transplant by United Therapeutics, a medical company set up by Martine Rothblatt to manufacture a drug to counter his daughter's lung disease.
This progressed from preserving human lungs for transplant rejected by transplant surgeons. It's part of Rothblatt's Transhumanist programme for eternal life via spare parts surgery, with fallbank immortality via AI memory banks downloaded as "consciousness" into robotic heads.
See Rothblatt's book "From Transgender to Transhuman" 2011 (often regarded as a "Transgender Manifesto"), originally "The Apartheid of Sex" published in 1990s. And a host of articles & YouTube videos. Rothblatt transitioned in 1994.
Thanks for that explanation ,awful as it is 😭. It's already well known of course that he's one of the evil billionaires funding this horror ! Well ,if men want to " get pregnant " after their uterine transplants ,with a pig uterus ,where are the ovaries coming from or do they think that IVF using a donor egg will " take " and gestate well in this abhorrent organ ?.Evil beyond imagining and hard to understand how he gets away with this appalling vision. Frankenstein indeed 🤮😭
Yes Rothblatt is one of the "founding fathers" of transactivism among US $billionaires, detailed in Jennifer Bilek's articles in The11thHourBlog.com.
I guess it will be donor eggs for uterus transplants in men: not (yet) seen ovaries mentioned. In fact it's already possible for men to carry foetuses, by surgical implantation & attachment to colon tissue in the abdomen. The foetus generates its own placenta. This has occasionally happened in women but is quite dangerous, and unlikely to be carried to term. Ectopic pregnancies -- with a fertilised egg attaching to a fallopian tube before reaching the uterus -- are most dangerous for women and always need surgery. Not an issue for men with uterus transplants if you do without ovaries.
I find it all very perverse, while both babies and women still die in childbirth, and so little is known about women's health: very neglected relative to the well-researched default male.
They will still say yes as womb transplants are being trialled. Glinner is already seeing into the dystopian future.
Yes: how many of us women have never worried that we might have accidentally impregnated our boyfriends or husbands?
Katie Montgomery tweeted a few of these surveys (including another one about whether or not women can have penises) to his followers for them to bombard the study with false reality answers..
He’s so full of hate.
This is the scariest one for me:
doomer boygirl
@abrahams_wife
i hope they learn how to transplant
uteruses. i want to be the first trans
woman to have an abortion
1:13 PM • 9/29/20 • Twitter for iPhone
1,242 Retweets 1,039 Quote Tweets 20.2K Likes
Still makes me sick to think about it. TWENTY THOUSAND PEOPLE ‘Liked’ it!!
Oh my god
Obviously he doesn't realise that ,to have an abortion ,he would need to "accidentally " get pregnant and that can never happen to MEN !! Pie in the sky
talkRadio is enjoying the attention, they're getting more votes than they have listeners.
Some Labour MPs are breaking ranks and some are getting closer to understanding that self ID will mean intact penisy men saying they're women.
Siobhain McDonough, Tonia Antoniazzi (in the chamber) and Wes Streeting. Oh and Khalid Mahmood spoke sense during Cervixgate. Hope more have the confidence now.
There has been articles in the tabloids about uterine transplants, where one TW said he was to go to Brazil for this and once it was done he would get pregnant the natural way as once he has the womb, he would start ovulating! This will be like the virgin birth all over again, as having a womb doesn't bring on ovulation, a woman needs fallopian tubes for that to happen. And oh, guess what, a uterus transplant doesn't come with fallopian tubes, but a uterus transplant may be attached to a woman's own fallopian tubes. Guess what, Jennifer, the TW in the article, you don't have fallopian tubes because you are biologically a man! This was not picked up in the Daily Mail article...
No knowledge of biology among any of them ,clearly !!
Colin Montgomerie and a few others sent out the Twat signal. Unfortunately for them, it just highlights how many of these ‘laydeeeez’ still have a penis, a fact that is still penetrating (so to speak) the wider public consciousness. People don’t support penises in women/girls toilets and changing rooms.
Wasn't there a pro golfer called Colin Montgomerie? Please tell me it's not the same one.
The golfer still has a Wikipedia page; if he was "Katy" I'd expect the article to be under that name, given how that site usually is
My recollection of the golfer was of a very manly man who liked beautiful women. I don’t see him in a frock.
That is my recollection too. The high heels would damage the fairway.
I have looked at the pic of 'Katie' M which bears no resemblance to the golfer but, you know, Photo Shop and all. Hayden looks nothing like his pics, 'Sue' Pascoe certainly doesn't. Nor do any of the rest of them really.
The public mostly doesn't know that:
-- we have de facto "Gender self-ID" in the absence of law;
-- only an estimated 3% of trans-identified males have Gender Recognition Certificates;
-- even GRCs don't require gender reassignment surgery;
-- possibly 98% of TiMs have not had such surgery & have no intention of having it;
-- 99% of sex offenders are male;
-- 88% of victims are female;
-- male pattern sex offending does not change with transition;
-- sex offenders will do almost anything to access victims, including cross-dressing & saying they are "trans".
Omg— we have to get that 1.4 percent undecided over to our side!