It is obvious Paul H is simply spouting stuff he has been fed by other people. He doesn't understand what he is responding to and so is not able to give a critical response.
That is a bit worrying, but then again, the Metro doesn't really do serious journalism as the mistakes are the highlight of the read.
Graham, remember that a man of your intellect can run rings round these wee men. They know not what they do... And they will get what they deserve.
the metro's biggest readership was probably commuters into london (at least they were before the pandemic). metro readers pick up the freebie paper to be entertained by news snippets or celebrity gossip, rather than informed by news stories; so as you say they are not trying to do serious journalism. but the mistakes do matter, if they go unchecked; for the metro has the highest circulation of any printed newspaper (uk), and keeps going even though it is probably loss making. maybe we should ask why do big media enterprises fund loss making concerns (inc the sun newspaper), and what do they gain from presenting stories that mislead or do not clearly present the facts?
In Scotland, most people took the Metro for their cat litter trays/cleaning their floors/for hamster cages. Straw polls, done on buses across Scotland in 2019.
So it is not important and should be treated as the rage it is. Just like the News of the Screws. Chip paper journalism.
What's satisfying at my house is using newspapers to start our winter fires, especially pleasurable if some creep's photo is on the page. Or, alternatively, my German shepherd years ago told us what she thought of Ronald Reagan when his picture was on the front page of the NY Daily News -- it was not positive.
if they (journalists) are unable to question or invalidate another's identity, that is whether an individual is who they say they are or an 'impersonator' as a fact, how then are they able to discern anything that is known about the individual as truth. 'facts' need to be questioned/challenged, rather than assumptions made before truth can be established. if the truth cannot be established then the stories that journalists tell can only be opinion or fictions.
He's welcome not to question ANYTHING himself, but all the rest of us can question whatever we like. I don't even know who he is and care nothing for his self-righteous proclamations about "anyone else."
You fell at the first hurdle, Graham, by assuming they could apply critical thinking in their response. They're like zombies with the mantras and afraid of disrupting their baseline cognitive dissonance.
That’s a lot of paragraphs to say nothing but demonstrates that belligerence, misogynist sexist crap is alive and kicking in the metro. They are the epitome of the wrong side of history. Sanctimonious ****s.
I am taking a new approach with all these loons, grovellers and self-serving boot licking woke fools. I’m laughing at them. Their lies and tomfoolery will be exposed.
Janedoe profile here illustrates why wiki should never be relied upon esp by professionals like journalists… “I wake up early and edit Wikipedia”! What is he, anyone can write anything on wiki.
There is a definite lack of insight amongst organisations, individuals and authorities who don’t have the background knowledge and are incapable of seeing the nuance. I wouldn’t get too depressed about it, they don’t know and they don’t understand. It’s like trying to explain a cat’s right to exist to a dog.
This is exactly why it's so important that trans rights activists have complete control over Wikipedia and have gotten every editor but two (last I checked) who attempts to keep articles about any gender critical person/book/idea banned. Wikipedia is used as not just a legitimate source, but as THE legitimate source by everyone from laypeople to lawyers and journalists.
TRAs were smart and spent years building up their numbers there so that it's now completely impossible for anyone to keep articles that deal with gender politics - or anybody who questions it - even slightly balanced.
Radfems, frankly, spent too many years shrugging off the growing TRA influence over there by saying "Who cares? It's just Wikipedia - no one takes it seriously". Well, nearly everyone gets their information there and it paints us as hatemongers and pushes false information about puberty blockers and much more. It hurts us and our cause immeasurably.
Ah yes, pinknews, that hard-hitting bastion of journalistic integrity, featuring stories like this plonker who wants to look like an animé doll. You'll never guess who the boyfriend is. 😁
Munchausen's? (Not the by proxy variant). It's a distressingly sad story this once you're past the initial vomit provoking reaction. Imagine feeling a 'need' to communicate to the world you've always felt you identified more with Barbie dolls than Ken dolls. Why are these people getting no real help for their delusions? But I guess as long as you have money to jet around the world and surf over the crest of reality instead of needing to confront it you can live indefinitely in cloud Cuckoo land where the only help you think you need is that of surgeons and medics.
yes talking/counselling would surely be more useful than surgery, and i would guess cheaper. but these strange activities and transactions from ultrafantasylandqueercaptialism are even more alienating than the previously advertised ontheneverneverpinkpound promotions that sought to shame thriftminded lesbians who desire to keep hold over their own purse-strings.
it's pink news, but is it 'fake' news? previously he had 'fake' implants as a man, and even after 70 surgeries to transition to become a women, he is still a man who looks like an anime doll apparently. but why does pink news not attempt to find out why he has done this - is it addiction? or vanity? or seeking attention? or just boredom? Or even go near the big question - how was it all financed? someone really should follow the money.
Their response is not surprising, but it is interesting. Not for the way they respond to you but the way they think of the other men's profiles. They can be pretty sure that you're taking the piss, but how do they know that none of the others are? They're acting as gatekeepers and it's incredibly self righteous, infuriating and karmically speaking I wish them an eternity of itchy jumpers.
🙄 “lesbian” men. “Trans Rights Advocates” erasing our words, language, safe spaces and replacing them with their own was one of the first of so many red flags. Watching them completely fork up and reveal their true Erasure of Women’s & Children’s Rights agenda is almost enjoyable. Thank you sir, for speeding ip this process! 😆 👏👏👏👏👏 Fifteen thousand gold stars for you. ⭐️ Keep up the excellent work!!
The dating site HER seems to be something of a hybrid between dating and social media. It gets a fairly positive review from the reviewer "Dating Scout" which notes:
"This site promotes inclusivity for all female members regardless of what they classify themselves— lesbians, bisexuals, and queers.
HER only lets users sign up through their Facebook or Instagram accounts. They do this to verify the authenticity of those who would like to become a member. This has raised protests before because they would mistakenly reject "masculine-looking" women (since men are not allowed to make profiles in the app)."
Of course we know this is eyewash, and they do too, because after all what value is there in a rule preventing men from making profiles in the app when you simultaneously proclaim yourself fully on board with the idea men are a type of woman. This I assume was Graham's point in doing his stunt.
Many of the comments to the review from users of the app stand in stark contrast to the mild critique of DatingScout, and slam the site for being a haven for scammers and phonies.
»This was supposed to be a site for WOMEN finding WOMEN why the hell is it FLOODED with disgusting perverted men at every single turn. Queer btw is a slur, the vast majority of lesbians do NOT identify with queer. It is a call for all the MEN who pretend to be women and lesbians. This is NOT for women. This site only caters to the men now. Way to let down an entire community. God forbid lesbians have one single effing site for themselves, every single one has to serve men. Disgusting. «
- - - for example.
But to be fair to the App's creators they make it clear enough that "HER is a home for all lesbian, bi, queer, non-binary, trans women, trans men and gender non conforming folks." So if you're a woman seeking women then obviously you need to pass this one by.
My guess is that finding an authentic alternative is easier said than done. You probably need to be adept at navigating the dark net to find a genuine lesbian dating site these days. How did it come to this in such a few short years after the final success of gay rights in winning over the mainstream of society?
As long as reality is the material reality we suppose it to be, enveloped in 3 dimensional Euclidian space, then our beings are physical in nature and the way we reproduce is physical which means that sex is physical. This means that someone born with the body of a biological male cannot experience female sexual desire, be it homo or hetero sexual. And therefore cannot possibly know what it feels like to be lesbian let alone woman. Any man claiming such is either deluded or a charlatan.
It's perhaps not just a little ironic that the statement from "HER" cited in the Metro article includes the words:
"We are here for ALL WOMEN, including the trans community" demonstrating in spite of all efforts to sound inclusive that they do in fact recognize that men are not women at least in the same way that women are women. We understand then why it is this absurdity "Transwomen are women - full stop" is SO important to get nailed into the brains of the land. With this brazen falsification the most outrageous impossiblities can become mundane unquestionable facts. Of course men can be lesbian since they are women, of course they should participate in women's sport when they are women, of course they shouldn't have to use the Gents if they are women. And of course you shouldn't be oppressed to prove you are a woman when you are one, it should be adequate just to say you are a woman.
Graham Linehans stupid stunts of course expose all this for the sham it is and we can't have that. So let's get him branded bigot as indelibly as possible.
Not sure what's meant by please post under the upcoming Pink News hit piece - does that mean I'm going to have to create an account at that foul oracle of lies and bullshit?
“It is unclear how this question relates to your complaint.” is the reply from a cluster b fucktard
It is obvious Paul H is simply spouting stuff he has been fed by other people. He doesn't understand what he is responding to and so is not able to give a critical response.
That is a bit worrying, but then again, the Metro doesn't really do serious journalism as the mistakes are the highlight of the read.
Graham, remember that a man of your intellect can run rings round these wee men. They know not what they do... And they will get what they deserve.
the metro's biggest readership was probably commuters into london (at least they were before the pandemic). metro readers pick up the freebie paper to be entertained by news snippets or celebrity gossip, rather than informed by news stories; so as you say they are not trying to do serious journalism. but the mistakes do matter, if they go unchecked; for the metro has the highest circulation of any printed newspaper (uk), and keeps going even though it is probably loss making. maybe we should ask why do big media enterprises fund loss making concerns (inc the sun newspaper), and what do they gain from presenting stories that mislead or do not clearly present the facts?
In Scotland, most people took the Metro for their cat litter trays/cleaning their floors/for hamster cages. Straw polls, done on buses across Scotland in 2019.
So it is not important and should be treated as the rage it is. Just like the News of the Screws. Chip paper journalism.
What's satisfying at my house is using newspapers to start our winter fires, especially pleasurable if some creep's photo is on the page. Or, alternatively, my German shepherd years ago told us what she thought of Ronald Reagan when his picture was on the front page of the NY Daily News -- it was not positive.
“It is not our, nor anyone else’s place to question or invalidate another’s identity.” EG NEVER MIND THE BOLLOX!
I can’t read any more 😖
It’s not my job to affirm their delusions.
In that case I identity as Richard Branson and hereby request access to my bank account.
if they (journalists) are unable to question or invalidate another's identity, that is whether an individual is who they say they are or an 'impersonator' as a fact, how then are they able to discern anything that is known about the individual as truth. 'facts' need to be questioned/challenged, rather than assumptions made before truth can be established. if the truth cannot be established then the stories that journalists tell can only be opinion or fictions.
He's welcome not to question ANYTHING himself, but all the rest of us can question whatever we like. I don't even know who he is and care nothing for his self-righteous proclamations about "anyone else."
Exactly people need to be paid a lot to sustain these delusions.
You fell at the first hurdle, Graham, by assuming they could apply critical thinking in their response. They're like zombies with the mantras and afraid of disrupting their baseline cognitive dissonance.
That’s a lot of paragraphs to say nothing but demonstrates that belligerence, misogynist sexist crap is alive and kicking in the metro. They are the epitome of the wrong side of history. Sanctimonious ****s.
I am taking a new approach with all these loons, grovellers and self-serving boot licking woke fools. I’m laughing at them. Their lies and tomfoolery will be exposed.
Janedoe profile here illustrates why wiki should never be relied upon esp by professionals like journalists… “I wake up early and edit Wikipedia”! What is he, anyone can write anything on wiki.
There is a definite lack of insight amongst organisations, individuals and authorities who don’t have the background knowledge and are incapable of seeing the nuance. I wouldn’t get too depressed about it, they don’t know and they don’t understand. It’s like trying to explain a cat’s right to exist to a dog.
This is exactly why it's so important that trans rights activists have complete control over Wikipedia and have gotten every editor but two (last I checked) who attempts to keep articles about any gender critical person/book/idea banned. Wikipedia is used as not just a legitimate source, but as THE legitimate source by everyone from laypeople to lawyers and journalists.
TRAs were smart and spent years building up their numbers there so that it's now completely impossible for anyone to keep articles that deal with gender politics - or anybody who questions it - even slightly balanced.
Radfems, frankly, spent too many years shrugging off the growing TRA influence over there by saying "Who cares? It's just Wikipedia - no one takes it seriously". Well, nearly everyone gets their information there and it paints us as hatemongers and pushes false information about puberty blockers and much more. It hurts us and our cause immeasurably.
Ah yes, pinknews, that hard-hitting bastion of journalistic integrity, featuring stories like this plonker who wants to look like an animé doll. You'll never guess who the boyfriend is. 😁
https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/01/21/frenchy-morgan-anime-doll-barcroft-tv-hooked-on-the-look/
Munchausen's? (Not the by proxy variant). It's a distressingly sad story this once you're past the initial vomit provoking reaction. Imagine feeling a 'need' to communicate to the world you've always felt you identified more with Barbie dolls than Ken dolls. Why are these people getting no real help for their delusions? But I guess as long as you have money to jet around the world and surf over the crest of reality instead of needing to confront it you can live indefinitely in cloud Cuckoo land where the only help you think you need is that of surgeons and medics.
A kick in the nads would be more effective and timely.
yes talking/counselling would surely be more useful than surgery, and i would guess cheaper. but these strange activities and transactions from ultrafantasylandqueercaptialism are even more alienating than the previously advertised ontheneverneverpinkpound promotions that sought to shame thriftminded lesbians who desire to keep hold over their own purse-strings.
it's pink news, but is it 'fake' news? previously he had 'fake' implants as a man, and even after 70 surgeries to transition to become a women, he is still a man who looks like an anime doll apparently. but why does pink news not attempt to find out why he has done this - is it addiction? or vanity? or seeking attention? or just boredom? Or even go near the big question - how was it all financed? someone really should follow the money.
🤣🤣🤣 that’s a “news paper”?
I've looked recently for the website Awful Plastic Surgery and now I know they morphed into Pink News.
Their response is not surprising, but it is interesting. Not for the way they respond to you but the way they think of the other men's profiles. They can be pretty sure that you're taking the piss, but how do they know that none of the others are? They're acting as gatekeepers and it's incredibly self righteous, infuriating and karmically speaking I wish them an eternity of itchy jumpers.
🙄 “lesbian” men. “Trans Rights Advocates” erasing our words, language, safe spaces and replacing them with their own was one of the first of so many red flags. Watching them completely fork up and reveal their true Erasure of Women’s & Children’s Rights agenda is almost enjoyable. Thank you sir, for speeding ip this process! 😆 👏👏👏👏👏 Fifteen thousand gold stars for you. ⭐️ Keep up the excellent work!!
🙄
These people have lied for so long they don't know what else to do. Its infuriating.
The dating site HER seems to be something of a hybrid between dating and social media. It gets a fairly positive review from the reviewer "Dating Scout" which notes:
"This site promotes inclusivity for all female members regardless of what they classify themselves— lesbians, bisexuals, and queers.
HER only lets users sign up through their Facebook or Instagram accounts. They do this to verify the authenticity of those who would like to become a member. This has raised protests before because they would mistakenly reject "masculine-looking" women (since men are not allowed to make profiles in the app)."
Of course we know this is eyewash, and they do too, because after all what value is there in a rule preventing men from making profiles in the app when you simultaneously proclaim yourself fully on board with the idea men are a type of woman. This I assume was Graham's point in doing his stunt.
Many of the comments to the review from users of the app stand in stark contrast to the mild critique of DatingScout, and slam the site for being a haven for scammers and phonies.
»This was supposed to be a site for WOMEN finding WOMEN why the hell is it FLOODED with disgusting perverted men at every single turn. Queer btw is a slur, the vast majority of lesbians do NOT identify with queer. It is a call for all the MEN who pretend to be women and lesbians. This is NOT for women. This site only caters to the men now. Way to let down an entire community. God forbid lesbians have one single effing site for themselves, every single one has to serve men. Disgusting. «
- - - for example.
But to be fair to the App's creators they make it clear enough that "HER is a home for all lesbian, bi, queer, non-binary, trans women, trans men and gender non conforming folks." So if you're a woman seeking women then obviously you need to pass this one by.
My guess is that finding an authentic alternative is easier said than done. You probably need to be adept at navigating the dark net to find a genuine lesbian dating site these days. How did it come to this in such a few short years after the final success of gay rights in winning over the mainstream of society?
As long as reality is the material reality we suppose it to be, enveloped in 3 dimensional Euclidian space, then our beings are physical in nature and the way we reproduce is physical which means that sex is physical. This means that someone born with the body of a biological male cannot experience female sexual desire, be it homo or hetero sexual. And therefore cannot possibly know what it feels like to be lesbian let alone woman. Any man claiming such is either deluded or a charlatan.
It's perhaps not just a little ironic that the statement from "HER" cited in the Metro article includes the words:
"We are here for ALL WOMEN, including the trans community" demonstrating in spite of all efforts to sound inclusive that they do in fact recognize that men are not women at least in the same way that women are women. We understand then why it is this absurdity "Transwomen are women - full stop" is SO important to get nailed into the brains of the land. With this brazen falsification the most outrageous impossiblities can become mundane unquestionable facts. Of course men can be lesbian since they are women, of course they should participate in women's sport when they are women, of course they shouldn't have to use the Gents if they are women. And of course you shouldn't be oppressed to prove you are a woman when you are one, it should be adequate just to say you are a woman.
Graham Linehans stupid stunts of course expose all this for the sham it is and we can't have that. So let's get him branded bigot as indelibly as possible.
Not sure what's meant by please post under the upcoming Pink News hit piece - does that mean I'm going to have to create an account at that foul oracle of lies and bullshit?
What a pos this revolting man is. “Unclear how this relates to your complaint” yuck. The entire point. “Men aren’t women though” 💜
A womans need for women only spaces just isnt as important as some mens need for validation it eould seem