42 Comments
author

I saw a screengrab, that if true appears to show her offering assistance with obtaining puberty blockers after pharmacies refused.

Expand full comment
author

'A Letter To Gay Men - A Warning' from EDI Jester on YouTube.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LDiZH59n3Ko0ALJF4OKtwCTQLESpjo17/view

Expand full comment

That's a powerfully worded warning. I hope it's getting widespread attention.

Expand full comment

I may be harsh, but I don't think ignorance is ever an excuse for these companies when they donate money - they should do their due diligence. I've been following the work of the Justice Defence Fund to hold Mindgeek accountable for the non-consensual videos posted on Pornhub. They have been holding businesses that enable them to operate accountable and putting pressure on them to withdraw their services and this has included huge companies like Visa. I think the same needs to be done for Mermaids. The businesses that enable them need pressure put on them and to be held accountable.

Expand full comment
author

Oh I agree, BlackieKat. And you're not harsh. Big companies and corporations need to and should do exacting research into the groups and charities they fund. But it rarely happens (they're usually more interested in the marketing and tax breaks than actually helping a good cause!). I think many assume if a charity is registered it must be legit. And, as we know, anything involving LGBTQIA++ groups has cache at the moment. Mermaids' funders should be held accountable. But I also think that, in the days to come, when we've won the gender war and the dust settles, there needs to be peace, reconciliation and a moving forward. We need to give people the space and the opportunity to admit they were wrong. A golden bridge.

Expand full comment
author

I'm not reconciling with the people who did know better. Those who should have known better - maybe. Those who could have known better - perhaps. Those who didn't know better - yes. But for the likes of Susie Green - never.

Expand full comment
Sep 28, 2022Liked by JL, KFP

Excellent research JL

Expand full comment
author

Thank you so much!

Expand full comment

Susie Green is one of the prime ‘trans’ cult leaders in Britain. She needs to be held accountable for her crimes. Pushing puberty blockers, cheerleading surgeries on healthy bodies, pushing the despicable and emotionally manipulative lie of ‘trans’ suicide, destroying children’s bodies and psyches. All to assuage her guilt for what she did to her own son. Look at the pain and suffering she’s caused because she refused to face the harm she caused to her own child. She has personally created a bulwark of British family tragedies to protect her own conscience. It’s difficult to fathom such cowardice.

Expand full comment
author

Don't forget her contribution to woke homophobia.

Expand full comment

So true. Another one of her hideous crimes.

Expand full comment

Great writing!

As an aside, I look at pictures of Green's son/daughter and wonder what he/she thinks of what the Greens did to him/her. I certainly wouldn't like to be paraded about like some sort of trophy child. And all the while knowing that the parents put him on lifelong medication and through painful surgery simply because he was the wrong type of boy. We'll probably never know. Sometimes, I think that Mrs Green does all this because she wants the consolation of other 'corrected' children being out there as some sort of crazy consolation for her child.

Expand full comment
author
Sep 28, 2022·edited Sep 28, 2022Author

Thank you, Suzanne! My heart breaks for Jackie. To me he always looks like a Stepford wife. I think he has to play along for his own sake, rather than confront the full horror of what was done to him by his own parents. (His father - who couldn't have a gay son - is just as culpable.) He could have a had a perfectly healthy and happy normal life if just left in peace to grown up a feminine gay man. Poor thing.

Expand full comment

It's simply horrendous. Such a hideous burden for such a young person.

Expand full comment
Sep 28, 2022Liked by JL, KFP

A key question is will detransitioners in-the-future be able to enact a class action that encompasses Dr Martens, Starbucks, The National Lottery, Wagamama, the BBC...for funding the abuse enacted on them, in addition to the medical authorities responsible and Mermaids itself?

I suspect of the corporate sponsors, only Dr Martens and Wagamama wouldn't be able to escape paying damages as the others could claim that insufficient knowledge of what Mermaids were up to was available at-the-time. Dr Martens and Wagamama though couldn't easily escape as at the time they announced their sponsorship there was plenty of data available in the public sphere that Mermaids were both institutionally abusive towards children and were promoting homophobia.

Expand full comment

Ooo she has been raking it in, can’t wait to see Green finally get her maniac-arse kicked!

Expand full comment
author

Kicked into a prison cell - perhaps her cellmate will be a 'transwoman'.

Expand full comment

I'd pay ready money to see that! :D

Expand full comment
Sep 28, 2022Liked by KFP

Whichever local authority Mermaids operates in should be investigating them under safeguarding.

Expand full comment

According to their website there's an office in Yeadon, which comes under Leeds and an office in London. Their safeguarding policy states: '3.1: the welfare of children is paramount in all the work Mermaids does and in all the decisions we take'

Expand full comment

Thank you JL and good for Andrew Gilligan .... these deluded grifting gotta stop - 'chest binding could be child abuse' - too right. this stuff got to go and soonest.

Expand full comment

Bout bloody time 😡

Expand full comment

Sorry thanks jl , I’m always late to the party !

Expand full comment
author

Haha not at all! And thank you!

Expand full comment
Sep 28, 2022Liked by KFP, JL

Obviously I didn’t mean bout bloody time by you 😀

I’m digging a bigger hole here 😂

Expand full comment
author

🤣 I know what you mean!

Expand full comment

And one lucky employee (possibly the Chief Executive, but not necessarily so - the Charity Commission requires the salary to be disclosed, but not the recipient) gets paid between £60,000 and £70,000 per year for being involved in managing all this harm.

Expand full comment
author

Blood money.

Expand full comment

Well done for unveiling this information.These collaborators should be boycotted by every rational and caring person. Do they even know what they're supporting ? Thankfully ,I don't buy from any of them but that's more of a happy accident than by design. This ideology is so pervasive that we don't always know if we're contributing to a movement that we absolutely abhor. Thanks very much for this post x

Expand full comment
author

Thank you Susan! x

Expand full comment
founding

Thank you JL, your article is so good and should be in mainstream media. Your writing and research are always great. You’ve said everything (and more and obviously so much better) that I said when I copy pasted the Telegraph article on to my Fb page about their investigation into the vile organisation Mermaids on 26th September with the report that the Charities Commission are going to look into investigating them. Here’s what I said -

‘All of the corporate organisations, all the government organisations entrusted with education, health, policing and safeguarding, the various celebrities … all taken in by the utter wrongdoing of this vile so-called Charity: Mermaids. And all of us that spoke the truth about them, that alerted and warned, all of the women’s organisations that spoke up - all called bigots and transphobes. Well, you all enabled these harms to be perpetrated on children. Time to speak up and apologise. Time to call for an investigation, for the immediate removal of their ‘training’ material from schools, NHS local trusts and the police, from everywhere. Time for the perps to be prosecuted. ‘

Expand full comment
author

Thank you so much, Julia. Your kind words are very much appreciated! x

Expand full comment
founding

I’ve shared your article on Fb and E-mailed to non-Fb friends. All your links, the whole article show so clearly how the fact that big organisations validate something as harmful and wrong and with unqualified people that recommend to illegal medics like the Webberley monster - doesn’t mean that organisation is okay. Awareness training? - your article and everything that Glinner does, everything that all the women’s organisations are doing, including JK, Maya, Allison Bailey - so many! - all this work is the real awareness training. Truth and reality awareness. It needs to be out there as much as possible. Thank you all for everything you do.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you so much for your support, Julia. It's really very much appreciated. x

Expand full comment

Aon is one of the world's largest insurance brokers so they will undoubtedly be broking medical malpractice and professional indemnity claims resulting from organisations captured by this nonsense in the not too distant future.

Expand full comment

Thinking of writing to all the relevant UK chief execs - would you mind if I borrow some of your research from here (with accreditation) or linking to this page? I feel now is the time for a concerted effort using all avenues, so also thinking of penning something to the Charity Commission.

Expand full comment
author

You would be very welcome to use anything you like - links, text, whatever... And there is absolutely no need for accreditation. I write these pieces in the hope they'll be of use so please take whatever you need!

Expand full comment

Thanks. I will let you know

Expand full comment