On Sunday The Telegraph published a deeply shocking article about Mermaids supplying young girls with dangerous breast binders without the knowledge and/or consent of their parents and the charity’s staff using lies and manipulation to push vulnerable kids into medical transition.
I may be harsh, but I don't think ignorance is ever an excuse for these companies when they donate money - they should do their due diligence. I've been following the work of the Justice Defence Fund to hold Mindgeek accountable for the non-consensual videos posted on Pornhub. They have been holding businesses that enable them to operate accountable and putting pressure on them to withdraw their services and this has included huge companies like Visa. I think the same needs to be done for Mermaids. The businesses that enable them need pressure put on them and to be held accountable.
Susie Green is one of the prime ‘trans’ cult leaders in Britain. She needs to be held accountable for her crimes. Pushing puberty blockers, cheerleading surgeries on healthy bodies, pushing the despicable and emotionally manipulative lie of ‘trans’ suicide, destroying children’s bodies and psyches. All to assuage her guilt for what she did to her own son. Look at the pain and suffering she’s caused because she refused to face the harm she caused to her own child. She has personally created a bulwark of British family tragedies to protect her own conscience. It’s difficult to fathom such cowardice.
As an aside, I look at pictures of Green's son/daughter and wonder what he/she thinks of what the Greens did to him/her. I certainly wouldn't like to be paraded about like some sort of trophy child. And all the while knowing that the parents put him on lifelong medication and through painful surgery simply because he was the wrong type of boy. We'll probably never know. Sometimes, I think that Mrs Green does all this because she wants the consolation of other 'corrected' children being out there as some sort of crazy consolation for her child.
A key question is will detransitioners in-the-future be able to enact a class action that encompasses Dr Martens, Starbucks, The National Lottery, Wagamama, the BBC...for funding the abuse enacted on them, in addition to the medical authorities responsible and Mermaids itself?
I suspect of the corporate sponsors, only Dr Martens and Wagamama wouldn't be able to escape paying damages as the others could claim that insufficient knowledge of what Mermaids were up to was available at-the-time. Dr Martens and Wagamama though couldn't easily escape as at the time they announced their sponsorship there was plenty of data available in the public sphere that Mermaids were both institutionally abusive towards children and were promoting homophobia.
Thank you JL and good for Andrew Gilligan .... these deluded grifting gotta stop - 'chest binding could be child abuse' - too right. this stuff got to go and soonest.
And one lucky employee (possibly the Chief Executive, but not necessarily so - the Charity Commission requires the salary to be disclosed, but not the recipient) gets paid between £60,000 and £70,000 per year for being involved in managing all this harm.
Well done for unveiling this information.These collaborators should be boycotted by every rational and caring person. Do they even know what they're supporting ? Thankfully ,I don't buy from any of them but that's more of a happy accident than by design. This ideology is so pervasive that we don't always know if we're contributing to a movement that we absolutely abhor. Thanks very much for this post x
Thank you JL, your article is so good and should be in mainstream media. Your writing and research are always great. You’ve said everything (and more and obviously so much better) that I said when I copy pasted the Telegraph article on to my Fb page about their investigation into the vile organisation Mermaids on 26th September with the report that the Charities Commission are going to look into investigating them. Here’s what I said -
‘All of the corporate organisations, all the government organisations entrusted with education, health, policing and safeguarding, the various celebrities … all taken in by the utter wrongdoing of this vile so-called Charity: Mermaids. And all of us that spoke the truth about them, that alerted and warned, all of the women’s organisations that spoke up - all called bigots and transphobes. Well, you all enabled these harms to be perpetrated on children. Time to speak up and apologise. Time to call for an investigation, for the immediate removal of their ‘training’ material from schools, NHS local trusts and the police, from everywhere. Time for the perps to be prosecuted. ‘
Aon is one of the world's largest insurance brokers so they will undoubtedly be broking medical malpractice and professional indemnity claims resulting from organisations captured by this nonsense in the not too distant future.
Thinking of writing to all the relevant UK chief execs - would you mind if I borrow some of your research from here (with accreditation) or linking to this page? I feel now is the time for a concerted effort using all avenues, so also thinking of penning something to the Charity Commission.
I saw a screengrab, that if true appears to show her offering assistance with obtaining puberty blockers after pharmacies refused.
'A Letter To Gay Men - A Warning' from EDI Jester on YouTube.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LDiZH59n3Ko0ALJF4OKtwCTQLESpjo17/view
I may be harsh, but I don't think ignorance is ever an excuse for these companies when they donate money - they should do their due diligence. I've been following the work of the Justice Defence Fund to hold Mindgeek accountable for the non-consensual videos posted on Pornhub. They have been holding businesses that enable them to operate accountable and putting pressure on them to withdraw their services and this has included huge companies like Visa. I think the same needs to be done for Mermaids. The businesses that enable them need pressure put on them and to be held accountable.
Excellent research JL
Susie Green is one of the prime ‘trans’ cult leaders in Britain. She needs to be held accountable for her crimes. Pushing puberty blockers, cheerleading surgeries on healthy bodies, pushing the despicable and emotionally manipulative lie of ‘trans’ suicide, destroying children’s bodies and psyches. All to assuage her guilt for what she did to her own son. Look at the pain and suffering she’s caused because she refused to face the harm she caused to her own child. She has personally created a bulwark of British family tragedies to protect her own conscience. It’s difficult to fathom such cowardice.
Great writing!
As an aside, I look at pictures of Green's son/daughter and wonder what he/she thinks of what the Greens did to him/her. I certainly wouldn't like to be paraded about like some sort of trophy child. And all the while knowing that the parents put him on lifelong medication and through painful surgery simply because he was the wrong type of boy. We'll probably never know. Sometimes, I think that Mrs Green does all this because she wants the consolation of other 'corrected' children being out there as some sort of crazy consolation for her child.
A key question is will detransitioners in-the-future be able to enact a class action that encompasses Dr Martens, Starbucks, The National Lottery, Wagamama, the BBC...for funding the abuse enacted on them, in addition to the medical authorities responsible and Mermaids itself?
I suspect of the corporate sponsors, only Dr Martens and Wagamama wouldn't be able to escape paying damages as the others could claim that insufficient knowledge of what Mermaids were up to was available at-the-time. Dr Martens and Wagamama though couldn't easily escape as at the time they announced their sponsorship there was plenty of data available in the public sphere that Mermaids were both institutionally abusive towards children and were promoting homophobia.
Ooo she has been raking it in, can’t wait to see Green finally get her maniac-arse kicked!
Whichever local authority Mermaids operates in should be investigating them under safeguarding.
Thank you JL and good for Andrew Gilligan .... these deluded grifting gotta stop - 'chest binding could be child abuse' - too right. this stuff got to go and soonest.
Bout bloody time 😡
And one lucky employee (possibly the Chief Executive, but not necessarily so - the Charity Commission requires the salary to be disclosed, but not the recipient) gets paid between £60,000 and £70,000 per year for being involved in managing all this harm.
Well done for unveiling this information.These collaborators should be boycotted by every rational and caring person. Do they even know what they're supporting ? Thankfully ,I don't buy from any of them but that's more of a happy accident than by design. This ideology is so pervasive that we don't always know if we're contributing to a movement that we absolutely abhor. Thanks very much for this post x
Thank you JL, your article is so good and should be in mainstream media. Your writing and research are always great. You’ve said everything (and more and obviously so much better) that I said when I copy pasted the Telegraph article on to my Fb page about their investigation into the vile organisation Mermaids on 26th September with the report that the Charities Commission are going to look into investigating them. Here’s what I said -
‘All of the corporate organisations, all the government organisations entrusted with education, health, policing and safeguarding, the various celebrities … all taken in by the utter wrongdoing of this vile so-called Charity: Mermaids. And all of us that spoke the truth about them, that alerted and warned, all of the women’s organisations that spoke up - all called bigots and transphobes. Well, you all enabled these harms to be perpetrated on children. Time to speak up and apologise. Time to call for an investigation, for the immediate removal of their ‘training’ material from schools, NHS local trusts and the police, from everywhere. Time for the perps to be prosecuted. ‘
Aon is one of the world's largest insurance brokers so they will undoubtedly be broking medical malpractice and professional indemnity claims resulting from organisations captured by this nonsense in the not too distant future.
Thinking of writing to all the relevant UK chief execs - would you mind if I borrow some of your research from here (with accreditation) or linking to this page? I feel now is the time for a concerted effort using all avenues, so also thinking of penning something to the Charity Commission.