JK Rowling exposes two dodgy men in two days

If you come at the Queen, you better not miss

JK Rowling’s increased activity on Twitter in the last few days isn’t proving to be just a headache for Labour; it’s bad news for today’s boundary-busting paedophile-enablers as well.

Rowling has been responding to several accounts that have been attacking her in the last week.

One was ‘Vaush’, real name Ian Kochinski, a far-left gamer with over 400,000 subscribers on YouTube, who told her to ‘shut the fuck up’ and added that women generally need to be quieter and start apologising more.

She posted a screenshot of the tweet and wrote that it was the same tactics her ex-husband used and that she wouldn’t be bullied out of resistance.

Vaush didn’t take this response terribly well, and responded with all the empathy to a victim of domestic abuse, and facts, that you might expect.

The problem for Vaush is that this brought him to a lot of people’s attention. It turns out that one topic he really likes talking about on his streams is child abuse. There are multiple clips of him defending it.

These are all real comments he’s made:

“Recognise this empirically correct fact. It is possible for an adult and a child to have a sexual relationship and for it to have positive outcomes on the child.”

“I’m yet to hear a convincing moral or legal argument why the possession of child pornography should be illegal.”

“Owning child pornography is probably a hell of a lot more ethical than wearing the t-shirts on your backs.”

“If you’re not paying for child pornography then there is no argument in favour of morally condemning people who get it.”

“We’ve all jerked at the loli. And after we nut we look over our history and go ‘oh jeez, some of these girls looked pretty young’. I don’t give a fuck.”

Several people became aware of Vaush’s history and tweeted about it - one tweet was retweeted by Rowling to her 14 million followers.

Given this, you might have thought that if you’re a high profile trans activist with a history you’d prefer the world not to know about, this may not be a good time to tweet abuse at JK Rowling.

Caspar Salmon also didn’t get the memo.

Salmon is a film writer who also occasionally contributes to The Guardian, including this article attacking people who had criticised Netflix for broadcasting the film Cuties, as they believed it sexualised children.

Salmon tried to patronise Rowling.

But instead got owned by her.

But then things then got even worse for Salmon. People started reading what he’s written.

One piece he wrote was about his experiences of sexuality as a child actor, which concludes with these paragraphs:

Kids should be exposed to sex. Should be allowed sometimes to peak (sic) under the covers and discover the strange coded world of grown-ups and their libidos. The reverse of the coin is unconsensual horrors, sordid and deplorable; let’s briskly send the Alapetites and Saviles of this world to jail. But, here’s to the others – the gentle oversharers, the unrepentant pervs, the kindly louche sweethearts – and all that they have to impart.

Just a reminder—there is no such thing as ‘consensual’ sex between an adult and a child. It is always, always abuse.

Many are beginning to wake up to the links between some of the pioneers of transgender ideology, such as Foucault, or the man who invented the term ‘gender identity’, or the man who invented the term ‘cis’, or the man who came up with the trans flag, or one of the first ever doctors to work on transgender surgeries, and their links to child abuse.

Isn’t it also strange that when JK Rowling starts randomly shooting at TRAs she keeps hitting paedophile apologists?