“Doctor” Jack Turban has swallowed the ‘gender’ cult spin — hook, line, and sinker. Not only has he bought it all, he’s enthusiastically pushing the nonsense that is poorly disguised as ‘science.’
He’s a goner, no matter which way he wriggles. He’s dangling on the ‘trans’ fishing line, running out of air and energy. Either he removes the hook that is killing his career, thereby dropping him into a sea of lawsuits, or he remains on the cult line until he is no longer viable.
Either way, he faces a loss of his prestige and potential criminal charges. He's obviously non-scientifically picking and choosing his research to prop up his shaky ideology. Another so-called expert who is more interested in his own reputation and ego than the health of children. God, let’s hope there’s consequences for all the stupid and selfish people like him who’ve caused so much damage in the name of ‘trans liberation.’
A number of years back there was a doctor called Andrew Wakefield who did a study and (I read it) suggested there *could* be some kind of link between ingredients in vaccines and autism. He also pointed out that *further investigation would be needed*.
Now, its clear with new evidence this was not the case but, he was hounded out and vilified for saying this.
Yet here are doctors across the world saying far more heinous and wrong things that NO additional studies will find to be true - that sex doesn't exist, that stopping puberty with toxic drugs isn't harmful, that it is **possible** to "change sex" which is what is being said when they say a person - no matter their age - is "trans".
The fundament basis of this ideology is a LIE. Its not "flawed" or "misinformation" or "misinterpretation of data, whether good or bad". Not one person can change their sex to the opposite or their sex class. It is a biological and scientific impossibility. Just as impossible as a human flapping their arms in t-shirt and jeans and stepping off a very tall building because they same they can fly!
It is blatant, out and out, wilful LIES.
Every single doctor who supports this ideology, or has kept silent and "treated" children or adults as if they *could* change sex, should be criminalised for the harm they have done.
I am very suspicious of "evidence" that claims vaccines are harmless because the evidence is coming from a highly unreliable and toxic doctor named Fauci who owns many vaccine patents and has made an enormous fortune pushing them. Vaccines seemed to be harmless when I was a child because we were not expected to get SIXTY-NINE vaccines before we started school. Fauci controls the CDC -- as well as NIAID and the NIH -- so any information coming out of the CDC is highly suspect. Fauci seems to enjoy maiming and murdering adults and children en masse and is not a trustworthy source of anything.
You are describing the US situation in which legislation from 1986 exempts vaccine manufacturers from liability and where the regulators are particularly cosied-up to those they are supposed to be regulating. It's not that bad anywhere else. What has of course intensified lately everywhere is the vilification of anyone questioning the safety or efficacy of any product defined as a vaccine as an "anti-vaxxer", including somewhat dubiously so-defined recently rushed-out, highly risky experimental gene-based products that have now spectacularly failed and gone into negative efficacy.
What no-one wants to talk about is the ethical dilemma arising when the risks from a disease (some people say this applies with measles) are so low for healthy children that the risk-benefit analysis of even a low-risk vaccine doesn't work out well for them, yet where the product is sufficiently effective in dampening down infectiousness as to protect immunocompromised children at greater risk. It goes against parental instincts to place the safety of some other hypothetical child above that of your own. The authorities know this and have chosen to respond, not by investigating questions of safety and openly discussing the results, but by becoming embroiled in a culture war.
Hypothetically, were it possible to change sex, would the new gender ideology make sense? I think not. It has two elements contradicting each other. On one hand, there's the dualistic neuroscience hypothesis of definitively male and female brains somehow mis-matched with bodies of the opposite sex. Arguably valid as a hypothesis, but what would the mis-matching mechanism be, and where is the supporting evidence? On the other hand, we have the subjective gender-as-a-social-construct-on-a-spectrum sociological analysis getting conflated with empirically verifiable biological sex. If the non-binary concept of sex in the sociological analysis is supposed to be a reflection of biology, then it is in direct conflict with the rigidly binary way of perceiving both body and brain in the dubious neuroscience.
What is a genuinely trans kid? One who would experience gender disphoria in any possible world? We don't have an infinite number of worlds in which to test this out. There is always going to be some kind of social context. Some kind of social norms to feel the pressure to conform to.
“Doctor” Jack Turban has swallowed the ‘gender’ cult spin — hook, line, and sinker. Not only has he bought it all, he’s enthusiastically pushing the nonsense that is poorly disguised as ‘science.’
He’s a goner, no matter which way he wriggles. He’s dangling on the ‘trans’ fishing line, running out of air and energy. Either he removes the hook that is killing his career, thereby dropping him into a sea of lawsuits, or he remains on the cult line until he is no longer viable.
Either way, he faces a loss of his prestige and potential criminal charges. He's obviously non-scientifically picking and choosing his research to prop up his shaky ideology. Another so-called expert who is more interested in his own reputation and ego than the health of children. God, let’s hope there’s consequences for all the stupid and selfish people like him who’ve caused so much damage in the name of ‘trans liberation.’
A number of years back there was a doctor called Andrew Wakefield who did a study and (I read it) suggested there *could* be some kind of link between ingredients in vaccines and autism. He also pointed out that *further investigation would be needed*.
Now, its clear with new evidence this was not the case but, he was hounded out and vilified for saying this.
Yet here are doctors across the world saying far more heinous and wrong things that NO additional studies will find to be true - that sex doesn't exist, that stopping puberty with toxic drugs isn't harmful, that it is **possible** to "change sex" which is what is being said when they say a person - no matter their age - is "trans".
The fundament basis of this ideology is a LIE. Its not "flawed" or "misinformation" or "misinterpretation of data, whether good or bad". Not one person can change their sex to the opposite or their sex class. It is a biological and scientific impossibility. Just as impossible as a human flapping their arms in t-shirt and jeans and stepping off a very tall building because they same they can fly!
It is blatant, out and out, wilful LIES.
Every single doctor who supports this ideology, or has kept silent and "treated" children or adults as if they *could* change sex, should be criminalised for the harm they have done.
I am very suspicious of "evidence" that claims vaccines are harmless because the evidence is coming from a highly unreliable and toxic doctor named Fauci who owns many vaccine patents and has made an enormous fortune pushing them. Vaccines seemed to be harmless when I was a child because we were not expected to get SIXTY-NINE vaccines before we started school. Fauci controls the CDC -- as well as NIAID and the NIH -- so any information coming out of the CDC is highly suspect. Fauci seems to enjoy maiming and murdering adults and children en masse and is not a trustworthy source of anything.
You are describing the US situation in which legislation from 1986 exempts vaccine manufacturers from liability and where the regulators are particularly cosied-up to those they are supposed to be regulating. It's not that bad anywhere else. What has of course intensified lately everywhere is the vilification of anyone questioning the safety or efficacy of any product defined as a vaccine as an "anti-vaxxer", including somewhat dubiously so-defined recently rushed-out, highly risky experimental gene-based products that have now spectacularly failed and gone into negative efficacy.
What no-one wants to talk about is the ethical dilemma arising when the risks from a disease (some people say this applies with measles) are so low for healthy children that the risk-benefit analysis of even a low-risk vaccine doesn't work out well for them, yet where the product is sufficiently effective in dampening down infectiousness as to protect immunocompromised children at greater risk. It goes against parental instincts to place the safety of some other hypothetical child above that of your own. The authorities know this and have chosen to respond, not by investigating questions of safety and openly discussing the results, but by becoming embroiled in a culture war.
Gone off your meds?
If this is directed at me, you are ridiculous!
Hypothetically, were it possible to change sex, would the new gender ideology make sense? I think not. It has two elements contradicting each other. On one hand, there's the dualistic neuroscience hypothesis of definitively male and female brains somehow mis-matched with bodies of the opposite sex. Arguably valid as a hypothesis, but what would the mis-matching mechanism be, and where is the supporting evidence? On the other hand, we have the subjective gender-as-a-social-construct-on-a-spectrum sociological analysis getting conflated with empirically verifiable biological sex. If the non-binary concept of sex in the sociological analysis is supposed to be a reflection of biology, then it is in direct conflict with the rigidly binary way of perceiving both body and brain in the dubious neuroscience.
Well ya know the old saying - there are lies, 'gender' bio-illogical lies n skewed woke statistics!
Now read the sequel, it's a cracker!: https://malcolmrichardclark.substack.com/p/turban-even-worse-than-we-thought
Ooft!
Finally saw damp squib used in context
What is a genuinely trans kid? One who would experience gender disphoria in any possible world? We don't have an infinite number of worlds in which to test this out. There is always going to be some kind of social context. Some kind of social norms to feel the pressure to conform to.