Isn't this fraud?
Can Stonewall be charged for lying to the country for cash?
 |
Fresh evidence pops that Nancy Kelly lied in her disastrous Woman's Hour interview.
But that’s to be expected. No-one would ever admit to such a thing on television. This is why ‘No Debate’ was key. ‘No Debate’ allows idiot blue ticks to feel good about blocking every woman who refuses to be treated like a doormat.
It also allows trans rights activists to hold up slogans counteracting arguments that no-one is making. If there’s no debate, people think this is the debate.
Because as myself and my TERF mates have been saying over and over again, this movement, this ideology, cannot stand up to even the slightest scrutiny. It is incoherent nonsense. Young women are currently cutting their breasts off because adults like Nancy Kelly have completely abdicated their responsibilities in service of a religious belief.
But then, there’s this as well.
Again, she had to say these things, because there was a microphone in front of her. She wanted to escape the fate of Thinktank McCrazypants here, even though Thinktank was simply parroting the Stonewall line.
So she lied to Emma Barnett, and she walked back on every single thing she has been pushing for the entire time she’s been at Stonewall.
Are there no grounds for a criminal charge here? Considering the amounts of money involved? Or might the Scottish government have grounds to sue?
Isn’t this fraud?
At the very, very least will people stop pretending that JK Rowling, or indeed, the co-author of ‘Father Ted’, did anything wrong? How long do we have to wait before people stand up to this confederacy of dunces?
=
I've no idea what the answer is but that would be a hell of a court case.
The Scottish Government would have to claim they were lied to when someone told them humans could change their sex; a bit like complaining that you now have two broken legs after stepping off the roof because someone told you that humans could levitate.
But then a woman is actually going to court for saying women have vaginas so anything's possible.
Thank you for putting this, in particular: "... allows trans rights activists to hold up slogans counteracting arguments that no-one is making. If there’s no debate, people think this is the debate." into words.