Isn't this fraud?

Can Stonewall be charged for lying to the country for cash?

Fresh evidence pops that Nancy Kelly lied in her disastrous Woman's Hour interview.

David Thompson @dt_ni

Nancy also says Stonewall aren't interested in 'erasing the word mother' and would have given three options in meetings and advice. She said the "historic" document in the Nolan podcast was "taken out of context". This is what Stonewall told the Scottish Government in 2020.

But that’s to be expected. No-one would ever admit to such a thing on television. This is why ‘No Debate’ was key. ‘No Debate’ allows idiot blue ticks to feel good about blocking every woman who refuses to be treated like a doormat.

Matthew Stadlen @MatthewStadlen

@TransMediaWatch had no idea there was quite so much hate out there for trans women. It’s been eye-opening and disturbing.

It also allows trans rights activists to hold up slogans counteracting arguments that no-one is making. If there’s no debate, people think this is the debate.

Because as myself and my TERF mates have been saying over and over again, this movement, this ideology, cannot stand up to even the slightest scrutiny. It is incoherent nonsense. Young women are currently cutting their breasts off because adults like Nancy Kelly have completely abdicated their responsibilities in service of a religious belief.

But then, there’s this as well.

Louise Ashworth 🦖 🟩⬜️🟪🇪🇺 @Ashworth101

#Stonewall CEO says humans can’t change sex, the word mother is fine, gender critical views aren’t necessarily transphobic & she doesn’t know if Kathleen Stock or JKR are transphobic. Can we all go back to normal now? Is gender ideology over?

Again, she had to say these things, because there was a microphone in front of her. She wanted to escape the fate of Thinktank McCrazypants here, even though Thinktank was simply parroting the Stonewall line.

Andrew @notthatbeard

I’m sorry, what?

So she lied to Emma Barnett, and she walked back on every single thing she has been pushing for the entire time she’s been at Stonewall.

Are there no grounds for a criminal charge here? Considering the amounts of money involved? Or might the Scottish government have grounds to sue?

Isn’t this fraud?

At the very, very least will people stop pretending that JK Rowling, or indeed, the co-author of ‘Father Ted’, did anything wrong? How long do we have to wait before people stand up to this confederacy of dunces?

=