In-house libel is still libel
A disgruntled female employee at a London-based social media agency sent me an appalling piece of propaganda in the form of an in-house company newsletter. It’s disingenuous shit, to say the least, and I am astonished that anyone signed off on it. Not only does it help propagate a smear campaign against JK Rowling, it also claims that puberty blockers give “the questioning teenager much needed time to explore their gender identity, without the stress of their body changing into something they might not be wanting (sic)”
I won’t link to the whole thing, but here’s the worst part of it.
I can only imagine the bosses at this company are confused about the debate and have chosen to blow in the same direction the wind is going. But when the Keira Bell decision is upheld, and when more and more people look at what JK Rowling actually said, they will be left looking like he condoned the sterilisation of gender-nonconforming children as well as the death and rape threats sent to a victim of domestic abuse.
JK Rowling never called trans people predators, and I’m surprised no-one at this company asked to see the evidence that she did.
It's an interesting slip to say she called them predators. Almost as if they know there are a significant number who are.
I think most of the toxic AGPs have NPD or BPD. The autistic, depressed, et al are just along for the ride.
The problem is the amount of sexual narcissism driving the AGP of some in the movement. These men ARE predators! I'd much rather take my chances with an average "cis" man going to the ladies' loo than with many of those men from HER, much less the Jessica Yanivs and Karen Whites of the world.
Fully 40% of trans-identified male prisoners in the UK are in prison for sexual offenses. That's nearly twice the number of sexual offenders among the regular male population.
Why the f*&! isn't anyone talking about THAT?
The writer is confused about actors and the characters they play.