Yeah, I think all women can relate to how sexually exciting our first bra was for us - NOT! Getting sexually excited about wearing womens clothing does not make someone a woman because wearing clothes is not a sexual act per se (discounting any clothing worn specifically by consenting adults for sex here), whether they match the traditional garb for your sex or not.
My first bra was a complete non-event-- got it while still in elementary school, because mom said I'd grown bosomy enough for all the jiggling around to have become unseemly. I, meanwhile, was pretty much oblivious. Didn't care about stuff like that yet. So not only not sexually exciting (to a 10-year-old???), really not much of anything-- I barely even remember it! SO glad that Robert is here to clue me in to the REAL female first-bra experience! (Apparently it's all about peens getting stiff-- who knew?)
Gosh , that's some story. Perverts now almost boasting about their fetishes ? What world are we now living in ? It feels as if we've all been magically transported to another planet ,where everything's the complete opposite of reality and logic. Thank you , Genevieve.👍👏
"Almost" boasting? It's the great reveal. Another exciting stage of sexual fetishism: daring to go public! You bet he gets off on it. It's also a great boost for narcissism.
An excellent headline to a disturbing read, but full of important and relevant information. The creator of this flag is transparently passing off his manipulative, narcissistic sadism as some kind of enlightment. He knows it's bullshit, he knows what he is and somewhere he must be wondering why other people haven't worked that out yet, or have but are not going to say anything. He's going to be assured in the knowledge that by this stage few will. People are wrapping themselves up in his stupid flag, literally and symbolically. Aligning themselves with something that's not just nonsensical, it's dangerous.
It's incredible to see images of this flag flying on civic buildings and schools, etc. I'm sure the power of this ideology will have captured enough minds that we will eventually see it imprinted on babies nappies, reminding us that we shouldn't make any bigoted assumptions about the gender of the wearer.
FFS, this cognisant demographic are well aware of the signifiers they have pushed in to the mainstream. It's grooming on a massive scale. The grubbiness of it all. Promoting personal kink in public and demanding it's upheld as a protected characteristic! I had wondered about the baby blue and baby pink used in the flag and this makes increasingly more sense.
Every time I see this flag, I think how sickly it is. And how the pink and pale blue say disturbing things about the mindset and arrested development of trans people: stuck in fantasy, unable to cope with reality. Using infantile narcissistic rage and loudly claimed victimhood to manipulate the world around them.
But to see these colours as a message from child rapists adds the most sickening, creepiest aspect of all. Nauseating.
Mental illnesses, including transvestism, can be a dealbreaker.
There’s a common phrase, “Don’t stick your dick in crazy.” What it means is that it’s seldom a good idea to have a sexual or romantic relationship with someone who has clear mental problems.
For women, though, the phrase can be turned as "Don't let crazy stick it's dick in you".
Trans, trans apologists and pedophiles (but I repeat myself) know that they are paving the way for the normalization of pedophilia, and they don’t care, because their validation matters more than the well being of other people.
If children can consent to something as life-changing and as drastic as SRS, HRT, or puberty blockers, they can absolutely consent to sexual intercourse as well, even with adults. Deep down, they’re perfectly okay with pedophilia.
They only outwardly oppose it for the sake of optics.
They no longer "outwardly oppose" pedophilia, even. The lead psychologist at the UK's Tavistock Gender Identity Service (GIDS) is pressing for paraphilias to be removed from DSM-5: including pedophilia.
GIDS is part of the UK's National Health Service (NHS). The NHS has already been groomed into dropping offensive, discriminatory terms like "women" and "mother": in favour of "gender neutral" terms like menstruator, cervix-haver, birthing parent and chest-feeder: enforced by NHS midwives.
The UK's criminal justice system no longer records offences and offenders by sex, but by "gender identity". And the House of Lords weeks ago threw out an amendment to the Police, Crime etc Bill currently going through Parliament, trying to prevent trans-identified male prisoners from being housed in women's prisons.
Toilets and changing rooms in schools, leisure centres, cafes, stores and theatres are being made "gender neutral" everywhere, despite public protest and schoolgirls refusing to use mixed toilets: getting dehydrated in the long wait to get home.
And children in primary schools are being indoctrinated with gender identity on Stonewall / Mermaids "Genderbread" model.
So it should only be a matter of time for TRAs to get the legal age of consent reduced, and then abolished.
As I wrote on Ovarit yesterday, I have always believed this Helms guy lifted his "design" for the trans flag directly from the "Candy Stripe" flannel receiving blankets manufactured by A.L. Mills (now owned by Medline) that were first introduced in the 1950s and have been standard issue in USA hospital maternity wards and birthing centers for close to 70 years. Medline has renamed the blankets the "Kuddle Up." All babies born in medical settings in the US get swaddled in these blankets, and take at least one of them home with them.
After the blankets have been washed a number of times, the stripes get the same pastel tones seen in the trans flag. Since "Monica" Helms is the father of two children whom I believe were born in the 80s, I imagine he must have had ample opportunity to observe these blankets in an up-close and personal way.
More, including links to articles showing pictures of the Medline baby blankets, hereL
Yes, Proxy! I know exactly what you mean! Those baby blankets look nearly identical to the trans flag. Knowing what we do about the overlapping paraphilias entrenched in gender ideology, it's incredibly disturbing to me that someone like this would project his fetish onto children. And, even more, that he is far from alone in doing so.
I have always been creeped out by the use of baby blue and pink as representing transgenderism, wondered how on earth that had originated but kind of didn't want to know. This is as bad as or even worse than feared. Thank you for bringing it out in the open.
When will people start to see what they've been groomed to cheer on? I hope this exposure helps, as it should.
"Six months into the marriage, I found out just how Donna really felt about my cross-dressing. She came home one day and found me wearing a dress. She went ballistic and told me in no uncertain terms that I would never dress like that at home ever again.”
This is where they always lie. Fetishists know from day one their partner doesnt or wont approve of their fetish. But that doesnt stop them from trying to force their fetish onto others. Having a fetish is just one of many issues that should be sorted out prior to marriage. Others include - does the couple want children? Or perhaps - where will the couple live or - who will they live with? If a couple cant agree on these issues prior to marriage, perhaps they shouldnt be married. Fetishists know from day one their significant other wont like their fetish. Rather their partner is likely to hate their fetish. Which is OK. fetishes arent for everyone. but many fetishists continue with the relationship anyways hoping their partner will change their mind. Often the fetishist will keep their fetish a secret untill there are children in the picture, thereby forcing her to put up with his fetish to support the children. The fetishists is well aware that had his partner known of his fetish before the fact, she wouldnt have married him. as such, the fetishists enters his relationship in a dishonest manor and then villainizes the woman later for not putting up with his obsessive hobby.
Yeah, I think all women can relate to how sexually exciting our first bra was for us - NOT! Getting sexually excited about wearing womens clothing does not make someone a woman because wearing clothes is not a sexual act per se (discounting any clothing worn specifically by consenting adults for sex here), whether they match the traditional garb for your sex or not.
My first bra was a complete non-event-- got it while still in elementary school, because mom said I'd grown bosomy enough for all the jiggling around to have become unseemly. I, meanwhile, was pretty much oblivious. Didn't care about stuff like that yet. So not only not sexually exciting (to a 10-year-old???), really not much of anything-- I barely even remember it! SO glad that Robert is here to clue me in to the REAL female first-bra experience! (Apparently it's all about peens getting stiff-- who knew?)
Exactly! I just remember finding it really uncomfortable and thinking it was totally unnecessary! Looks like I reacted incorrectly too then!
So profoundly disturbing.
Gosh , that's some story. Perverts now almost boasting about their fetishes ? What world are we now living in ? It feels as if we've all been magically transported to another planet ,where everything's the complete opposite of reality and logic. Thank you , Genevieve.👍👏
"Almost" boasting? It's the great reveal. Another exciting stage of sexual fetishism: daring to go public! You bet he gets off on it. It's also a great boost for narcissism.
Gobsmacked. Looking forward to sharing this information!
With Nicola Sturgeon hopefully?
An excellent headline to a disturbing read, but full of important and relevant information. The creator of this flag is transparently passing off his manipulative, narcissistic sadism as some kind of enlightment. He knows it's bullshit, he knows what he is and somewhere he must be wondering why other people haven't worked that out yet, or have but are not going to say anything. He's going to be assured in the knowledge that by this stage few will. People are wrapping themselves up in his stupid flag, literally and symbolically. Aligning themselves with something that's not just nonsensical, it's dangerous.
It's incredible to see images of this flag flying on civic buildings and schools, etc. I'm sure the power of this ideology will have captured enough minds that we will eventually see it imprinted on babies nappies, reminding us that we shouldn't make any bigoted assumptions about the gender of the wearer.
Ew...hated the flag ALWAYS! This is an excellent piece that should be widely disseminated. Thank you for writing and posting this. Meanwhile, in the U.S. we have this. https://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/local/vermont/2019/03/26/sen-bernie-sanders-hangs-transgender-pride-flag-office-lgbtq/3275878002/
FFS, this cognisant demographic are well aware of the signifiers they have pushed in to the mainstream. It's grooming on a massive scale. The grubbiness of it all. Promoting personal kink in public and demanding it's upheld as a protected characteristic! I had wondered about the baby blue and baby pink used in the flag and this makes increasingly more sense.
“Divine intervention “. “Enlightened being “. Avatars (I have it on good authority) are not ruled by their lower chakra.
Heart chakra?
Don't think Robert Hogge is ruled by his heart chakra.
Thank you for using his real name. We do not need to participate in his fantasies.
Not at all. None of them are, that’s the problem. Sexual misconduct waved through with “equality” by our politicians and business leaders
Every time I see this flag, I think how sickly it is. And how the pink and pale blue say disturbing things about the mindset and arrested development of trans people: stuck in fantasy, unable to cope with reality. Using infantile narcissistic rage and loudly claimed victimhood to manipulate the world around them.
But to see these colours as a message from child rapists adds the most sickening, creepiest aspect of all. Nauseating.
Message to pervs:
Women (actual ones) might say “let me try it” - as in blouse/shoes etc - but never underwear. That’s gross/you 🤮
Mental illnesses, including transvestism, can be a dealbreaker.
There’s a common phrase, “Don’t stick your dick in crazy.” What it means is that it’s seldom a good idea to have a sexual or romantic relationship with someone who has clear mental problems.
For women, though, the phrase can be turned as "Don't let crazy stick it's dick in you".
Trans, trans apologists and pedophiles (but I repeat myself) know that they are paving the way for the normalization of pedophilia, and they don’t care, because their validation matters more than the well being of other people.
If children can consent to something as life-changing and as drastic as SRS, HRT, or puberty blockers, they can absolutely consent to sexual intercourse as well, even with adults. Deep down, they’re perfectly okay with pedophilia.
They only outwardly oppose it for the sake of optics.
They no longer "outwardly oppose" pedophilia, even. The lead psychologist at the UK's Tavistock Gender Identity Service (GIDS) is pressing for paraphilias to be removed from DSM-5: including pedophilia.
GIDS is part of the UK's National Health Service (NHS). The NHS has already been groomed into dropping offensive, discriminatory terms like "women" and "mother": in favour of "gender neutral" terms like menstruator, cervix-haver, birthing parent and chest-feeder: enforced by NHS midwives.
The UK's criminal justice system no longer records offences and offenders by sex, but by "gender identity". And the House of Lords weeks ago threw out an amendment to the Police, Crime etc Bill currently going through Parliament, trying to prevent trans-identified male prisoners from being housed in women's prisons.
Toilets and changing rooms in schools, leisure centres, cafes, stores and theatres are being made "gender neutral" everywhere, despite public protest and schoolgirls refusing to use mixed toilets: getting dehydrated in the long wait to get home.
And children in primary schools are being indoctrinated with gender identity on Stonewall / Mermaids "Genderbread" model.
So it should only be a matter of time for TRAs to get the legal age of consent reduced, and then abolished.
Re: his shirt-- "THIS IS WHAT TRANS LOOKS LIKE". Oh yeah... does it ever. In a word: GODAWFUL.
As I wrote on Ovarit yesterday, I have always believed this Helms guy lifted his "design" for the trans flag directly from the "Candy Stripe" flannel receiving blankets manufactured by A.L. Mills (now owned by Medline) that were first introduced in the 1950s and have been standard issue in USA hospital maternity wards and birthing centers for close to 70 years. Medline has renamed the blankets the "Kuddle Up." All babies born in medical settings in the US get swaddled in these blankets, and take at least one of them home with them.
After the blankets have been washed a number of times, the stripes get the same pastel tones seen in the trans flag. Since "Monica" Helms is the father of two children whom I believe were born in the 80s, I imagine he must have had ample opportunity to observe these blankets in an up-close and personal way.
More, including links to articles showing pictures of the Medline baby blankets, hereL
https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/66677/creator-of-trans-pride-flag-was-admitted-crossdressing-fetishist
Yes, Proxy! I know exactly what you mean! Those baby blankets look nearly identical to the trans flag. Knowing what we do about the overlapping paraphilias entrenched in gender ideology, it's incredibly disturbing to me that someone like this would project his fetish onto children. And, even more, that he is far from alone in doing so.
I have always been creeped out by the use of baby blue and pink as representing transgenderism, wondered how on earth that had originated but kind of didn't want to know. This is as bad as or even worse than feared. Thank you for bringing it out in the open.
When will people start to see what they've been groomed to cheer on? I hope this exposure helps, as it should.
Anyone else remember this predator?
https://wiki2.org/en/Russell_Williams_(criminal)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6427169/How-Queens-cross-dressing-pilots-police-interview-gave-away-life-rapist-murderer.html
If only there was a flag or some such symbol that could clearly identify a men's rights movement...
"Six months into the marriage, I found out just how Donna really felt about my cross-dressing. She came home one day and found me wearing a dress. She went ballistic and told me in no uncertain terms that I would never dress like that at home ever again.”
This is where they always lie. Fetishists know from day one their partner doesnt or wont approve of their fetish. But that doesnt stop them from trying to force their fetish onto others. Having a fetish is just one of many issues that should be sorted out prior to marriage. Others include - does the couple want children? Or perhaps - where will the couple live or - who will they live with? If a couple cant agree on these issues prior to marriage, perhaps they shouldnt be married. Fetishists know from day one their significant other wont like their fetish. Rather their partner is likely to hate their fetish. Which is OK. fetishes arent for everyone. but many fetishists continue with the relationship anyways hoping their partner will change their mind. Often the fetishist will keep their fetish a secret untill there are children in the picture, thereby forcing her to put up with his fetish to support the children. The fetishists is well aware that had his partner known of his fetish before the fact, she wouldnt have married him. as such, the fetishists enters his relationship in a dishonest manor and then villainizes the woman later for not putting up with his obsessive hobby.