'No LGB without the T'. The latest mantra on mindless repeat. Why is that? Because 'LGB' has provided legitimacy and cover for an sneaky (Denton's document) illegitimate cult. The unholy, unasked for 'alliance' has enabled ideologues to spread their tentacles throughout society. 'LGB' is entirely diminished by the 'forced teaming', but the T is emboldened by the public's support of LGB, and its past failures towards same-sex attracted people. So the T is not only feeding on public guilt, but is taking advantage of public goodwill towards 'LGB'. On its own (except for the ludicrous never-ending alphabet glomming onto it) the singular T is toast.
Can any of those people screaming 'No LGB without the T coherently and logically explain why lesbians who choose not to associate with men who identify themselves as lesbians should be forced to?
Why is it a right to force others to associate with you?
Why do they just accept what these men are claiming without question?
Do they not even think of the consequences of they're wrong?
Or do they know very well what those consequences are and relish the thought?
Unthinking group think, or the newest latest manifestation of homophobia, and more particularly lesbophobia.
The unthinking masses desperate to be seen as good citizens being led by lesbophobes and all too happy to have their actions, thoughts and speech dictated.
They crave authoritarian overlords and don't care who they are.
'No LGB without the T'. The latest mantra on mindless repeat. Why is that? Because 'LGB' has provided legitimacy and cover for an sneaky (Denton's document) illegitimate cult. The unholy, unasked for 'alliance' has enabled ideologues to spread their tentacles throughout society. 'LGB' is entirely diminished by the 'forced teaming', but the T is emboldened by the public's support of LGB, and its past failures towards same-sex attracted people. So the T is not only feeding on public guilt, but is taking advantage of public goodwill towards 'LGB'. On its own (except for the ludicrous never-ending alphabet glomming onto it) the singular T is toast.
Freedom of association used to be a thing.
Can any of those people screaming 'No LGB without the T coherently and logically explain why lesbians who choose not to associate with men who identify themselves as lesbians should be forced to?
Why is it a right to force others to associate with you?
Why do they just accept what these men are claiming without question?
Do they not even think of the consequences of they're wrong?
Or do they know very well what those consequences are and relish the thought?
Unthinking group think, or the newest latest manifestation of homophobia, and more particularly lesbophobia.
The unthinking masses desperate to be seen as good citizens being led by lesbophobes and all too happy to have their actions, thoughts and speech dictated.
They crave authoritarian overlords and don't care who they are.