Russell T Davies peddling the dangerous narrative that excluding transgender people from anything means they will be murdered or simply just die. Fear mongering over-dramatic twat.
As for the aggressive mini Jolyon M in the John Lewis advert, I agree. Non conformity is great in anyone but because of the great trans agenda, I'm just cynical about something that could have been cute. Especially when there are drag kids being exploited.
Furthermore, the advert shows him ruining stuff for his sister as his mother placidly sits there and lets him trash the house and it just screamed "gender roles", the complete opposite of what they were trying to achieve with glitter-throwing dress boy.
Woketard playing to his base. Prison of choice is not 'inclusivity'. Hormones on demand is not 'inclusivity'. These sick men have FOMO and it'll never be fixed.
We like your DIRECTNESS, your NO-BULLSHIT approach. Like you, I have never found this a popular stance, at least in my lifetime. "Can't you just be nice?" said in whiny voice, meaning of course "Can't you be more feminine?" And truthfully, "Can't you just shut up?" Where's that quote I have? A woman who does not require validation is the most fearsome being on the planet, if I have it right.
I couldn't even watch the entire one minute. I expect the kid will show up on Dr Phil where the fact that he still lives at home at age 40, still destroys everything, and has a serious drug habit will be discussed.
Oh, I don't know. It shows a white boy in a skirt as an annoying little prick destroying everything around him regardless of how he affects others. Seems about right to me.
No no no, are you serious?!? As in a meme? Will I have to search out their whole campaign. Is that little ballet girl also in cyber (she just doesn't know it yet)? Is there one where she clears up (asking his to lift his feet up as he sits there) and he gets to eat cake?
Who the hell have most organisations contracted their brains out to? They are all having their Ratner moments. Why isn't anyone senior getting a grip? Do Stonewall Lobotomisers get them to sign this away too?
Rang them yesterday, went bonkers, as always...They've informed Head Office, who are (supposed) to be ringing me back at some point...but as they've apparently been inundated with complaints, that may never happen...Told the young lad I spoke to, in their insurance section, that I'd never use their dept store, or Waitrose ever again, as they have total plonkers working for them now, sending out subliminal messages to children........AND, as IF any insurance company would settle ANY claim where a parent just sat back and 'let life happen'! HA! Every year they tighten up the rules for insurance, charge more and more, whilst offering less and less and wriggling out of everything they possibly can...'Left Life Happen', my arse!
The way he stares at his sister, brandishes an umbrella, uses it to smash the vase behind her head, and then destroys her paints - that’s a domestic violence scenario.
Forgot to add - a woman on twitter suggested complaining to the ASA regarding the John Lewis ad. Their code specifically advises against the sexualisation of children in adverts (4.13) https://www.asa.org.uk/type/broadcast/code_section/04.html
Also, you could argue that it's misleading advertising - if your property is damaged because your child is badly behaved and you did nothing to stop him, are they really going to accept your claim?
If trans women are real women why are all the 'lesbians' with a penis not happy screwing each other? If they believe what they say then what's the problem?
Heads up to Stephen Nolan for his exposure of stonewall. It’s been a long time coming. Although there have been very many people pointing out the same bollox for a long while. I commend him for pointing out the obvious. And to glinner obviously. I may disagree with you on many things but the immutability of sex isn’t one of those. Hopefully that Stephen Nolan podcast / broadcast will start an honest conversation. Given I hope it’s cast and reception. Let’s all dust ourselves down. And hope a modicum of sanity can be restored. Women are Women. And Men are Men. Mother’s are Mother’s.
Father's are Father's. Only women can birth a child. And only a father can father a child. Let’s applaud that as a testament to biological reality.
The important thing here is children being led astray into trans ideology. Which is a lie. It’s child abuse. End of.
And as for Russel T Davies. Who cares. As much as writing scripts for Doctor Who means something. He turned it into a boring genuflect of the past. Like a lot of modern culture.
He gleans on his past. Like a lot of people in his ilk. And should be respectively ignored. His anger is metaphorical. About something he can virtue signal easily at. Tell me when he is annoyed, outraged even, when he learns of children being betrayed and sent on a path of medical and genital mutilation. Which any sentient adult who cares can see a mile off. He can fuck off.
What is great about Stephen Nolan doing this expose. In so much he’s something of a blustering UlsterMan. Is that he comes from a society which has grown up with and known personal and societal turmoil. Which is real and visceral. He’s a fella that knows about contradiction. As much as that is his stick. But so what. Finally the BBC that is presumably filled with some off the most prestigious and best resourced journalists in the world. Is being taught a lesson by one of its regional hacks. In doing actual fucking journalism. Not about activism. Looking at the facts. Any sentient adult can see that transgenderism is a lie. As so many sentient people have called out on this. But why the silence on those we see as the adults and authorities on this. Sacrificing children (and adults) to a false god. Why?
I dont think Kes up there is a gay man but an AGP. I think the AGP pretend to be gay men so that women think they are "real trans" and wont assualt them to get women to trust and put their guard down more. That is something AGPs have been doing for decades in the gay community. Many, many, many lesbians have fallen for that and have been sexually assaulted as a result. Women, dont be fooled. He ain't gay or harmless
The Erin Mohr video is interesting in its way. There's a kind of "in your face" triumphalism about it presumably intended as bait for "transphobes" made by a man whose sexuality almost certainly is hetero and who isn't the least bit interested in dating men. Most men would also certainly return the compliment but perhaps some gays may be interested, although I'd doubt it would be many.
What seems to animate Erin is the pantomimic theatricality of being able - in spite of actually not passing as a woman -to pass as a woman thanks to a political climate which intimidates anyone who would try to make fun of him not passing. But if he really wants a boyfriend then if course it shouldn't be that difficult. He just needs to subscribe to a gay dating site and be honest about his passion for dressing in women's clothing, and perhaps be open about the possibility of dressing and appearing like a man when as a couple with his new partner they go on a date. Go for it Erin
He's a Revolting Pervert, who needs a jolly good talking to...and, as my Granny would have said, a Jolly Good SLAP as well. Double UGH and Triple YUK! These Deviant Men should be put in th broom cupboard, together, and then, the key thrown away. As for that stupid bloke giving the biggest load of baloney at the award he was given, for what, I've no idea, does it get more DUMB than that? I don't drink, but I'm starting to think that maybe I just should start at the age of 66, because this world has become so fecked up that it's hard to get through the day on just A Cup Of Tea alone! Ye GODS and Little Fishes!
Doesn't surprise me about Russell T Davies. I wonder how much he knew about some of the cast's antics when he was showrunner of Dr Who. He must've known about Barrowman - this video is from 2011, and there's a gag about JB getting his cock out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7JWY_oYlps
He is a man he gets a free pass. This isn't gay behaviour, it's specifically male behaviour. The antics of some men. Some abusers. For some reason some observers seem to be confused by this. It's all gone a bit quiet now about that, and those well-known incidents on those sets. Many, many women and men knew and were silenced or not bothered to do anything. Just having a laugh and all. How, as a woman, can you say, no I have a problem with this behaviour, if all around you say, it's ok he's gay! Oh he's not getting his cock out in any sexual way love, what are you like you prude, it's just a laugh. He didn't mean it blah blah.
I was in a bar once with someone mentioned in the above post. A gay man who insulted me with misogynist slurs and insults, really foul stuff, in an attempt to flirt and get my male partner to sleep with him. To 'turn' him. It was a bit sad really but upsetting and caused some real fallout and even physical violence. I was attacked. But he's gay, so vulnerable, so very marginalised, so was untouchable. I find his hypocritical stances on rights very hard to stomach. It seems a speciality of some men to be this deluded about who is actually vulnerable.
I'm not so surprised that Glinner hasn't had so much support from the comedy or acting sleb world. There are some fragile puffed up egos. There was a big thing a few years back with some comedians deplatformed and outraged that their very misogynistic vein of humour wasn't so in fashion and women were speaking up. A new generation. It caused a real crisis and it came up a lot in my social circle and at how unfair it was for the poor millionaire men. Many supposedly decent leftish men could just not see why the little women were being uppity and selfishly ending their careers.
I have laughed at some fairly close the bone stuff and to mix my metaphors I do admire the ability to be funny whilst sailing fairly close to the wind.
With regard to the Police Scotland tweet, I had a suspicion regarding the protected characteristics mentioned, so I checked. As I suspected they are the characteristics protected by the new Hate Crime Act, not the EA2010.
Regulatory capture is almost complete. When even the Farce is lying to us, while telling people not to trust people who say they're the po...... #DystopianWakingDream
It seems to be post 2015. University was not like this when I was there (graduated 2012). People were still sniggering at a trans lecturer at my uni. And 'he' was the only trans person any of us had ever met! Now it seems they're bloody everywhere.
Can one of your clever axolotly peeps have a play with that dire John Lewis ad? Moley we need you! That those numbskulls have reinforced that little boys and men should be encouraged to be intensely selfish and cause havoc in their homes and lives in 'expressing themselves' while we women and girls sit by passively, patiently and peacefully getting on with stuff? And destroying that song? Are they hoping grandparents will be ahhing at this? Oh you know, boys will be boys! Whassat den? Identifying as violent destructive home wreckers? Gendered shite.
John Lewis and nice Waitrose? Oh do FUCK RIGHT OFF! GRRRRRR. Brand damage alert! Brand damage alert!
the only thing to do for gays and lesbians is to withdraw from any LGBTQ or LGBA (including Stonewall), because all of them are corrupt woman-hating organisations, they move continually with a new label, but contain the same organisers!
Russell T Davies peddling the dangerous narrative that excluding transgender people from anything means they will be murdered or simply just die. Fear mongering over-dramatic twat.
As for the aggressive mini Jolyon M in the John Lewis advert, I agree. Non conformity is great in anyone but because of the great trans agenda, I'm just cynical about something that could have been cute. Especially when there are drag kids being exploited.
Furthermore, the advert shows him ruining stuff for his sister as his mother placidly sits there and lets him trash the house and it just screamed "gender roles", the complete opposite of what they were trying to achieve with glitter-throwing dress boy.
I agree, very unsettling in many ways.
Woketard playing to his base. Prison of choice is not 'inclusivity'. Hormones on demand is not 'inclusivity'. These sick men have FOMO and it'll never be fixed.
Haha.
🥰 I love how you talk and lay it all out.
In all my years, this is the FIRST time my #NakedEmperor approach has paid off ;) Long may it last!
We like your DIRECTNESS, your NO-BULLSHIT approach. Like you, I have never found this a popular stance, at least in my lifetime. "Can't you just be nice?" said in whiny voice, meaning of course "Can't you be more feminine?" And truthfully, "Can't you just shut up?" Where's that quote I have? A woman who does not require validation is the most fearsome being on the planet, if I have it right.
I couldn't even watch the entire one minute. I expect the kid will show up on Dr Phil where the fact that he still lives at home at age 40, still destroys everything, and has a serious drug habit will be discussed.
I do think the young woman at the table is their nanny, with no control over an entitled twerp.
Maybe if Lice Scotland keep forgetting what protected characteristics are I might keep forgetting the letter 'P' and one of the 'o's of their name.
Haha 😂
Or the Pie, as they seem to think rights are indeed, a pie. LoL.
That John Lewis ad is so awful on so many levels.
Oh, I don't know. It shows a white boy in a skirt as an annoying little prick destroying everything around him regardless of how he affects others. Seems about right to me.
Have you seen the girl version? She's in a ballet costume and dances without demolishing the family home. 😐
No no no, are you serious?!? As in a meme? Will I have to search out their whole campaign. Is that little ballet girl also in cyber (she just doesn't know it yet)? Is there one where she clears up (asking his to lift his feet up as he sits there) and he gets to eat cake?
Who the hell have most organisations contracted their brains out to? They are all having their Ratner moments. Why isn't anyone senior getting a grip? Do Stonewall Lobotomisers get them to sign this away too?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sW-aMjMrib0
She's quite gender conforming compared to the boy advert.
Rang them yesterday, went bonkers, as always...They've informed Head Office, who are (supposed) to be ringing me back at some point...but as they've apparently been inundated with complaints, that may never happen...Told the young lad I spoke to, in their insurance section, that I'd never use their dept store, or Waitrose ever again, as they have total plonkers working for them now, sending out subliminal messages to children........AND, as IF any insurance company would settle ANY claim where a parent just sat back and 'let life happen'! HA! Every year they tighten up the rules for insurance, charge more and more, whilst offering less and less and wriggling out of everything they possibly can...'Left Life Happen', my arse!
The way he stares at his sister, brandishes an umbrella, uses it to smash the vase behind her head, and then destroys her paints - that’s a domestic violence scenario.
And his ugly little mug's look of superiority. Jeebus. What a prick.
And even his mother who seems to indulge him. Looks like storing up trouble doesn't it?
Forgot to add - a woman on twitter suggested complaining to the ASA regarding the John Lewis ad. Their code specifically advises against the sexualisation of children in adverts (4.13) https://www.asa.org.uk/type/broadcast/code_section/04.html
Also, you could argue that it's misleading advertising - if your property is damaged because your child is badly behaved and you did nothing to stop him, are they really going to accept your claim?
It seems that you pay a premium for this. Just enough remuneration to hire someone at low wage to clean up after him?
"These people are just not very bright."
No kidding. Where to begin? Well there's the bloke in a dress who can't figure out why more blokes won't date blokes in dresses...
Am I missing something?
If trans women are real women why are all the 'lesbians' with a penis not happy screwing each other? If they believe what they say then what's the problem?
That's a conundrum worthy of Will Hunting's blackboard.
Quite!!
BiGoT.... it's not affirming to have another cockfrocker, tHeMs NeEdZ tHe VaLiDaTiOn of corrective rape. #cynicalme
Heads up to Stephen Nolan for his exposure of stonewall. It’s been a long time coming. Although there have been very many people pointing out the same bollox for a long while. I commend him for pointing out the obvious. And to glinner obviously. I may disagree with you on many things but the immutability of sex isn’t one of those. Hopefully that Stephen Nolan podcast / broadcast will start an honest conversation. Given I hope it’s cast and reception. Let’s all dust ourselves down. And hope a modicum of sanity can be restored. Women are Women. And Men are Men. Mother’s are Mother’s.
Father's are Father's. Only women can birth a child. And only a father can father a child. Let’s applaud that as a testament to biological reality.
The important thing here is children being led astray into trans ideology. Which is a lie. It’s child abuse. End of.
And as for Russel T Davies. Who cares. As much as writing scripts for Doctor Who means something. He turned it into a boring genuflect of the past. Like a lot of modern culture.
He gleans on his past. Like a lot of people in his ilk. And should be respectively ignored. His anger is metaphorical. About something he can virtue signal easily at. Tell me when he is annoyed, outraged even, when he learns of children being betrayed and sent on a path of medical and genital mutilation. Which any sentient adult who cares can see a mile off. He can fuck off.
What is great about Stephen Nolan doing this expose. In so much he’s something of a blustering UlsterMan. Is that he comes from a society which has grown up with and known personal and societal turmoil. Which is real and visceral. He’s a fella that knows about contradiction. As much as that is his stick. But so what. Finally the BBC that is presumably filled with some off the most prestigious and best resourced journalists in the world. Is being taught a lesson by one of its regional hacks. In doing actual fucking journalism. Not about activism. Looking at the facts. Any sentient adult can see that transgenderism is a lie. As so many sentient people have called out on this. But why the silence on those we see as the adults and authorities on this. Sacrificing children (and adults) to a false god. Why?
sorry we don’t hv access in US.
I think what I’ve heard that the podcast will be available from the next few days from outside the U.K. Otherwise try and use a VPN link.
https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/100DGRXY3IqMgyGrt-pS8_cxOcRcb2OkM
Yes. Why?
Sorry but I would love Owen Jones to meet his match in real life.
I think most of those ‘opponents’ were blocked months ago .. 🥴
My sister outclasses him.
One can dream!
I dont think Kes up there is a gay man but an AGP. I think the AGP pretend to be gay men so that women think they are "real trans" and wont assualt them to get women to trust and put their guard down more. That is something AGPs have been doing for decades in the gay community. Many, many, many lesbians have fallen for that and have been sexually assaulted as a result. Women, dont be fooled. He ain't gay or harmless
Good grief! Though by now I should not be surprised at the depths to which they will stoop!
The Erin Mohr video is interesting in its way. There's a kind of "in your face" triumphalism about it presumably intended as bait for "transphobes" made by a man whose sexuality almost certainly is hetero and who isn't the least bit interested in dating men. Most men would also certainly return the compliment but perhaps some gays may be interested, although I'd doubt it would be many.
What seems to animate Erin is the pantomimic theatricality of being able - in spite of actually not passing as a woman -to pass as a woman thanks to a political climate which intimidates anyone who would try to make fun of him not passing. But if he really wants a boyfriend then if course it shouldn't be that difficult. He just needs to subscribe to a gay dating site and be honest about his passion for dressing in women's clothing, and perhaps be open about the possibility of dressing and appearing like a man when as a couple with his new partner they go on a date. Go for it Erin
He's a Revolting Pervert, who needs a jolly good talking to...and, as my Granny would have said, a Jolly Good SLAP as well. Double UGH and Triple YUK! These Deviant Men should be put in th broom cupboard, together, and then, the key thrown away. As for that stupid bloke giving the biggest load of baloney at the award he was given, for what, I've no idea, does it get more DUMB than that? I don't drink, but I'm starting to think that maybe I just should start at the age of 66, because this world has become so fecked up that it's hard to get through the day on just A Cup Of Tea alone! Ye GODS and Little Fishes!
All this nonsense seems like an excellent justification for a pleasant drink in the afternoon.
Or, maybe just stand on a street corner, after all, that clit is obvious, a block away !
Women’s Lit prize: “We only accept submissions from ppl who identify or live as women”. OR ???!!!
And what about writers who neither ‘identify as’ or ‘live as’ women, but just ARE women???!!!
Silence, TERF! ;) that's what's in store for US.
Make that ERF, please.
That's the 'non-binaries' fucked then
Hoist by their own petard 😁
Doesn't surprise me about Russell T Davies. I wonder how much he knew about some of the cast's antics when he was showrunner of Dr Who. He must've known about Barrowman - this video is from 2011, and there's a gag about JB getting his cock out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7JWY_oYlps
He is a man he gets a free pass. This isn't gay behaviour, it's specifically male behaviour. The antics of some men. Some abusers. For some reason some observers seem to be confused by this. It's all gone a bit quiet now about that, and those well-known incidents on those sets. Many, many women and men knew and were silenced or not bothered to do anything. Just having a laugh and all. How, as a woman, can you say, no I have a problem with this behaviour, if all around you say, it's ok he's gay! Oh he's not getting his cock out in any sexual way love, what are you like you prude, it's just a laugh. He didn't mean it blah blah.
I was in a bar once with someone mentioned in the above post. A gay man who insulted me with misogynist slurs and insults, really foul stuff, in an attempt to flirt and get my male partner to sleep with him. To 'turn' him. It was a bit sad really but upsetting and caused some real fallout and even physical violence. I was attacked. But he's gay, so vulnerable, so very marginalised, so was untouchable. I find his hypocritical stances on rights very hard to stomach. It seems a speciality of some men to be this deluded about who is actually vulnerable.
I'm so sorry that happened to you xxx
I'm not so surprised that Glinner hasn't had so much support from the comedy or acting sleb world. There are some fragile puffed up egos. There was a big thing a few years back with some comedians deplatformed and outraged that their very misogynistic vein of humour wasn't so in fashion and women were speaking up. A new generation. It caused a real crisis and it came up a lot in my social circle and at how unfair it was for the poor millionaire men. Many supposedly decent leftish men could just not see why the little women were being uppity and selfishly ending their careers.
I have laughed at some fairly close the bone stuff and to mix my metaphors I do admire the ability to be funny whilst sailing fairly close to the wind.
Thank you :-) x
That advert...seriously who is it supposed to appeal to. Bratty little kid.! anyone who would put up with that is a failure as a parent.
Russell T Davies …Welsh weirdo (I am Welsh so whatever!).
Also Lu Thomas good as #bekind ... then insults.
and are comedians now demanding we laugh at their unfunny routines!
With regard to the Police Scotland tweet, I had a suspicion regarding the protected characteristics mentioned, so I checked. As I suspected they are the characteristics protected by the new Hate Crime Act, not the EA2010.
Regulatory capture is almost complete. When even the Farce is lying to us, while telling people not to trust people who say they're the po...... #DystopianWakingDream
No surprise then.
When did universities become propaganda hubs for Stonewall Inc?
Stock is better off out of the cesspit.
It seems to be post 2015. University was not like this when I was there (graduated 2012). People were still sniggering at a trans lecturer at my uni. And 'he' was the only trans person any of us had ever met! Now it seems they're bloody everywhere.
Can one of your clever axolotly peeps have a play with that dire John Lewis ad? Moley we need you! That those numbskulls have reinforced that little boys and men should be encouraged to be intensely selfish and cause havoc in their homes and lives in 'expressing themselves' while we women and girls sit by passively, patiently and peacefully getting on with stuff? And destroying that song? Are they hoping grandparents will be ahhing at this? Oh you know, boys will be boys! Whassat den? Identifying as violent destructive home wreckers? Gendered shite.
John Lewis and nice Waitrose? Oh do FUCK RIGHT OFF! GRRRRRR. Brand damage alert! Brand damage alert!
the only thing to do for gays and lesbians is to withdraw from any LGBTQ or LGBA (including Stonewall), because all of them are corrupt woman-hating organisations, they move continually with a new label, but contain the same organisers!