Via Jarvis Dupont “How can I use murdered gay people to shit on women?” BBC Woman’s Hour continues to betray women Predator Eli Erlick gloats about assaulting women The hypocrisy of Emma Kennedy and Joe Lycett Banging on about Qatar and David Beckham but this bloke saying he’s a lesbian is fine and dandy.
Water it. Feed it. Concentrate on it. Dream on it. Fixate upon it. Buy stuff for it. Give it room to grow -- it's ever fluid you know. Use it. Weaponize it. And at some point in the future, regret it.
Just everything about this perverted, paedophillic, child abusing, women abusing, depraved cult is beyond sickening and yet mainstream media ignore it and even praise it. But then the mainstream media did hide Savile. I did read the other day that the person who exposed Savile said there’s someone else, another big name, they are trying to cover up again.
I read once that when women tried to resist the calls to cover themselves when the Iranian revolution was underway, young men would simulate masturbation at them in the street to intimidate them. That’s what at least one of the TRAs was doing in the SFW protest in NYC, I believe he was doing it to Karen Davis. So much happened at that protest that it’s taken awhile for that nastiness to really sink in.
Not apropos to anything technically in this Glinner Update, but as we all know, everything's connected. Just got a plea for money in my email from National Women's Law Center in the US of A. Captured from top to bottom. They may as well be honest and call it the National Men's Law Center. Obsessed with all things 'trans,' including 'trans' kids. Look at her frickin' pronouns. So deeply lost in the cult, this organization is no longer fit for purpose.
Here's a case they've taken on. It's a battle for a boy to play on a girls' team. This boy came out as a 'transgender girl' before he was four years old!
I read the article you’ve linked to. I’d never have guessed it was written by a women’s law center. The logic (?) of the writing resembles the evangelical cult my birth mother was caught up in during the Satanic Panic: down = up black = white, etc. It’s utter nonsense, and rather infuriating. 😠😡🤬
" And one day Dermot was sitting at the bar in this pub and the barman comes over to him and says: “You see that fella at the other end of the bar?” And Dermot says: “Yeah”. And the barman says: “That fella killed his wife, put her in the trunk of a car and pushed her off a cliff. So you’re not the only celebrity in town”.’"
Taliban leaving twitter b/c of Trump re-instatement has to be the most 'pot calling kettle' event since Al Qaeda criticised Daesh (ISIS) for being too extreme!
Someone who has written for Pink News among other things clearly setting out how wrong she was about JKR specifically and women’s rights more generally and apologising. Brave woman!
One of the first in a coming avalanche of backtrackers. They are seeing the cracks in the 'gender' juggernaut and want to save themselves. Even though so late following the direction of their consciences -- it's something to be pleased about.
I don't think we should criticise the backtrackers. If we do that, then it will discourage others from backtracking. We should welcome them into the fold. Besides, Graham himself has backtracked over his stance on Dankula, and in a very public and admirable way. I've backtracked plenty of times in my life, including on the very issues which are discussed on this forum. I used to have views that were almost diametrically opposed to those I hold today. Backtracking isn't always bad - it can be a noble endeavor.
Well, there are, of course, the backtrackers who are clearly doing it for no reason other than to cover their own backs. They can fuck off. Haha. But, in this instance, I think her backtracking is very much genuine.
Congrats to your interview. Read it with great interest.
I just published a story on my blog about a musician/political cartoonist in Serbia who has lost a lot of work as a musician because he refuses to be part of the make believe machinery that has taken over the country. It's about bifferent issues, but essentially it's the same story. Destroy the dissenters.
As far as Serbia goes, this sort of thing is routinely being criticized by Western media as an abuse of power and part of the country's corrupt political system. Yet, when it comes to "us", i.e. more or less Western countries, the same people who will rightly denounce what happens in Serbia either keep very silent about very similar developments or demand that even harsher measures be taken against people wo disagree. (People spreading actual hatred or gurblers on the other hand are given ample air time and media coverage because "balanced reporting"...)
JoeLycett used to ‘present’ the BBC Sewing Bee ( why. Who knows?). He actually propositioned one of the male models on camera, astonishingly it wasn’t cut, but broadcast.
Does sexual harassment not count when it is ‘gay’?
Me too. His narcissistic, showboating stunt on the very first Laura Kuenssberg show – HER launch programme of HER show! – did it for me. Upstaging, entitled arseholery.
He chose to damage the credibility of HER programme. Put us right off it, in case more Lycett-types are invited on to spew in viewers' faces of a Sunday morning. Regardless of points they may be aiming to make.
I saw him the LK show too. Her face said it all. I'm finding Lycett more cringeworthy than the politicians he tries to bring down. There's a difference between being predictable and being tedious, Joe. He says his mum finds him embarrassing... it's not just your mum, Joe! Also, the £10k is a bit of a piss take in my view. He has wealth a plenty. A lot for most people, not a lot for him. Give me a break!
I'd not seen the £10k stunt, so googled it: ithttps://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/breaking-joe-lycett-david-beckham-28544008
Worse than a piss take, it seems: he didn't shred it!
Again, the self-certain posing to blackmail Beckham, 'I'll thkweeam and thkweeam and thkweeam until you do as I thkweeam!' Or am I missing something (I've read nothing but skimming this)?
Yeah David Beckham had some sponsorship deal related to the Qatar World Cup. Joe Lycett thought he should pull out as a sign of solidarity with the LGBTQIA+ alphabet soup.
So apparently a heterosexual "gay icon" should be sticking up for minorities, but JL - a pansexual man, apparently - doesn't have to stick up for LGB people, or LGB youth.
His silence about that, but his loudness about more politically palatable causes (i.e. LGBTQIA+) pisses me off so much! How dare he criticise someone else for not making a stand!
It appears that Rachel (nee Richard) Levine's work address at Dept of Health is there for those of us who are moved to write a cogent letter regarding the bad science of "affirmation." I have one young natal female detransitioner in my town to cite. I can at least make a request that her detransition 2 years ago be added to the list. The obscured part of the address looks like 625 Forster Street. I think I'll send a copy of my book, In the Curated Woods, True Tales from a Grass Widow as well, and ask why isn't Martha, the mother of their children, able to get her side of the story out?
I am going to list the main post office address as the return address.
I haven't quite had the courage to come out with this one yet, on my journey peaking others.
Regarding how men can never feel women because they can never know how it feels to be in a female body (so it can only be a performative and regressive stereotype).
I'm imagining a specific friend who believes all the BS.
Friend: Oh that man came out as trans
Me: Came out as what, a sexist bigot?
I know it's blunt, but I won't be called a bigot by bigots...
Another superb roundup. Question about Scott Newgent. I've read some criticism of him recently. According to some people, he is "true trans". I've watched almost every interview he has done on YouTube and his views are as follows:
- This is the worst medical scandal in modern history.
- Humans cannot change sex. He was never and will never be a man. His own words.
- Don't lie to children about what transition is. It's cosmetic surgery, in his own words.
- Exposes long list of medical problems he had / has
- He's anti the LGBTQIA+ gender cult like us and he's not afraid to speak publicly.
Why the criticism of him? He seems to be doing great work! Am I missing something?
Also Gays against Groomers, where do they sit? They have a trans offshoot and there's some politics I know. They don't like our very hardline stance (I realise I'm not using "she" for Scott Newgent, I should be, because I refuse to use preferred pronouns for Eddie Girl Mode Izzard). That's mainly because I'm enraged by his narcissism.
I don't know, but wonder if Newgent's views or willingness to be upfront in declaring humans can't change sex and that she'll 'never be a man' despite appearances could perhaps have changed over time? We are all prisoners of the internet clinging onto out-of-date, past statements, making them appear fresh way past their sell-by date.
I was very impressed by Newgent's recent speech I-forget-where, maybe a rally outside a US clinic.
Yeah, possibly. I can't see a problem with what he says. Perhaps it's just that he still calls people "trans", whereas lots of organisations take the line that being trans doesn't exist. If I'm honest, I'm not sure the public are ready for the latter viewpoint. It just makes us sound like bigots, even if we are right!
Better that we keep on about the unnecessary medicalisation of children and the threat to women's and LGB rights. Once the trans fever has subsided and people are more pissed off with this "poor, marginalised group", that's when I think we can take a harder look.
The weather will be freezing tonight, make sure your gender has water and don't leave it outside
Water it. Feed it. Concentrate on it. Dream on it. Fixate upon it. Buy stuff for it. Give it room to grow -- it's ever fluid you know. Use it. Weaponize it. And at some point in the future, regret it.
Just everything about this perverted, paedophillic, child abusing, women abusing, depraved cult is beyond sickening and yet mainstream media ignore it and even praise it. But then the mainstream media did hide Savile. I did read the other day that the person who exposed Savile said there’s someone else, another big name, they are trying to cover up again.
I read once that when women tried to resist the calls to cover themselves when the Iranian revolution was underway, young men would simulate masturbation at them in the street to intimidate them. That’s what at least one of the TRAs was doing in the SFW protest in NYC, I believe he was doing it to Karen Davis. So much happened at that protest that it’s taken awhile for that nastiness to really sink in.
Not apropos to anything technically in this Glinner Update, but as we all know, everything's connected. Just got a plea for money in my email from National Women's Law Center in the US of A. Captured from top to bottom. They may as well be honest and call it the National Men's Law Center. Obsessed with all things 'trans,' including 'trans' kids. Look at her frickin' pronouns. So deeply lost in the cult, this organization is no longer fit for purpose.
Fatima Goss Graves
she/her/hers
President & CEO
National Women's Law Center
Here's a case they've taken on. It's a battle for a boy to play on a girls' team. This boy came out as a 'transgender girl' before he was four years old!
https://nwlc.org/dont-bench-trans-kids/
I read the article you’ve linked to. I’d never have guessed it was written by a women’s law center. The logic (?) of the writing resembles the evangelical cult my birth mother was caught up in during the Satanic Panic: down = up black = white, etc. It’s utter nonsense, and rather infuriating. 😠😡🤬
" And one day Dermot was sitting at the bar in this pub and the barman comes over to him and says: “You see that fella at the other end of the bar?” And Dermot says: “Yeah”. And the barman says: “That fella killed his wife, put her in the trunk of a car and pushed her off a cliff. So you’re not the only celebrity in town”.’"
haha
Blimey Comerford is really grasping at straws with that tweet - what a narc prick
Thanks Graham, that was a properly good read.
Taliban leaving twitter b/c of Trump re-instatement has to be the most 'pot calling kettle' event since Al Qaeda criticised Daesh (ISIS) for being too extreme!
Well it IS the Babylon Bee, after all.
Definitely worth looking at https://mobile.twitter.com/ejrosetta
Someone who has written for Pink News among other things clearly setting out how wrong she was about JKR specifically and women’s rights more generally and apologising. Brave woman!
One of the first in a coming avalanche of backtrackers. They are seeing the cracks in the 'gender' juggernaut and want to save themselves. Even though so late following the direction of their consciences -- it's something to be pleased about.
I don't think we should criticise the backtrackers. If we do that, then it will discourage others from backtracking. We should welcome them into the fold. Besides, Graham himself has backtracked over his stance on Dankula, and in a very public and admirable way. I've backtracked plenty of times in my life, including on the very issues which are discussed on this forum. I used to have views that were almost diametrically opposed to those I hold today. Backtracking isn't always bad - it can be a noble endeavor.
You're right of course. Sometimes my anger clouds my vision.
Well, there are, of course, the backtrackers who are clearly doing it for no reason other than to cover their own backs. They can fuck off. Haha. But, in this instance, I think her backtracking is very much genuine.
Agree
Lovely old you Graham. Thank you.
Congrats to your interview. Read it with great interest.
I just published a story on my blog about a musician/political cartoonist in Serbia who has lost a lot of work as a musician because he refuses to be part of the make believe machinery that has taken over the country. It's about bifferent issues, but essentially it's the same story. Destroy the dissenters.
As far as Serbia goes, this sort of thing is routinely being criticized by Western media as an abuse of power and part of the country's corrupt political system. Yet, when it comes to "us", i.e. more or less Western countries, the same people who will rightly denounce what happens in Serbia either keep very silent about very similar developments or demand that even harsher measures be taken against people wo disagree. (People spreading actual hatred or gurblers on the other hand are given ample air time and media coverage because "balanced reporting"...)
JoeLycett used to ‘present’ the BBC Sewing Bee ( why. Who knows?). He actually propositioned one of the male models on camera, astonishingly it wasn’t cut, but broadcast.
Does sexual harassment not count when it is ‘gay’?
Good point. I've gone right off him. He's in the gender cult and everything he does now is a publicity stunt.
Me too. His narcissistic, showboating stunt on the very first Laura Kuenssberg show – HER launch programme of HER show! – did it for me. Upstaging, entitled arseholery.
He chose to damage the credibility of HER programme. Put us right off it, in case more Lycett-types are invited on to spew in viewers' faces of a Sunday morning. Regardless of points they may be aiming to make.
I saw him the LK show too. Her face said it all. I'm finding Lycett more cringeworthy than the politicians he tries to bring down. There's a difference between being predictable and being tedious, Joe. He says his mum finds him embarrassing... it's not just your mum, Joe! Also, the £10k is a bit of a piss take in my view. He has wealth a plenty. A lot for most people, not a lot for him. Give me a break!
I'd not seen the £10k stunt, so googled it: ithttps://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/breaking-joe-lycett-david-beckham-28544008
Worse than a piss take, it seems: he didn't shred it!
Again, the self-certain posing to blackmail Beckham, 'I'll thkweeam and thkweeam and thkweeam until you do as I thkweeam!' Or am I missing something (I've read nothing but skimming this)?
Yeah David Beckham had some sponsorship deal related to the Qatar World Cup. Joe Lycett thought he should pull out as a sign of solidarity with the LGBTQIA+ alphabet soup.
So apparently a heterosexual "gay icon" should be sticking up for minorities, but JL - a pansexual man, apparently - doesn't have to stick up for LGB people, or LGB youth.
His silence about that, but his loudness about more politically palatable causes (i.e. LGBTQIA+) pisses me off so much! How dare he criticise someone else for not making a stand!
If I had more than two thumbs I'd stick'em up for this. (Maybe I should identify as multi-thumbed.) How dare he, indeed.
It appears that Rachel (nee Richard) Levine's work address at Dept of Health is there for those of us who are moved to write a cogent letter regarding the bad science of "affirmation." I have one young natal female detransitioner in my town to cite. I can at least make a request that her detransition 2 years ago be added to the list. The obscured part of the address looks like 625 Forster Street. I think I'll send a copy of my book, In the Curated Woods, True Tales from a Grass Widow as well, and ask why isn't Martha, the mother of their children, able to get her side of the story out?
I am going to list the main post office address as the return address.
uteheggengrasswidow.wordpress.com
Don't you just love Clive?
I haven't quite had the courage to come out with this one yet, on my journey peaking others.
Regarding how men can never feel women because they can never know how it feels to be in a female body (so it can only be a performative and regressive stereotype).
I'm imagining a specific friend who believes all the BS.
Friend: Oh that man came out as trans
Me: Came out as what, a sexist bigot?
I know it's blunt, but I won't be called a bigot by bigots...
re Joe Lycet why are some industries subjected to moral scrutiny and the ones that provide our food, clothes, energy, toys etc not.
Another superb roundup. Question about Scott Newgent. I've read some criticism of him recently. According to some people, he is "true trans". I've watched almost every interview he has done on YouTube and his views are as follows:
- This is the worst medical scandal in modern history.
- Humans cannot change sex. He was never and will never be a man. His own words.
- Don't lie to children about what transition is. It's cosmetic surgery, in his own words.
- Exposes long list of medical problems he had / has
- He's anti the LGBTQIA+ gender cult like us and he's not afraid to speak publicly.
Why the criticism of him? He seems to be doing great work! Am I missing something?
Also Gays against Groomers, where do they sit? They have a trans offshoot and there's some politics I know. They don't like our very hardline stance (I realise I'm not using "she" for Scott Newgent, I should be, because I refuse to use preferred pronouns for Eddie Girl Mode Izzard). That's mainly because I'm enraged by his narcissism.
Anyway, just wondered what people thought!
I don't know, but wonder if Newgent's views or willingness to be upfront in declaring humans can't change sex and that she'll 'never be a man' despite appearances could perhaps have changed over time? We are all prisoners of the internet clinging onto out-of-date, past statements, making them appear fresh way past their sell-by date.
I was very impressed by Newgent's recent speech I-forget-where, maybe a rally outside a US clinic.
Yeah, possibly. I can't see a problem with what he says. Perhaps it's just that he still calls people "trans", whereas lots of organisations take the line that being trans doesn't exist. If I'm honest, I'm not sure the public are ready for the latter viewpoint. It just makes us sound like bigots, even if we are right!
Better that we keep on about the unnecessary medicalisation of children and the threat to women's and LGB rights. Once the trans fever has subsided and people are more pissed off with this "poor, marginalised group", that's when I think we can take a harder look.
This? https://youtu.be/Quruq623rlk