The Botox Chucky thinks lesbians are a bit like blokes! Once again, the homophobia can’t help but bubble out. Huge win for women in the US An entitled, straight, white male begins to get angry The Irish definition of ‘gender’ is ‘gender’ This is the ‘definition’ of ‘gender’ from the Irish Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill 2022. As
@ Graham Linehan Educate & Celebrate are inclusive of Pansexuality. However when you click on the word at this link on their website https://www.educateandcelebrate.org/pansexual-pride-day-2021/ it brings you to Wikipedia. It states this - "although the term's literal meaning can be interpreted as 'attracted to everything,' people who identify as pansexual do not usually include paraphilias, such as bestiality, pedophilia, and necrophilia, in their definition". Usually. So what exactly are Educate & Celebrate including, promoting, and endorsing?
Bloody hell. Not usually necrophilia. You know you cannot translate some words, phrases or concepts in some languages? They don't exist. Well I wish this was one.
Wiki, Jimmy Wales, being your usual reliable source of complete shite.
Sorry Graham, not related to this, was just looking for how to message you. Just enjoying watching Father Ted on Ch4 right now and the announcer just introduced the next ep with (slight paraphrase) "back to Craggy Island, where Ted's trying his hand at a spot of the old cancel culture". Choice of words struck me, there! (did not sound piss-takey to me).
Just realised it was announcing the 'down with sort of thing' 'careful now' ep. (not kick bishop brennan up the arse which I thought it was cox BB was in it early on)
Don't you just love how the word ‘gender’ resists definition? Because it means sex category. That’s it. No matter how hard the ‘gender’ ideologues try, any definition is necessarily circular. This is why everything they ‘argue’ is utterly nonsensical and contradictory. For example — ‘gender’ is innate and immutable, but also simultaneously assigned and acquired. Even though, according to Eddie, ‘transgender’ people have been around for millions of years, it has been, and will forever remain, impossible for anyone to transcend their sex. No amount of opposite sex hormones, or cruel surgeries, or cosmetics, or stereotypical clothing, or voice coaching, or jewellery, or long curly wigs, or ‘trans’ flag draping, or mantra chanting, or wishful thinking will miraculously accomplish what is physically impossible.
To borrow Phyllis Chesler’s brilliant wording, a lot of ‘trans’ people are suffering a ‘profound cognitive siege’. Like she/they @RamonaQuaxli, an autistic man who thinks he’s a woman, and unhesitatingly, and publicly, proclaims ‘there’s literally a trans genocide going on right now’. He, and others like him, are suffering from a cult-induced pathological victimhood. What will become of him, and others like him? They are lost.
OMG. Moley had me going there for a few minutes. I was counting the furries and the stuffies and the blue haired critters. Thoroughly sucked me in. Just noticed Moley's photoshop attribution, then had a good laugh. So hard to separate farce from reality these days.
But Casey had a subsequent tweet that underlines the problem with that "definition":
"It violates one of the basic conditions of any competent definition by including the term to be defined in the purported definition.
Perhaps those who drafted the section don't know what 'gender means, or perhaps they do but don't want us to know. Who can say?"
Another example of that was Graham's quote of a recent Matt Walsh tweet that pointed, even if somewhat indirectly, to Merriam-Webster's circular definitions of "gender identity":
"female: having a gender identity that is the opposite of male."
But if you look at their definition for "male" it says this:
"male: having a gender identity that is the opposite of female."
Circular definitions R Us. Gender, in the MW lexicon, is not just entirely subjective but rank insanity. Whoever was responsible for that at MW should be fired, if not ridden out of town on a rail.
But, as I had indicated in a Substack post of my own, Statistics Canada is just as bad:
"Male gender: This category includes persons whose current gender was reported as male. This includes cisgender and transgender persons whose current gender was reported as male.
Female gender: This category includes persons whose current gender was reported as female. This includes cisgender and transgender persons whose current gender was reported as female."
"Circular Definitions R Us" -- absolute idiots, being charitable. Link to my submission to Stats Canada on that score in the Substack article.
When Government Lawyers are pulling tricks like this, the only logical conclusion I can come up with is that they have taken a cynical decision to treat us like idiots. And that is wicked, and proves that there is no accountability for those at the top of these decisions. Or at least they believe there isn’t. Time will tell.
The 17th century painting titled "The Court of Foolishness" in that article seems a rather damning, though depressing, indictment of many governments, NGOs, and segments of the population on pretty much anything to do with gender and transgenderism.
Of course Botox Chucky is angry about Kathleen Stock having short hair and wearing trousers. It's because she is still obviously female but if BC and his ilk styled themselves the same way, they'd be even more obviously men than they are with their badly-fitting frocks. It's the usual AGP/Narc rage.
India is a gay man who has a fetish for very straight men, right? I think I understand why he's coming after KS here. It's pathetic but interesting, psychologically.
@ Graham Linehan Educate & Celebrate are inclusive of Pansexuality. However when you click on the word at this link on their website https://www.educateandcelebrate.org/pansexual-pride-day-2021/ it brings you to Wikipedia. It states this - "although the term's literal meaning can be interpreted as 'attracted to everything,' people who identify as pansexual do not usually include paraphilias, such as bestiality, pedophilia, and necrophilia, in their definition". Usually. So what exactly are Educate & Celebrate including, promoting, and endorsing?
Bloody hell. Not usually necrophilia. You know you cannot translate some words, phrases or concepts in some languages? They don't exist. Well I wish this was one.
Wiki, Jimmy Wales, being your usual reliable source of complete shite.
Erm, millions of years ago Eddie, the LGBT-Rex Community?
Hahaha. T-Rex. Good one. Do we need another meteor?
Do you think Eddie is meteor had it cut off?
And we're the dinosaurs?
A Barney can never become a Betty.
Nor Wilma a Fred
Yabba Dabba Doo sound like pronouns 😁
I hear Chucky dressed up as India Willoughby for Halloween.
Sorry Graham, not related to this, was just looking for how to message you. Just enjoying watching Father Ted on Ch4 right now and the announcer just introduced the next ep with (slight paraphrase) "back to Craggy Island, where Ted's trying his hand at a spot of the old cancel culture". Choice of words struck me, there! (did not sound piss-takey to me).
Can you record on 4+1?
Don't see why not?
I'm sure Graham would appreciate the clip recorded for him, even on a phone?
Just rewound & did it :)
Brilliant. I think he will really appreciate that.
Just realised it was announcing the 'down with sort of thing' 'careful now' ep. (not kick bishop brennan up the arse which I thought it was cox BB was in it early on)
I've been watching too.
Did you see the one with all the rabbits? "It's a travelling pet shop, they're not back until the spring!"
Father Ted is fecking brilliant!
Yes, seen them all, multiple times. Good to see it on Ch4 tonight. It is perfect all round. On the kick Bishop Brennan up the arse ep.
It's a brilliant episode!
Sorry, my mistake - it was the 'Down with this sort of thing.' 'Careful now' episode - but Bishop Brennan was in it!
Woah what??
Don't you just love how the word ‘gender’ resists definition? Because it means sex category. That’s it. No matter how hard the ‘gender’ ideologues try, any definition is necessarily circular. This is why everything they ‘argue’ is utterly nonsensical and contradictory. For example — ‘gender’ is innate and immutable, but also simultaneously assigned and acquired. Even though, according to Eddie, ‘transgender’ people have been around for millions of years, it has been, and will forever remain, impossible for anyone to transcend their sex. No amount of opposite sex hormones, or cruel surgeries, or cosmetics, or stereotypical clothing, or voice coaching, or jewellery, or long curly wigs, or ‘trans’ flag draping, or mantra chanting, or wishful thinking will miraculously accomplish what is physically impossible.
Menno was asking for Gender Woo Woo Theme Park ideas, and I suggested a merry-go-round where you listen to a circular definition of woman.
Hahaha. You make me laugh. As does Moley, and Graham, and Menno. Thank God for the funny ones. We need you.
Hang on though, how are we going to fit all of society onto a carousel? They've all been taken for a ride.
Ha, I love how you're getting into the banter!
or the Narcissist Slide, where you go up the stairs, then slide down, and end up your own arse
A Hall of Mirrors that Blokes with Cocks in Frocks can look like a more full on version of Jessica Rabbit
Johnathan STILL doesn't understand the difference between SEX and STEREOTYPES.
No hope for this pillock.
Both words beginning with S is likely adding to the confusion.
So Silly!
Another two words beginning with S!
I know, look at me with the witty banter!
My favourite word beginning with s is now sleuth. 😄
Mine is Staythefuckawayfromthekids!
To borrow Phyllis Chesler’s brilliant wording, a lot of ‘trans’ people are suffering a ‘profound cognitive siege’. Like she/they @RamonaQuaxli, an autistic man who thinks he’s a woman, and unhesitatingly, and publicly, proclaims ‘there’s literally a trans genocide going on right now’. He, and others like him, are suffering from a cult-induced pathological victimhood. What will become of him, and others like him? They are lost.
OMG. Moley had me going there for a few minutes. I was counting the furries and the stuffies and the blue haired critters. Thoroughly sucked me in. Just noticed Moley's photoshop attribution, then had a good laugh. So hard to separate farce from reality these days.
I did the same. I even showed my husband the employees before I saw the attribution to Moley.
Moley is the one reason I'm nearly thankfull for long covid brain fog - gets me every time .....
Most kind... Thank you - I think!
I was a genius before Moley came along 😂
He REALLY got me with Nicola Sturgeon and co. holding up signs with rainbow penises. I thought "yep, looks about right"...
keep scrolling...
more glinner updates...
... wait a minute!!
Shit for brains now.
I was going to heart this comment but then you put yourself down - don't put yourself down!
Ah, you're too kind ☺
#BeKind 😂
India Willoughby, a trans-identified man, telling women how to be women. A century later, but same old shite.
Glinner, please do a piss take of this when this is all said and done.
Kids Meet a Gender Non-Conforming Person
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZsBei4nCkU&ab_channel=HiHoKids
FFS!
You know my definition of nonbinary right - someone who owns a pink t-shirt and a blue t-shirt.
Or toothbrushes. You reminded me of that song.
Max Bygraves? Always remember false teeth are real teeth, false teeth are real teeth!
And ceramic veneers are valid
I laughed out loud.
I made KFP laugh; the pinnacle of my life on the Internet
Haaaaa! 🤩
I'm reminded that it sucks how they're called t-shirts. 😄
GC-shirts? 😂
Yeah 🤩😁
The ‘definition’ of gender is the best laugh I’ve had today. 🤯
Sadly, very typical of pretty much anything to do with "gender". But I think Graham missed the exact twitter link (Nitterized for better access):
https://nitter.it/Casey5122dark/status/1586123432978178049#m
But Casey had a subsequent tweet that underlines the problem with that "definition":
"It violates one of the basic conditions of any competent definition by including the term to be defined in the purported definition.
Perhaps those who drafted the section don't know what 'gender means, or perhaps they do but don't want us to know. Who can say?"
Another example of that was Graham's quote of a recent Matt Walsh tweet that pointed, even if somewhat indirectly, to Merriam-Webster's circular definitions of "gender identity":
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1549382790952656899
"female: having a gender identity that is the opposite of male."
But if you look at their definition for "male" it says this:
"male: having a gender identity that is the opposite of female."
Circular definitions R Us. Gender, in the MW lexicon, is not just entirely subjective but rank insanity. Whoever was responsible for that at MW should be fired, if not ridden out of town on a rail.
But, as I had indicated in a Substack post of my own, Statistics Canada is just as bad:
"Male gender: This category includes persons whose current gender was reported as male. This includes cisgender and transgender persons whose current gender was reported as male.
Female gender: This category includes persons whose current gender was reported as female. This includes cisgender and transgender persons whose current gender was reported as female."
"Circular Definitions R Us" -- absolute idiots, being charitable. Link to my submission to Stats Canada on that score in the Substack article.
https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/p/statistics-departments-corrupted
When Government Lawyers are pulling tricks like this, the only logical conclusion I can come up with is that they have taken a cynical decision to treat us like idiots. And that is wicked, and proves that there is no accountability for those at the top of these decisions. Or at least they believe there isn’t. Time will tell.
"malice aforethought" is certainly a possibility, and may well be a contributing factor in some cases or for some people.
However, I also think there's some merit in "Hanlon's razor": "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor
The 17th century painting titled "The Court of Foolishness" in that article seems a rather damning, though depressing, indictment of many governments, NGOs, and segments of the population on pretty much anything to do with gender and transgenderism.
The whole thing is like Stars Wars: The Nonsense Planet, always covered in fog, 24/7.
Brilliant response from For Women Scotland to Eddie Izzard. Get it right up ya, mate.
I really think IW must just be a bit thick 🤔
thick and really offensive. Why didnt his post about KS end with ‘just get back in the kitchen’. So regresssive, what a complete a hole
Of course Botox Chucky is angry about Kathleen Stock having short hair and wearing trousers. It's because she is still obviously female but if BC and his ilk styled themselves the same way, they'd be even more obviously men than they are with their badly-fitting frocks. It's the usual AGP/Narc rage.
eddie izzard is also a delusional transvestite
India is a gay man who has a fetish for very straight men, right? I think I understand why he's coming after KS here. It's pathetic but interesting, psychologically.