Thanks for the quote, Juniper! Lesbians, trying to get the truth out there GB News, reporting it The BBC, misrepresenting it You can send your complaint here. Here’s one to inspire. "Those removed by the police from Cardiff Gay Pride march were lesbians - as clearly evidenced from their banners - yet you failed to even use the word, never mind say what their concerns were, why they were there or what their banners were saying.
I think your horrifying photo should be seen by as many as possible although I don't know where it would be published.
People who champion gender identity ideology should, if they believe what they preach, be celebrating photos such as the one of that girl's mutilated arm. If they are genuinely committed to their belief, they should welcome images of a girl's arms stripped of its skin, and have no reason to object to it being seen far and wide.
Of course I've no doubt they would strongly object to it being seen, which might at least help some confused teenage girl to realise that the people are who are telling her she's embarking on a beautiful journey of self-realisation by having her arm skinned, are dangerous fucking idiots who have no idea that they're in a cult-like belief system.
I agree Ewen. This is exactly the kind of image twitter incels despise. Because a picture is worth thousands of words. This kind of image completely erases the magical 'trans' glitter and rainbow sparkle and faery unicorn dust from the grotesqueries resulting from cult capture. Poor girl. She may lose her arm eventually. Isn't it marvellous what 'affirming trans care' can accomplish?
Photographs of young girls, after a double mastectomy, the poster is accused by troons and TRAs, of being a paedophile, and asked why are they obsessed with nude pictures of girls!
I understand why you think this, but I don't think I agree. If you think that carving up your body and flooding it with hormones that shouldn't be there in the first place is a form of self-harm, and I do think that, and that this form of self-harm is also part of social-media driven social contagion, then it seems not a good idea to amplify these images even further. Champions of gender identity ideology, I think some of them do know what all this entails, physically, but they just don't care. They are too busy being In the Right to care. And the harms that detransitioners are highlighting are an irrelevance to them, because they were not "genuinely trans" in the first place. Or something.
It is interesting though, if that's the right word for it, that it seems that young women are, in the majority now, suffering the awful physical effects of transitioning, whereas the gender ideologues seem to think that all a young male needs to do to trans himself is to apply a bit of nail polish and adopt a frumpy haircut and dye it blue.
The point about incels that Fraserreal mentions below, I also disagree. Incels couldn't care less about the well being, mentally or physically, of teenage girls and young women who are doing this to themselves. In fact, I expect they take great pleasure in seeing women harm themselves in this way.
I do agree that one wouldn't want to publish a photo where it will be drooled over, but to send it to these dopes that want to pretend trans is all glitter and rainbows? Definitely!
I believe I saw them when they briefly appeared on Twitter - I did find them difficult to see. Is there a facility on this site as on FB, where you get a fuzzy screen with a warning that it will be graphic. This would be the right solution.
Queer theory's destructive influence on all that is good and decent -- jumps the patriarchal shark. Snipers 'protecting' a 'family friendly' drag show from anyone who objects! Aarrgghh. Pinch me. Tell me it's all a bad dream.
If one needs anything to prove that antifa is a government-infiltrated (and possibly government-organized) organization, it's snipers on rooftops. No one outside the government would ever be permitted to do this; this would have been with the blessing of Homeland [In}security, the FBI, and the local police / sheriff's department.
The video from Anderson Distillery & Grill? Of course guns are there. A lot of these fairly plain looking people, many of them women, are they really unaware of what stuffing bills is all about? Are they really that naive? The 'drag acts' weren't dancing well, weren't that interesting to look at, weren't that attractive and their clothes weren't that special. They were a bit meh. A unicorn headpiece nearly wobbled off. At least it wasn't a live writhing simulated sex show like many of the other fetish ones doing the rounds. Yet they must get on a table and wobble their limbs a bit, or stand in a pose, then they greedily grab bills from people who are excited to take part in such a ground-breaking and important 'rights movement'? Kids being encouraged to offer bills and get in on the action? Getting all excited at getting a selfie with them. While people ate burgers? I am completely lost. And it turns out it was a load of school teachers? Yeah, no shit Sherlock.
Yet if that was men or women putting bills down knickers or in tassley bits on strippers/lapdancers/any other female entertainers tiny body coverings in a club? That would be awful and wrong? They would look down on those women. Bad women. Look at Dre and Snoop Dogg videos from twenty odd years ago. Look at women in clubs who are incredibly athletic and can perform fairly impressive gymnastic feats. Usually nominally fairly if not very attractive - that's the point - and usually have some grace or ability. Far less cartoonish than these men.
Yet fat ugly men with no discernable talent put some make up and flammable material on in a mockery of women and stupid average people are clamouring to stick money down their dresses in some simulcra of the sex industry but it's not? And none of this is about sex or porn? Or misogyny? It's all good clean fun and children's education. Huh? This same queer theory ideology, all cute and child-friendly, is flaying children's skin?
I just feel so bloody desperate reading all this. When is the rest of the world going to wake up? Schools are going back soon and I’ll be back worrying about what absolute lies are being fed the children while they’re out.
You're right. And no, I also don't think clown paint, clown lanyards or clown cars have much good evidential underpinning. There are a few other national and international standards they seem to be diverging from. I hope they have documented why. I can point you to some good stuff on retroreflectivity if you're interested. And why we developed easily understandable and standard ways to do things.
After all anything 'hi vis' has a purpose and reason - that's signs, road signs, markings, vehicle markings and uniforms. Pedestrian crossings. You tend to get hi vis on uniform back packs too, so there's no area of the body that is more likely to be unseen even from behind. So they don't get hit, and you can see them and move out of the way and from a distance, maybe at night. You know, for safety.
That image of a paedophile in woman face getting into a clown car sums it all up for me. It's absolutely shocking. How much further can the police fall?
Hi Graham, I think I have just seen the four photos you refer to.
They are very graphic and very distressing.
BUT they are an important record of what is actually happening to girls and young women. If you publish them it means that people can show them to the unconvinced who still believe that no doctor is going to really do harm.
Can I suggest putting them in a post on their own with a warning headline and far enough down so that people will have a choice not to scroll if they can't face seeing them.
The truth isn't always nice but we can't ignore it.
It can’t be right that roads in major towns are being closed for long periods of time because of the progress pride movement. Pride is meant to be in June. It must affect lots of people who can’t go about their usual business.
Well done to the women protesting against the capture and corruption for the benefit of heterosexual men.
And it's meant to be not just 'in' June, but for the entirety of June. The disproportionate attention-seeking and co-opting of public spaces, institutions, etc is actually turning people off. I think the LGB would benefit from maybe proposing a scaling back from Pride MONTH, from drag for kids, etc. and leaving the excesses to the TQs? Maybe not viable, but you do wonder where it's going.
Does anyone know how many are attending? Would be interesting to find out as they don’t appear so popular now ie outside of corporate businesses and TRAs groups
Even though I agree with the first speech bubble from Stewart Lee, I think the second one is an improvement. I reckon THAT'S the bubble he should now give out when on tour. You know, for the three people who still want to see him.
The buzz on Nitrous oxide sounds like high concentrate cannabis … but the side effects are much worse.
With some effects which are similar to heavy drinking...
"Heavy regular use of nitrous oxide can lead to a deficiency of vitamin B12 and to a form of anaemia. Severe B12 deficiency can lead to serious nerve damage, causing tingling and numbness in the fingers and toes. This can be very painful and make walking difficult.
Regular use can stop you forming white blood cells properly"
I started seeing it (the little used bottles discarded) on pavements and gutters I suppose 15 or more years ago and wondered what it was. It was an area of concern for UK Public Health so I'm surprised a medical professional was unaware of it until recently. I've had some very interesting chats with those in anaesthetics and pain management about it - where drugs like this are used in controlled environments.
That photo of the girl's arm. If I hadn't been peaked before that picture alone would have done it. Doctors did that to a healthy young arm in order to make a pretend penis, which won't even work and could quite possibly turn necrotic or simply fall off. This is lunacy on an almost inconceivable scale.
On a positive note I thought Sarah Phillimore was brilliant. Love her clarity and compassion ❤️
If 99.9% of lesbians are 'trans inclusive', as claimed by Steph's place, and Steph claims never have met one of the 'exclusive' variety, what is there to complain about? Anyone in advertising or sales would tell you that if you've got 99.9% of your potential market on board it's not only a phenomenal success but a total-fucking-miracle.
Might it be noted, that on a 'gay pride' march, no male homosexuals came to the aid of the lesbians?
There was a tiktok video a while ago of a lesbian who regrets that LGB activism has led to LGBTQ and the child safeguarding danger that goes with it. Gays Against Groomers ran it, but Twitter appears to have erased them (some bearded Twitter mod in lipstick and a skirt looking at child porn on his mobile one imagines). I think Graham ran it?
The abolition of Clause 28 is what has led to where we are today with mandatory LGBTQ grooming in schools, but LGB Alliance block anyone who raises bringing a revised form of Clause 28 back.
They stand more alongside LGBTQ than that lesbian lady.
Things wouldn't have ended up the way they are now if homosexual activists accepted homosexuality shouldn't be promoted in schools.
Homosexuals and lesbians genuinely against groomers will at least be open to debate on bringing back Clause 28, but LGBA are very much #NoDebate on that.
"Mentally ill entitled narcissists" hoo-ah that lady.
"Christian far right"?? Not so hoo-ah. If regarding homosexuality as a perversion is 'far right', all of Christianity is far right, and it's not. I'm a deeply conservative Christian who monitors the far right and from time to time point out when Graham shares something from a far right source, like recently Jolene Bunting.
Sarah Phillimore is on the Bad Law Project with Fr Calvin Robinson. Does she regard him as 'far right'? He has been on the far right platform 'Hearts of Oak' before (as with Harry Miller) that repeatedly platforms Holocaust deniers and Jew haters. One of its founders Simon Evans was a Holocaust denier. Another founder is one Tommy Robinson. Not racist, not anti-Semitic, but has been in bed with Nazis his entire political career nonetheless. Fr Robinson gets pretty tetchy and gaslighty when you point out he's giving himself a far right taint by appearing on that platform. He thinks it's "impolite" to criticise him for it.
What I would say is far something ('flung' maybe?) is Sarah Phillimore supporting the LGBTQ demand to lock people up if they give a child abuse victim who doesn't want to be homosexual the counselling and prayer they ask for, as part of the spurious conversion therapy ban its after.
Sarah Phillimore is a fabulously coherent and candid speaker, but nonetheless, from my perspective, has some very incoherent strands of thought she needs to work on. Maybe she's trying to ingratiate herself with the LGBA by branding Christianity far right?
Christianity can't be that right wing in of itself, a majority of the Christians I know generally learn to the left if anything. I didn't get the impression she was suggesting ALL Christians were far right, although clearly some are. I would have thought all major religions have adherents on both sides of the fence.
It was more she was defining far right as viewing homosexuality as a perversion, which is, well, perverse! That's getting into namecally land with the TRAs if one is going to do that. It's a conservative view held by a lot of liberals and leftists, but they'll only admit to it in a whisper.
I think your horrifying photo should be seen by as many as possible although I don't know where it would be published.
People who champion gender identity ideology should, if they believe what they preach, be celebrating photos such as the one of that girl's mutilated arm. If they are genuinely committed to their belief, they should welcome images of a girl's arms stripped of its skin, and have no reason to object to it being seen far and wide.
Of course I've no doubt they would strongly object to it being seen, which might at least help some confused teenage girl to realise that the people are who are telling her she's embarking on a beautiful journey of self-realisation by having her arm skinned, are dangerous fucking idiots who have no idea that they're in a cult-like belief system.
I agree Ewen. This is exactly the kind of image twitter incels despise. Because a picture is worth thousands of words. This kind of image completely erases the magical 'trans' glitter and rainbow sparkle and faery unicorn dust from the grotesqueries resulting from cult capture. Poor girl. She may lose her arm eventually. Isn't it marvellous what 'affirming trans care' can accomplish?
Photographs of young girls, after a double mastectomy, the poster is accused by troons and TRAs, of being a paedophile, and asked why are they obsessed with nude pictures of girls!
They can’t face the reality.
Always with the projection of their creepy motivations onto others. They can't face reality, they can't face themselves.
I think that mirror cracked a long time ago.
I understand why you think this, but I don't think I agree. If you think that carving up your body and flooding it with hormones that shouldn't be there in the first place is a form of self-harm, and I do think that, and that this form of self-harm is also part of social-media driven social contagion, then it seems not a good idea to amplify these images even further. Champions of gender identity ideology, I think some of them do know what all this entails, physically, but they just don't care. They are too busy being In the Right to care. And the harms that detransitioners are highlighting are an irrelevance to them, because they were not "genuinely trans" in the first place. Or something.
It is interesting though, if that's the right word for it, that it seems that young women are, in the majority now, suffering the awful physical effects of transitioning, whereas the gender ideologues seem to think that all a young male needs to do to trans himself is to apply a bit of nail polish and adopt a frumpy haircut and dye it blue.
The point about incels that Fraserreal mentions below, I also disagree. Incels couldn't care less about the well being, mentally or physically, of teenage girls and young women who are doing this to themselves. In fact, I expect they take great pleasure in seeing women harm themselves in this way.
I do agree that one wouldn't want to publish a photo where it will be drooled over, but to send it to these dopes that want to pretend trans is all glitter and rainbows? Definitely!
I believe I saw them when they briefly appeared on Twitter - I did find them difficult to see. Is there a facility on this site as on FB, where you get a fuzzy screen with a warning that it will be graphic. This would be the right solution.
Queer theory's destructive influence on all that is good and decent -- jumps the patriarchal shark. Snipers 'protecting' a 'family friendly' drag show from anyone who objects! Aarrgghh. Pinch me. Tell me it's all a bad dream.
If one needs anything to prove that antifa is a government-infiltrated (and possibly government-organized) organization, it's snipers on rooftops. No one outside the government would ever be permitted to do this; this would have been with the blessing of Homeland [In}security, the FBI, and the local police / sheriff's department.
The video from Anderson Distillery & Grill? Of course guns are there. A lot of these fairly plain looking people, many of them women, are they really unaware of what stuffing bills is all about? Are they really that naive? The 'drag acts' weren't dancing well, weren't that interesting to look at, weren't that attractive and their clothes weren't that special. They were a bit meh. A unicorn headpiece nearly wobbled off. At least it wasn't a live writhing simulated sex show like many of the other fetish ones doing the rounds. Yet they must get on a table and wobble their limbs a bit, or stand in a pose, then they greedily grab bills from people who are excited to take part in such a ground-breaking and important 'rights movement'? Kids being encouraged to offer bills and get in on the action? Getting all excited at getting a selfie with them. While people ate burgers? I am completely lost. And it turns out it was a load of school teachers? Yeah, no shit Sherlock.
Yet if that was men or women putting bills down knickers or in tassley bits on strippers/lapdancers/any other female entertainers tiny body coverings in a club? That would be awful and wrong? They would look down on those women. Bad women. Look at Dre and Snoop Dogg videos from twenty odd years ago. Look at women in clubs who are incredibly athletic and can perform fairly impressive gymnastic feats. Usually nominally fairly if not very attractive - that's the point - and usually have some grace or ability. Far less cartoonish than these men.
Yet fat ugly men with no discernable talent put some make up and flammable material on in a mockery of women and stupid average people are clamouring to stick money down their dresses in some simulcra of the sex industry but it's not? And none of this is about sex or porn? Or misogyny? It's all good clean fun and children's education. Huh? This same queer theory ideology, all cute and child-friendly, is flaying children's skin?
I just feel so bloody desperate reading all this. When is the rest of the world going to wake up? Schools are going back soon and I’ll be back worrying about what absolute lies are being fed the children while they’re out.
I see the Stonewall decorated police cars have made an appearance in Norwich (pictured above) and possibly Wales (see the LGB Alliance letter above).
The Home Office’s Police Scientific Development Branch has a national standard, the Full and Half Battenburg vehicle marking scheme, for police vehicles: see https://www.fleetid.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Home-Office-PSDB-14-04-High-Conspicuity-Li1.pdf
The standard was scientifically developed to ensure that police vehicles are conspicuous as police vehicles.
The Stonewall decorated vehicles don’t look as though they comply. Still, Stonewall and science don’t seem to mix.
Stonewall law trumps actual law.
You're right. And no, I also don't think clown paint, clown lanyards or clown cars have much good evidential underpinning. There are a few other national and international standards they seem to be diverging from. I hope they have documented why. I can point you to some good stuff on retroreflectivity if you're interested. And why we developed easily understandable and standard ways to do things.
After all anything 'hi vis' has a purpose and reason - that's signs, road signs, markings, vehicle markings and uniforms. Pedestrian crossings. You tend to get hi vis on uniform back packs too, so there's no area of the body that is more likely to be unseen even from behind. So they don't get hit, and you can see them and move out of the way and from a distance, maybe at night. You know, for safety.
That image of a paedophile in woman face getting into a clown car sums it all up for me. It's absolutely shocking. How much further can the police fall?
re. paedophilic 'children's worker' Oliver Owen, the BBC article describes him as 'a man of previous good character'. Aren't they always though?
Well, yes. Until they get caught.
I think that applied to a previous hair colour.
The BBC seems committed to complete naivete and lack of thought.
Hi Graham, I think I have just seen the four photos you refer to.
They are very graphic and very distressing.
BUT they are an important record of what is actually happening to girls and young women. If you publish them it means that people can show them to the unconvinced who still believe that no doctor is going to really do harm.
Can I suggest putting them in a post on their own with a warning headline and far enough down so that people will have a choice not to scroll if they can't face seeing them.
The truth isn't always nice but we can't ignore it.
It can’t be right that roads in major towns are being closed for long periods of time because of the progress pride movement. Pride is meant to be in June. It must affect lots of people who can’t go about their usual business.
Well done to the women protesting against the capture and corruption for the benefit of heterosexual men.
And it's meant to be not just 'in' June, but for the entirety of June. The disproportionate attention-seeking and co-opting of public spaces, institutions, etc is actually turning people off. I think the LGB would benefit from maybe proposing a scaling back from Pride MONTH, from drag for kids, etc. and leaving the excesses to the TQs? Maybe not viable, but you do wonder where it's going.
Does anyone know how many are attending? Would be interesting to find out as they don’t appear so popular now ie outside of corporate businesses and TRAs groups
Even though I agree with the first speech bubble from Stewart Lee, I think the second one is an improvement. I reckon THAT'S the bubble he should now give out when on tour. You know, for the three people who still want to see him.
As many as 3 ?????
Yes - his wife and two kids. ... or maybe not?
Mum, his Nan and the next door neighbour ?
Antifa, from Black Lives Matter to paedos' best pals - what a journey
I don't think antifa was anything other than a group of fascists. They've been harassing and assaulting women for many years.
I won't be able to sleep tonight... need to riro big time. Phone off kindle on☹️🥴😢
The buzz on Nitrous oxide sounds like high concentrate cannabis … but the side effects are much worse.
With some effects which are similar to heavy drinking...
"Heavy regular use of nitrous oxide can lead to a deficiency of vitamin B12 and to a form of anaemia. Severe B12 deficiency can lead to serious nerve damage, causing tingling and numbness in the fingers and toes. This can be very painful and make walking difficult.
Regular use can stop you forming white blood cells properly"
https://www.talktofrank.com/drug/nitrous-oxide#the-risks
and the effects only last 1-2 mins!
wow and you can it buy online!
I started seeing it (the little used bottles discarded) on pavements and gutters I suppose 15 or more years ago and wondered what it was. It was an area of concern for UK Public Health so I'm surprised a medical professional was unaware of it until recently. I've had some very interesting chats with those in anaesthetics and pain management about it - where drugs like this are used in controlled environments.
I did it a few years ago and it really messed me up… I would black out. I had no idea it was this dangerous.
That photo of the girl's arm. If I hadn't been peaked before that picture alone would have done it. Doctors did that to a healthy young arm in order to make a pretend penis, which won't even work and could quite possibly turn necrotic or simply fall off. This is lunacy on an almost inconceivable scale.
On a positive note I thought Sarah Phillimore was brilliant. Love her clarity and compassion ❤️
If 99.9% of lesbians are 'trans inclusive', as claimed by Steph's place, and Steph claims never have met one of the 'exclusive' variety, what is there to complain about? Anyone in advertising or sales would tell you that if you've got 99.9% of your potential market on board it's not only a phenomenal success but a total-fucking-miracle.
Might it be noted, that on a 'gay pride' march, no male homosexuals came to the aid of the lesbians?
There was a tiktok video a while ago of a lesbian who regrets that LGB activism has led to LGBTQ and the child safeguarding danger that goes with it. Gays Against Groomers ran it, but Twitter appears to have erased them (some bearded Twitter mod in lipstick and a skirt looking at child porn on his mobile one imagines). I think Graham ran it?
The abolition of Clause 28 is what has led to where we are today with mandatory LGBTQ grooming in schools, but LGB Alliance block anyone who raises bringing a revised form of Clause 28 back.
They stand more alongside LGBTQ than that lesbian lady.
Things wouldn't have ended up the way they are now if homosexual activists accepted homosexuality shouldn't be promoted in schools.
Homosexuals and lesbians genuinely against groomers will at least be open to debate on bringing back Clause 28, but LGBA are very much #NoDebate on that.
"Mentally ill entitled narcissists" hoo-ah that lady.
"Christian far right"?? Not so hoo-ah. If regarding homosexuality as a perversion is 'far right', all of Christianity is far right, and it's not. I'm a deeply conservative Christian who monitors the far right and from time to time point out when Graham shares something from a far right source, like recently Jolene Bunting.
Sarah Phillimore is on the Bad Law Project with Fr Calvin Robinson. Does she regard him as 'far right'? He has been on the far right platform 'Hearts of Oak' before (as with Harry Miller) that repeatedly platforms Holocaust deniers and Jew haters. One of its founders Simon Evans was a Holocaust denier. Another founder is one Tommy Robinson. Not racist, not anti-Semitic, but has been in bed with Nazis his entire political career nonetheless. Fr Robinson gets pretty tetchy and gaslighty when you point out he's giving himself a far right taint by appearing on that platform. He thinks it's "impolite" to criticise him for it.
What I would say is far something ('flung' maybe?) is Sarah Phillimore supporting the LGBTQ demand to lock people up if they give a child abuse victim who doesn't want to be homosexual the counselling and prayer they ask for, as part of the spurious conversion therapy ban its after.
Sarah Phillimore is a fabulously coherent and candid speaker, but nonetheless, from my perspective, has some very incoherent strands of thought she needs to work on. Maybe she's trying to ingratiate herself with the LGBA by branding Christianity far right?
Christianity can't be that right wing in of itself, a majority of the Christians I know generally learn to the left if anything. I didn't get the impression she was suggesting ALL Christians were far right, although clearly some are. I would have thought all major religions have adherents on both sides of the fence.
It was more she was defining far right as viewing homosexuality as a perversion, which is, well, perverse! That's getting into namecally land with the TRAs if one is going to do that. It's a conservative view held by a lot of liberals and leftists, but they'll only admit to it in a whisper.