I was on the Paddick thread just saying my normal 'men cannot become women.
Interesting I have just been suspend from Twitter with no reasons given!
"Your account is permanently suspended
After careful review, we determined your account broke the Twitter Rules. Your account is permanently in read-only mode, which means you can’t Tweet, Retweet, or Like content. You won’t be able to create new accounts. If you think we got this wrong, you can submit an appeal."
I have asked Twitter why I was suspended.
So who knows...I am penning a reply to twitter to tell them millions have gone to Gettr because they know biology is true...and that Twitter is a sewer of porn and pedos!
Your account has been suspended and will not be restored because it was found to be violating the Twitter Terms of Service, specifically the Twitter Rules against participating in targeted abuse.
In order to ensure that people feel safe expressing diverse opinions and beliefs on our platform, we do not tolerate abusive behavior. This includes inciting other people to engage in the targeted harassment of someone.
You can learn more about our rules against abusive behavior.
Pointing out the difference between men and women appears to be THE insurmountable crime against Twitter's "standards", with identifying paedos who happen to be chummy with Management running a very close second as far as I can see.
In order to “prevent a lifetime of torment” (a Stonewall description), just spin your head around several times, say no to reality, and sign up for a lifetime of medicalization instead.
Wrote an old school poet flyting about the UK jail situation. I'm not really on twitter but if anyone wants to use it (anywhere) feel free:
Are females seen as prostitutes in every UK jail?
Have jailors become pimps since your morals went on sale?
Are brothels not illegal? Or is jail now a 'Salon'?
One last question fore you go, do we still call them 'Johns'?
- the Poet Penny
I'm going to see if there's any comments sections I can leave it on later. Still technically at work now. Not in a suit though so I'm not 'Tory' working.
He tweeted that after voting to continue subjecting vulnerable abused women to rape and sexual assault? Is there a point where bludgeoning someone with a baseball bat (AKA 'Maughaming') is actually acceptable for the good of society? ASKING FOR A FRIEND
Discussions on this range from the sedate to the fantasical. Allyn Walker proposed in her Phd that there are techniques that keep paedophiles from committing abuse, which include watching child porn - which ignores the fact that abuse is being committed producing such porn.
I think the issue has to be looked at through a wider lens.
For me, sexual attraction (to be considered healthy) has to be non-coercive, and between equals in terms of autonomy and power.
So, sexual attraction to children indicates a compulsion that needs be to addressed, and if possible eliminated. There is no possibility that a child will knowingly initiate a sexual encounter without previous sexual abuse.
The attraction to a child could be related to an inconsequential sense of self, an abhorrence of the act of sex as dirty which is somehow purified by the child's presence, or a power play knowing that control is in the hands of the adult and solidified by a child's lack of power or knowledge. I'm sure that there are more, but the point is I cannot think of an explanation or perspective where a child is considered as an equivalent sexual partner rather than a prop. And that makes this attraction - every time - a problem.
Now, unfortunately, the harm done when this objectification is acted on, the harm is most heinously on the child.
If someone had a sexual compulsion to engage with a working lawnmower, then everyone would be able to see that removing that compulsion is the right thing to aim for. No matter how much someone loves the twin-blades, and the smell of freshly cut grass. However, the lawnmower is an object, and this objectification is plain to see and the harm easy to imagine.
When the compulsion is a child we seem to get confused. We are at risk of objectification of children, if ALL we do understand and explain the factors leading to compulsion, and fail to use that knowledge to address and remove it. In order to improve the well-being of the person holding it, but also to safeguard those children they use to feed that compulsion, and those they have contact or access to.
The issue here is the normalisation of paedophilia, the attempt to redefine and rebrand it as an attraction, to align it with LGB ('add the P to the LGBTQ'). It's the kind of bullshit that Prostasia come out with along with trying to get rid of sex offender registers and legalise child sex dolls - I wasn't expecting it from USA today on the whole, but then paedos (or 'minor-attracted persons' as they like to style themselves) are now posting this openly on twitter (we no recourse whatsover) along with their preferred age range.
I also have about ZERO time for some pseudo-psychological bullshit hairsplitting over what constitutes pedophilia in a fucking TWEET - does it actually get more irresponsible?
I was on the Paddick thread just saying my normal 'men cannot become women.
Interesting I have just been suspend from Twitter with no reasons given!
"Your account is permanently suspended
After careful review, we determined your account broke the Twitter Rules. Your account is permanently in read-only mode, which means you can’t Tweet, Retweet, or Like content. You won’t be able to create new accounts. If you think we got this wrong, you can submit an appeal."
I have asked Twitter why I was suspended.
So who knows...I am penning a reply to twitter to tell them millions have gone to Gettr because they know biology is true...and that Twitter is a sewer of porn and pedos!
Yes! Make it lengthy, there's plenty to cover after all. I have been enjoying watching their stock take a hammering #downwiththatkindofthing
the reason "targeted abuse" that is a lie!
Hello,
Your account has been suspended and will not be restored because it was found to be violating the Twitter Terms of Service, specifically the Twitter Rules against participating in targeted abuse.
In order to ensure that people feel safe expressing diverse opinions and beliefs on our platform, we do not tolerate abusive behavior. This includes inciting other people to engage in the targeted harassment of someone.
You can learn more about our rules against abusive behavior.
Thanks,
Twitter
Pointing out the difference between men and women appears to be THE insurmountable crime against Twitter's "standards", with identifying paedos who happen to be chummy with Management running a very close second as far as I can see.
In order to “prevent a lifetime of torment” (a Stonewall description), just spin your head around several times, say no to reality, and sign up for a lifetime of medicalization instead.
that prick paddick also blocked me on FB when I commented that he's rapist's best friend.
"Woman decides she’s not “womanly” enough by society’s standards, concludes she is in fact not a woman"
= Person decides they are not interesting enough … so they go in for all this gender hoopla!
Hate to say snowflake generation but you must seek truth!
Look around to different thoughts!
Wrote an old school poet flyting about the UK jail situation. I'm not really on twitter but if anyone wants to use it (anywhere) feel free:
Are females seen as prostitutes in every UK jail?
Have jailors become pimps since your morals went on sale?
Are brothels not illegal? Or is jail now a 'Salon'?
One last question fore you go, do we still call them 'Johns'?
- the Poet Penny
I'm going to see if there's any comments sections I can leave it on later. Still technically at work now. Not in a suit though so I'm not 'Tory' working.
Hah! Not in a suit though so I'm not "Tory" working! I pretty much figure anyone IN a suit is NOT working.
Conversion therapy ban for LGBTQIA+?
Taken literally, the "I" would mean preventing doctors from treating children with DSDs.
And I've just caught up with The Mess, which features Graham demanding asexual conversion therapy!
Thanks for that giving chirpy woman-hating cockwomble a severe scolding, Graham. x
Here is the story of the only known "trans" to be murdered worldwide in 2021:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roHc-gB6TBw
The Netflix show is called “The House” https://www.netflix.com/title/81178338/
He tweeted that after voting to continue subjecting vulnerable abused women to rape and sexual assault? Is there a point where bludgeoning someone with a baseball bat (AKA 'Maughaming') is actually acceptable for the good of society? ASKING FOR A FRIEND
About that USA Today tweet. What is the problem with that statement?
Surely someone can be a pedophile, yet stay away from children, so not engage in child sexual abuse?
Discussions on this range from the sedate to the fantasical. Allyn Walker proposed in her Phd that there are techniques that keep paedophiles from committing abuse, which include watching child porn - which ignores the fact that abuse is being committed producing such porn.
I think the issue has to be looked at through a wider lens.
For me, sexual attraction (to be considered healthy) has to be non-coercive, and between equals in terms of autonomy and power.
So, sexual attraction to children indicates a compulsion that needs be to addressed, and if possible eliminated. There is no possibility that a child will knowingly initiate a sexual encounter without previous sexual abuse.
The attraction to a child could be related to an inconsequential sense of self, an abhorrence of the act of sex as dirty which is somehow purified by the child's presence, or a power play knowing that control is in the hands of the adult and solidified by a child's lack of power or knowledge. I'm sure that there are more, but the point is I cannot think of an explanation or perspective where a child is considered as an equivalent sexual partner rather than a prop. And that makes this attraction - every time - a problem.
Now, unfortunately, the harm done when this objectification is acted on, the harm is most heinously on the child.
If someone had a sexual compulsion to engage with a working lawnmower, then everyone would be able to see that removing that compulsion is the right thing to aim for. No matter how much someone loves the twin-blades, and the smell of freshly cut grass. However, the lawnmower is an object, and this objectification is plain to see and the harm easy to imagine.
When the compulsion is a child we seem to get confused. We are at risk of objectification of children, if ALL we do understand and explain the factors leading to compulsion, and fail to use that knowledge to address and remove it. In order to improve the well-being of the person holding it, but also to safeguard those children they use to feed that compulsion, and those they have contact or access to.
Very well said!
The issue here is the normalisation of paedophilia, the attempt to redefine and rebrand it as an attraction, to align it with LGB ('add the P to the LGBTQ'). It's the kind of bullshit that Prostasia come out with along with trying to get rid of sex offender registers and legalise child sex dolls - I wasn't expecting it from USA today on the whole, but then paedos (or 'minor-attracted persons' as they like to style themselves) are now posting this openly on twitter (we no recourse whatsover) along with their preferred age range.
I also have about ZERO time for some pseudo-psychological bullshit hairsplitting over what constitutes pedophilia in a fucking TWEET - does it actually get more irresponsible?