39 Comments

Thanks for this. It's jaw-dropping. This supposed complaint caught my eye: "Some transgender attorneys were assumed by court staff to be defendants on prostitution charges simply due to their gender expression, specifically clothing and makeup."

Being mistaken for prostitutes would have made those men feel "affirmed" - and more. Indeed, no doubt that was a main goal.

Expand full comment

LinkedIn blows - just a worthless, garbage site. I check now and then but last login i was prompted to add pronouns, so i put Ob/Vi/Ous. Oddly, i haven't gotten any recruiter emails since then...

I've kept my profile out of date on purpose because someone tried to doxx me shortly after i started being GC online.

Expand full comment

Wow! Brilliant analysis and shocking that LinkedIn are taking this line. See what happens if I share on twitter next.

Expand full comment

"It is hard to believe that the Massachusetts Trial Court has endorsed an ideology that results in this type of degradation."

No kidding. I frequently can't believe I'm living in a time when people can be openly vile and it gets adopted as official advice. Who the fuck would call their mother a "front hole person?" Why does a justice system think that's OK and why is there not widespread outrage?

"hard to believe" is an understatement.

Expand full comment

What were the grown ups doing when they allowed this?

Expand full comment

Hells Bells, this lot will not stop. The acceptance of respectful deference will never be enough. It's maddening. I can only imagine what follows the pulling apart of this once it has weaved it's way in to every aspect of civil life and been rejected. I'm worried that we might be fucked either way.

Expand full comment

Thanks for publishing this I saw the message from the author saying it had been banned. It’s terrifying - both the contents and (perhaps even more) that it was banned for hate speech.

Expand full comment

This was great. Thank you for sharing this. The tech world needs to stop the censorship of the impacts of gender ideology on women, girls and transboys like my kid. This ideology only privileges the males.

Expand full comment

"Gender dogma is backed by enormous power and unlimited wealth." What the hell is going on?

Expand full comment

Terrifying. We are going to stop this ideology. Not sure how, but we will.

Expand full comment

Indeed...gaslighting people on a major scale all for politics and money!

“The key thing to understand about trans rights activism is that, unlike gay rights activism, it is not just a movement seeking to ensure that trans people are not discriminated against. It is, rather, a movement committed to a fundamental reconceptualization of the very idea of what makes someone a man or a woman.” (Emphasis in original.)

Jane Claire Jones.

Expand full comment

that is horrific - have just shared it to my linked in

Expand full comment

It's terrifying how the judiciary has been captured and is, presumably, blind to that capture. And how very telling that TW attorneys get taken for being defendants on prostitution charges. I recall seeing a photo of two TW on their way to court, one I believe was formerly in the world of boxing and the other a lawyer. On their way to court, both with skirts skimming the tops of their thighs and wearing thigh-high boots.

Excellent advice from Alexander S at the end there.

Expand full comment

Extraordinary and terrifying, and yet totally par for the course in Batshitworld. These people are claiming victory in a debate they refuse to have. Is this censorship a way of preparing us for when the CCP rules the world? More and more it feels to me as if, as William and others have put it, this really is "reality's last stand". If such hateful crap is not fought and beaten, then there is no hope for us. It's not right vs left. It's far more important. If we can't get this right, we deserve the asteroid, frankly.

Expand full comment

This is an excellent and important article. I'm going to log in to linkedin to support the author however I can.

Expand full comment

A family court judge wrote this?Whilst I think he's right about the lack of impartiality regards adopting genderism as a court mandated approach, it sits right alongside the refusal to train family court judges in domestic abuse. The war against feminist understanding of male oppression is overt and covert in the courts, along with the Law Commission's recent refusal to make misogyny a hate crime. It seems that all oppression is recognised in law EXCEPT the hatred of women. In the UK, human rights legislation specifically excluded the domestic environment which is why family law/courts look like the shit show of misogyny that they are.

Expand full comment