Discussion about this post

User's avatar
WomanOnTheEdge's avatar

"A lot of my patients were quite conservative — many female patients wore long clothes, or the hijab — but they allowed me to examine them despite my change. In fact, after my transition, they even allowed me to perform more intimate examinations that they did not let me to do when I was a male GP’. "

I could be wrong but I suspect that this is not a demographic with a high degree of information or awareness of the facts about transgenderism and the absolute impossibility of 'changing sex'. I wonder how many of these women would be horrified to be told they had just been intimately examined examined by someone who is in fact STILL a male GP.

This seems to me to qualify as some kind of assault by deception. At the very least it should be possible to claim that the women's Equality Act rights to their religious belief had been disregarded.

The recent ruling from the Court of Sessions draws a very clear line between those in possession of a GRC and those merely claiming a transgender 'identity'. I wonder if any of these men have a GRC?

Expand full comment
Matthew gibson's avatar

I know these people struggle to tell the difference between a horse and a chair so it isn't surprising that they cannot tell the difference between a male and a female body. But for most people, unless they are a coma patient, it is going to be pretty obvious whether it is a male or female regardless of what a database says.

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts