Is it just me, or are the toys in the illustrations from Aido's bookywook there really showing the author's age? I mean, there's what appears to be a *cassette deck*, a She-Ra/GreySkull figurine, Night Rider's car, a rotary dial landline phone etc, etc.
I don't know why I bothered to mention it, really!
The real point is that SA continues to make life tough for anyone who they consider to be defamatory or harassing, by reporting to idiot slavish police who dutifully arrest and bail, then chucking in a court claim that defendants seek paid advice.
The court paper is a tough read. It gets down to paras 70 until reading some conclusions why the judge dismissed the case brought by SA. One of the points is that one can't claim harassment from a mention on social media that doesn't copy you in, so it's not targeted. SA went looking for it, and the defendant didn't have a big following, another point about it not being very significant. Big point for everyone is that if someone has a spent conviction, it's illegal to mention it?
Is it just me, or are the toys in the illustrations from Aido's bookywook there really showing the author's age? I mean, there's what appears to be a *cassette deck*, a She-Ra/GreySkull figurine, Night Rider's car, a rotary dial landline phone etc, etc.
I don't know why I bothered to mention it, really!
It's almost as if its autobiographical!
**that television however, is really SOMETHING though. Something from last century...
Ring of pubes around a drain. *swallows slowly and slides weetabix away*
I was looking for some hidden meaning there Graham! Showing my age that I just thought - oh that’s whatsisname from Crossroads - is he now trans 😂
Benny. He was just a bit 'special'
I want that bobble hat xx
The real point is that SA continues to make life tough for anyone who they consider to be defamatory or harassing, by reporting to idiot slavish police who dutifully arrest and bail, then chucking in a court claim that defendants seek paid advice.
The court paper is a tough read. It gets down to paras 70 until reading some conclusions why the judge dismissed the case brought by SA. One of the points is that one can't claim harassment from a mention on social media that doesn't copy you in, so it's not targeted. SA went looking for it, and the defendant didn't have a big following, another point about it not being very significant. Big point for everyone is that if someone has a spent conviction, it's illegal to mention it?
“Dry Cleaning”. Cool. I enjoyed the music and the video :-)