A rigged consultation process, an extraordinary abuse of parliament and a paedophile in a 'Queer' organisation may slow down Iceland's gender revolution
These predators have always been out there but have been forced to change the organisations they base themselves in,.... due to churches etc being under deeper scrutiny.
So the trans/ queer ideology began. Sounds like the Scottish committee dealing with GRA reform could easily get work in Iceland once snp kicked out of Holyrood!!!
You'd be hard pressed to find such a densitiy of pedophiles even in the Catholic Church as have apparently managed to insert themselves into the transmovement. This is just utterly insane.
The explanation, of course, is not that so many transpeople are pedophiles. There is no evidence of that. But the movement is a very handy umbrella for pedophiles to sneak under. It gives you access to children and teenagers and you get away with things you would not get away with anywhere else - and by default. And let's not forget the ideological framework that constantly talks about smashing boundaries...
Again, not a statement about people with gender dysphoria. But one about those people who claim to represent them.
You've really summed it up. It's all very well to go around smashing boundaries, but those boundaries are generally there for a reason. One of the big reasons is often protecting children from evil predators.
We aren't allowed to define anything, and even 'dysphoria' is now not to be discussed as that's hurtful and mean and doubting.
Many now seems allergic to the word boundary and as a result to merely suggest there might be one, or even should be one, let alone mark and defend one, for absolutely everything is pure, unadulterated transphobia. And exclusion and not being diverse. Which is wrong. People won't hear 'no' and they insist on you explaining everything and everything must be debated and justified. But, but, why is having boundaries to stop men abusing the vulnerable necessary again? Well...
We are not sharing language, and everything must be 'protected' and there's some real confected confusion about what words, concepts and principles mean. Everything is up for debate. You must not compare and contrast opinions as each opinion is golden in itself and must not be challenged.
Do you recall how people with selfie sticks kept falling off high objects and edges and dying? That doesn't seem to be reported so much now but it was as if people float about entirely in their own virtual bubbles, often in tech worlds, then there's a nasty challenge with the real, actual world and gravity. Physics. They sure smashed those boundaries. Go them!
This is the link to the postmodernist theories and theologies about smashing 'the system' that too many are not thinking about at all and seem very resistant to being asked to consider. When you delve a little further they do really rather like many boundaries, but they want to get to assert which ones they think everyone else should have, to satisfy their skewed world view. As their personal identity must be what is most important to everyone else and at all times. That some of these who struggle with basic logic are in government and education is chilling.
Emma Corrin on BBC Radio 4 this morning with the usual bingo card of inclusivity and seeming to think her non-binariness isn't her rejecting her 'femininity'. Sure love, but you are rejecting female and I don't give a stuff about your 'femininity'. That they are taking Virginia Woolf and her 'playing with gender' is entirely missing the point yet again and hurts my head.
"Þórhildur was born as a man but defines herself as a woman, she has not undergone a gender reassignment procedure but is on a waiting list. Þórhildur has also defined herself as a lesbian and transgender."
'She.' 'Herself'. 'Lesbian'. Puke. Puke. Puke.
".. she has not undergone a gender reassignment procedure but is on a waiting list".
Yeah, sure. He's not gonna let go of his penis. It might come in handy when he violates teen-aged disabled girls.
Women just are, yes and we very rarely if ever, go around raping small boys or anyone else. Yet these sick, mentally ill perverts go around doing just that and this stupid society labels it as having been done by a woman.
I think I saw Eldur at the LGB Alliance Conference asking questions in the talk with psychiatrist who left the Tavistock. He knew his stuff for sure. Glad he is keeping on top of things in Iceland.
Be sure to watch this one all the way through. The shocker at 15 minutes in about a groomer man, thinks he's female, taking advantage of "disabled teen girls!" I worked in Special Education for 15 years. This saga of the male sexual predator of innocent, naive and vulnerable adolescent girls is all too common.
Oh, it will come out of the woodwork every day now. On Isaac Uncooked youtube channel, he's put up quite a bit about a testosterone-consuming pornographer named something Angel, who sells the idea of girls being happy as males, while pretending not to, as well as hawking all kinds of sex toys and creams. Was part of the California drug culture decades ago. The child molesters are revealed on a weekly basis lately.
Yes very true, it happened to my friend's autistic daughter when she was in respite care for a couple of nights about 20 years ago. I will never forget the upset and outrage we all felt that a predator had been allowed access to a vulnerable young girl.
Just watched this. This is a really shocking revelation and I shared your reaction. I have a few years experience of working with men who sexually abuse children and based on my knowledge and training I would see this TIM as being on the higher end of the risk scale when it comes to child sexual abuse. Based on the article he has both male and female victims. This means he is someone who is a lot harder to risk manage because he is indiscriminate about the children he targets. I would guess that the boy mentioned was probably very young as I think it unlikely a teenage boy would accompany an adult male into a toilet to pee, although the article doesn't specify an age. This could suggest that his target group ranges from prepubescent into early teens so again he is indiscriminate as opposed to a preferential abuser who has a specific age range and sex they target. This is somewhat uncommon as even situational offenders generally have a preferred group they target. But statistically men who sexually abuse boys are more dangerous as they are more likely to be prolific and more likely to be aggressive or violent in their abuse if their other grooming strategies are unsuccessful. And then you add in the additional factor of his "special interest" in disabled girls, the most vulnerable of a highly vulnerable group. So not an assessment as information is very limited but several massive red flags for me and my prediction would be that he has many more victims who have not yet come forward (and more who probably never will).
If it didn't have such tragic consequences for thousands of young people, this would look like a practical joke blown out of proportion.
Of course, no stone must be left unturned when we try to understand how transideology came to capture Western societies - but there is literally no stone you turn you don't find anything under. I don't think I'ver seen a movement so full of scandals - and I know quite a few who are rotten to the core - and investigative journalists haven't even started looking. (And yes, Graham, you are right: Where are they, anyway?)
Thank you, Eldur and Glinner. Really appreciate your support if women’s rights and the protection of vulnerable children and youths. There is a deep homophobia to trans ideology. And society just can’t seem to see it.
So is the bill that was proposed on hold after your submission objecting to certain provisions within the bill?
I think i’ve figured it out. As well as making billions monetising body dysphoria the pharma companies have perfected a brain control pill that they have managed to get into world leader’s tea.
“A woman can’t have a penis”…… (add brain control pill to cornflakes)… “A woman can have a penis, its called a she dick and its really a beautiful thing that spells out hope for humanity and a lot of things”
Yep and then when it came to the public, all they needed to do was create a fake human rights movement (on the back of gay rights), get everyone hooked on Ru Paul's Drag Race, and smear any dissenters with the label of ring wing bigot. Job done.
The control pill is a very valid explanation, although I do wonder if the world leaders have all been replaced by undersized cyborgs. Macron, Sunak, Trudeau. It's looking suspicious.
Good God! This Pordhildur who describes himself as a lesbian somehow then goes around raping young boys, how sick and mixed up do any of these perverts get? The whole Iceland story has managed to include every form of corruption that exists into one big bundle. Big pharma corruption, political corruption, sick individuals abusing children. You couldn't make it up!
I have an idea. How about we get that evil ‘yeet the tests’ Irish Dr employed in the removal of the genitals of any Man who has sexually abused a child? She would make even more money...everyone is happy except the paedophiles of course...but they can never be happy. Sorry.....just a rant. 🤬🤬🤬
bet she doesn’t get asked to remove many she dicks. You know the dicks on heterosexual men. What a fucking joke. I’m cool with my male body- but i can get another 5ml of blood pumped in there if i tell everyone i’m a woman.
By the way, I just heard Frans de Waal on Radio 4. He seemed to be backing up the idea of gender identity... does anyone know him? Did I get this wrong? Will research tonight but wondered if anyone has heard of him! He's a primatologist. Jordan Peterson had him on his podcast a few months back and JP said he greatly respects him. What am I missing here!?
His recent stuff is full of gender identity rhetoric—he is arguing that because there is individual behavioural variation in bonobos and chimpanzees that “transgenderism” is “natural”. It’s deeply sexist and based on stereotypes of so-called male and female behaviour amongst chimpanzees/bonobos (who not only have highly divergent group-level behaviour as species but also — like all the other great apes called humans, chimps, bonobos, gorillas, orangutans — have highly divergent individual behaviour due to complex sociality).
Thanks for this. Yes he seemed to be saying that female chimp who loves rough and tumble has a gender identity different to her sex and that is a transgender identity??
Gender non-conformity means that a chimp is transgender...FFS!
When you say his recent stuff, did he say something different before?
He never got into the subject before. I mean in relation to his recent book he’s publicising. My guess is he has a trans family member, because he keeps prevaricating on both “sides” of the debate. If he believes in unscientific souls he should just say so.
Ah I get you. I agree. I assume you're familiar with his work. Why would JP tolerate any of that!? Unless FdW only very recently started to talk about in this way.
JP often takes an incredibly shallow take on a subject, then interviews someone who rambles in a similar way. These are blind spots that lead to many dismissing everything he does. Quite a lot of these self-proclaimed great male thinkers then pronounce that they greatly admire other great male thinkers. And as The Voynich Herbalists mentioned, he does have a book to plug. Great thinker! Buy my book! Buy his book! Quick write a book!
His recent interview with Helen Joyce was weird. He rambled in a very strange way and she was politely saying, that's a good point, picking a thread from that, then saying a tightly constructed point back. It was on track, then off track, then off track some more. It was a jumble whenever he responded and off on tangents that weren't the meanderings of an illuminating conversation, he was jumping about and making statements that she seemed to listen to, not really requiring her input, then she had to try to make a response to that. He wasn't following her points, he kept introducing more of his own so it was frustrating as I wanted to hear her fully develop those strings and him let her. It may have been the editing and I know he's been ill but it was a disturbing watch.
Funny, a lot of people raved about the Peterson/Joyce interview. It was good but I'm with you, I find him a bit convoluted at times. I lose his thread a lot.
I must admit though, I think Peterson would have pushed back hard on any gender woo with Frans de Waal. JP hates it 🤣 I bet this bloke didn't mention transgender kids or the term gender identity to JP in the interview, yet he does on BBC Radio?
Yes I heard that too and wasn't sure what to make of it. He seemed to be suggesting that the aggressive behaviour of one female monkey was evidence that animals can be transgender. Will be interested to know what you find out.
That's a very stereotyped and distorted view of sex differences (typical in trans ideology) . Women can get very aggressive if their children are threatened for instance, that doesn't mean that they're really males.
i heard that too. Don’t people campaign against animal testing because we are not like and like with rabbits. I know its a push sometimes to believe it but, we aren’t actually monkeys.
Not the first time I've heard a Radio 4 science programme airing gender woo. And a couple of months ago there was a segment on PM about young people transitioning, which I don't think even mentioned the risks or detransitioning - it was about a happy teenager and enabling parent.
I just listened again. He absolutely does imply that a non-conforming female chimp may be transgender.
He also talks (casually) about the ability to identify as a particular sex. Surely a chimp can only display more masculine behaviour. I don't even mind if he was to say that she resonates with males. Even if he'd said "identify with" not "identify as" would have made it better. Why didn't he say that she is female and that that can't ever change?
And he mentions transgender kids.
A primatologist making links between gender non-conformity and being trans on the radio makes me mad, as well as throwing his weight behind the concept of trans kids...!? People will believe there is some science to this.
I've also heard R4's happy stories of transitioning teens. They're doing a good job at keeping a huge medical scandal a national success story.
BBC (Radio 4) also seem to be doing the 'little local problem up there in that there Scotland it might be nationalism or independence we're not really paying any attention'. They give the impression it's all political squabbles. None of the stories and scandals are being covered. Sandyford, the bill going though now, scarfgate, paedos in women's prisons, indy votes, it's all the same.
Have just updated that blogpost so visit the web version for latest.
These predators have always been out there but have been forced to change the organisations they base themselves in,.... due to churches etc being under deeper scrutiny.
So the trans/ queer ideology began. Sounds like the Scottish committee dealing with GRA reform could easily get work in Iceland once snp kicked out of Holyrood!!!
You'd be hard pressed to find such a densitiy of pedophiles even in the Catholic Church as have apparently managed to insert themselves into the transmovement. This is just utterly insane.
The explanation, of course, is not that so many transpeople are pedophiles. There is no evidence of that. But the movement is a very handy umbrella for pedophiles to sneak under. It gives you access to children and teenagers and you get away with things you would not get away with anywhere else - and by default. And let's not forget the ideological framework that constantly talks about smashing boundaries...
Again, not a statement about people with gender dysphoria. But one about those people who claim to represent them.
You've really summed it up. It's all very well to go around smashing boundaries, but those boundaries are generally there for a reason. One of the big reasons is often protecting children from evil predators.
We aren't allowed to define anything, and even 'dysphoria' is now not to be discussed as that's hurtful and mean and doubting.
Many now seems allergic to the word boundary and as a result to merely suggest there might be one, or even should be one, let alone mark and defend one, for absolutely everything is pure, unadulterated transphobia. And exclusion and not being diverse. Which is wrong. People won't hear 'no' and they insist on you explaining everything and everything must be debated and justified. But, but, why is having boundaries to stop men abusing the vulnerable necessary again? Well...
We are not sharing language, and everything must be 'protected' and there's some real confected confusion about what words, concepts and principles mean. Everything is up for debate. You must not compare and contrast opinions as each opinion is golden in itself and must not be challenged.
Do you recall how people with selfie sticks kept falling off high objects and edges and dying? That doesn't seem to be reported so much now but it was as if people float about entirely in their own virtual bubbles, often in tech worlds, then there's a nasty challenge with the real, actual world and gravity. Physics. They sure smashed those boundaries. Go them!
This is the link to the postmodernist theories and theologies about smashing 'the system' that too many are not thinking about at all and seem very resistant to being asked to consider. When you delve a little further they do really rather like many boundaries, but they want to get to assert which ones they think everyone else should have, to satisfy their skewed world view. As their personal identity must be what is most important to everyone else and at all times. That some of these who struggle with basic logic are in government and education is chilling.
Emma Corrin on BBC Radio 4 this morning with the usual bingo card of inclusivity and seeming to think her non-binariness isn't her rejecting her 'femininity'. Sure love, but you are rejecting female and I don't give a stuff about your 'femininity'. That they are taking Virginia Woolf and her 'playing with gender' is entirely missing the point yet again and hurts my head.
"Þórhildur was born as a man but defines herself as a woman, she has not undergone a gender reassignment procedure but is on a waiting list. Þórhildur has also defined herself as a lesbian and transgender."
'She.' 'Herself'. 'Lesbian'. Puke. Puke. Puke.
".. she has not undergone a gender reassignment procedure but is on a waiting list".
Yeah, sure. He's not gonna let go of his penis. It might come in handy when he violates teen-aged disabled girls.
Women just are, yes and we very rarely if ever, go around raping small boys or anyone else. Yet these sick, mentally ill perverts go around doing just that and this stupid society labels it as having been done by a woman.
I think I saw Eldur at the LGB Alliance Conference asking questions in the talk with psychiatrist who left the Tavistock. He knew his stuff for sure. Glad he is keeping on top of things in Iceland.
Struck me as a highly intelligent and certainly very eloquent guy who knows his stuff.
Be sure to watch this one all the way through. The shocker at 15 minutes in about a groomer man, thinks he's female, taking advantage of "disabled teen girls!" I worked in Special Education for 15 years. This saga of the male sexual predator of innocent, naive and vulnerable adolescent girls is all too common.
Just horrific!!
What else is there to be dug up?
They are all in this game for their own gain!
Oh, it will come out of the woodwork every day now. On Isaac Uncooked youtube channel, he's put up quite a bit about a testosterone-consuming pornographer named something Angel, who sells the idea of girls being happy as males, while pretending not to, as well as hawking all kinds of sex toys and creams. Was part of the California drug culture decades ago. The child molesters are revealed on a weekly basis lately.
Yes very true, it happened to my friend's autistic daughter when she was in respite care for a couple of nights about 20 years ago. I will never forget the upset and outrage we all felt that a predator had been allowed access to a vulnerable young girl.
Just watched this. This is a really shocking revelation and I shared your reaction. I have a few years experience of working with men who sexually abuse children and based on my knowledge and training I would see this TIM as being on the higher end of the risk scale when it comes to child sexual abuse. Based on the article he has both male and female victims. This means he is someone who is a lot harder to risk manage because he is indiscriminate about the children he targets. I would guess that the boy mentioned was probably very young as I think it unlikely a teenage boy would accompany an adult male into a toilet to pee, although the article doesn't specify an age. This could suggest that his target group ranges from prepubescent into early teens so again he is indiscriminate as opposed to a preferential abuser who has a specific age range and sex they target. This is somewhat uncommon as even situational offenders generally have a preferred group they target. But statistically men who sexually abuse boys are more dangerous as they are more likely to be prolific and more likely to be aggressive or violent in their abuse if their other grooming strategies are unsuccessful. And then you add in the additional factor of his "special interest" in disabled girls, the most vulnerable of a highly vulnerable group. So not an assessment as information is very limited but several massive red flags for me and my prediction would be that he has many more victims who have not yet come forward (and more who probably never will).
If it didn't have such tragic consequences for thousands of young people, this would look like a practical joke blown out of proportion.
Of course, no stone must be left unturned when we try to understand how transideology came to capture Western societies - but there is literally no stone you turn you don't find anything under. I don't think I'ver seen a movement so full of scandals - and I know quite a few who are rotten to the core - and investigative journalists haven't even started looking. (And yes, Graham, you are right: Where are they, anyway?)
The disturbed 'gender' ideology certainly magnetizes disturbed individuals. Like attracts like. What a mess.
Thank you, Eldur and Glinner. Really appreciate your support if women’s rights and the protection of vulnerable children and youths. There is a deep homophobia to trans ideology. And society just can’t seem to see it.
So is the bill that was proposed on hold after your submission objecting to certain provisions within the bill?
I think i’ve figured it out. As well as making billions monetising body dysphoria the pharma companies have perfected a brain control pill that they have managed to get into world leader’s tea.
“A woman can’t have a penis”…… (add brain control pill to cornflakes)… “A woman can have a penis, its called a she dick and its really a beautiful thing that spells out hope for humanity and a lot of things”
Yep and then when it came to the public, all they needed to do was create a fake human rights movement (on the back of gay rights), get everyone hooked on Ru Paul's Drag Race, and smear any dissenters with the label of ring wing bigot. Job done.
The control pill is a very valid explanation, although I do wonder if the world leaders have all been replaced by undersized cyborgs. Macron, Sunak, Trudeau. It's looking suspicious.
Excellent interview, thank you for doing it
It's grotesque what this monster has done. The end of this madness is coming
Well done Glinner! Enjoy the news from Iceland. My heart sunk at a fetish for disabled girls...
Same guy that Barry spoke to!? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMS0U6pewfs&ab_channel=EDIJester
Good God! This Pordhildur who describes himself as a lesbian somehow then goes around raping young boys, how sick and mixed up do any of these perverts get? The whole Iceland story has managed to include every form of corruption that exists into one big bundle. Big pharma corruption, political corruption, sick individuals abusing children. You couldn't make it up!
An Icelandic Yaniv. He'll go to a women's prison of course.
If ever there was a good candidate for fast-tracking castration he looks like one!
I have an idea. How about we get that evil ‘yeet the tests’ Irish Dr employed in the removal of the genitals of any Man who has sexually abused a child? She would make even more money...everyone is happy except the paedophiles of course...but they can never be happy. Sorry.....just a rant. 🤬🤬🤬
bet she doesn’t get asked to remove many she dicks. You know the dicks on heterosexual men. What a fucking joke. I’m cool with my male body- but i can get another 5ml of blood pumped in there if i tell everyone i’m a woman.
By the way, I just heard Frans de Waal on Radio 4. He seemed to be backing up the idea of gender identity... does anyone know him? Did I get this wrong? Will research tonight but wondered if anyone has heard of him! He's a primatologist. Jordan Peterson had him on his podcast a few months back and JP said he greatly respects him. What am I missing here!?
His recent stuff is full of gender identity rhetoric—he is arguing that because there is individual behavioural variation in bonobos and chimpanzees that “transgenderism” is “natural”. It’s deeply sexist and based on stereotypes of so-called male and female behaviour amongst chimpanzees/bonobos (who not only have highly divergent group-level behaviour as species but also — like all the other great apes called humans, chimps, bonobos, gorillas, orangutans — have highly divergent individual behaviour due to complex sociality).
Thanks for this. Yes he seemed to be saying that female chimp who loves rough and tumble has a gender identity different to her sex and that is a transgender identity??
Gender non-conformity means that a chimp is transgender...FFS!
When you say his recent stuff, did he say something different before?
He never got into the subject before. I mean in relation to his recent book he’s publicising. My guess is he has a trans family member, because he keeps prevaricating on both “sides” of the debate. If he believes in unscientific souls he should just say so.
Ah I get you. I agree. I assume you're familiar with his work. Why would JP tolerate any of that!? Unless FdW only very recently started to talk about in this way.
JP often takes an incredibly shallow take on a subject, then interviews someone who rambles in a similar way. These are blind spots that lead to many dismissing everything he does. Quite a lot of these self-proclaimed great male thinkers then pronounce that they greatly admire other great male thinkers. And as The Voynich Herbalists mentioned, he does have a book to plug. Great thinker! Buy my book! Buy his book! Quick write a book!
His recent interview with Helen Joyce was weird. He rambled in a very strange way and she was politely saying, that's a good point, picking a thread from that, then saying a tightly constructed point back. It was on track, then off track, then off track some more. It was a jumble whenever he responded and off on tangents that weren't the meanderings of an illuminating conversation, he was jumping about and making statements that she seemed to listen to, not really requiring her input, then she had to try to make a response to that. He wasn't following her points, he kept introducing more of his own so it was frustrating as I wanted to hear her fully develop those strings and him let her. It may have been the editing and I know he's been ill but it was a disturbing watch.
Funny, a lot of people raved about the Peterson/Joyce interview. It was good but I'm with you, I find him a bit convoluted at times. I lose his thread a lot.
I must admit though, I think Peterson would have pushed back hard on any gender woo with Frans de Waal. JP hates it 🤣 I bet this bloke didn't mention transgender kids or the term gender identity to JP in the interview, yet he does on BBC Radio?
Seems very selective to me...
Yes I heard that too and wasn't sure what to make of it. He seemed to be suggesting that the aggressive behaviour of one female monkey was evidence that animals can be transgender. Will be interested to know what you find out.
That's a very stereotyped and distorted view of sex differences (typical in trans ideology) . Women can get very aggressive if their children are threatened for instance, that doesn't mean that they're really males.
i heard that too. Don’t people campaign against animal testing because we are not like and like with rabbits. I know its a push sometimes to believe it but, we aren’t actually monkeys.
No, we are apes.
Apes with social media and nukes!
Yes, but still great apes whether we write concertos and go to the moon or not. I don’t mean it as an insult, just a fact.
Yes. That's what I took it to mean. It was bizarre, wasn't it? Surely if JP respects him so much, he can't be into gender woo?
Dulle, I tried to find the programme again on BBC Sounds, but I can't find it. Do you what specific programme it was on?
It's "Inside Science" ("Science Funding", 23.11.22) and the interview with Frans de Waal is at 21:22 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m001fd08
Not the first time I've heard a Radio 4 science programme airing gender woo. And a couple of months ago there was a segment on PM about young people transitioning, which I don't think even mentioned the risks or detransitioning - it was about a happy teenager and enabling parent.
Brilliant, thank you.
I just listened again. He absolutely does imply that a non-conforming female chimp may be transgender.
He also talks (casually) about the ability to identify as a particular sex. Surely a chimp can only display more masculine behaviour. I don't even mind if he was to say that she resonates with males. Even if he'd said "identify with" not "identify as" would have made it better. Why didn't he say that she is female and that that can't ever change?
And he mentions transgender kids.
A primatologist making links between gender non-conformity and being trans on the radio makes me mad, as well as throwing his weight behind the concept of trans kids...!? People will believe there is some science to this.
I've also heard R4's happy stories of transitioning teens. They're doing a good job at keeping a huge medical scandal a national success story.
BBC (Radio 4) also seem to be doing the 'little local problem up there in that there Scotland it might be nationalism or independence we're not really paying any attention'. They give the impression it's all political squabbles. None of the stories and scandals are being covered. Sandyford, the bill going though now, scarfgate, paedos in women's prisons, indy votes, it's all the same.
Same with Wales, same with Northern Ireland.
One rather hopes that the Norse god Thor will come down and take vengeance on this creature using his name...