36 Comments

I've appealed...I'm surprised by how little I care about being banned, but I've lost access to lots of parents who DM'd me in the last few days to talk about autism

Expand full comment

Nah, perma-banned. "Targeted harassment"

Expand full comment

Don't worry have spread the word, expect a few parents to be getting in contact.

Expand full comment

Well done to you for calling this out. That picture is truly horrific.! Trans healthcare = trans mutilation & butchery.,and she's far from the only victim 😢😢😢😢😢😢

Expand full comment

Hi Robert. Perhaps put a call out on Mumsnet Feminism Sex and Gender Topic? You may find some of them on there. Glinner posts there occasionally and also may be able to help if you don't want t join there. And thank you.

Expand full comment

that's a really good call, thank you!

Expand full comment

I second that advice. 👍

Expand full comment

Good for you.

Expand full comment

WTAF doesn't really cover it - I can't decide whether to abandon twitter before I get banned or stay on there to reach as many as possible before I do. Good luck with your appeal!

Expand full comment

Could you switch over to GETTR? Would they find you there?

Expand full comment

I was banned with exactly the same reason given. I'd been sarcastic to someone who had been hanging out on the gender critical side who then started arguing for TRA that she might as well go and get a baseball bat now (referring of course to all the pictures of TRA with the same).

I'd appealed about 5 times previously and had got the account back each time but this time I just havn't been bothered to do so.

Expand full comment

Also. Let's see but I have posted some things that others would have been banned for. So they don't seem to ban people with fewer followers (111 followers), unless someone reports you. Just reposed Rob's thing so let's see if I get banned. I sort of want to be banned, spend too much time on it and am on Gettr. I have been pretty punchy, but under the radar - so they are showing inconsistencies of approach.

Expand full comment

Ohhh .... Crikey. The truth they don’t want you to see or hear... It’s SCANDALOUS.

The promised outcomes are a lie; and the fact that Twatter has banned this person are both an indication of agenda setting / a controlling narrative. OMG.

SJWs - get an eyeful of THIS.

Expand full comment

This is precisely what I was banned for.

Expand full comment

O/T William, just read your article 'Scotland on the edge. A good summation of whats ahead with self ID. Sturgeon is utterly committed, despite 3 separate polls showing only around 20% are supporting. However her motivation is not simply to be different from England. Her motivation is to ingratiate herself with the captured international community. Cushy job awaits. The women of Scotland will never forgive.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/12/nicola-sturgeons-motivation/

Expand full comment

Hope the SNP ( who I've never voted for ) get slaughtered in the local elections. Unfortunately the next general / Scottish elections are too far away just now.

Expand full comment

I do want Scotland to be independent but not under Sturgeons mob. I did'nt vote SNP back in May and I won't either in the council elections. Point is we're supposed to leave a better world for our girls, not bloody worse.

I also hope the SNP take a kicking come May. I actually detest Sturgeon these days.

Expand full comment

Aa detest the brit nats mair. As fr capture, thet a' are.

Expand full comment

I copied and pasted the image in reply on Twitter. Fingers crossed that I don't get banned too. If so I will be joining everyone on Gettr.

Expand full comment

Surely if they ban Rob, they need to ban you and me for the same thing? Let's see.

Expand full comment

Interesting to know how quickly this is happening too and rough geographical locations (as in individual country scale or roughly whereabouts).

Expand full comment

“Consensual incest”. (An oh so obvious misunderstanding of the meaning of consent.) There’s only one step lower, isn’t there? This is the darkly logical result of perversions being affirmed and lauded under a miles-wide ideological umbrella. “Affirm my perversion too” — the demand? slogan? of those lurking in up-until-now unspeakable realms. Perhaps we should appreciate they’re finally making themselves visible?

Expand full comment

I saw a triggernometry interview recently, can’t remember the mans name, who ended his interview by stating that the next thing would be normalising consensual incest. And here we are. Theodore Dalrymple.

Expand full comment

Shocking, but I doubt it will gain the same traction since I can't see a way of monetising it. On the other hand if you'd told me even two years ago that you would be banned from social media for saying men aren't female, I wouldn't have believed you so who the f**k knows what will happen next.

Expand full comment

The muck, and slime at the bottom of Twitter, is getting thicker and deeper, day by day. Thank goodness, the posters of quality and honour, namely the Twitter rejects, always rise to the top.

They deserve the very best!

Expand full comment

Re Rob's suspension: It looks as though they have a fairly dumb algorithm that assumes the poster wishes what's seen in the picture.

Expand full comment

The trans kids (and their doctors!) are the ones who apparently wish for/glorify what's in the picture. Don't they post photos like that themselves (and not get banned)?

Expand full comment

Might it be worth appealing then?

Expand full comment

The/a human they may get to appeal 'to' may be just as dumb or more likely following dumb rules with little or no discretion - it's good to read here about the detail of how these processes are unfolding. The rules also appear to change or build in further opaque ways. There are waves of similar decisions generated (struggling to find a way to describe the lack of decision-making in this 'decision-making'). Their 'explanations' are blanket perverse, almost 'we banned you because we banned you' and it's up to 'us' so tough.

It's a consistent theme that to post warnings of XYZ you need to provide enough detail of that, without being accused of doing XYZ. Like any human anatomy was being labelled as offensive porn as I assume that's what it was trained on. And the minds of those humans training it are often full of it.

It'd be a interesting test if someone could post exactly the same image from different accounts or with a pro or anti stance and see if it was banned, or the account was banned, temp or perm and how they reacted.

Expand full comment

There’s probably a PHD waiting to be earned testing that stuff, yes. Or at least a decent documentary made.

Expand full comment

I am a woman who had breast & nipple recon after double Breast cancer. That image is not one done by an plastic surgeon! That is a butchering! Their medicaire may pay for the top surgery but NOT cosmetic surgeries after!

Expand full comment

It's showing details of a healthcare option. Where is the harm?!

Expand full comment

Here, once again, is a link to an article about Twitter:

https://thegrayzone.com/2021/08/04/twitter-uk-cia-reuters-censorship/

How anyone can think Twitter is EVER a vehicle for decency is beyond me. They are allied with the worst people in many countries; in essence, Twitter is fascistic.

Expand full comment

Well done Rob that was well worth getting banned for. Time the Twatter execs were questioned about this. And shown yours and the incest one and asked..so you like incest then?

Expand full comment

I have reported @incestadvocate to Twitter moderators for a selection of their insidious tweets. I chose "suicide" because there is not a "mental ill-health" option. Fingers crossed!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

All the supporters of genderism I have come across don't want to hear the slightest thing about the reality of bodily harm and mutilation. It ruins the la-la world they live in.

Expand full comment