Just realised I’ve lost the tickets the doctors handed me after the birth of my kids detailing the sex that they’d assigned them at birth . Now I don’t know if they’re male or female. The youngest isn’t old enough to speak yet. Any ideas how I can tell the difference?
Under the rules of the transgender fraternity, finding out would be an aggressive act, one for which you could lose your job and, worst of all, your twitter account. You must now wait till they tell you.
I read on Twitter that the people in charge of Recreational Facilities in Dundee advise that there is no way to tell until they are 14 years old, so until then they can attend swimming classes for both boys and girls.
It is only when they are 14 that you should take any notice of what they tell you as before that they could change their minds from one day to the next.
I don't know how this works if you need to get them passports - I expect the Dundee Recreational Facilities Dept has the answer.
In all truth I didn't feel that much different, when trying to imagine I was reading about a woman, than when reading it as though of a man. The only difference was in my idea that men can do more harm to a child, anatomically speaking, than perhaps a woman could do, for obvious reasons.
A judge, whose very title, "JUDGE", implies they were given the job because of their good judgement, should be able to see clearly what these men are doing and that they are a very grave danger, but it appears some judges cases should be reviewed, and their involvement in political issues examined. I cannot believe there is truly blind acceptance amongst judges, elected representatives, law enforcement and the media. It just has to be some kind of conspiracy against all ethics, morals, and right thinking. It's like a war of lunacy against reason
Unfortunately judges aren't wise like you would hope. In the small claims court they have been great, but I have experience of 3 others in higher courts (I'm not a crim - one was re a local blogger, one was dealing with my mother's will, and one on a separation settlement) and their decisions not only defied precedent and case law, but also logic, and were blatantly biased. It seems to be well known in the legal profession that judges just do their "own thing".
The unfortunate thing about judges in the UK, on the criminal court circuit, is that they cannot be sacked, if they are to go they must resign, but often do not resign even when every opinion in the land is against them.
I recently came across the story of Naomi Hersi, a transwoman murdered in 2018.
According to the BBC “...Ms Hersi, whose legal name was Hersi Mohamed Hersi, was an openly transgender woman, although to her family, who are originally from Somalia, she remained a much-loved son.”
They might not even known Hersi’s transgender persona, his sister certainly didn’t according to a Daily Mail article.
And yet, the BBC felt the need to redact the ‘wrong’ pronoun when sharing the family’s sentiments:
"Our lives will never be the same. The grief has swallowed us up. It's consumed us. Maybe one day it will not be so painful but the violence of [the] death haunts us".
Oh if they're ever a victim of a crime, you can bet your ass their trans status will be invoked. Funny that it's so often omitted when they're a perpetrator. It's almost like there's an agenda. Hmm.
It's not an accident, it's the way UK crime stats are collected and then reported.
Perpetrator details are recorded by the MoJ (Ministry of Justice. The identity of perpetrators is according to how perpetrators self-identify themselves at any stage in their contact with the Criminal Justice System - and they can re-identify at will. So the police might bring a "man" in for questioning but he can self-ID as a woman at any point thereafter. There is now, although there used to be, no means for the police to record "transgender status" as part of the computerised record.
Victim stats and details are recorded by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) as part of the "Household Survey". The ONS system allows an individual to have their self-reported transgender status recorded.
There was a point at which the ONS was unaware that the MoJ was not recording transgender status and even disbelieved that this could be true. The ONS is now fully aware but neither the MoJ nor the ONS seem keen to clarify this pernicious situation. There is plenty of other evidence that both the MoJ and the ONS have been completely "captured" by the trans lobby - the recent debacle over the 2021 Census conducted by the ONS is illustrative.
In the UK, it is official:
- transgender people never commit crimes, they are only ever victims of crime
- there is an apparent increase in "male pattern crime" being perpetrated by "females", purely as an artefact of the different crime-recording systems used by the MoJ and the ONS
- transwomen are only ever the innocent victims of crime, never the perpetrators.
=================
Twitter thread by @HairyLeggdHarpy
14 March 2019
ICYMI.
The government KNEW in 2004 that they were creating the legal fiction of 'female rapists' with the GRA. It's a matter of public record that they confirmed.
But within 5 years this legal lie had been extended from GRC holders, to ANY man who self-identified as a 'woman'.
The London Metropolitan Police have been recording crimes by the self-declared identity of the perpetrator since 2009.
That means any rapist - and in English law rape is always with a penis - is recorded as female if he requests it.
Self-ID isn't law.
But our major institutions, such as the police and the NHS have been operating as if it IS.
For a decade.
The scale of this lie is astonishing.
When I spoke to the Office of National Statistics about this in 2016, they wouldn't believe that the crime stats they compiled were corrupted because police were recording self declared gender instead of sex.
They argued incidences of 'female rapists' must be clerical errors.
Turns out the police forgot to mention to the ONS what they were doing when they switched from recording the sex of criminals, to the self-declared gender of criminals.
The ONS didn't believe me.
You want to know what started me down the path of following these breadcrumbs?
A newspaper article in 2016 commenting on the rise in sexual offences apparently committed by 'women'.
The thing is.
There's no way to distinguish sexual offences committed by women from 'women'.
Apart from rape.
If you see a crime stat about 'female' rapists, you know.
Because rape is with a penis, in English law.
That's where the lie has nowhere to hide.
So next time you read about 'female sex offenders', you'll perhaps have this knowledge to help interpret that.
Why are the Press so willing to lie to their readers? surely the reporters and editors know this blatant and wilful disregard of material reality is beyond bizarre? is it 'cos 'Helen' Belcher of transmedia watch is constantly on their backs?
- stories about court cases must accurately report the language used in court (sometimes they find ways to wiggle around a bit and leave hints)
- most of the Press is signed up to the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) and they can be reported if they breach IPSO "Transgender guidance".
The main stream media has a lot of answer for, they shouldn’t be cow towing to these twisted individuals with their ‘preferred pronouns’ and call them what they are, sick perverted men, males! I mean, come on people! Get with reality! Mess with kids and you should automatically loose all respect from society.
In the UK most of the press is bound by rules and guidance set down by the Independent Press Standards Authority - which has, of course, been captured by the trans lobby:
I see #BanConversionTherapy is trending on Irish Twitter. Specifically aimed at Northern Ireland and their very local brand of religious conservativism. The line that sticks out in an article in the Irish Independent: "Conversion therapy refers to any form of treatment proposed to change a person's sexual orientation or to suppress a person's gender identity.".
Of course modern conversion therapy uses transition ideology as a means of sexual orientation suppression. Also of course the purpose is not to actually change anything but to self congratulate and post crying emotions on twitter.... which is the same thing as achievement these days!
Wow, that was very enlightening! And what makes me even more furious is that their crimes will now be statistically lumped in with "female crime."
Judge Joanna Dickens needs to fuck right off!! How do people like her get into these positions of power .
Just realised I’ve lost the tickets the doctors handed me after the birth of my kids detailing the sex that they’d assigned them at birth . Now I don’t know if they’re male or female. The youngest isn’t old enough to speak yet. Any ideas how I can tell the difference?
Under the rules of the transgender fraternity, finding out would be an aggressive act, one for which you could lose your job and, worst of all, your twitter account. You must now wait till they tell you.
I read on Twitter that the people in charge of Recreational Facilities in Dundee advise that there is no way to tell until they are 14 years old, so until then they can attend swimming classes for both boys and girls.
It is only when they are 14 that you should take any notice of what they tell you as before that they could change their minds from one day to the next.
I don't know how this works if you need to get them passports - I expect the Dundee Recreational Facilities Dept has the answer.
In all truth I didn't feel that much different, when trying to imagine I was reading about a woman, than when reading it as though of a man. The only difference was in my idea that men can do more harm to a child, anatomically speaking, than perhaps a woman could do, for obvious reasons.
A judge, whose very title, "JUDGE", implies they were given the job because of their good judgement, should be able to see clearly what these men are doing and that they are a very grave danger, but it appears some judges cases should be reviewed, and their involvement in political issues examined. I cannot believe there is truly blind acceptance amongst judges, elected representatives, law enforcement and the media. It just has to be some kind of conspiracy against all ethics, morals, and right thinking. It's like a war of lunacy against reason
Unfortunately judges aren't wise like you would hope. In the small claims court they have been great, but I have experience of 3 others in higher courts (I'm not a crim - one was re a local blogger, one was dealing with my mother's will, and one on a separation settlement) and their decisions not only defied precedent and case law, but also logic, and were blatantly biased. It seems to be well known in the legal profession that judges just do their "own thing".
The unfortunate thing about judges in the UK, on the criminal court circuit, is that they cannot be sacked, if they are to go they must resign, but often do not resign even when every opinion in the land is against them.
I recently came across the story of Naomi Hersi, a transwoman murdered in 2018.
According to the BBC “...Ms Hersi, whose legal name was Hersi Mohamed Hersi, was an openly transgender woman, although to her family, who are originally from Somalia, she remained a much-loved son.”
They might not even known Hersi’s transgender persona, his sister certainly didn’t according to a Daily Mail article.
And yet, the BBC felt the need to redact the ‘wrong’ pronoun when sharing the family’s sentiments:
"Our lives will never be the same. The grief has swallowed us up. It's consumed us. Maybe one day it will not be so painful but the violence of [the] death haunts us".
oh my God, do you have the link?
‘Much beloved son:
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-england-london-45625789
‘Violence of [the] death’
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-46061200
'He never asked me to call him Naomi and he never asked me to call him she,'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7067821/Sister-murdered-transgender-man-admits-shell-regret-not-calling-day-died.html
Oh if they're ever a victim of a crime, you can bet your ass their trans status will be invoked. Funny that it's so often omitted when they're a perpetrator. It's almost like there's an agenda. Hmm.
It's not an accident, it's the way UK crime stats are collected and then reported.
Perpetrator details are recorded by the MoJ (Ministry of Justice. The identity of perpetrators is according to how perpetrators self-identify themselves at any stage in their contact with the Criminal Justice System - and they can re-identify at will. So the police might bring a "man" in for questioning but he can self-ID as a woman at any point thereafter. There is now, although there used to be, no means for the police to record "transgender status" as part of the computerised record.
Victim stats and details are recorded by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) as part of the "Household Survey". The ONS system allows an individual to have their self-reported transgender status recorded.
There was a point at which the ONS was unaware that the MoJ was not recording transgender status and even disbelieved that this could be true. The ONS is now fully aware but neither the MoJ nor the ONS seem keen to clarify this pernicious situation. There is plenty of other evidence that both the MoJ and the ONS have been completely "captured" by the trans lobby - the recent debacle over the 2021 Census conducted by the ONS is illustrative.
In the UK, it is official:
- transgender people never commit crimes, they are only ever victims of crime
- there is an apparent increase in "male pattern crime" being perpetrated by "females", purely as an artefact of the different crime-recording systems used by the MoJ and the ONS
- transwomen are only ever the innocent victims of crime, never the perpetrators.
=================
Twitter thread by @HairyLeggdHarpy
14 March 2019
ICYMI.
The government KNEW in 2004 that they were creating the legal fiction of 'female rapists' with the GRA. It's a matter of public record that they confirmed.
But within 5 years this legal lie had been extended from GRC holders, to ANY man who self-identified as a 'woman'.
The London Metropolitan Police have been recording crimes by the self-declared identity of the perpetrator since 2009.
That means any rapist - and in English law rape is always with a penis - is recorded as female if he requests it.
Self-ID isn't law.
But our major institutions, such as the police and the NHS have been operating as if it IS.
For a decade.
The scale of this lie is astonishing.
When I spoke to the Office of National Statistics about this in 2016, they wouldn't believe that the crime stats they compiled were corrupted because police were recording self declared gender instead of sex.
They argued incidences of 'female rapists' must be clerical errors.
Turns out the police forgot to mention to the ONS what they were doing when they switched from recording the sex of criminals, to the self-declared gender of criminals.
The ONS didn't believe me.
You want to know what started me down the path of following these breadcrumbs?
A newspaper article in 2016 commenting on the rise in sexual offences apparently committed by 'women'.
The thing is.
There's no way to distinguish sexual offences committed by women from 'women'.
Apart from rape.
If you see a crime stat about 'female' rapists, you know.
Because rape is with a penis, in English law.
That's where the lie has nowhere to hide.
So next time you read about 'female sex offenders', you'll perhaps have this knowledge to help interpret that.
https://archive.is/wiqKl
Absolutely brilliant post. A lot of insight is within it.
Why are the Press so willing to lie to their readers? surely the reporters and editors know this blatant and wilful disregard of material reality is beyond bizarre? is it 'cos 'Helen' Belcher of transmedia watch is constantly on their backs?
It is because:
- stories about court cases must accurately report the language used in court (sometimes they find ways to wiggle around a bit and leave hints)
- most of the Press is signed up to the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) and they can be reported if they breach IPSO "Transgender guidance".
https://www.ipso.co.uk/member-publishers/guidance-for-journalists-and-editors/transgender-guidance/
I have complained many times and they just trot out the usual mantra - they have been Stonewashed i suspect
The main stream media has a lot of answer for, they shouldn’t be cow towing to these twisted individuals with their ‘preferred pronouns’ and call them what they are, sick perverted men, males! I mean, come on people! Get with reality! Mess with kids and you should automatically loose all respect from society.
In the UK most of the press is bound by rules and guidance set down by the Independent Press Standards Authority - which has, of course, been captured by the trans lobby:
https://www.ipso.co.uk/member-publishers/guidance-for-journalists-and-editors/transgender-guidance/
I see #BanConversionTherapy is trending on Irish Twitter. Specifically aimed at Northern Ireland and their very local brand of religious conservativism. The line that sticks out in an article in the Irish Independent: "Conversion therapy refers to any form of treatment proposed to change a person's sexual orientation or to suppress a person's gender identity.".
Of course modern conversion therapy uses transition ideology as a means of sexual orientation suppression. Also of course the purpose is not to actually change anything but to self congratulate and post crying emotions on twitter.... which is the same thing as achievement these days!