Amnesty now silencing women one by one.
Oof, Colm is busy at the moment.
His plan to silence women en masse foiled, Colm is now trying to shut them up individually.
@you_know_nuttin @Colmogorman @AmnestyIreland Colm blocks women that ask him to consider that gender ideology may be harmful to women and children. Have you been blocked yet?
I asked @Colmogorman if the threats of rape and murder that women face when debating issues that affect them were as abusive as women not believing transwomen are women. He blocked me.
I guess that means no, threats against women aren't as significant.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐔𝐬 @therestofus5
@therestofus5 @Colmogorman Also blocked for raising my concerns for women and children’s rights and safeguarding
He’s actually proud of this one.
@SResisters @Joy_ismyname_ I blocked that account for this appallingly bad faith and dishonest take on what I tweeted.
Anyway, you get the idea.
Veterans of the gender debate will recognise this inability to explain exactly why women need to make room in their own category for men, or why Amnesty’s official line is that there is “no such thing” as a biologically female body when every year one million Indian girls are killed within the first year of their life. If my positions were so incoherent and indefensible, I’d have that block button worn out too.
He’s such a coward. He knows the TRA arguments are indefensible. He also “likes” comments from TRAs who do attempt to debate but never adds anything himself. Pleased I made it into a Glinner post though. 😀
There was a moment on twitter during Irish Repeal the 8th (abortion) referendum when Colm was asked by someone to use the term 'pregnant people' and he accepted this, noting that there was no legal reason to exclude transmen from the debate. Someone else tweeted to the effect that this was so niche a concern that, on this particular issue, the focus should be on biological women. He retweeted this. Once abortion passed, he chose the path of least resistance.