59 Comments

So the Germans think that self ID might cause criminals to evade justice. Who’d have thought it!

Lots of brilliant good news, thanks JL.

Expand full comment
author

More than welcome!

Expand full comment

or even Terrorists...? If everybody is forbidden to mention previous identities because it is dead-naming, then it could become easier for suspects to slip away around the world under a new identity...

Expand full comment

Typical German thinking, emphasising precision and efficiency. Vorsprung durch technik.

Expand full comment

Tracey Ullman is a genius.

Expand full comment
Jul 11, 2023Liked by JL

😂 I had never seen the sketch at the end. A brilliant and happy newsletter as ever JL, thanks for making my day 😘.

Expand full comment
author

My pleasure! 😊

Expand full comment

I'd say this stuff keeps you going JL, thanks for your work. It's invaluable.

LBGlliance take the victory, im so delighted for them that a scandal ridden, paedophile board member, breast binder supplier and ceo who, with no medical training whatsoever, overrides a gp, child abusing crowd called mermaids gets told they have no standing! Brilliant, now they can get going on what they really need to do - stand for LGB rights. And then Allison Bailey wins her case too. This is great news, for all Allison has been put through the victory must be sweet.

Helen mcentee should not be in charge of an ant farm let alone the disgraceful, anti democratic pos law she is pushing, which BTW is shoving trans rights into law against the wishes of the majority of its people, maybe nicola sturgeon should have a word.

The campaign run by the countess needs success to stop insanity that is males in women's prisons. Why can't ireland look at Europe and see that this delusional cult is being halted everywhere because of the harm it is doing. Good on Germany

Australia is very nearly as bad as Canada but they have tendrils of hope. One such is dr jillian Spencer, I hope she succeeds asap.

Prof lawford-smiths book will be a good read, she is on the right side of history

Everyone should sign the 13 y o girl's change.org petition to keep single sex spaces in all public buildings and schools/ universities.

So glad mhairi black is nit standing for election, another one not fit to run an ant farm. Poor ants!

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for your kind words, Trudie! Glad to be of service! x

Expand full comment

Re. 'LGBT’…

’T’ — a letter too far.

Expand full comment

A letter that negates the first three. And they didn't even stop there!

Expand full comment

And there the 'B' sits triumphant, blatantly ignored, but still testifying to the existence of two, and two only, sexes. Bonkers.

Expand full comment

If they genuinely believed in non-binary, they wouldn't even say transWOMAN or transMAN.

Expand full comment

Excellent observation! You can see right through them — why can’t everyone else? It’s all nonsense isn’t it?

Expand full comment

I am glad the school girl's petition is back up. I have signed it. Does anyone know why it was taken down and how it got to be restored?

Expand full comment
author

I think Change.org tried to use the excuse of the girl being too young.

Expand full comment

What about Nancy Kelly getting the boot?

Expand full comment
author

That's for THIS week's GNS. Let's not peak too early...

Expand full comment

Is she resigning or getting the boot? Would prefer 2nd option with a lesbian boot where the sun dont shine!! Not that I'm advocating violence, "but lesbians are full of rage and must be allowed to express this in a free speech society" .....sauce for the goose?

Expand full comment
author

I think it's one of several options; either she got the boot, she was about to get the boot so got in first and resigned or there is a scandal brewing and, like any self-serving rat would, she's jumped ship before it breaks.

Expand full comment

She will be hoping to get a ride on the Gravy train in Scotlands Parliament now. Cokeheed wokeheed.

Expand full comment
Jul 11, 2023Liked by JL

Thank JL - these are great stories - solid legal results. It sounds like Ireland is pulling itself back from the brink. Scotland might be in with a chance as reality crashes the SNP. Mhairi Black was a weapons-grade moron and here's hoping her departure is the start of a trend.

Expand full comment
author

"Leaving politics to spend more time with her dealer..."

Expand full comment

It's strange that in Guardian comments sections a few keep saying she'll be First Minister soon. It's a weird kind of frothing. She can do no wrong. It's very odd how far apart perceptions can be and are magnified in our current press.

Expand full comment

Sorry to burst the good news bubble (thank you JL) so quickly, but this just popped up in my news feed, and it's GOT TO STOP. This headline:

"Edinburgh woman cleared of posting 'threatening' tweet about Edinburgh MP Joanna Cherry"

The so-called 'woman' named 'Eve' who threatened Joanna Cherry is a MAN named Adam.

Ggaahhh!!!!

If ‘gender’ ideology has taught us anything, it’s the near magical power of language. It has incantatory power — for good and for bad. Used with unethical intention and purpose, deliberately mangled language leads directly to mangled bodies. We see this in all authoritarian ideologies.

The headline has me fuming!

https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/crime/edinburgh-woman-cleared-of-posting-threatening-tweet-about-edinburgh-mp-joanna-cherry-4213997?_hsmi=265849792&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9yoeDu6T2E6hJExsjLDlIWX-1yXvZ-BTZo-gyihUp8zfD2D0WHqsyK9bWKxb9My3tcbQ7v0IYlXCS11NMlpTlB7MD0aXhzn_-QeCARjfhE0AonlOg

Expand full comment

Captured courts. Captured newspapers. To add insult to injury -- this threatening man told the court he was only trying to 'lighten the mood' by using a 'pun' on the MP's name. "Pop". As in 'to pop a cherry'. So what do we have here? Rape and death threat culture being ignored. This vile man, who gets off free, has combined a rape and murder threat into one small word. Will he get one of the many 'gender' prizes now on offer for such a feat?

Expand full comment

No wonder you are fuming. I did a quick search and looking at coverage it seems only The Daily Telegraph have the ability to report this vaguely correctly as him being a 'trans woman' and The Times and others also refer to him as a 'woman' as The Edinburgh Evening News did.

So they are fully implementing and following the 'trans style guide' to remove the fact that these are men, no mention they may be 'trans identifying' men, and now flat out lie that they are 'women' with no mention of their 'trans' status at all.

It used to be that transvestites knew they were and are transvestites. We all knew what fetishes were. This 'trans' bunch that anyone can 'identify' into seem totally deluded liars and that judge seems totally deliberately naive. I am furious that any state function or body is allowing this gaping hole of a legal fantasy we're all having to nicely step around.

Expand full comment

Captured CPS too.

Expand full comment

Who knew Tracey Ullman was such a Cassandra!

Expand full comment

As always 🌹 thanks JL

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, Petal! xx

Expand full comment
Jul 11, 2023·edited Jul 11, 2023

I’m raging at myself as I now can’t find it ( should have splurged and spent a whole 2 quid on the hardback copy rather than the kindle)

But some arsehole said a female swimmer couldn’t beat a male swimmer as she ‘was just a bit lazy ‘

Paraphrasing as I can’t find the bloody quote

Sorry I meant the Sharon Davies book , I just assume everyone can read my mind ……….😂

Expand full comment
Jul 11, 2023Liked by JL

Brilliant work JL. So much good news. I can't actually find the petition on change.org . Can anyone link directly to it for me?

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for your kinds words, Jean! Here's a link to the petition. (It was linked to in the piece - when the text is red, there's a link embedded! I try to make things as easy as possible!)

https://www.change.org/p/ensure-single-sex-spaces-in-all-public-buildings-including-schools?recruiter=1311743750&recruited_by_id=483e6490-1b56-11ee-963a-c774d2511c61&utm_source=share_petition&utm_campaign=share_for_starters_page&utm_medium=copylink

Expand full comment

Thank you so much. Sorry to give you extra work. Somehow the link in the email just took me to change.org homepage and then I tried to search for the petition by title but it did not seem to come up. I hope change.org have not hidden it.

Expand full comment

As stonewall seems to be crumbling why are there still so many organisations hell bent on pushing their agenda? Good that NK has gone though.

I’m feeling a bit bothered by it all this week so thank you for this good news JL.

Expand full comment
Jul 11, 2023·edited Jul 11, 2023

How's this for a war on women?:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/07/09/vagina-named-bonus-hole-cervical-cancer-charity-transgender/

"“Bonus hole” and “front hole” are deemed acceptable alternatives to vagina, a word which could “cause someone to feel hurt or distressed”"

"Bonus" hole doesn't even make any sense ..... unless it's meant to cause associations with the similarly sounding "anus". Thus the further degradation of women. But the question of whether THEY feel hurt or distressed never arises.

At which point we should ask WHO it is who could be "caused" to feel hurt or distressed. Not the women. Only severely disturbed men.

Expand full comment

And it is severely disturbed men who are behind all this. No, I take that back for it is being too kind. To say they are disturbed is to grant them the decency of considering them victims too. They are not disturbed. They know exactly what they are doing. They display supreme cynicism. They are bloody evil.

Expand full comment

For people who primarily use the anus to have sex the vagina could be seen as 'just another hole' and therefore is a 'bonus'. You get a prize for scoring a goal! It is female and must be rejected and never ever mentioned. Bodies are objects to be penetrated to get off and satisfy your sexual needs - that is the primary concern and not much else for this bunch. Every bodily function can be twisted to fulfil some fetish. And this ideological thinking has taken over the NHS and all services to do with health, so everything is now viewed through that lens. Then they 'advise' under the guise of 'inclusion' and preventing 'exclusion'. We must centre porn and how porn views women and men. Can't be upsetting people now can we. Those so stuck in the delusion they are men that they can't hear the terms for their own body or organs. Why don't they advise we use 'this thing here' and 'that thing there' or 'the other thing' as that surely couldn't upset a fly and would be so clear we'd all understand. It's like calling the Lords or the Commons 'the other place'.

Front hole makes little sense too - only if it's by default and in comparison to a 'back hole'. Under carriage always used to amuse me for those who couldn't bear talking about bodies. But then they want women to be called cis - as of course 'trans' is the natural state of humans in their addled minds - they are the default and we are now the 'other', abnormal and some aberration.

Expand full comment

“Bonus hole”. The very terminology now being encouraged shows the unbelievable degradation of our media discourse which has now sunk to the level of a sniggering schoolboy.

Expand full comment

It’s just disgusting

But shows where where our political classes are

I was going to post ‘ just where we are ‘ but most folks are not there , most just don’t know it

I detest this country , and world

I’m a decent human being and wouldn’t wish the worst on anyone but fuck these weird peado freaks

Apologies language

Expand full comment

It is. I'm sorry to be so graphic, but we can't shy away from what the gender loons are up to. They rely on people feeling awkward and being accused of being prudes/right wing/bigots/whatever this week's slur is.

What I have seen in current 'learning' materials funded, sent out (for free aren't we nice!), recommended and put on reading lists, if not mandated has truly horrified me. It's pornographic, not nudity, or naked bodies, but mutilated bodies and actively encouraging compulsive sexual activity in tiny children and it is obviously about removing all boundaries and blurring consent. Then actively preventing parents from even being aware and claiming it's intellectual property rights, or they are contracted out services and those third parties must be protected or yada yada. It's mind-blowing how far this got.

We don't get cutesy little cartoons for 'mummy and daddy took me on holiday or to aunty to get my labia removed with a blade in a kitchen and leave me incontinent to make sex more pleasurable for my future male partner' do we? There was that brief no FGM time, isn't that bad, then this monstrosity of a movement. It's female multiple mutilation on a terrifying scale.

Expand full comment

And all done with a deeply compassionate face.

Expand full comment

I’ve been reading today ( albeit news posts and we know we can’t trust them ) abouts what’s going on in Germany !! Fucking hell

Then that twat sturgeon is on loose wimmen , just drop the fucking bomb

Apologies again , language

Expand full comment

It's silly and some not so silly reporting on silly lost organisations, not only the media. That this all is being promoted in health services and charities is an utter abomination as it means more people are confused about their own bodies, what is 'normal' for them, so how to spot changes or if something's just not right, then have the confidence to speak to someone they trust about it. That's getting rarer and rarer and to know where to go for what. It's a tiny proportion of the population that language is being corrupted for and I doubt too many are actually demanding this. The gender Borg have got their claws in with anything youth, marginalised or to do with sex and sexuality in the title. Then produce report after report and 'consultants' springing up creating more work. This is being spread and taught in medical schools. They are unilaterally rewriting health and NHS policies. What proportion of their target populations will be 'offended' by terms that don't centre their 'transness'. Maybe 0.0001%? It's all bollix!

Expand full comment

Ewww ,I like but I don’t , you know what I mean

Need mind bleach 🤢

Expand full comment

Or, as is it is often put in online parlance: "thanks, I hate it!" :)

Expand full comment

..and meant to say fantastic news re Ireland's hate speech law!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Expand full comment