Monday 26th September - Labour Losing Women UNHERD: Joan Smith writes about the Labour Party Conference, its capture by gender identity zealots and the silencing of feminist organisations. Two feminist groups were denied a platform at the Labour Party Conference in Liverpool this week.
I absolutely love how the article describes Stonewall as what it truly is - 'The study’s list of resources links to the controversial trans charities Stonewall, Mermaids, Gendered Intelligence and the Gender Identity Research and Education Society'.
Thank you JL for your ever increasing compilation of the travesties perpetrated by 'trans' ideology. The Glinner Archive is invaluable for future historians and legal tribunals. Allow me to share this space with a little description of a personal experience.
After immersing myself in the 'gender' mess (ever since JKR's entrance into the fray), I've only ever encountered 'transwomen' in digital format. Until now.
I live in a very small town. Yesterday, for the first time, I saw IRL a ‘transwoman.’ In full fetish gear. Grocery shopping. A big, middle-aged, masculine face with makeup, a truly horrible long curly blonde wig, ‘blouse’ and skirt, bracelets, necklace and earrings, stockings and purple heels. Clip clopping along with his shopping cart unlike any woman I’ve ever seen. If you looked around, most women in the store were sensibly dressed in flat shoes, jeans or trousers — no makeup, minimal jewellery. His idea of ‘woman’ was a parody of a mid-20th century women’s magazine version of woman going about her errands.
The thought of encountering him in a private space was scary and intimidating. His publicly displayed psycho-sexual disturbance was frightening. He was unequivocally telling the world that his mind is unbalanced.
Imagine him getting ready for this public outing. The application of makeup, the brushing and placement of his wig, the fitting of a stuffed bra, the pulling on of nylon stockings, the careful choice of jewellery, and then the stereotypical finale — the purple heels. (Never mind, the fetishistic shopping for said items.) The planning, the purposeful time consumption, and the expectation of public approval, or curiosity, or even overt disapproval. This is a mentally disturbed man.
His mental disturbance is now legitimized, even celebrated. And I think of the affect of his fetish display on unsuspecting children, which he bloody well isn’t thinking about. So utterly confusing, and frankly frightening for children — ultimately leading to the further diminishment of women by his presentation of ‘woman’ as pure gender stereotype. But nah, he wasn't aware of this. He was oblivious to anything and everything but his insatiable fetish.
As Maya Angelou famously said, when someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time. He’s not telling the world he’s a woman (as he so deludedly hopes he is doing). Rather, he is telling us that he is a psycho-sexually disturbed man. And people’s first survival instinct is to stay clear of disturbed persons.
Yet the cult ideology tells us he is safe, nothing to see here, move on, acceptance without exception, be kind, be inclusive, he is a real woman, he is allowed into women’s spaces, don’t ‘hurt’ his feelings, make him feel ‘safe’, move over, welcome him into breastfeeding groups, endometriosis support groups, pregnancy classes, women’s rape crisis support groups, women’s change rooms and gyms, women’s sports, women’s toilets, our hospital rooms.
Welcome him in, even though every fibre of your being is screaming - DANGER.
And so to JL and Graham, and to all the women and men who are pushing back against the 'trans' ideological agenda -- a great big thank-you.
When I have read transwidows' blogs, a common theme has seemed to be the incredible amount of TIME and MONEY their former husbands spent on their fetishes. I'm always reminded of the saying Give money to women and they spend it on their children; give money to men and they spend it on themselves.
This post is worth reading to the end, I recommend pressing the button for complete comments. I'd add, considering the bloke who got 18 years at age 22, if the cross-dresser was younger and more convincing in "female" appearance, it's also a danger to women and children. It's severely disturbed.
The lunatic who was recently filmed screaming at "fascist baby" is a Labour Party Policy advisor, so presumably that's the sort of shrieking moron who informs Starmer's views on gender.
I am so glad you are chronicling all of this! "Where are the feminists??" they cry. And yet every time a woman speaks up she is cancelled and silenced and excluded.
Craptastic! I just had lunch and am fighting to keep it down. As usual, any insanity proferred by a male pretending to be a woman is swallowed whole while women's protests are ignored, ridiculed and even punished. Those ten girls should force their way into their Locker Room and eject any male by force. But women rarely fight, and that's what empowers the so-called "trans women". They would be beaten to a pulp by their fellow males for one tenth of what they do and say to females. This is why the cowards decided to invade our territories and our very lives. We need to start fighting back, girls and ladies. Now!
That one bothers me a lot. There is almost certainly something particularly creepy about that specific boy that the girls are responding to. Ignoring the gift of fear in the name of overcoming prejudice is maladaptive. The school telling the girls to do so is enabling abuse. Where are the adults?
Well said, Dame Jenni Murray. It’s easy to see why she was pensioned off Woman’s Hour - because she understands what a woman is. Be very careful about voting for Labour in any future GE.
>The three-year project was led by Dr Melissa Stepney and Dr Sam Martin and interviewed 50 trans identified and ‘gender-diverse’ people aged between 12 and 35 and 20 parents and carers.
So it's yet another example of the bullshit customer satisfaction surveys with a sample size of naff all that TRA's use to advance nonsense claims. That dissenting parent is telling when remarking:
>they’ve used it as a figleaf for hardline trans activism and have recruited from a very narrow selection of channels
Selective enrolment of subjects is RIFE in these "studies". The usual method of discounting unfavourable outcomes is to claim that subjects were "lost to follow up". How exactly do you lose someone who is obtaining a prescription for controlled medication every few weeks from the medical system? Detransition and suicide are very obvious implied reasons. The one study I've seen that tracks what people subjected to these treatments actually did over a long period of time (Dhejne et al) showed quite different outcomes to the results these surveys. Which is probably why it has not, to my knowledge, been replicated.
Anyway, I'm ranting and likely preaching to the converted here. So I shall shut up now.
The pic of Doctor Sam Martin in his black feathered fantasy me me me miniskirted womanface costume... This person was entrusted with £700,000 of taxpayers' money to co-lead looking at the use of puberty blockers, by talking to 50 trans-identified and ‘gender-diverse’ people and 20 parents and carers? Alongside 3 Mermaids staff and the CEO of Gendered Intelligence, somehow? At the behest of an Oxford University Health Sciences Department?
Was there any proper medical monitoring of effects and outcomes?
Are there people at Oxford who have their minds engaged critically about the youth gender craze, apart from Michael Biggs?
In theory, Labour should breeze the next General Election with a majority that would dwarf Tony Blair’s successes.
The genderists and incel’s though that Starmer and others have chosen to ally with might be the one source of ‘difficulty’ to prevent that.
And we can see that the incel’s, across Europe and here in the UK, are ramping-up the violence towards women, to the point that their own female supporters risk being attacked by the white male supremacists that they’ve encouraged.
The gender it’s movement, still marching through our institutions, has managed to amplify the incel movement, perhaps unintentionally, but the encouragement is incessant. We can’t even rightly claim that genderism is a Men’s Rights Movement, because in the U.K. that’s the likes of Fathers For Justice. I’m afraid FFJ are absolutely not incels. Incel’s are perhaps closer to…well the nearest group I guess would be the KKK.
And Sir Keir, perhaps through ignorance, has placed Labour directly on the track in supporting incel’s.
Which means just incident could see that 50-53% lead dissolve overnight.
Gosh ,these stories show a description of what HELL will look like. So much evil is really hard to understand. The " this never happens " brigade should have these horror stories pushed under their noses and be FORCED to face the reality here. This is rape and paedophile culture and governments might as well be honest and openly pass laws to that effect. There are no words to describe these people and the cowards who support them. . Thanks ,JL ,for continuing to point out the absolutely demonic horrors of all this ,You must feel it's like swimming in a sewer.👍👏❤️ Telling WOMEN that abortion is not their issue ??? These guys are cookoo !!.Truly makes me despair of humanity
Between that photo of Starmer and the one of D'Vine, I'm ready to throw up the cup of tea I just drank. I'm such an old fogey I remember when people, including some men, wanted to be seen as at least minimally attractive.
Mermaids must be browning their gender-neutral underwear, because they have lifted the page showcasing their trustees from their websites; other pages outlining corporate supporters also seem to be conveniently absent. Bastards.
Oh I feel the same. I was an active and campaigning member of the Labour Party for years. Like you, I now fear their election. I can see women's rights unravelling before my eyes.
Me too but I won't be voting for them ,in spite of being a Labour voter all my life. No woman should but sadly many will and by doing so will continue to throw our rights away as well as their own. I've not forgotten Keir Starmer saying that they would bring in Self I'd immediately if they got voted into power
That study is nothing more than farmers, abattoirs, and butchers carrying out research into whether people should eat meat.
Perfect description.
I absolutely love how the article describes Stonewall as what it truly is - 'The study’s list of resources links to the controversial trans charities Stonewall, Mermaids, Gendered Intelligence and the Gender Identity Research and Education Society'.
Thank you JL for your ever increasing compilation of the travesties perpetrated by 'trans' ideology. The Glinner Archive is invaluable for future historians and legal tribunals. Allow me to share this space with a little description of a personal experience.
After immersing myself in the 'gender' mess (ever since JKR's entrance into the fray), I've only ever encountered 'transwomen' in digital format. Until now.
I live in a very small town. Yesterday, for the first time, I saw IRL a ‘transwoman.’ In full fetish gear. Grocery shopping. A big, middle-aged, masculine face with makeup, a truly horrible long curly blonde wig, ‘blouse’ and skirt, bracelets, necklace and earrings, stockings and purple heels. Clip clopping along with his shopping cart unlike any woman I’ve ever seen. If you looked around, most women in the store were sensibly dressed in flat shoes, jeans or trousers — no makeup, minimal jewellery. His idea of ‘woman’ was a parody of a mid-20th century women’s magazine version of woman going about her errands.
The thought of encountering him in a private space was scary and intimidating. His publicly displayed psycho-sexual disturbance was frightening. He was unequivocally telling the world that his mind is unbalanced.
Imagine him getting ready for this public outing. The application of makeup, the brushing and placement of his wig, the fitting of a stuffed bra, the pulling on of nylon stockings, the careful choice of jewellery, and then the stereotypical finale — the purple heels. (Never mind, the fetishistic shopping for said items.) The planning, the purposeful time consumption, and the expectation of public approval, or curiosity, or even overt disapproval. This is a mentally disturbed man.
His mental disturbance is now legitimized, even celebrated. And I think of the affect of his fetish display on unsuspecting children, which he bloody well isn’t thinking about. So utterly confusing, and frankly frightening for children — ultimately leading to the further diminishment of women by his presentation of ‘woman’ as pure gender stereotype. But nah, he wasn't aware of this. He was oblivious to anything and everything but his insatiable fetish.
As Maya Angelou famously said, when someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time. He’s not telling the world he’s a woman (as he so deludedly hopes he is doing). Rather, he is telling us that he is a psycho-sexually disturbed man. And people’s first survival instinct is to stay clear of disturbed persons.
Yet the cult ideology tells us he is safe, nothing to see here, move on, acceptance without exception, be kind, be inclusive, he is a real woman, he is allowed into women’s spaces, don’t ‘hurt’ his feelings, make him feel ‘safe’, move over, welcome him into breastfeeding groups, endometriosis support groups, pregnancy classes, women’s rape crisis support groups, women’s change rooms and gyms, women’s sports, women’s toilets, our hospital rooms.
Welcome him in, even though every fibre of your being is screaming - DANGER.
And so to JL and Graham, and to all the women and men who are pushing back against the 'trans' ideological agenda -- a great big thank-you.
Thank you! Your kind words and support are very much appreciated.
When I have read transwidows' blogs, a common theme has seemed to be the incredible amount of TIME and MONEY their former husbands spent on their fetishes. I'm always reminded of the saying Give money to women and they spend it on their children; give money to men and they spend it on themselves.
“ And I think of the affect of his fetish display on unsuspecting children, which he bloody well isn’t thinking about. ”
Can’t be entirely sure about that, can you? Not every troon is a nonce, but these days a lot of nonces are troons.
This post is worth reading to the end, I recommend pressing the button for complete comments. I'd add, considering the bloke who got 18 years at age 22, if the cross-dresser was younger and more convincing in "female" appearance, it's also a danger to women and children. It's severely disturbed.
Thank you Ute.
I guess this isn’t a “little’ description— sorry ‘bout that!
The lunatic who was recently filmed screaming at "fascist baby" is a Labour Party Policy advisor, so presumably that's the sort of shrieking moron who informs Starmer's views on gender.
I am so glad you are chronicling all of this! "Where are the feminists??" they cry. And yet every time a woman speaks up she is cancelled and silenced and excluded.
Thank you, Good Reason.
Craptastic! I just had lunch and am fighting to keep it down. As usual, any insanity proferred by a male pretending to be a woman is swallowed whole while women's protests are ignored, ridiculed and even punished. Those ten girls should force their way into their Locker Room and eject any male by force. But women rarely fight, and that's what empowers the so-called "trans women". They would be beaten to a pulp by their fellow males for one tenth of what they do and say to females. This is why the cowards decided to invade our territories and our very lives. We need to start fighting back, girls and ladies. Now!
That one bothers me a lot. There is almost certainly something particularly creepy about that specific boy that the girls are responding to. Ignoring the gift of fear in the name of overcoming prejudice is maladaptive. The school telling the girls to do so is enabling abuse. Where are the adults?
Well said, Dame Jenni Murray. It’s easy to see why she was pensioned off Woman’s Hour - because she understands what a woman is. Be very careful about voting for Labour in any future GE.
>The three-year project was led by Dr Melissa Stepney and Dr Sam Martin and interviewed 50 trans identified and ‘gender-diverse’ people aged between 12 and 35 and 20 parents and carers.
So it's yet another example of the bullshit customer satisfaction surveys with a sample size of naff all that TRA's use to advance nonsense claims. That dissenting parent is telling when remarking:
>they’ve used it as a figleaf for hardline trans activism and have recruited from a very narrow selection of channels
Selective enrolment of subjects is RIFE in these "studies". The usual method of discounting unfavourable outcomes is to claim that subjects were "lost to follow up". How exactly do you lose someone who is obtaining a prescription for controlled medication every few weeks from the medical system? Detransition and suicide are very obvious implied reasons. The one study I've seen that tracks what people subjected to these treatments actually did over a long period of time (Dhejne et al) showed quite different outcomes to the results these surveys. Which is probably why it has not, to my knowledge, been replicated.
Anyway, I'm ranting and likely preaching to the converted here. So I shall shut up now.
Rant away! You're amongst friends here!
It's like compiling statistics on weight and health outcomes, and taking out all the women who smoke to avoid gaining weight (this is actual fact).
The pic of Doctor Sam Martin in his black feathered fantasy me me me miniskirted womanface costume... This person was entrusted with £700,000 of taxpayers' money to co-lead looking at the use of puberty blockers, by talking to 50 trans-identified and ‘gender-diverse’ people and 20 parents and carers? Alongside 3 Mermaids staff and the CEO of Gendered Intelligence, somehow? At the behest of an Oxford University Health Sciences Department?
Was there any proper medical monitoring of effects and outcomes?
Are there people at Oxford who have their minds engaged critically about the youth gender craze, apart from Michael Biggs?
Coming up in California: big protests outside of American Association of Pediatrics in Anaheim, CA. Please send Graham any clips you find!
In theory, Labour should breeze the next General Election with a majority that would dwarf Tony Blair’s successes.
The genderists and incel’s though that Starmer and others have chosen to ally with might be the one source of ‘difficulty’ to prevent that.
And we can see that the incel’s, across Europe and here in the UK, are ramping-up the violence towards women, to the point that their own female supporters risk being attacked by the white male supremacists that they’ve encouraged.
The gender it’s movement, still marching through our institutions, has managed to amplify the incel movement, perhaps unintentionally, but the encouragement is incessant. We can’t even rightly claim that genderism is a Men’s Rights Movement, because in the U.K. that’s the likes of Fathers For Justice. I’m afraid FFJ are absolutely not incels. Incel’s are perhaps closer to…well the nearest group I guess would be the KKK.
And Sir Keir, perhaps through ignorance, has placed Labour directly on the track in supporting incel’s.
Which means just incident could see that 50-53% lead dissolve overnight.
Gosh ,these stories show a description of what HELL will look like. So much evil is really hard to understand. The " this never happens " brigade should have these horror stories pushed under their noses and be FORCED to face the reality here. This is rape and paedophile culture and governments might as well be honest and openly pass laws to that effect. There are no words to describe these people and the cowards who support them. . Thanks ,JL ,for continuing to point out the absolutely demonic horrors of all this ,You must feel it's like swimming in a sewer.👍👏❤️ Telling WOMEN that abortion is not their issue ??? These guys are cookoo !!.Truly makes me despair of humanity
Thank you, Susan. Yes, it does feel like wading through the mire sometimes. I have to hold my nose A LOT. Thank goodness for wine!
Between that photo of Starmer and the one of D'Vine, I'm ready to throw up the cup of tea I just drank. I'm such an old fogey I remember when people, including some men, wanted to be seen as at least minimally attractive.
Someone has a picture of Starmer wearing ladies’ lingerie in bed with a hooker.
There's a mental image I could do without! ;-)
Mermaids must be browning their gender-neutral underwear, because they have lifted the page showcasing their trustees from their websites; other pages outlining corporate supporters also seem to be conveniently absent. Bastards.
I'll warrant they're shredding like they work for Nixon at the Mermaids office right now.
The absolute unconscionable ar*eholes.
Oh I feel the same. I was an active and campaigning member of the Labour Party for years. Like you, I now fear their election. I can see women's rights unravelling before my eyes.
Me too but I won't be voting for them ,in spite of being a Labour voter all my life. No woman should but sadly many will and by doing so will continue to throw our rights away as well as their own. I've not forgotten Keir Starmer saying that they would bring in Self I'd immediately if they got voted into power