73 Comments

After this week and on hearing some really good interviews from Julie Bindel and others plus a great monologue from Andrew Doyle, I was beginning to think…. maybe, just maybe we’re getting somewhere. Then this morning on GB News some Labour plonker saying ‘ oh it’s just a small side issue that can be easily accommodated.’ A man of course, apologies to Graham and other brilliant men.

I’m afraid it’s all caused me to do something I very, very rarely do …. fucking swear my head off, over and over. I’m fucking furious. What the fuck is it going to take to wake up these wankers. I go back to another of my posts, with added expletives..it’s taken me nearly 70 fucking years to realise just how little women matter.

Expand full comment

I get it. My swearing has reached new heights too. The depth of woman hatred is nearly overwhelming -- very difficult to process.

Expand full comment

It is. Given me sleepless nights. Living in a dystopian nightmare.

Expand full comment

I know, I know. Woke nonsense has ruined everything. Bodies, psyches, experts, institutions, science, even feminism. My only hope is that the full extent of misogyny, and child-hatred, and some men's self-hatred has been brought up from the darkest depths into the light. We need to acknowledge the susceptibility of human beings' seemingly fragile minds to internet cult-capture. Only then can we arm people and children against the danger of mass psychosis. The internet has created a 'hive' mind and we must create bulwarks against its dangers.

Expand full comment

You are not alone. Many people are equally disgusted. Fight back as best you can.

Expand full comment

I like you. You are rightfully angry 😡. It’s this fuel that we now need to use because otherwise they ain’t fucking listening. Women gotta revolt. They’ve stolen our sports prizes, accolades, raped and assaulted women in what’s supposed to be women only spaces, nicked our language, come after our kids. ENOUGH - got to take it to the streets. I’m with Posie Parker. It’s the only way forward at this point. The feminists have worked damn hard and done sterling work but at end of the day women get walked over whatever. Women and their good men need to get feet on the ground.

Expand full comment

I'm going on Sunday too Reena.

Expand full comment

Let it out mate. When faced with this poison and no one seemly cares you just got to go for it.

Expand full comment

😂 at least I felt better afterwards

Expand full comment

I’m always swearing here which i don’t feel great about as i don’t swear infront of my kids or parents. But these trans hobbyists are really offensive. i wish they’d get a better hobby.

Expand full comment

I agree .. we could be deeply disappointed how much this gets swept under the rug. More people have become aware thanks to these last couple of weeks but I hope we also see the politicians now move totally away from ‘TW are W’.

Expand full comment

Sadly I think it’s going to take a long time to fully extricate society from the malign tentacles which have wound themselves so tightly around every institution and business. Too many people have very little awareness of gender ideology and once rapists are removed from prisons, I think it’ll be business as usual……. and when Labour get in, will they quietly introduce a slightly watered down version of self ID as per the Dentons playbook?

Expand full comment

There certainly are plenty of malign tentacles, and they're everywhere. They got there by stealth, lots of organisation and focus among the bastards responsible and, a massive lack of awareness among those being affected. You can only do that once and there's been so much unanticipated disruption, though you'd have to be particularly cretinous not to anricipate it, given how ambitious project misogyny is.

The ongoing debacle in Scotland, the double rapist who was initially imprisoned in a woman's prison, reflecting a surreal level of sadism. Now there are questions about where prisoners who currently identify as women but might present a risk to women. How about putting them somewhere well away from women? But why should this only be about assorted violent sex offenders? Why should female prisoners be obliged to tolerate any men claiming to be women in their space. Prisoners identifying as transwomen should be held alongside other transwomen. They frequently insist that transwomen are women, so they would be in the right place.

I don't think it will be 'busineas as usual' after this. What happened has attracted enormous attention and made people think, and in doing so things become joined up and form a larger, more coherent whole. And those who already know have to keep sharing their knowledge with those who don't or are reluctant to speak and act.

Expand full comment

I hope you’re right.

Expand full comment

So do I, dearly because one way or another the s cannot continue.

Expand full comment

Sadly.. yes, Labour can’t be trusted on this.

Expand full comment

"Most abused minority in our society" really has to go to female prisoners. It's despicable how their safety is being denied.

Expand full comment

thanks JL, we must know our enemies.

The one thing well not one thing, one of the things that has just overwhelmed me with disbelief is the constant lying that trans rights people make constantly on camera or as we learn today- on oath!

Whether it be Chief wanker in residence at trans central- india fuckface - lying to the nation on gmb the other day about there being no cases of trans women- i hate that term, using their new identity’ - hate that term too, to gain access to women to abuse them. Or Nicola sturgeon lying to the nation saying that men in womens prisons was a matter for the prison service when its clear that the agenda of pushing men into womens prisons is the result of an ideological push from the ruling snp.

they will lie and lie and lie and lie and lie. Until they are shamed into admitting the truth through negative media attention and/or court cases.

Too much to comment on as usual. I’ll enjoy reading everyone else’s reflections. My most prominent reflection is times up for these fuckers. Any wriggle room that i might have had two years ago to be understanding to a trans identifying man have gone. Men, dress up how you like, call yourself Tracy or Sandra, or Nicola, or whatever, fuck i think i might call all trans identifying men sturgeons from now on in recognition of her services to men’s sexually rights. Any way what was i dribbling on about, oh men, yes do what you want, its your life but you are legally MEN. So no women’s spaces, or misleading census bullshit. You got a dick, you’re a man. Good luck with it. Try to enjoy the good things it offers like, al fresco weeing in the countryside. Oh and the other benefits like not being statistically more likely to experience sexual abuse, or not facing the menopause, and generally enjoying a world that was set up by and for men. Wankers. So rude. Just grow up. Ohh its my identity.... its so personal to me..... i don’t give a shit about a man’s identity. One’s identity is literally just a hobby. A HOBBY. India, you are trying to make your HOBBY a protected characteristic! Well i want my HOBBIES written into law too. Otherwise I’m going to claim to be persecuted minority! Sorry. ranting again. But these posts really upset me. As they do all readers.

Expand full comment

I think you're spot on characterizing this nonsense as HOBBIES. These men do not have enough to do -- do any of them actually work? we know none of them do women's work such as cleaning, cooking, caring for others, etc -- and their HOBBIES are all-consuming.

Expand full comment

goodness Susan i just read that you are from a different continent to me! isnt the internet amazing! Its good for so much and terrible for even more. We got to sort it out so it serves humanity and not ruins it. Good luck with that. Still glad its allows us all to take comfort knowing that we are not alone in this fight. best wishes from north of england

Expand full comment

oh and we were also engaged in theology corner earlier too! The trans continental theology corner!

Expand full comment

I honestly believe that the interview with the wife of Adam who said 'he had never mentioned being born in the wrong body' and that he was 'just bullshitting' and 'he was a danger to those vulnerable women' is why Sturgeon had to act - it was straight from the horses mouth.

Expand full comment

Good on her for speaking up

Expand full comment

Absolutely. They immediately went into suppression and operation save Nicola and the SNP/Greens mode. They may be wriggling a little more now under this new scrutiny but they're still on manoeuvres. Look how grotesque it had to be, that mix of sexual violence and politics to get the papers to cover it like they did and the timing just after the GRRB blew up. It was only knocked off by another revelation that the scummy politicians we have really are lying and trying to slap SLAPPs on everywhere and anyone who dares to call out their lies. There's more to come so another few rounds of that.

Gone from the front pages again. I dread that it's another case that will need to happen (or the same cases some have been trying to expose) for it to get back to the front again. I hope the SPS are under investigation now by people who do a proper job. Maybe headlines of 'It's another rapist calling himself Isla!' each time this happens. We need a way to punch through the clouds of pronouns and lies they pump out.

Expand full comment

Keith Brown, Scotland’s Justice Secretary has just announced that out of the trans-identified men in Scotland’s only women’s prison, none have been convicted of violence against women. Lucky for him then that ‘Katie’ Dolotowski, a 6’ 5” trans-identified man, has just been released on licence from that same women’s prison! Some might say it’s a coincidence, I couldn’t possibly comment. Dolotowski was moved to the women’s prison after beating up an inmate in the men’s prison where he was being held for sexually assaulting a 10-year-old girl in a women’s toilet. Keith, you’re an arse.

Expand full comment

They are complete liars. Hard to believe how little they care about women.

Expand full comment

After 69 years I have come to the realization that people in power care nothing for other human beings, in particular women and children. Here in the U.S. it's easy to label them as the gangsters they are, money-grubbing sycophants licking the bums of their masters.

Expand full comment

He’s apparently in Dunfermline just now , he was quickly found in Kirkcaldy and hounded out

Expand full comment

The blame for that is at the feet of the SPS and the SNP. Lying through their teeth has meant that man and coverage rocketed as outraged communities sought out the truth. He'll be chased around the UK for the rest of his days because of all of this ideological creep, from the GRA 2004 right through to these policies they've introduced against the will and even knowledge of the populations they serve.

Expand full comment

I have written the following to my local MP Stephen Barclay who is Health Secretary.

As Health Secretary are you aware of the dangerous erasure of the word 'women' from Cervical Cancer Screening Notifications? I have taken these examples from the following web page

https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/a-week-in-the-war-on-women-monday-9e0 which also includes other material not directly pertinent.

"Cervical cancer is a largely preventable disease if it is diagnosed and treated early enough. Proper screening greatly improves the chances of survival. However, 1 in 3 women do not attend for regular screening, a dangerous situation that needs to be addressed urgently, hence the need for an ‘awareness week’.

It is, therefore, absolutely shameful that so many organisations are erasing women from its promotion.

The Thames Valley Cancer Alliance referred to ‘people with a cervix’.

Thames Valley Cancer Alliance@ThamesV_Cancer

All people with a cervix aged 25-64 are eligible for #cervicalscreening. Those registered as male need to request an appt from their GP practice or a local sexual health clinic. This BSL video explains more about the 'smear test'

Astoundingly, the Government of Jersey spoke of transgender men, gender non-conforming people and those ‘assigned female at birth and with a cervix’. Everyone, in fact, except women.

Government of Jersey@GovJersey

If you are a transgender man, a gender non-conforming person, or assigned female at birth and with a cervix, you can book your free cervical screening today. Contact your GP or Le Bas Centre on 443781. We are working to make it as comfortable as possible for you.​​#DontPutItOff

In another incredibly confusing tweet, the Government of Jersey promoted screening “If you’re female or have a cervix”.

Government of Jersey@GovJersey

Did you know that cervical screening tests are free? ​​If you are female or have a cervix and are aged 25-64, you can opt-in and book your free cervical screening test today by contacting Le Bas Centre on 01534 443781 or your GP. ​​#DontPutItOff

NHS England ignored women altogether and spoke in general terms about ‘people’ not coming forward to be screened.

NHS England@NHSEngland

'It didn’t hurt.’ Five million people received cervical screening invites last year, but almost a third of people eligible haven’t come forward. If you‘ve been invited, take Jodie’s advice and book an appointment — it could save your life. nhs.uk/cervical-scree…

According to Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust, almost half of the women in the UK do not know what a cervix is, still less realise that they have one. And it must be remembered that many of the women in need of cervical screening will not speak English as a first language or, indeed, at all.

The Guardian@guardian

Proportion of women in England not screened for cervical cancer at 10-year high

theguardian.com: Proportion of women in England not screened for cervical cancer at 10-year highNHS England data show 4.6m or so women still unscreened or behind with tests, for disease diagnosed in 3,200 annually in UK...

Official figures show that record numbers of women are not being regularly screened for cervical cancer. About 3,200 women in the UK are diagnosed with this disease each year. Around one quarter of those women- approximately 800 - will not survive.

The situation is urgent. To encourage women to attend for potentially life-saving screening, what’s needed is clear, plain language. But it seems ‘inclusivity’ is more important than saving women’s lives.

I hope you will look into this.

As we have seen with Sturgeon's Gender Recognition bill Gender identity Ideology is causing considerable disruption to our way of life. It is leading people down the wrong path and we have ideologues and extremists ( in influential positions) pushing this belief system, and many virtual signalling useful idiots going along with it, as well as people too frightened to stand up to it.

Expand full comment

If nearly half of women in the U.K. don't know what a cervix is (and I realize you have a sizable immigrant population), it says everything we need to know about 1) quality of education and 2) quality of health care. One presumes many of those women have given birth and not one "medical professional" described to them what was happening in their bodies.

Expand full comment

Gosh, those ubiquitous female penises are dragging down the ‘gender' movement aren’t they? “Women” with troublesome penises raping women. Can't see how this movement can survive much longer now that the public is beginning to be aware of just how ‘womanly’ ‘transwomen' actually are.

Expand full comment

yes and wait for the headlines.... my daughter was expected to share a dorm with a 15 year old boy on the school trip. Honestly its going to be law suit tennis within a couple of years in the education world. Bring it on, this will only be properly sorted in the courts.

Expand full comment

Violent perps laughing all the way to the make up counter .

Expand full comment

Their beloved mantra TWAW is dead in the water.

Now we have STAWBNAOTATNSEITAR:

Some Transwomen Are Women But Not All Of Them According To Nicola Sturgeon Especially If They Are Rapists.

Let’s see them chant that mouthful with gusto, bwaaahahahahahaha

Expand full comment

I can see it on a flag already lol

Expand full comment

yes trans women are women if we like them, but not if we don’t like them.

Expand full comment

:-) it's strange isn't it. That looks like it's the new official SNP and Scottish Govt policy. By merely liking a man because they are a nice person, that makes them a woman! Then when or if they rape women they lose their brownie points. Maybe. Depending on something. Whoops! Who knew!! Men, wear your wigs and lippy, but try to remember not to rape and murder us, are those the rules?

There's some very incisive and funny commentary on all this - on how 'being trans' can and must be self-identified, self-reported or based on context, or based on the 'risk assessment' of others and a variety of other 'others', also again according to whichever layers of context. Ah but you see it depends if there's an 'r' in the month. Is it one rape or five? What's the threshold? But we must not know or ask how this is done or can be assessed as that's bigotry. Only the very clever are tasked with that job. Poor Little Owen Jones announcing his new grand plan that having representation of two sexes, male or female might be best for the Brits, to properly and fairly 'represent' us all, then good ole Nicola tying herself in loops on loops in interviews. Maybe there's a list of activities that they can share with the general public that mean these men lose their 'woman' points. And are we women at risk of being less female, less of a woman if we do some of those same things? Or 'more' of a woman (in legal terms of course). Drink driving? Not paying TV licences? Defending ourselves against men physically attacking us? Saying no? Saying yes? Is that male or female now? Walking in public when it's dark. Or during the day. Somebody tell me!

Do we gain or lose wimmining points - oh of course we do, it's the India WillyBoyBe way of identifying us - if we don't shave our legs we are 'less' of a woman than he is. Jonathan is the best most wimminingy woman ever known to man. All this 'evidence' of 'living as a woman' is complete bloody nonsense. And what a woman is can only be assessed by men, but men decide if they themselves are women or men according to their superior internal wimmining radar. And we must agree with that self-determination. The women and men who go along with this bemuse me.

These activists always leap on women who've had our organs removed to treat cancer, then try to use the logic of what is a woman back at us. I'll like to see Keir and his merry troupe visit a hospital or community support group and tell women to our faces we are not women according to which bits are missing in his genderwoo tick boxes. And that the men who've crashed our spaces are.

I've seen a screenshot of part of the risk assessment form for where these men are housed. I have no idea if that's a real form, but if so, that's not a risk assessment I would recognise. You have to mitigate for everything, and note down and consider what might reasonably be expected to happen. To fail to reflect what women think and feel and the impact on them when a man is placed in their spaces is an immediate and egregious failure in safeguarding. Rather obviously. All this confected fear we are told men have about imagined 'trans' genocide is so much more important that women's fear borne through actual and well-evidenced experience.

Expand full comment

Richard Madeley -- another coward incapable of holding the ethical line.

Imagine apologizing to Sam Smith for ‘misgendering’?

Sam Smith is a man whose degraded thirst for fame and money perpetuates the atrocities of the ‘gender’ ideology. Cowards are propping up the Big Lie. Cowards.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-11691695/Richard-Madeley-apologises-misgendering-non-binary-Sam-Smith.html

Expand full comment

Sam smith is a massive nobhead

Expand full comment

Oh no! misgendering! quick call west yorkshire police! Someone’s feelings may have been hurt in a violent assault on their identity! quick quick. lets hope the police aren’t busy doing anything, sam smith urgently needs his cock stroking until he can stead his nerves.

Expand full comment

Oh, please no, someone, what am I missing here, how did Richard Madeley go from crushingly inane light waffle on morning TV to the elder statesman of waffle and bending in the wind yet bloody everywhere. I keep seeing his name on articles too - like a Piers Morgan but emptier. He baits and whines and thinks it's journalism.

Expand full comment

Please sign and share the UKGov petition - ‘Update the Equality Act to make clear the characteristic “sex” is biological sex’. Google ‘petition 623243’ to find it or look on the Sex Matters website.

Expand full comment

I have the two petitions (this and 628382 Repeal the GRA) bookmarked and cheers me to keep checking in to see the numbers creeping up like watching seedlings grow :-)

Expand full comment

Well, it is all pretty predictable, based on the website of rules for reporting on "trans," The Trans Journalists Association Style Guide. It demands that trans widows like myself do not get coverage, and informs that "too many trans people" are "arrested" so reporting on their crimes is incorrect.

Expand full comment

I'd really like to see Nicola Sturgeon be forced to share a cell with Andrew Burns, aka Tiffany Scott. How lightning fast would be her recantation that TWAW?

Expand full comment

I heard fish face on desert island discs ages ago. Any chance we can make that a reality?

Expand full comment

She had a car crash interview on itv today , absolutely pathetic but hilarious at the same time , aye but no but yea but , arsehole

Expand full comment

All of these women -- thinking of my horrific governor of Maine -- should be forced to share space with these men they are so bloody fond of. At least I finally realized from a profile shot that she is a serious drunk (I think she avoids profile shots).

Expand full comment

Ms sturgeon is not a lover of men , or women , although I’m led to believe she likes a wee frenchie

….. puts down glass of wine 🍷😂

Expand full comment

I doubt he’d be interested

Expand full comment

sorry by fish face i meant sturgeon

Expand full comment

I think we all knew 😂

Expand full comment

sorry i sometimes struggle to see which comments follow on from other ones!

Expand full comment

I know , sometimes they don’t come in order and fail to make sense

Expand full comment

all those weird lines down the side. I just can’t identify with them. They just aren’t inclusive. I say we cancel them.

Expand full comment

Thank you JL. This is hard to read and that so many of these men have long criminal histories. We are told to report, then what happens when we do? This is at the heart of MVAWG and I am seeing so many campaigns and men shaking hands to celebrate how well they are doing this.

There is a lot going very wrong with some risk assessments and particularly with 'domestic' reports and for people you may know. I have recently been risk assessed again with a new set of questions and was told I had to do this for my own safety. To which I replied that I do my own risk assessments. The young female and very bored sounding police officer then asked me a series of questions (over the phone) that were completely inappropriate. They did not reflect risk or contributory factors. I had to answer never, sometimes, often or always. Incidents also have to be a set number (more than one) within a 6 month period and after that time any report is deemed a 'first report'. So, if this is a pattern of abuse, over years and very drawn out, with lots of 'first reports' they are not linked together and maybe with more than one person affected or targeted, it's not being picked up. It is then 'crimed' as no crime. You have to pursue this in a civil action if you are able to.

It's hard to explain this - but if a man cannot get physically within a certain distance of the target he is or has abused then a different type of risk assessment is needed. They try to contact you using any means - online, or through others. I was asked if I had been threatened with a weapon or if this man has weapons. As if abusers say 'I will be be coming to your address on the 4th of next month and I will be bringing a gun of this model and make, and with that I will shoot you.' If they don't do this and fit a very specific form of threat, you are 'assessed' as at no risk.

I have been pushed and thrown against floors and walls. And down stairs. As a result, if the man attempting to contact me doesn't threaten to use those floors and walls as a weapon, I am not at risk. Many of these men are highly skilled at manipulation and coercion and it's the criminal justice system they are masterful at coercing and conning.

These are clear patterns of behaviour that are mysteriously being missed.

Expand full comment

I'm so sorry to hear of all you've been through. My love & solidarity to you, sister.

Expand full comment

Thank you, that means a lot, back atcha :-)

Expand full comment

❤️

Expand full comment

How many times has this crap got to happen before the likes of Sturgeon et al will admit it happens alarmingly often and furthermore they are simply enabling more of these vile scum to do the same and take advantage of vulnerable women. It makes me rage.

Expand full comment

Yet another interview where she has a face like a dropped pie

Expand full comment

Thank God at last ,SOME light is being.shone on this horror ,but we can't afford to let it quietly disappear. We need to keep the momentum going. The tabloids have stayed mostly silent for far too long and the captured IPSOS should be told where to go. No female pronouns for men ,EVER !! KJK's rather hoping ,I think ,that the tras will turn up in Glasgow and help to make our case for us. Thanks ,JL ,for your usual excellent compilation 👏👍❤️

Expand full comment